All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Which one comes under the jurisdiction of bot... Start Learning for Free
Which one comes under the jurisdiction of both the High Courts and the Supreme Court?
  • a)
    Dispute between the Centre and the States
  • b)
    Dispute between/ among the States inter se
  • c)
    Protection of Fundamental Rights
  • d)
    Protection against violation of the Constitution
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your CLAT doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
Which one comes under the jurisdiction of both the High Courts and the...
According to The Constitution of India in article 32 for Supreme Court and Article 226 for High Court provide jurisdiction to protection of Fundamental Righs
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
Which one comes under the jurisdiction of both the High Courts and the...
Dispute between/ among the States inter se comes under the jurisdiction of both the High Courts and the Supreme Court.

Explanation:
Dispute between/ among the States inter se refers to conflicts or disagreements that arise between two or more states within the country. These disputes can be related to various issues, such as territorial disputes, water disputes, boundary conflicts, or any other matter that involves multiple states.

Jurisdiction of the High Courts:
- Each state in India has its own High Court, which has the jurisdiction to hear cases within the territorial boundaries of that state.
- In case of a dispute between/ among the States inter se, the High Court of the state where the dispute has originated has the jurisdiction to hear and decide the matter.
- The High Court has the power to interpret and apply the laws relevant to the dispute, ensuring that justice is served.

Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court:
- The Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in India and has the power of both original and appellate jurisdiction.
- In case of a dispute between/ among the States inter se, the Supreme Court has the jurisdiction to hear and decide the matter, regardless of the state where the dispute has originated.
- The Supreme Court has the power to interpret and apply the Constitution, ensuring that the fundamental principles and rights enshrined in the Constitution are upheld.
- The Supreme Court also acts as the guardian of the Constitution, ensuring that the rights and privileges of the states are protected and any violations are addressed.

Importance of the Jurisdiction:
- Disputes between/ among the States inter se can have significant implications for inter-state relations, governance, and public welfare.
- By having both the High Courts and the Supreme Court vested with the jurisdiction to hear such disputes, a system of checks and balances is maintained.
- The High Courts provide immediate access to justice for disputes that arise within the territorial boundaries of a state, while the Supreme Court ensures uniformity in the interpretation and application of laws across the country.
- The jurisdiction of both the High Courts and the Supreme Court in such cases ensures that the states have a fair platform to resolve their differences and that the principles of federalism and constitutional rights are upheld.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

The Writ Jurisdiction of Supreme Court can be invoked under Article 32 of the Constitution for the violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Part - III of the Constitution. Any provision in any Constitution for Fundamental Rights is meaningless unless there are adequate safeguards to ensure enforcement of such provisions. Since the reality of such rights is tested only through the judiciary, the safeguards assume even more importance. In addition, enforcement also depends upon the degree of independence of the Judiciary and the availability of relevant instruments with the executive authority. Indian Constitution, like most of Western Constitutions, lays down certain provisions to ensure the enforcement of Fundamental Rights. However, Article 32 is referred to as the “Constitutional Remedy” for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. This provision itself has been included in the Fundamental Rights and hence it cannot be denied to any person. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar described Article 32 as the most important one, without which the Constitution would be reduced to nullity. It is also referred to as the heart and soul of the Constitution. By including Article 32 in the Fundamental Rights, the Supreme Court has been made the protector and guarantor of these Rights. An application made under Article 32 of the Constitution before the Supreme Court, cannot be refused on technical grounds. In addition to the prescribed five types of writs, the Supreme Court may pass any other appropriate order. Moreover, only the questions pertaining to the Fundamental Rights can be determined in proceedings against Article 32. Under Article 32, the Supreme Court may issue a Writ against any person or government within the territory of India. Where the infringement of a Fundamental Right has been established, the Supreme Court cannot refuse relief on the ground that the aggrieved person may have remedy before some other court or under the ordinary law.The relief can also not be denied on the ground that the disputed facts have to be investigated or some evidence has to be collected. Even if an aggrieved person has not asked for a particular Writ, the Supreme Court, after considering the facts and circumstances, may grant the appropriate Writ and may even modify it to suit the exigencies of the case. Normally, only the aggrieved person is allowed to move the Court. But it has been held by the Supreme Court that in social or public interest matters, any one may move the Court. A Public Interest Litigation can be filed before the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution or before the High Court of a State under Article 226 of the Constitution under their respective Writ Jurisdictions.What is the correct meaning of the word ‘infringement’?

The Writ Jurisdiction of Supreme Court can be invoked under Article 32 of the Constitution for the violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Part – III of the Constitution. Any provision in any Constitution for Fundamental Rights is meaningless unless there are adequate safeguards to ensure enforcement of such provisions. Since the reality of such rights is tested only through the judiciary, the safeguards assume even more importance. In addition, enforcement also depends upon the degree of independence of the Judiciary and the availability of relevant instruments with the executive authority. Indian Constitution, like most of Western Constitutions, lays down certain provisions to ensure the enforcement of Fundamental Rights.However, Article 32 is referred to as the “Constitutional Remedy” for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. This provision itself has been included in the Fundamental Rights and hence it cannot be denied to any person. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar described Article 32 as the most important one, without which the Constitution would be reduced to nullity. It is also referred to as the heart and soul of the Constitution. By including Article 32 in the Fundamental Rights, the Supreme Court has been made the protector and guarantor of these Rights. An application made under Article 32 of the Constitution before the Supreme Court, cannot be refused on technical grounds. In addition to the prescribed five types of writs, the Supreme Court may pass any other appropriate order. Moreover, only the questions pertaining to the Fundamental Rights can be determined in proceedings against Article 32. Under Article 32, the Supreme Court may issue a Writ against any person or government within the territory of India. Where the infringement of a Fundamental Right has been established, the Supreme Court cannot refuse relief on the ground that the aggrieved person may have remedy before some other court or under the ordinary law.The relief can also not be denied on the ground that the disputed facts have to be investigated or some evidence has to be collected. Even if an aggrieved person has not asked for a particular Writ, the Supreme Court, after considering the facts and circumstances, may grant the appropriate Writ and may even modify it to suit the exigencies of the case. Normally, only the aggrieved person is allowed to move the Court. But it has been held by the Supreme Court that in social or public interest matters, any one may move the Court. A Public Interest Litigation can be filed before the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution or before the High Court of a State under Article 226 of the Constitution under their respective Writ Jurisdictions.Q. What is the correct meaning of the word ‘infringement’?

The Writ Jurisdiction of Supreme Court can be invoked under Article 32 of the Constitution for the violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Part – III of the Constitution. Any provision in any Constitution for Fundamental Rights is meaningless unless there are adequate safeguards to ensure enforcement of such provisions. Since the reality of such rights is tested only through the judiciary, the safeguards assume even more importance. In addition, enforcement also depends upon the degree of independence of the Judiciary and the availability of relevant instruments with the executive authority. Indian Constitution, like most of Western Constitutions, lays down certain provisions to ensure the enforcement of Fundamental Rights.However, Article 32 is referred to as the “Constitutional Remedy” for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. This provision itself has been included in the Fundamental Rights and hence it cannot be denied to any person. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar described Article 32 as the most important one, without which the Constitution would be reduced to nullity. It is also referred to as the heart and soul of the Constitution. By including Article 32 in the Fundamental Rights, the Supreme Court has been made the protector and guarantor of these Rights. An application made under Article 32 of the Constitution before the Supreme Court, cannot be refused on technical grounds. In addition to the prescribed five types of writs, the Supreme Court may pass any other appropriate order. Moreover, only the questions pertaining to the Fundamental Rights can be determined in proceedings against Article 32. Under Article 32, the Supreme Court may issue a Writ against any person or government within the territory of India. Where the infringement of a Fundamental Right has been established, the Supreme Court cannot refuse relief on the ground that the aggrieved person may have remedy before some other court or under the ordinary law.The relief can also not be denied on the ground that the disputed facts have to be investigated or some evidence has to be collected. Even if an aggrieved person has not asked for a particular Writ, the Supreme Court, after considering the facts and circumstances, may grant the appropriate Writ and may even modify it to suit the exigencies of the case. Normally, only the aggrieved person is allowed to move the Court. But it has been held by the Supreme Court that in social or public interest matters, any one may move the Court. A Public Interest Litigation can be filed before the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution or before the High Court of a State under Article 226 of the Constitution under their respective Writ Jurisdictions.Q. What is the tone of the author?

The Writ Jurisdiction of Supreme Court can be invoked under Article 32 of the Constitution for the violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Part - III of the Constitution. Any provision in any Constitution for Fundamental Rights is meaningless unless there are adequate safeguards to ensure enforcement of such provisions. Since the reality of such rights is tested only through the judiciary, the safeguards assume even more importance. In addition, enforcement also depends upon the degree of independence of the Judiciary and the availability of relevant instruments with the executive authority. Indian Constitution, like most of Western Constitutions, lays down certain provisions to ensure the enforcement of Fundamental Rights. However, Article 32 is referred to as the “Constitutional Remedy” for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. This provision itself has been included in the Fundamental Rights and hence it cannot be denied to any person. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar described Article 32 as the most important one, without which the Constitution would be reduced to nullity. It is also referred to as the heart and soul of the Constitution. By including Article 32 in the Fundamental Rights, the Supreme Court has been made the protector and guarantor of these Rights. An application made under Article 32 of the Constitution before the Supreme Court, cannot be refused on technical grounds. In addition to the prescribed five types of writs, the Supreme Court may pass any other appropriate order. Moreover, only the questions pertaining to the Fundamental Rights can be determined in proceedings against Article 32. Under Article 32, the Supreme Court may issue a Writ against any person or government within the territory of India. Where the infringement of a Fundamental Right has been established, the Supreme Court cannot refuse relief on the ground that the aggrieved person may have remedy before some other court or under the ordinary law.The relief can also not be denied on the ground that the disputed facts have to be investigated or some evidence has to be collected. Even if an aggrieved person has not asked for a particular Writ, the Supreme Court, after considering the facts and circumstances, may grant the appropriate Writ and may even modify it to suit the exigencies of the case. Normally, only the aggrieved person is allowed to move the Court. But it has been held by the Supreme Court that in social or public interest matters, any one may move the Court. A Public Interest Litigation can be filed before the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution or before the High Court of a State under Article 226 of the Constitution under their respective Writ Jurisdictions.What is the tone of the author?

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

Which one comes under the jurisdiction of both the High Courts and the Supreme Court?a)Dispute between the Centre and the Statesb)Dispute between/ among the States inter sec)Protection of Fundamental Rightsd)Protection against violation of the ConstitutionCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Which one comes under the jurisdiction of both the High Courts and the Supreme Court?a)Dispute between the Centre and the Statesb)Dispute between/ among the States inter sec)Protection of Fundamental Rightsd)Protection against violation of the ConstitutionCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Which one comes under the jurisdiction of both the High Courts and the Supreme Court?a)Dispute between the Centre and the Statesb)Dispute between/ among the States inter sec)Protection of Fundamental Rightsd)Protection against violation of the ConstitutionCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Which one comes under the jurisdiction of both the High Courts and the Supreme Court?a)Dispute between the Centre and the Statesb)Dispute between/ among the States inter sec)Protection of Fundamental Rightsd)Protection against violation of the ConstitutionCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Which one comes under the jurisdiction of both the High Courts and the Supreme Court?a)Dispute between the Centre and the Statesb)Dispute between/ among the States inter sec)Protection of Fundamental Rightsd)Protection against violation of the ConstitutionCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Which one comes under the jurisdiction of both the High Courts and the Supreme Court?a)Dispute between the Centre and the Statesb)Dispute between/ among the States inter sec)Protection of Fundamental Rightsd)Protection against violation of the ConstitutionCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Which one comes under the jurisdiction of both the High Courts and the Supreme Court?a)Dispute between the Centre and the Statesb)Dispute between/ among the States inter sec)Protection of Fundamental Rightsd)Protection against violation of the ConstitutionCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Which one comes under the jurisdiction of both the High Courts and the Supreme Court?a)Dispute between the Centre and the Statesb)Dispute between/ among the States inter sec)Protection of Fundamental Rightsd)Protection against violation of the ConstitutionCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Which one comes under the jurisdiction of both the High Courts and the Supreme Court?a)Dispute between the Centre and the Statesb)Dispute between/ among the States inter sec)Protection of Fundamental Rightsd)Protection against violation of the ConstitutionCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Which one comes under the jurisdiction of both the High Courts and the Supreme Court?a)Dispute between the Centre and the Statesb)Dispute between/ among the States inter sec)Protection of Fundamental Rightsd)Protection against violation of the ConstitutionCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup