A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the companys failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investors sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case it is clearly not justified. It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burtons case it indicates no such thing. Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion.b)The first states the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support that conclusionc)The first is the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence against the position being opposed.d)The first states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a wholee)The first andamp; second both state intermediate conclusions that are drawn in order to support jointly the conclusions of the argument as a wholeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > A prominent investor who holds a large stake ...

Join the Discussion on the App

A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the company's failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investor's sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case it is clearly not justified. It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burton's case it indicates no such thing. Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

a)
The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion.
b)
The first states the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support that conclusion
c)
The first is the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence against the position being opposed.
d)
The first states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole
e)
The first & second both state intermediate conclusions that are drawn in order to support jointly the conclusions of the argument as a whole

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Test: Bold Face CR

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan...

The first boldfaced section is clearly phrased as a conclusion ("justified" being a judgemental word), and it is a refutation of the argument which has just been put forward - thus, it is the argument's main conclusion.
The second boldfaced section is also, clearly, a conclusion ("indicates" being our main clue), but what is its relation to the first one? well, the structure (" it is true... but") and context (coming right ofter the previous boldface) of the sentence tells us this is a detailing of the precious conclusion - that is, it is a supporting conclusion.
Quickly skimming the answer, we see B is our answer.

Answered by Talent Skill Learning · View profile

Attention GMAT Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool Company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the companys failure to slow down production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investors sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case, it is clearly not justified. It is true thatan increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burtons case it indicates no such thing. Rather,the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.Q. In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles? (underlin e)

View answer

Tenured professors at higher education institutions are certainly given more prestige than other lecturers are. But they are not better teachers as shown by a working paper published by National Education Research Institute (NERI). NERI collected, from more than 15,000 students, ratings for both tenured and non-tenured professors. Even though we would expect tenured professors to get much better ratings because of their much greater experience, the results showed otherwise. Non-tenured professors got better ratings, slightly though, than tenured professors. This clearly shows that there is an immediate need to do course correction – after all, the whole purpose of the existence of the education system is to provide quality teaching to the students.In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

View answer

Directions: Read the Passage carefully and answer the question as follow.The word Inference is used in two different senses, which are often confused but should be carefully distinguished. In the first sense, it means a process of thought or reasoning by which the mind passes from facts or statements presented, to some opinion or expectation. The data may be very vague and slight, prompting no more than a guess or surmise; as from the trick of a man’s face entertain some prejudice as to his character. Or the data may be important and strongly significant, like the footprint that frightened Crusoe into thinking of cannibals, or as when news of war makes the city expect that Consols will fall. These are examples of the act of inferring, or of inference as a process; and with inference in this sense Logic has nothing to do; it belongs to Psychology to explain how it is that our minds pass from one perception or thought to another thought, and how we come to conjecture, conclude and believe. In the second sense, ‘inference’ means not this process of guessing or opining, but the result of it; the surmise, opinion, or belief when formed; in a word, the conclusion: and it is in this sense that Inference is treated off in Logic. The subject-matter of Logic is an inference, judgment or conclusion concerning facts, embodied in a proposition, which is to be examined in relation to the evidence that may be adduced for it, in order to determine whether, or how far, the evidence amounts to proof.Logic is the science of Reasoning in the sense in which ‘reasoning’ means giving reasons, for it shows what sort of reasons are good. Whilst Psychology explains how the mind goes forward from data to conclusions, Logic takes a conclusion and goes back to the data, inquiring whether those data, together with any other evidence (facts or principles) that can be collected, are of a nature to warrant the conclusion. If we think that John Doe is of an amiable disposition, that water expands on freezing, or that one means to national prosperity is popular education, and wish to know whether we have evidence sufficient to justify us in holding these opinions, Logic can tell us what form the evidence should assume in order to be conclusive. But whatever facts constitute the evidence, they must, in order to prove the point, admit of being stated in conformity with certain principles or conditions; and of these principles or conditions Logic is the science. It deals, then, not with the subjective process of inferring, but with the objective grounds that justify or discredit the inference.Q. The passage states which of the following about Logic?

View answer

When the world-wide economic recession began in December 2007, 60% of the under-25 population was in the labor force, meaning they were either working or looking for work. Today, that figure has fallen to 55%.The decline in the participation rate among the young cannot be fully attributed to the recession. Labor force participation among young people peaked at just under 70% in 1989 and has trended downward ever since, primarily because of rising rates of college attendance. The presence of other factors that have driven the decline in the last few years cannot be discounted. The number of young people saying theyre discouraged meaning they arent looking for jobs because they dont think they can find one has been trending upwards.In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

View answer

Many people choose listening to a particular kind of music that is compatible with the mental state they are in. However, studies have shown that people can report feeling happier and calm after listening to sad music. Nevertheless, it is uncalled for to conclude that sad music actually makes people happy. The studies also found that the people only felt positive emotions after listening to sad music when the purpose of listening to it was to release emotions. Contrarily, when the purpose of listening to such music was to recall memories, people felt even more morose after listening to sad music.In the above argument, the two boldface portions play which of the following roles?

View answer

Top Courses for GMATView all

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

100 RCs for GMAT

Top Courses for GMAT

View all

A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the companys failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investors sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case it is clearly not justified. It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burtons case it indicates no such thing. Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion.b)The first states the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support that conclusionc)The first is the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence against the position being opposed.d)The first states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a wholee)The first & second both state intermediate conclusions that are drawn in order to support jointly the conclusions of the argument as a wholeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the companys failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investors sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case it is clearly not justified. It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burtons case it indicates no such thing. Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion.b)The first states the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support that conclusionc)The first is the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence against the position being opposed.d)The first states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a wholee)The first & second both state intermediate conclusions that are drawn in order to support jointly the conclusions of the argument as a wholeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the companys failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investors sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case it is clearly not justified. It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burtons case it indicates no such thing. Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion.b)The first states the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support that conclusionc)The first is the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence against the position being opposed.d)The first states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a wholee)The first & second both state intermediate conclusions that are drawn in order to support jointly the conclusions of the argument as a wholeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the companys failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investors sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case it is clearly not justified. It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burtons case it indicates no such thing. Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion.b)The first states the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support that conclusionc)The first is the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence against the position being opposed.d)The first states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a wholee)The first & second both state intermediate conclusions that are drawn in order to support jointly the conclusions of the argument as a wholeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the companys failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investors sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case it is clearly not justified. It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burtons case it indicates no such thing. Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion.b)The first states the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support that conclusionc)The first is the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence against the position being opposed.d)The first states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a wholee)The first & second both state intermediate conclusions that are drawn in order to support jointly the conclusions of the argument as a wholeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the companys failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investors sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case it is clearly not justified. It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burtons case it indicates no such thing. Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion.b)The first states the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support that conclusionc)The first is the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence against the position being opposed.d)The first states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a wholee)The first & second both state intermediate conclusions that are drawn in order to support jointly the conclusions of the argument as a wholeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the companys failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investors sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case it is clearly not justified. It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burtons case it indicates no such thing. Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion.b)The first states the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support that conclusionc)The first is the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence against the position being opposed.d)The first states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a wholee)The first & second both state intermediate conclusions that are drawn in order to support jointly the conclusions of the argument as a wholeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the companys failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investors sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case it is clearly not justified. It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burtons case it indicates no such thing. Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion.b)The first states the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support that conclusionc)The first is the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence against the position being opposed.d)The first states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a wholee)The first & second both state intermediate conclusions that are drawn in order to support jointly the conclusions of the argument as a wholeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the companys failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investors sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case it is clearly not justified. It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burtons case it indicates no such thing. Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion.b)The first states the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support that conclusionc)The first is the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence against the position being opposed.d)The first states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a wholee)The first & second both state intermediate conclusions that are drawn in order to support jointly the conclusions of the argument as a wholeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the companys failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investors sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case it is clearly not justified. It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burtons case it indicates no such thing. Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion.b)The first states the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support that conclusionc)The first is the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence against the position being opposed.d)The first states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a wholee)The first & second both state intermediate conclusions that are drawn in order to support jointly the conclusions of the argument as a wholeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.

Explore Courses for GMAT exam