CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Directions: Each question consists of five st...
Start Learning for Free
Directions: Each question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.
A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.
B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to health.
C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.
D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.
E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.
B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to health.
C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.
D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.
E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.
- a)CBA
- b)BDE
- c)CDE
- d)BAC
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Directions: Each question consists of five statements followed by opti...
BAC is the correct option choice
TC = Instances of traffic congestion
ICM = Instances of increase in carbon monoxide in the environment
HH = Instances that are hazardous to health.
The premises state that increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to health and traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment. Therefore, traffic congestion is hazardous to health.
ICM = Instances of increase in carbon monoxide in the environment
HH = Instances that are hazardous to health.
The premises state that increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to health and traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment. Therefore, traffic congestion is hazardous to health.
(a) CBA is invalid, because if TC and ICM are both separately hazardous to health (HH), no definite relationship between TC and ICM necessarily follows.
(b) BDE is invalid, because the some TC that are not ICM need not necessarily be free of any hazard to health (HH); they could possibly pollute the environment with other noxious gases.
(b) BDE is invalid, because the some TC that are not ICM need not necessarily be free of any hazard to health (HH); they could possibly pollute the environment with other noxious gases.
The shaded portion shows those some TC that are not ICM, but could possibly be hazardous to health (HH).
(c) CDE is invalid, because the conclusion E is a negation of one of the premises C. Another check reveals the TC is the middle term, which appears in both the premises C and D, and E, therefore, should not appear in the conclusion E, as per the basic definition of a syllogism.
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: Each question consists of five statements followed by opti...
Understanding the Argument Structure
To determine the valid argument from the given statements, we need to analyze how the statements link together logically.
Statements Breakdown
- A: Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.
- B: Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to health.
- C: Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.
- D: Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.
- E: Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.
Identifying Valid Arguments
We need to find a set of three statements where the third statement logically follows from the first two.
Option D: BDE
- B: Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to health.
- D: Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.
- E: Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.
Logical Flow
1. Premise 1 (B): It is established that an increase in carbon monoxide is harmful to health.
2. Premise 2 (D): Some traffic congestion does not result in increased carbon monoxide levels.
3. Conclusion (E): From these premises, we can conclude that some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health since it doesn’t contribute to increased carbon monoxide, which is what poses the health risk.
Why Other Options Fail
- Options A (CBA) and C (CDE) do not establish a logical connection between the statements.
- Option B (BDE) seems valid but does not lead to a direct conclusion regarding traffic congestion and health.
Conclusion
Thus, option D (BDE) provides a coherent argument structure where the conclusion logically stems from the premises.
To determine the valid argument from the given statements, we need to analyze how the statements link together logically.
Statements Breakdown
- A: Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.
- B: Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to health.
- C: Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.
- D: Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.
- E: Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.
Identifying Valid Arguments
We need to find a set of three statements where the third statement logically follows from the first two.
Option D: BDE
- B: Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to health.
- D: Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.
- E: Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.
Logical Flow
1. Premise 1 (B): It is established that an increase in carbon monoxide is harmful to health.
2. Premise 2 (D): Some traffic congestion does not result in increased carbon monoxide levels.
3. Conclusion (E): From these premises, we can conclude that some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health since it doesn’t contribute to increased carbon monoxide, which is what poses the health risk.
Why Other Options Fail
- Options A (CBA) and C (CDE) do not establish a logical connection between the statements.
- Option B (BDE) seems valid but does not lead to a direct conclusion regarding traffic congestion and health.
Conclusion
Thus, option D (BDE) provides a coherent argument structure where the conclusion logically stems from the premises.
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Similar CLAT Doubts
Top Courses for CLATView all
Directions: Each question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to health.C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.a)CBAb)BDEc)CDEd)BACCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: Each question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to health.C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.a)CBAb)BDEc)CDEd)BACCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Each question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to health.C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.a)CBAb)BDEc)CDEd)BACCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Each question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to health.C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.a)CBAb)BDEc)CDEd)BACCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Directions: Each question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to health.C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.a)CBAb)BDEc)CDEd)BACCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Each question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to health.C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.a)CBAb)BDEc)CDEd)BACCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Each question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to health.C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.a)CBAb)BDEc)CDEd)BACCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: Each question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to health.C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.a)CBAb)BDEc)CDEd)BACCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Each question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to health.C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.a)CBAb)BDEc)CDEd)BACCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Directions: Each question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to health.C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.a)CBAb)BDEc)CDEd)BACCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Each question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to health.C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.a)CBAb)BDEc)CDEd)BACCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Each question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to health.C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.a)CBAb)BDEc)CDEd)BACCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Directions: Each question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to health.C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.a)CBAb)BDEc)CDEd)BACCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup