Consider the following statements:1. Agriculture would have been the ...
- Looking at the resources available, agriculture would have been the obvious choice as the prime moving force (PMF) of the economy (i.e., cultivable land and human power).
- But as Indian Agriculture was using traditional tools and technology its modernisation, as well as future mechanisation (later to some extent), would have been blocked due to the lack of indigenous industrial support.
- If India would have gone for import this would have required enough foreign reserves and a natural dependence on foreign countries.
This question is part of UPSC exam. View all UPSC courses
Consider the following statements:1. Agriculture would have been the ...
Statement 1: Agriculture would have been the obvious choice as the prime moving force (PMF) of the economy, But Indian agriculture was using traditional tools and technology.
Indian agriculture has historically been a significant contributor to the country's economy, employing a large portion of the population. However, despite its importance, Indian agriculture has been characterized by the use of traditional tools and technology. This reliance on traditional methods has limited the productivity and efficiency of the sector, preventing it from becoming the prime moving force (PMF) of the economy.
Traditional tools and technology in agriculture refer to practices that have been passed down through generations, often involving manual labor and rudimentary tools. These traditional methods have several limitations, such as low productivity, inadequate mechanization, and a lack of access to modern agricultural practices. As a result, Indian agriculture has struggled to keep up with the growing demands of a rapidly developing economy.
Statement 2: By choosing industry as the prime moving force, India opted to industrialize the economy as well as modernize the traditional mode of farming.
Recognizing the limitations of traditional agriculture, India made a strategic decision to focus on industry as the prime moving force of the economy. This decision aimed to achieve two key objectives: industrialization and the modernization of farming practices.
Industrialization involves the expansion of manufacturing and industrial sectors, which can generate employment opportunities, increase productivity, and contribute to economic growth. By prioritizing industry, India sought to diversify its economy, reduce dependency on agriculture, and stimulate overall development.
Simultaneously, modernizing the traditional mode of farming was also a crucial aspect of India's development strategy. This involved introducing modern tools, technologies, and techniques in agriculture to enhance productivity and efficiency. The adoption of modern agricultural practices, such as mechanization, irrigation systems, improved seeds, and fertilizers, aimed to transform Indian agriculture into a more productive and sustainable sector.
By choosing industry as the PMF, India's focus on industrialization and modernizing agriculture were complementary objectives. Industrialization provided the necessary resources, infrastructure, and capital to support the modernization of agriculture. The increased income generated from industrial growth could be invested in agricultural development, leading to higher farm productivity and improved rural livelihoods.
Overall, both statements 1 and 2 are correct. While agriculture had the potential to be the PMF, its reliance on traditional tools and technology hindered its transformation. India's decision to prioritize industry as the PMF aimed to address this limitation by industrializing the economy and modernizing the traditional mode of farming.
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UPSC study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UPSC.