Humanities/Arts Exam  >  Humanities/Arts Questions  >   Directions: In the following questions, a st... Start Learning for Free
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:
Assertion: The interim government took a firm stance against the possible division of India into small principalities of different sizes.
Reason: Before 15 August 1947, peaceful negotiations had brought almost all states whose territories were contiguous to the new boundaries of India, into the Indian Union.
  • a)
    Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
  • b)
    Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
  • c)
    (A) is true, but (R) is false.
  • d)
    (A) is false, but (R) is true.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) ...
The interim government took a firm stance against the possible division of India into smaller principalities of different sizes. The Muslim League opposed the Indian National Congress and took the view that the States should be free to adopt any course they liked.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) ...
Assertion and Reasoning

Assertion: The interim government took a firm stance against the possible division of India into small principalities of different sizes.

Reason: Before 15 August 1947, peaceful negotiations had brought almost all states whose territories were contiguous to the new boundaries of India, into the Indian Union.

Explanation

The assertion states that the interim government took a firm stance against India's possible division into small principalities of different sizes. The reason behind this is that peaceful negotiations had brought almost all states whose territories were contiguous to the new boundaries of India, into the Indian Union before August 15, 1947.

Option (a) states that both the assertion and reasoning are true, and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion. Option (b) states that both the assertion and reasoning are true, but the reasoning is not the correct explanation of the assertion. Option (c) states that the assertion is true, but the reason is false. Option (d) states that the assertion is false, but the reason is true.

Option (a) can be ruled out as the reason is not the correct explanation of the assertion. The assertion talks about the interim government taking a firm stance against the division of India, while the reasoning talks about the peaceful negotiations that brought most states into the Indian Union.

Option (c) can be ruled out as the assertion is true. The interim government did take a firm stance against the possible division of India into small principalities of different sizes.

Option (d) can also be ruled out as the reason is true. Peaceful negotiations had indeed brought almost all states whose territories were contiguous to the new boundaries of India, into the Indian Union before August 15, 1947.

Therefore, option (b) is the correct answer. Both the assertion and reasoning are true, but the reasoning is not the correct explanation of the assertion.
Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

Similar Humanities/Arts Doubts

Read the following passage and answer the question.The interim government took a firm stance against the possible division of India into small principalities of different sizes. The Muslim League opposed the Indian National Congress and took the view that the States should be free to adopt any course they liked. Sardar Patel was India’s Deputy Prime Minister and the Home Minister during the crucial period immediately following Independence. He played a historic role in negotiating with the rulers of princely states firmly but diplomatically and bringing most of them into the Indian Union. It may look easy now. But it was a very complicated task which required skilful persuasion. For instance, there were 26 small states in today’s Orissa. Saurashtra region of Gujarat had 14 big states, 119 small states and numerous other different administrations. The government’s approach was guided by three considerations. Firstly, the people of most of the princely states clearly wanted to become part of the Indian union. Secondly, the government was prepared to be flexible in giving autonomy to some regions. The idea was to accommodate plurality and adopt a flexible approach in dealing with the demands of the regions. Thirdly, in the backdrop of Partition which brought into focus the contest over demarcation of territory, the integration and consolidation of the territorial boundaries of the nation had assumed supreme importance.What was one of the key challenges the interim government faced regarding the princely states?

Read the following passage and answer the question.The interim government took a firm stance against the possible division of India into small principalities of different sizes. The Muslim League opposed the Indian National Congress and took the view that the States should be free to adopt any course they liked. Sardar Patel was India’s Deputy Prime Minister and the Home Minister during the crucial period immediately following Independence. He played a historic role in negotiating with the rulers of princely states firmly but diplomatically and bringing most of them into the Indian Union. It may look easy now. But it was a very complicated task which required skilful persuasion. For instance, there were 26 small states in today’s Orissa. Saurashtra region of Gujarat had 14 big states, 119 small states and numerous other different administrations. The government’s approach was guided by three considerations. Firstly, the people of most of the princely states clearly wanted to become part of the Indian union. Secondly, the government was prepared to be flexible in giving autonomy to some regions. The idea was to accommodate plurality and adopt a flexible approach in dealing with the demands of the regions. Thirdly, in the backdrop of Partition which brought into focus the contest over demarcation of territory, the integration and consolidation of the territorial boundaries of the nation had assumed supreme importance.How did the Indian government approach the integration of princely states?

Read the following passage and answer the question.The interim government took a firm stance against the possible division of India into small principalities of different sizes. The Muslim League opposed the Indian National Congress and took the view that the States should be free to adopt any course they liked. Sardar Patel was India’s Deputy Prime Minister and the Home Minister during the crucial period immediately following Independence. He played a historic role in negotiating with the rulers of princely states firmly but diplomatically and bringing most of them into the Indian Union. It may look easy now. But it was a very complicated task which required skilful persuasion. For instance, there were 26 small states in today’s Orissa. Saurashtra region of Gujarat had 14 big states, 119 small states and numerous other different administrations. The government’s approach was guided by three considerations. Firstly, the people of most of the princely states clearly wanted to become part of the Indian union. Secondly, the government was prepared to be flexible in giving autonomy to some regions. The idea was to accommodate plurality and adopt a flexible approach in dealing with the demands of the regions. Thirdly, in the backdrop of Partition which brought into focus the contest over demarcation of territory, the integration and consolidation of the territorial boundaries of the nation had assumed supreme importance.What was Sardar Patel’s role in post-Independence India?

Read the following passage and answer the question.The interim government took a firm stance against the possible division of India into small principalities of different sizes. The Muslim League opposed the Indian National Congress and took the view that the States should be free to adopt any course they liked. Sardar Patel was India’s Deputy Prime Minister and the Home Minister during the crucial period immediately following Independence. He played a historic role in negotiating with the rulers of princely states firmly but diplomatically and bringing most of them into the Indian Union. It may look easy now. But it was a very complicated task which required skilful persuasion. For instance, there were 26 small states in today’s Orissa. Saurashtra region of Gujarat had 14 big states, 119 small states and numerous other different administrations. The government’s approach was guided by three considerations. Firstly, the people of most of the princely states clearly wanted to become part of the Indian union. Secondly, the government was prepared to be flexible in giving autonomy to some regions. The idea was to accommodate plurality and adopt a flexible approach in dealing with the demands of the regions. Thirdly, in the backdrop of Partition which brought into focus the contest over demarcation of territory, the integration and consolidation of the territorial boundaries of the nation had assumed supreme importance.What was the Muslim League’s view on the status of princely states?

Top Courses for Humanities/Arts

Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:Assertion: The interim government took a firm stance against the possible division of India into small principalities of different sizes.Reason: Before 15 August 1947, peaceful negotiations had brought almost all states whose territories were contiguous to the new boundaries of India, into the Indian Union.a)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).c)(A) is true, but (R) is false.d)(A) is false, but (R) is true.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:Assertion: The interim government took a firm stance against the possible division of India into small principalities of different sizes.Reason: Before 15 August 1947, peaceful negotiations had brought almost all states whose territories were contiguous to the new boundaries of India, into the Indian Union.a)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).c)(A) is true, but (R) is false.d)(A) is false, but (R) is true.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for Humanities/Arts 2024 is part of Humanities/Arts preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:Assertion: The interim government took a firm stance against the possible division of India into small principalities of different sizes.Reason: Before 15 August 1947, peaceful negotiations had brought almost all states whose territories were contiguous to the new boundaries of India, into the Indian Union.a)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).c)(A) is true, but (R) is false.d)(A) is false, but (R) is true.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Humanities/Arts 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:Assertion: The interim government took a firm stance against the possible division of India into small principalities of different sizes.Reason: Before 15 August 1947, peaceful negotiations had brought almost all states whose territories were contiguous to the new boundaries of India, into the Indian Union.a)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).c)(A) is true, but (R) is false.d)(A) is false, but (R) is true.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:Assertion: The interim government took a firm stance against the possible division of India into small principalities of different sizes.Reason: Before 15 August 1947, peaceful negotiations had brought almost all states whose territories were contiguous to the new boundaries of India, into the Indian Union.a)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).c)(A) is true, but (R) is false.d)(A) is false, but (R) is true.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Humanities/Arts. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:Assertion: The interim government took a firm stance against the possible division of India into small principalities of different sizes.Reason: Before 15 August 1947, peaceful negotiations had brought almost all states whose territories were contiguous to the new boundaries of India, into the Indian Union.a)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).c)(A) is true, but (R) is false.d)(A) is false, but (R) is true.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:Assertion: The interim government took a firm stance against the possible division of India into small principalities of different sizes.Reason: Before 15 August 1947, peaceful negotiations had brought almost all states whose territories were contiguous to the new boundaries of India, into the Indian Union.a)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).c)(A) is true, but (R) is false.d)(A) is false, but (R) is true.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:Assertion: The interim government took a firm stance against the possible division of India into small principalities of different sizes.Reason: Before 15 August 1947, peaceful negotiations had brought almost all states whose territories were contiguous to the new boundaries of India, into the Indian Union.a)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).c)(A) is true, but (R) is false.d)(A) is false, but (R) is true.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:Assertion: The interim government took a firm stance against the possible division of India into small principalities of different sizes.Reason: Before 15 August 1947, peaceful negotiations had brought almost all states whose territories were contiguous to the new boundaries of India, into the Indian Union.a)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).c)(A) is true, but (R) is false.d)(A) is false, but (R) is true.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:Assertion: The interim government took a firm stance against the possible division of India into small principalities of different sizes.Reason: Before 15 August 1947, peaceful negotiations had brought almost all states whose territories were contiguous to the new boundaries of India, into the Indian Union.a)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).c)(A) is true, but (R) is false.d)(A) is false, but (R) is true.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Humanities/Arts tests.
Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

Top Courses for Humanities/Arts

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev