Question Description
General defenses available under the IPC are as follows:- Mistake of fact- Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who is or by reason of a mistake of fact, not by mistake of law in good faith believes himself to be, bound by law to do such an act. It is derived from the legal maxim “ignorantia facti doth excusat, ignorantia juris non excusat”. Nothing is an offence which is done by any person who is justified by law, or who by reason of mistake of fact and not mistake of law in good faith, believes himself to be justified by law, in doing that particular act.Accident- Includes an Accident committed while doing a lawful act. Nothing is an offence which is done by accident or misfortune, without any criminal intention or knowledge in the doing of a lawful act in a lawful manner by lawful means and with proper care and caution.Infancy- It includes an act of a child below seven years of age. Nothing is an offence which is done by a child under seven years of age. It includes an act of a child above seven and below twelve of immature understanding. Nothing is an offence which is done by a child above seven years of age and under twelve, who has not yet attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge the nature and repercussions of his conduct during that occasion.Insanity- Act of a person of unsound mind. Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who at that time of performing it, by reason of unsoundness of mind, is incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong or contrary to law.Intoxication- Act of a person incapable of judgment by reason of intoxication caused against his will. Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who at the time of doing it, is, by reason of intoxication, incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong, or contrary to law, provided that the thing which intoxicated him was administered involuntarily without his will or knowledge.Q. Gary sees a person walking out of a departmental store. Gary thinks that the person is the same who had committed murder a week back, so Gary captures him and takes him to the police station. The person files a case of assault against Gary. Will Gary be liable for his acts?a)No, he has the defense of accident.b)No, he has the defense of mistake of fact.c)Yes, he will be liable as he should have verified his belief before acting.d)Yes, he would be liable if the description of the person does not match with the person who committed murder.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about General defenses available under the IPC are as follows:- Mistake of fact- Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who is or by reason of a mistake of fact, not by mistake of law in good faith believes himself to be, bound by law to do such an act. It is derived from the legal maxim “ignorantia facti doth excusat, ignorantia juris non excusat”. Nothing is an offence which is done by any person who is justified by law, or who by reason of mistake of fact and not mistake of law in good faith, believes himself to be justified by law, in doing that particular act.Accident- Includes an Accident committed while doing a lawful act. Nothing is an offence which is done by accident or misfortune, without any criminal intention or knowledge in the doing of a lawful act in a lawful manner by lawful means and with proper care and caution.Infancy- It includes an act of a child below seven years of age. Nothing is an offence which is done by a child under seven years of age. It includes an act of a child above seven and below twelve of immature understanding. Nothing is an offence which is done by a child above seven years of age and under twelve, who has not yet attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge the nature and repercussions of his conduct during that occasion.Insanity- Act of a person of unsound mind. Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who at that time of performing it, by reason of unsoundness of mind, is incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong or contrary to law.Intoxication- Act of a person incapable of judgment by reason of intoxication caused against his will. Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who at the time of doing it, is, by reason of intoxication, incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong, or contrary to law, provided that the thing which intoxicated him was administered involuntarily without his will or knowledge.Q. Gary sees a person walking out of a departmental store. Gary thinks that the person is the same who had committed murder a week back, so Gary captures him and takes him to the police station. The person files a case of assault against Gary. Will Gary be liable for his acts?a)No, he has the defense of accident.b)No, he has the defense of mistake of fact.c)Yes, he will be liable as he should have verified his belief before acting.d)Yes, he would be liable if the description of the person does not match with the person who committed murder.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for General defenses available under the IPC are as follows:- Mistake of fact- Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who is or by reason of a mistake of fact, not by mistake of law in good faith believes himself to be, bound by law to do such an act. It is derived from the legal maxim “ignorantia facti doth excusat, ignorantia juris non excusat”. Nothing is an offence which is done by any person who is justified by law, or who by reason of mistake of fact and not mistake of law in good faith, believes himself to be justified by law, in doing that particular act.Accident- Includes an Accident committed while doing a lawful act. Nothing is an offence which is done by accident or misfortune, without any criminal intention or knowledge in the doing of a lawful act in a lawful manner by lawful means and with proper care and caution.Infancy- It includes an act of a child below seven years of age. Nothing is an offence which is done by a child under seven years of age. It includes an act of a child above seven and below twelve of immature understanding. Nothing is an offence which is done by a child above seven years of age and under twelve, who has not yet attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge the nature and repercussions of his conduct during that occasion.Insanity- Act of a person of unsound mind. Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who at that time of performing it, by reason of unsoundness of mind, is incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong or contrary to law.Intoxication- Act of a person incapable of judgment by reason of intoxication caused against his will. Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who at the time of doing it, is, by reason of intoxication, incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong, or contrary to law, provided that the thing which intoxicated him was administered involuntarily without his will or knowledge.Q. Gary sees a person walking out of a departmental store. Gary thinks that the person is the same who had committed murder a week back, so Gary captures him and takes him to the police station. The person files a case of assault against Gary. Will Gary be liable for his acts?a)No, he has the defense of accident.b)No, he has the defense of mistake of fact.c)Yes, he will be liable as he should have verified his belief before acting.d)Yes, he would be liable if the description of the person does not match with the person who committed murder.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for General defenses available under the IPC are as follows:- Mistake of fact- Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who is or by reason of a mistake of fact, not by mistake of law in good faith believes himself to be, bound by law to do such an act. It is derived from the legal maxim “ignorantia facti doth excusat, ignorantia juris non excusat”. Nothing is an offence which is done by any person who is justified by law, or who by reason of mistake of fact and not mistake of law in good faith, believes himself to be justified by law, in doing that particular act.Accident- Includes an Accident committed while doing a lawful act. Nothing is an offence which is done by accident or misfortune, without any criminal intention or knowledge in the doing of a lawful act in a lawful manner by lawful means and with proper care and caution.Infancy- It includes an act of a child below seven years of age. Nothing is an offence which is done by a child under seven years of age. It includes an act of a child above seven and below twelve of immature understanding. Nothing is an offence which is done by a child above seven years of age and under twelve, who has not yet attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge the nature and repercussions of his conduct during that occasion.Insanity- Act of a person of unsound mind. Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who at that time of performing it, by reason of unsoundness of mind, is incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong or contrary to law.Intoxication- Act of a person incapable of judgment by reason of intoxication caused against his will. Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who at the time of doing it, is, by reason of intoxication, incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong, or contrary to law, provided that the thing which intoxicated him was administered involuntarily without his will or knowledge.Q. Gary sees a person walking out of a departmental store. Gary thinks that the person is the same who had committed murder a week back, so Gary captures him and takes him to the police station. The person files a case of assault against Gary. Will Gary be liable for his acts?a)No, he has the defense of accident.b)No, he has the defense of mistake of fact.c)Yes, he will be liable as he should have verified his belief before acting.d)Yes, he would be liable if the description of the person does not match with the person who committed murder.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of General defenses available under the IPC are as follows:- Mistake of fact- Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who is or by reason of a mistake of fact, not by mistake of law in good faith believes himself to be, bound by law to do such an act. It is derived from the legal maxim “ignorantia facti doth excusat, ignorantia juris non excusat”. Nothing is an offence which is done by any person who is justified by law, or who by reason of mistake of fact and not mistake of law in good faith, believes himself to be justified by law, in doing that particular act.Accident- Includes an Accident committed while doing a lawful act. Nothing is an offence which is done by accident or misfortune, without any criminal intention or knowledge in the doing of a lawful act in a lawful manner by lawful means and with proper care and caution.Infancy- It includes an act of a child below seven years of age. Nothing is an offence which is done by a child under seven years of age. It includes an act of a child above seven and below twelve of immature understanding. Nothing is an offence which is done by a child above seven years of age and under twelve, who has not yet attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge the nature and repercussions of his conduct during that occasion.Insanity- Act of a person of unsound mind. Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who at that time of performing it, by reason of unsoundness of mind, is incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong or contrary to law.Intoxication- Act of a person incapable of judgment by reason of intoxication caused against his will. Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who at the time of doing it, is, by reason of intoxication, incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong, or contrary to law, provided that the thing which intoxicated him was administered involuntarily without his will or knowledge.Q. Gary sees a person walking out of a departmental store. Gary thinks that the person is the same who had committed murder a week back, so Gary captures him and takes him to the police station. The person files a case of assault against Gary. Will Gary be liable for his acts?a)No, he has the defense of accident.b)No, he has the defense of mistake of fact.c)Yes, he will be liable as he should have verified his belief before acting.d)Yes, he would be liable if the description of the person does not match with the person who committed murder.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of General defenses available under the IPC are as follows:- Mistake of fact- Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who is or by reason of a mistake of fact, not by mistake of law in good faith believes himself to be, bound by law to do such an act. It is derived from the legal maxim “ignorantia facti doth excusat, ignorantia juris non excusat”. Nothing is an offence which is done by any person who is justified by law, or who by reason of mistake of fact and not mistake of law in good faith, believes himself to be justified by law, in doing that particular act.Accident- Includes an Accident committed while doing a lawful act. Nothing is an offence which is done by accident or misfortune, without any criminal intention or knowledge in the doing of a lawful act in a lawful manner by lawful means and with proper care and caution.Infancy- It includes an act of a child below seven years of age. Nothing is an offence which is done by a child under seven years of age. It includes an act of a child above seven and below twelve of immature understanding. Nothing is an offence which is done by a child above seven years of age and under twelve, who has not yet attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge the nature and repercussions of his conduct during that occasion.Insanity- Act of a person of unsound mind. Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who at that time of performing it, by reason of unsoundness of mind, is incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong or contrary to law.Intoxication- Act of a person incapable of judgment by reason of intoxication caused against his will. Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who at the time of doing it, is, by reason of intoxication, incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong, or contrary to law, provided that the thing which intoxicated him was administered involuntarily without his will or knowledge.Q. Gary sees a person walking out of a departmental store. Gary thinks that the person is the same who had committed murder a week back, so Gary captures him and takes him to the police station. The person files a case of assault against Gary. Will Gary be liable for his acts?a)No, he has the defense of accident.b)No, he has the defense of mistake of fact.c)Yes, he will be liable as he should have verified his belief before acting.d)Yes, he would be liable if the description of the person does not match with the person who committed murder.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for General defenses available under the IPC are as follows:- Mistake of fact- Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who is or by reason of a mistake of fact, not by mistake of law in good faith believes himself to be, bound by law to do such an act. It is derived from the legal maxim “ignorantia facti doth excusat, ignorantia juris non excusat”. Nothing is an offence which is done by any person who is justified by law, or who by reason of mistake of fact and not mistake of law in good faith, believes himself to be justified by law, in doing that particular act.Accident- Includes an Accident committed while doing a lawful act. Nothing is an offence which is done by accident or misfortune, without any criminal intention or knowledge in the doing of a lawful act in a lawful manner by lawful means and with proper care and caution.Infancy- It includes an act of a child below seven years of age. Nothing is an offence which is done by a child under seven years of age. It includes an act of a child above seven and below twelve of immature understanding. Nothing is an offence which is done by a child above seven years of age and under twelve, who has not yet attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge the nature and repercussions of his conduct during that occasion.Insanity- Act of a person of unsound mind. Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who at that time of performing it, by reason of unsoundness of mind, is incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong or contrary to law.Intoxication- Act of a person incapable of judgment by reason of intoxication caused against his will. Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who at the time of doing it, is, by reason of intoxication, incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong, or contrary to law, provided that the thing which intoxicated him was administered involuntarily without his will or knowledge.Q. Gary sees a person walking out of a departmental store. Gary thinks that the person is the same who had committed murder a week back, so Gary captures him and takes him to the police station. The person files a case of assault against Gary. Will Gary be liable for his acts?a)No, he has the defense of accident.b)No, he has the defense of mistake of fact.c)Yes, he will be liable as he should have verified his belief before acting.d)Yes, he would be liable if the description of the person does not match with the person who committed murder.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of General defenses available under the IPC are as follows:- Mistake of fact- Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who is or by reason of a mistake of fact, not by mistake of law in good faith believes himself to be, bound by law to do such an act. It is derived from the legal maxim “ignorantia facti doth excusat, ignorantia juris non excusat”. Nothing is an offence which is done by any person who is justified by law, or who by reason of mistake of fact and not mistake of law in good faith, believes himself to be justified by law, in doing that particular act.Accident- Includes an Accident committed while doing a lawful act. Nothing is an offence which is done by accident or misfortune, without any criminal intention or knowledge in the doing of a lawful act in a lawful manner by lawful means and with proper care and caution.Infancy- It includes an act of a child below seven years of age. Nothing is an offence which is done by a child under seven years of age. It includes an act of a child above seven and below twelve of immature understanding. Nothing is an offence which is done by a child above seven years of age and under twelve, who has not yet attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge the nature and repercussions of his conduct during that occasion.Insanity- Act of a person of unsound mind. Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who at that time of performing it, by reason of unsoundness of mind, is incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong or contrary to law.Intoxication- Act of a person incapable of judgment by reason of intoxication caused against his will. Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who at the time of doing it, is, by reason of intoxication, incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong, or contrary to law, provided that the thing which intoxicated him was administered involuntarily without his will or knowledge.Q. Gary sees a person walking out of a departmental store. Gary thinks that the person is the same who had committed murder a week back, so Gary captures him and takes him to the police station. The person files a case of assault against Gary. Will Gary be liable for his acts?a)No, he has the defense of accident.b)No, he has the defense of mistake of fact.c)Yes, he will be liable as he should have verified his belief before acting.d)Yes, he would be liable if the description of the person does not match with the person who committed murder.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice General defenses available under the IPC are as follows:- Mistake of fact- Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who is or by reason of a mistake of fact, not by mistake of law in good faith believes himself to be, bound by law to do such an act. It is derived from the legal maxim “ignorantia facti doth excusat, ignorantia juris non excusat”. Nothing is an offence which is done by any person who is justified by law, or who by reason of mistake of fact and not mistake of law in good faith, believes himself to be justified by law, in doing that particular act.Accident- Includes an Accident committed while doing a lawful act. Nothing is an offence which is done by accident or misfortune, without any criminal intention or knowledge in the doing of a lawful act in a lawful manner by lawful means and with proper care and caution.Infancy- It includes an act of a child below seven years of age. Nothing is an offence which is done by a child under seven years of age. It includes an act of a child above seven and below twelve of immature understanding. Nothing is an offence which is done by a child above seven years of age and under twelve, who has not yet attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge the nature and repercussions of his conduct during that occasion.Insanity- Act of a person of unsound mind. Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who at that time of performing it, by reason of unsoundness of mind, is incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong or contrary to law.Intoxication- Act of a person incapable of judgment by reason of intoxication caused against his will. Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who at the time of doing it, is, by reason of intoxication, incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong, or contrary to law, provided that the thing which intoxicated him was administered involuntarily without his will or knowledge.Q. Gary sees a person walking out of a departmental store. Gary thinks that the person is the same who had committed murder a week back, so Gary captures him and takes him to the police station. The person files a case of assault against Gary. Will Gary be liable for his acts?a)No, he has the defense of accident.b)No, he has the defense of mistake of fact.c)Yes, he will be liable as he should have verified his belief before acting.d)Yes, he would be liable if the description of the person does not match with the person who committed murder.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.