Which of the following statements is/are correct? 1. There is no provi...
**Statement 1: There is no provision in the Constitution for the system of legal responsibility of a Minister.**
This statement is incorrect.
**Explanation:**
The Constitution of India does provide for the system of legal responsibility of a Minister. The concept of ministerial responsibility is an important feature of parliamentary democracy.
In India, the system of ministerial responsibility is based on the principles of collective responsibility and individual responsibility. The Constitution provides for the collective responsibility of the Council of Ministers to the Parliament. Article 75(3) states that the Council of Ministers shall be collectively responsible to the House of the People (Lok Sabha).
Additionally, Article 75(2) of the Constitution provides for the individual responsibility of Ministers to the President. It states that the Ministers shall hold office during the pleasure of the President. This means that the President can remove a Minister from office if they are not performing their duties satisfactorily or if they are found to be involved in any wrongdoing.
Furthermore, the concept of ministerial responsibility is also reinforced by various provisions and practices. For example, the Parliament can hold Ministers accountable through mechanisms such as questions, debates, no-confidence motions, and impeachment proceedings.
Therefore, statement 1 is incorrect as there is indeed a provision in the Constitution for the system of legal responsibility of a Minister.
**Statement 2: An order of the President for a public act is countersigned by an authorized officer in accordance with the rules made by the Parliament.**
This statement is correct.
**Explanation:**
According to Article 77(1) of the Constitution, all executive actions of the Government of India shall be expressed to be taken in the name of the President. However, these executive actions are required to be formally communicated by the President to the concerned authorities.
Article 77(2) states that orders and other instruments made and executed in the name of the President shall be authenticated in such manner as may be specified by rules to be made by the President. These rules are made by the President under Article 77(3).
As per the rules made by the President, every order or instrument made and executed in the name of the President is required to be countersigned by an authorized officer. This countersignature is necessary to authenticate the order or instrument and to ensure that it has been duly authorized by the President.
The authorized officer who countersigns the order or instrument is usually a Minister or a Secretary to the Government of India. The countersignature indicates that the order or instrument has been approved by the concerned Minister or Secretary and is in accordance with the policies and decisions of the Government.
Therefore, statement 2 is correct as an order of the President for a public act is indeed countersigned by an authorized officer in accordance with the rules made by the President.
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UPSC study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UPSC.