CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Directions: Question consists of five statem...
Start Learning for Free
Directions: Question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the best option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.
A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.
B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to wealth.
C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.
D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.
E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.
- a)CBA
- b)EDE
- c)CDE
- d)BAC
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: Question consists of five statements followed by options ...
To determine the valid argument, we need to find the statement that is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements. Let's analyze each statement and eliminate the options that do not fit the criteria.
Statement A: Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.
Statement B: Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to health.
Statement C: Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.
Statement D: Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.
Statement E: Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.
Analysis:
- Statement A states that traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment. This implies that there is a relationship between traffic congestion and carbon monoxide levels.
- Statement B states that an increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to health. This implies that high levels of carbon monoxide can have negative effects on health.
- Statement C concludes that traffic congestion is hazardous to health. This conclusion is drawn from the preceding two statements (A and B), as it combines the relationship between traffic congestion and carbon monoxide levels (A) with the negative health effects of carbon monoxide (B).
Elimination:
- Option B (EDE) cannot be the correct answer because the third statement (E) does not follow logically from the preceding two statements (D and E).
- Option C (CDE) cannot be the correct answer because the third statement (D) contradicts the first statement (A), which states that traffic congestion does increase carbon monoxide levels.
- Option D (BAC) cannot be the correct answer because the third statement (B) does not follow logically from the preceding two statements (A and C).
Conclusion:
The valid argument is option A (CBA) because the third statement (C) is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements (A and B). Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide levels (A), and an increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to health (B), therefore, traffic congestion is hazardous to health (C).
Statement A: Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.
Statement B: Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to health.
Statement C: Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.
Statement D: Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.
Statement E: Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.
Analysis:
- Statement A states that traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment. This implies that there is a relationship between traffic congestion and carbon monoxide levels.
- Statement B states that an increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to health. This implies that high levels of carbon monoxide can have negative effects on health.
- Statement C concludes that traffic congestion is hazardous to health. This conclusion is drawn from the preceding two statements (A and B), as it combines the relationship between traffic congestion and carbon monoxide levels (A) with the negative health effects of carbon monoxide (B).
Elimination:
- Option B (EDE) cannot be the correct answer because the third statement (E) does not follow logically from the preceding two statements (D and E).
- Option C (CDE) cannot be the correct answer because the third statement (D) contradicts the first statement (A), which states that traffic congestion does increase carbon monoxide levels.
- Option D (BAC) cannot be the correct answer because the third statement (B) does not follow logically from the preceding two statements (A and C).
Conclusion:
The valid argument is option A (CBA) because the third statement (C) is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements (A and B). Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide levels (A), and an increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to health (B), therefore, traffic congestion is hazardous to health (C).
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
Directions: Question consists of five statements followed by options ...
Option A: Traffic congestion and increase in carbon monoxide are hazardous to health. But, we cannot infer that one is a result of other. Hence, option A is wrong.
Option B: Option B is wrong because the traffic congestion that does not cause increased carbon monoxide might cause some thing else that is hazardous to health.
Option C: C and D are not related. So, we cannot infer E.
Option D: Increase in Carbon monoxide is hazardous to health and traffic congestion increases Carbon monoxide. So, we can say that traffic congestion is hazardous to health.
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Similar CLAT Doubts
Top Courses for CLATView all
Directions: Question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the best option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to wealth.C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.a)CBAb)EDEc)CDEd)BACCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: Question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the best option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to wealth.C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.a)CBAb)EDEc)CDEd)BACCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the best option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to wealth.C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.a)CBAb)EDEc)CDEd)BACCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the best option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to wealth.C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.a)CBAb)EDEc)CDEd)BACCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Directions: Question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the best option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to wealth.C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.a)CBAb)EDEc)CDEd)BACCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the best option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to wealth.C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.a)CBAb)EDEc)CDEd)BACCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the best option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to wealth.C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.a)CBAb)EDEc)CDEd)BACCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: Question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the best option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to wealth.C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.a)CBAb)EDEc)CDEd)BACCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the best option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to wealth.C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.a)CBAb)EDEc)CDEd)BACCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Directions: Question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the best option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to wealth.C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.a)CBAb)EDEc)CDEd)BACCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the best option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to wealth.C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.a)CBAb)EDEc)CDEd)BACCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the best option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to wealth.C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.a)CBAb)EDEc)CDEd)BACCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Directions: Question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the best option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to wealth.C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.a)CBAb)EDEc)CDEd)BACCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup