What is titular monarchy?.and why is Indian president not considered a...
A titular monarchy is a form of government in which a monarch serves as the ceremonial head of state, but has no actual political power or authority. In a titular monarchy, the monarch serves a symbolic role, representing the nation and its history, but the actual governance of the country is carried out by elected officials or a council of advisors.
The President of India is not considered a titular monarchy because the President of India is not a ceremonial head of state with no political power or authority. Instead, the President of India is a constitutional head of state with specific powers and responsibilities set out in the Indian Constitution.
The President of India is elected by the members of an electoral college and serves as the supreme commander of the Indian Armed Forces. The President also has the power to appoint the Prime Minister and other high-ranking government officials, and to veto or sign bills into law.
Therefore, the President of India is not considered a titular monarchy because the President has actual political power and authority within the government of India.
This question is part of UPSC exam. View all UPSC courses
What is titular monarchy?.and why is Indian president not considered a...
Titular monarchy:
A titular monarchy, also known as a ceremonial monarchy, is a form of government where the monarch holds a symbolic and ceremonial role with limited or no political power. In this system, the monarch typically performs duties such as representing the state in diplomatic affairs, presiding over official ceremonies, and acting as a unifying figurehead for the nation. The real political power is usually vested in a separate governing body, such as a parliament or a president.
Indian President:
In the case of India, the President is not considered a titular monarch but rather the head of state with certain executive powers. Let us delve into the reasons behind this distinction:
1. Constitutional Role:
The Indian President has a defined constitutional role and specific powers outlined in the Constitution of India. They are not merely a symbolic figurehead but hold certain executive responsibilities.
2. Election Process:
The President of India is elected through an electoral process. They are not hereditary or appointed based on lineage, as is the case with a titular monarch. The President is elected by an Electoral College comprising the elected members of both houses of Parliament and the State Legislative Assemblies.
3. Executive Powers:
The President of India possesses executive powers, including the appointment and dismissal of ministers, granting pardons, and the power to promulgate ordinances. These executive functions are not typically associated with a titular monarch.
4. Legislative Role:
The President has a role in the legislative process. They can summon, prorogue, or dissolve the Parliament, address both houses, and give assent to bills passed by Parliament. These legislative powers are not vested in a titular monarch.
5. Checks and Balances:
The Indian President's powers are subject to checks and balances. They cannot exercise their powers independently but are bound by the advice of the Council of Ministers. The President's decisions can be challenged and reviewed by the judiciary, ensuring accountability and preventing absolute power.
Conclusion:
While the Indian President holds significant powers and responsibilities, they are not considered a titular monarch. The President's position is established through an electoral process, possesses executive and legislative powers, and is subject to checks and balances. This distinguishes the role of the President from that of a symbolic figurehead in a titular monarchy.
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UPSC study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UPSC.