A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool Company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the companys failure to slow down production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investors sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case, it is clearly not justified. It is true thatan increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burtons case it indicates no such thing. Rather,the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.Q. In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles? (underline)a)The first states a generalization that underlies the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence to show that the generalization does not apply in the case at issue.b)The first states a generalization that underlies the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second clarifies the meaning of a specific phrase as it is used in that generalization.c)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second is evidence that has been used to support the position that the argument as a whole opposes.d)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states that conclusion.e)The first and the second each provide evidence against the position that the argument as a whole opposes.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > A prominent investor who holds a large stake ...

Join the Discussion on the App

A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool Company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the company's failure to slow down production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investor's sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case, it is clearly not justified. It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burton's case it indicates no such thing. Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.

Q. In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles? (underline)

a)
The first states a generalization that underlies the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence to show that the generalization does not apply in the case at issue.
b)
The first states a generalization that underlies the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second clarifies the meaning of a specific phrase as it is used in that generalization.
c)
The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second is evidence that has been used to support the position that the argument as a whole opposes.
d)
The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states that conclusion.
e)
The first and the second each provide evidence against the position that the argument as a whole opposes.

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

GMAT Focus Edition Mock test - 1

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool Compan...

Premise 1: An investor has claimed that Burton tool company is mismanaged. The evidence presented by him is failure to slow down production & increasing inventory of finished goods.

Premise 2: The author of the argument says in most cases the investors snipping has a positive effect on the strategy of a company, however in this case the investors claims are not justified. The author as a whole opposes the investors claim & provides a common view applicable for the situation and how it is not applicable in burton tool company's case

Conclusion: The argument as a whole thinks that the Burton tool company has valid reason for the inventory.

Analysis: The company strategy for holding inventory is justified with two supporting reasons by the author. The argument as a whole opposes the investors claims & justifies the case for burton tool company with supporting evidences.

(A) The first states a generalization that underlies the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence to show that the generalization does not apply in the case at issue. - Correct. The first provides a common view in favor of the opposing argument & the second proves that the first is not applicable in this case.

(B) The first states a generalization that underlies the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second clarifies the meaning of a specific phrase as it is used in that generalization. - The second does not clarify meaning of first phrase. Incorrect

(C) The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second is evidence that has been used to support the position that the argument as a whole opposes. Incorrect. The first does not provide support for the conclusion

(D) The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states that conclusion. - The second is not the conclusion. Incorrect.

(E) The first and the second each provide evidence against the position that the argument as a whole opposes. - Evidence is not against the position that is opposed. Incorrect.

Answered by Talent Skill Learning · View profile

Attention GMAT Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the companys failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investors sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case it is clearly not justified. It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burtons case it indicates no such thing. Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

View answer

Marketing Analyst: Traditionally, introducing a new consumer product contributes to the diversity of a company’s product mix and results in an overall increase in revenues and profits. However, our launch of a new brand of soft drinks, Cool Breeze, planned for the end of this fiscal year, will almost certainly reduce rather than increase the company’s profits. Since we already offer a line of chilled refreshments that are very similar to Cool Breeze, the launch of the new drink is likely to cannibalize our current sales rather than attract new customers. Additionally, since the costs of producing Cool Breeze are higher than those of the other chilled refreshments, a large part of our current sales will be replaced with lower-margin revenues.In the argument above, which of the following statements best describes the role played by each portion in boldface?

View answer

Mathematician: Recently, Zubin Ghosh made headlines when he was recognized to have solved the Hilbert Conjecture. Ghosh posted his work on the internet,rather than submitting it to established journals. In fact,he has no job, let alone a university position; he lives alone and has refused all acclaim. In reporting on Ghosh, the press unfortunately has reinforced the popular view that mathematicians are antisocial loners. Butmathematicians clearly form a tightly knit community,frequently collaborating on important efforts; indeed, teams of researchers are working together to extend Ghoshs findings.In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the followingroles?

View answer

Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the same thing appeals to most consumers, who seem to have an intuitive dislike for inflation. But much as we may like to pay less, a sustained decline in prices, deflation, may not be in our best interests. Deflation, in fact, is considered to be a bigger evil than inflation, and evokes strong action by policymakers who would try everything possible to prop up prices. Deflation often results from a slowdown in which reduction in demand vis--vis supply causes prices to dip. With a sharp decline in prices, consumers tend to postpone purchases in the belief that prices will head further lower. This adds to the pressure on businesses, which in addition to a fall in prices also see an accumulation of inventory. Production cuts are hence resorted to, resulting in factory closures and consequent layoffs or salary cuts. With unemployment increasing, income levels in the economy fall, leading to further cuts in consumer spending and more pressure on prices. A vicious cycle emerges; the cascade effect is felt across sectors; and the economy goes into defeatist mode.To prevent deflations and to tackle the downward spiral caused by them, governments resort to large-scale spending, undertaking massive projects to increase employment, incomes, and prices and pumping in huge sums of money to propel demand. For instance, in the aftermath of the financial market crash in 2008, the US government undertook big-ticket stimulus measures and QE (quantitative easing) to revive the economy.However, not all dips in prices are bad. A fall in prices of goods and services due to technological innovations and increased competition could actually benefit both the consumers and the producers. Such a situation is very different from deflation, which affects prices across the economy on a sustained basis (mainly due to decreasing demand or liquidity problems) and which should indeed be considered a red flag.Which of the following describes the function of the final paragraph?

View answer

The agricultural market throughout the world is struggling with a significant reduction in the production of rice, and it is feared that demand will far outstrip supply in the coming months. However, Belvanias export shipments of rice have increased from a total of $21.2 million last quarter to $27.6 million in this quarter. Clearly, Belvanias production of rice has increased.Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument above?

View answer

Top Courses for GMATView all

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

100 RCs for GMAT

Top Courses for GMAT

View all

A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool Company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the companys failure to slow down production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investors sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case, it is clearly not justified. It is true thatan increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burtons case it indicates no such thing. Rather,the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.Q. In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles? (underline)a)The first states a generalization that underlies the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence to show that the generalization does not apply in the case at issue.b)The first states a generalization that underlies the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second clarifies the meaning of a specific phrase as it is used in that generalization.c)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second is evidence that has been used to support the position that the argument as a whole opposes.d)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states that conclusion.e)The first and the second each provide evidence against the position that the argument as a whole opposes.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool Company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the companys failure to slow down production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investors sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case, it is clearly not justified. It is true thatan increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burtons case it indicates no such thing. Rather,the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.Q. In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles? (underline)a)The first states a generalization that underlies the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence to show that the generalization does not apply in the case at issue.b)The first states a generalization that underlies the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second clarifies the meaning of a specific phrase as it is used in that generalization.c)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second is evidence that has been used to support the position that the argument as a whole opposes.d)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states that conclusion.e)The first and the second each provide evidence against the position that the argument as a whole opposes.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool Company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the companys failure to slow down production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investors sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case, it is clearly not justified. It is true thatan increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burtons case it indicates no such thing. Rather,the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.Q. In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles? (underline)a)The first states a generalization that underlies the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence to show that the generalization does not apply in the case at issue.b)The first states a generalization that underlies the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second clarifies the meaning of a specific phrase as it is used in that generalization.c)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second is evidence that has been used to support the position that the argument as a whole opposes.d)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states that conclusion.e)The first and the second each provide evidence against the position that the argument as a whole opposes.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool Company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the companys failure to slow down production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investors sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case, it is clearly not justified. It is true thatan increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burtons case it indicates no such thing. Rather,the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.Q. In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles? (underline)a)The first states a generalization that underlies the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence to show that the generalization does not apply in the case at issue.b)The first states a generalization that underlies the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second clarifies the meaning of a specific phrase as it is used in that generalization.c)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second is evidence that has been used to support the position that the argument as a whole opposes.d)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states that conclusion.e)The first and the second each provide evidence against the position that the argument as a whole opposes.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool Company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the companys failure to slow down production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investors sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case, it is clearly not justified. It is true thatan increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burtons case it indicates no such thing. Rather,the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.Q. In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles? (underline)a)The first states a generalization that underlies the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence to show that the generalization does not apply in the case at issue.b)The first states a generalization that underlies the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second clarifies the meaning of a specific phrase as it is used in that generalization.c)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second is evidence that has been used to support the position that the argument as a whole opposes.d)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states that conclusion.e)The first and the second each provide evidence against the position that the argument as a whole opposes.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool Company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the companys failure to slow down production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investors sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case, it is clearly not justified. It is true thatan increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burtons case it indicates no such thing. Rather,the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.Q. In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles? (underline)a)The first states a generalization that underlies the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence to show that the generalization does not apply in the case at issue.b)The first states a generalization that underlies the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second clarifies the meaning of a specific phrase as it is used in that generalization.c)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second is evidence that has been used to support the position that the argument as a whole opposes.d)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states that conclusion.e)The first and the second each provide evidence against the position that the argument as a whole opposes.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool Company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the companys failure to slow down production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investors sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case, it is clearly not justified. It is true thatan increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burtons case it indicates no such thing. Rather,the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.Q. In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles? (underline)a)The first states a generalization that underlies the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence to show that the generalization does not apply in the case at issue.b)The first states a generalization that underlies the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second clarifies the meaning of a specific phrase as it is used in that generalization.c)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second is evidence that has been used to support the position that the argument as a whole opposes.d)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states that conclusion.e)The first and the second each provide evidence against the position that the argument as a whole opposes.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool Company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the companys failure to slow down production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investors sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case, it is clearly not justified. It is true thatan increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burtons case it indicates no such thing. Rather,the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.Q. In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles? (underline)a)The first states a generalization that underlies the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence to show that the generalization does not apply in the case at issue.b)The first states a generalization that underlies the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second clarifies the meaning of a specific phrase as it is used in that generalization.c)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second is evidence that has been used to support the position that the argument as a whole opposes.d)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states that conclusion.e)The first and the second each provide evidence against the position that the argument as a whole opposes.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool Company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the companys failure to slow down production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investors sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case, it is clearly not justified. It is true thatan increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burtons case it indicates no such thing. Rather,the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.Q. In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles? (underline)a)The first states a generalization that underlies the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence to show that the generalization does not apply in the case at issue.b)The first states a generalization that underlies the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second clarifies the meaning of a specific phrase as it is used in that generalization.c)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second is evidence that has been used to support the position that the argument as a whole opposes.d)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states that conclusion.e)The first and the second each provide evidence against the position that the argument as a whole opposes.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool Company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the companys failure to slow down production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investors sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case, it is clearly not justified. It is true thatan increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burtons case it indicates no such thing. Rather,the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.Q. In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles? (underline)a)The first states a generalization that underlies the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence to show that the generalization does not apply in the case at issue.b)The first states a generalization that underlies the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second clarifies the meaning of a specific phrase as it is used in that generalization.c)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second is evidence that has been used to support the position that the argument as a whole opposes.d)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states that conclusion.e)The first and the second each provide evidence against the position that the argument as a whole opposes.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.

Explore Courses for GMAT exam