Consider the following statements:1. Article 137 of the Constitution ...
Article 137 of the Constitution gives the Supreme Court the power to review any of its judgments or orders. It is a crucial power that allows the court to correct any errors or mistakes made in its previous judgments. The review petition can be filed by any party aggrieved by the judgment or order of the court.
Who Can Seek a Review?
Contrary to popular belief, it is not necessary that only parties to a case can seek a review of the judgment on it. Any person aggrieved by a ruling can seek a review. This means that even if a person is not a party to the case, they can file a review petition if they are affected by the judgment or order of the court.
Grounds for Review
The grounds for review are limited and are mentioned in Order XLVII, Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013. Some of the grounds for review are:
1. Discovery of new and important matter or evidence which was not within the knowledge of the petitioner or could not be produced by him/her despite due diligence.
2. Mistake or error apparent on the face of the record.
3. Any other sufficient reason.
Procedure for Filing a Review Petition
A review petition has to be filed within 30 days from the date of the judgment or order. The petition must be accompanied by an affidavit stating the grounds on which the review is sought. The Supreme Court may dismiss the review petition without granting notice to the opposite party if it finds that the petition is not maintainable or if it does not disclose any ground for review.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Article 137 of the Constitution gives the Supreme Court the power to review its judgments or orders. Any person aggrieved by a ruling can seek a review, not just parties to a case. The grounds for review are limited, and the procedure for filing a review petition is stringent. The court may dismiss a review petition if it finds that it is not maintainable or if it does not disclose any ground for review.
Consider the following statements:1. Article 137 of the Constitution ...
Supreme Court will review Sabarimala judgment and a review plea is set to be moved over Ayodhya verdict too. About: Article 137 of the Constitution gives the Supreme Court the power to review any of its judgments or orders. The court has the power to review its rulings to correct a “patent error” and not “minor mistakes of inconsequential import”. Grounds for review petition: In a 2013 ruling, the Supreme Court itself laid down three grounds for seeking a review of a verdict it has delivered — the discovery of new and important matter or evidence which was not within the knowledge of the petitioner or could not be produced by him; mistake or error apparent on the face of the record; or any other sufficient reason which means a reason that is analogous to the other two grounds. Who can file a review petition? It is not necessary that only parties to a case can seek a review of the judgment on it. Any person aggrieved by a ruling can seek a review. Time frame: As per 1996 rules framed by the Supreme Court, a review petition must be filed within 30 days of the date of judgment or order. While a judgment is a final decision in a case, an order is an interim ruling that is subject to its final verdict.
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UPSC study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UPSC.