Question Description
The justiciability of Fundamental Rights and the moral obligation of the State to implement Directive Principles have led to a conflict between the two since the commencement of the Constitution. In this context, consider the following statements:1. The Parliament can amend the Fundamental Rights for implementing any of the Directive Principles.2. Articles 39 (b) and 39 (c) have been given priority over all the Fundamental Rights.Which of the above statements is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about The justiciability of Fundamental Rights and the moral obligation of the State to implement Directive Principles have led to a conflict between the two since the commencement of the Constitution. In this context, consider the following statements:1. The Parliament can amend the Fundamental Rights for implementing any of the Directive Principles.2. Articles 39 (b) and 39 (c) have been given priority over all the Fundamental Rights.Which of the above statements is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The justiciability of Fundamental Rights and the moral obligation of the State to implement Directive Principles have led to a conflict between the two since the commencement of the Constitution. In this context, consider the following statements:1. The Parliament can amend the Fundamental Rights for implementing any of the Directive Principles.2. Articles 39 (b) and 39 (c) have been given priority over all the Fundamental Rights.Which of the above statements is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for The justiciability of Fundamental Rights and the moral obligation of the State to implement Directive Principles have led to a conflict between the two since the commencement of the Constitution. In this context, consider the following statements:1. The Parliament can amend the Fundamental Rights for implementing any of the Directive Principles.2. Articles 39 (b) and 39 (c) have been given priority over all the Fundamental Rights.Which of the above statements is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of The justiciability of Fundamental Rights and the moral obligation of the State to implement Directive Principles have led to a conflict between the two since the commencement of the Constitution. In this context, consider the following statements:1. The Parliament can amend the Fundamental Rights for implementing any of the Directive Principles.2. Articles 39 (b) and 39 (c) have been given priority over all the Fundamental Rights.Which of the above statements is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The justiciability of Fundamental Rights and the moral obligation of the State to implement Directive Principles have led to a conflict between the two since the commencement of the Constitution. In this context, consider the following statements:1. The Parliament can amend the Fundamental Rights for implementing any of the Directive Principles.2. Articles 39 (b) and 39 (c) have been given priority over all the Fundamental Rights.Which of the above statements is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The justiciability of Fundamental Rights and the moral obligation of the State to implement Directive Principles have led to a conflict between the two since the commencement of the Constitution. In this context, consider the following statements:1. The Parliament can amend the Fundamental Rights for implementing any of the Directive Principles.2. Articles 39 (b) and 39 (c) have been given priority over all the Fundamental Rights.Which of the above statements is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The justiciability of Fundamental Rights and the moral obligation of the State to implement Directive Principles have led to a conflict between the two since the commencement of the Constitution. In this context, consider the following statements:1. The Parliament can amend the Fundamental Rights for implementing any of the Directive Principles.2. Articles 39 (b) and 39 (c) have been given priority over all the Fundamental Rights.Which of the above statements is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The justiciability of Fundamental Rights and the moral obligation of the State to implement Directive Principles have led to a conflict between the two since the commencement of the Constitution. In this context, consider the following statements:1. The Parliament can amend the Fundamental Rights for implementing any of the Directive Principles.2. Articles 39 (b) and 39 (c) have been given priority over all the Fundamental Rights.Which of the above statements is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.