GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Tenured professors at higher education instit... Start Learning for Free
Tenured professors at higher education institutions are certainly given more prestige than other lecturers are. But they are not better teachers as shown by a working paper published by National Education Research Institute (NERI).  NERI collected, from more than 15,000 students, ratings for both tenured and non-tenured professors. Even though we would expect tenured professors to get much better ratings because of their much greater experience, the results showed otherwise. Non-tenured professors got better ratings, slightly though, than tenured professors. This clearly shows that there is an immediate need to do course correction – after all, the whole purpose of the existence of the education system is to provide quality teaching to the students.
In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
  • a)
    The first provides evidence that has been used to challenge a common expectation; the second can be interpreted to challenge the common expectation.
  • b)
    The first presents a judgment that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second is a fact that supports the main conclusion of the argument. 
  • c)
    The first is a fact that supports a conclusion that in turn supports the position that the argument seeks to establish; the second supports that conclusion.
  • d)
    The first is a fact that has been used to support a position that the argument seeks to establish; the second is another consideration raised in order to support that position.
  • e)
    The first is a judgment that challenges one of the intermediate conclusions drawn in the argument; the second can be interpreted to support that intermediate conclusion.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Top Courses for GMAT

Tenured professors at higher education institutions are certainly given more prestige than other lecturers are. But they are not better teachers as shown by a working paper published by National Education Research Institute (NERI). NERI collected, from more than 15,000 students, ratings for both tenured and non-tenured professors. Even though we would expect tenured professors to get much better ratings because of their much greater experience, the results showed otherwise. Non-tenured professors got better ratings, slightly though, than tenured professors. This clearly shows that there is an immediate need to do course correction – after all, the whole purpose of the existence of the education system is to provide quality teaching to the students.In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence that has been used to challenge a common expectation; the second can be interpreted to challenge the common expectation.b)The first presents a judgment that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second is a fact that supports the main conclusion of the argument.c)The first is a fact that supports a conclusion that in turn supports the position that the argument seeks to establish; the second supports that conclusion.d)The first is a fact that has been used to support a position that the argument seeks to establish; the second is another consideration raised in order to support that position.e)The first is a judgment that challenges one of the intermediate conclusions drawn in the argument; the second can be interpreted to support that intermediate conclusion.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Tenured professors at higher education institutions are certainly given more prestige than other lecturers are. But they are not better teachers as shown by a working paper published by National Education Research Institute (NERI). NERI collected, from more than 15,000 students, ratings for both tenured and non-tenured professors. Even though we would expect tenured professors to get much better ratings because of their much greater experience, the results showed otherwise. Non-tenured professors got better ratings, slightly though, than tenured professors. This clearly shows that there is an immediate need to do course correction – after all, the whole purpose of the existence of the education system is to provide quality teaching to the students.In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence that has been used to challenge a common expectation; the second can be interpreted to challenge the common expectation.b)The first presents a judgment that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second is a fact that supports the main conclusion of the argument.c)The first is a fact that supports a conclusion that in turn supports the position that the argument seeks to establish; the second supports that conclusion.d)The first is a fact that has been used to support a position that the argument seeks to establish; the second is another consideration raised in order to support that position.e)The first is a judgment that challenges one of the intermediate conclusions drawn in the argument; the second can be interpreted to support that intermediate conclusion.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Tenured professors at higher education institutions are certainly given more prestige than other lecturers are. But they are not better teachers as shown by a working paper published by National Education Research Institute (NERI). NERI collected, from more than 15,000 students, ratings for both tenured and non-tenured professors. Even though we would expect tenured professors to get much better ratings because of their much greater experience, the results showed otherwise. Non-tenured professors got better ratings, slightly though, than tenured professors. This clearly shows that there is an immediate need to do course correction – after all, the whole purpose of the existence of the education system is to provide quality teaching to the students.In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence that has been used to challenge a common expectation; the second can be interpreted to challenge the common expectation.b)The first presents a judgment that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second is a fact that supports the main conclusion of the argument.c)The first is a fact that supports a conclusion that in turn supports the position that the argument seeks to establish; the second supports that conclusion.d)The first is a fact that has been used to support a position that the argument seeks to establish; the second is another consideration raised in order to support that position.e)The first is a judgment that challenges one of the intermediate conclusions drawn in the argument; the second can be interpreted to support that intermediate conclusion.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Tenured professors at higher education institutions are certainly given more prestige than other lecturers are. But they are not better teachers as shown by a working paper published by National Education Research Institute (NERI). NERI collected, from more than 15,000 students, ratings for both tenured and non-tenured professors. Even though we would expect tenured professors to get much better ratings because of their much greater experience, the results showed otherwise. Non-tenured professors got better ratings, slightly though, than tenured professors. This clearly shows that there is an immediate need to do course correction – after all, the whole purpose of the existence of the education system is to provide quality teaching to the students.In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence that has been used to challenge a common expectation; the second can be interpreted to challenge the common expectation.b)The first presents a judgment that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second is a fact that supports the main conclusion of the argument.c)The first is a fact that supports a conclusion that in turn supports the position that the argument seeks to establish; the second supports that conclusion.d)The first is a fact that has been used to support a position that the argument seeks to establish; the second is another consideration raised in order to support that position.e)The first is a judgment that challenges one of the intermediate conclusions drawn in the argument; the second can be interpreted to support that intermediate conclusion.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Tenured professors at higher education institutions are certainly given more prestige than other lecturers are. But they are not better teachers as shown by a working paper published by National Education Research Institute (NERI). NERI collected, from more than 15,000 students, ratings for both tenured and non-tenured professors. Even though we would expect tenured professors to get much better ratings because of their much greater experience, the results showed otherwise. Non-tenured professors got better ratings, slightly though, than tenured professors. This clearly shows that there is an immediate need to do course correction – after all, the whole purpose of the existence of the education system is to provide quality teaching to the students.In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence that has been used to challenge a common expectation; the second can be interpreted to challenge the common expectation.b)The first presents a judgment that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second is a fact that supports the main conclusion of the argument.c)The first is a fact that supports a conclusion that in turn supports the position that the argument seeks to establish; the second supports that conclusion.d)The first is a fact that has been used to support a position that the argument seeks to establish; the second is another consideration raised in order to support that position.e)The first is a judgment that challenges one of the intermediate conclusions drawn in the argument; the second can be interpreted to support that intermediate conclusion.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Tenured professors at higher education institutions are certainly given more prestige than other lecturers are. But they are not better teachers as shown by a working paper published by National Education Research Institute (NERI). NERI collected, from more than 15,000 students, ratings for both tenured and non-tenured professors. Even though we would expect tenured professors to get much better ratings because of their much greater experience, the results showed otherwise. Non-tenured professors got better ratings, slightly though, than tenured professors. This clearly shows that there is an immediate need to do course correction – after all, the whole purpose of the existence of the education system is to provide quality teaching to the students.In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence that has been used to challenge a common expectation; the second can be interpreted to challenge the common expectation.b)The first presents a judgment that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second is a fact that supports the main conclusion of the argument.c)The first is a fact that supports a conclusion that in turn supports the position that the argument seeks to establish; the second supports that conclusion.d)The first is a fact that has been used to support a position that the argument seeks to establish; the second is another consideration raised in order to support that position.e)The first is a judgment that challenges one of the intermediate conclusions drawn in the argument; the second can be interpreted to support that intermediate conclusion.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Tenured professors at higher education institutions are certainly given more prestige than other lecturers are. But they are not better teachers as shown by a working paper published by National Education Research Institute (NERI). NERI collected, from more than 15,000 students, ratings for both tenured and non-tenured professors. Even though we would expect tenured professors to get much better ratings because of their much greater experience, the results showed otherwise. Non-tenured professors got better ratings, slightly though, than tenured professors. This clearly shows that there is an immediate need to do course correction – after all, the whole purpose of the existence of the education system is to provide quality teaching to the students.In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence that has been used to challenge a common expectation; the second can be interpreted to challenge the common expectation.b)The first presents a judgment that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second is a fact that supports the main conclusion of the argument.c)The first is a fact that supports a conclusion that in turn supports the position that the argument seeks to establish; the second supports that conclusion.d)The first is a fact that has been used to support a position that the argument seeks to establish; the second is another consideration raised in order to support that position.e)The first is a judgment that challenges one of the intermediate conclusions drawn in the argument; the second can be interpreted to support that intermediate conclusion.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Tenured professors at higher education institutions are certainly given more prestige than other lecturers are. But they are not better teachers as shown by a working paper published by National Education Research Institute (NERI). NERI collected, from more than 15,000 students, ratings for both tenured and non-tenured professors. Even though we would expect tenured professors to get much better ratings because of their much greater experience, the results showed otherwise. Non-tenured professors got better ratings, slightly though, than tenured professors. This clearly shows that there is an immediate need to do course correction – after all, the whole purpose of the existence of the education system is to provide quality teaching to the students.In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence that has been used to challenge a common expectation; the second can be interpreted to challenge the common expectation.b)The first presents a judgment that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second is a fact that supports the main conclusion of the argument.c)The first is a fact that supports a conclusion that in turn supports the position that the argument seeks to establish; the second supports that conclusion.d)The first is a fact that has been used to support a position that the argument seeks to establish; the second is another consideration raised in order to support that position.e)The first is a judgment that challenges one of the intermediate conclusions drawn in the argument; the second can be interpreted to support that intermediate conclusion.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Tenured professors at higher education institutions are certainly given more prestige than other lecturers are. But they are not better teachers as shown by a working paper published by National Education Research Institute (NERI). NERI collected, from more than 15,000 students, ratings for both tenured and non-tenured professors. Even though we would expect tenured professors to get much better ratings because of their much greater experience, the results showed otherwise. Non-tenured professors got better ratings, slightly though, than tenured professors. This clearly shows that there is an immediate need to do course correction – after all, the whole purpose of the existence of the education system is to provide quality teaching to the students.In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence that has been used to challenge a common expectation; the second can be interpreted to challenge the common expectation.b)The first presents a judgment that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second is a fact that supports the main conclusion of the argument.c)The first is a fact that supports a conclusion that in turn supports the position that the argument seeks to establish; the second supports that conclusion.d)The first is a fact that has been used to support a position that the argument seeks to establish; the second is another consideration raised in order to support that position.e)The first is a judgment that challenges one of the intermediate conclusions drawn in the argument; the second can be interpreted to support that intermediate conclusion.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Tenured professors at higher education institutions are certainly given more prestige than other lecturers are. But they are not better teachers as shown by a working paper published by National Education Research Institute (NERI). NERI collected, from more than 15,000 students, ratings for both tenured and non-tenured professors. Even though we would expect tenured professors to get much better ratings because of their much greater experience, the results showed otherwise. Non-tenured professors got better ratings, slightly though, than tenured professors. This clearly shows that there is an immediate need to do course correction – after all, the whole purpose of the existence of the education system is to provide quality teaching to the students.In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence that has been used to challenge a common expectation; the second can be interpreted to challenge the common expectation.b)The first presents a judgment that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second is a fact that supports the main conclusion of the argument.c)The first is a fact that supports a conclusion that in turn supports the position that the argument seeks to establish; the second supports that conclusion.d)The first is a fact that has been used to support a position that the argument seeks to establish; the second is another consideration raised in order to support that position.e)The first is a judgment that challenges one of the intermediate conclusions drawn in the argument; the second can be interpreted to support that intermediate conclusion.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev