Question Description
As anticipated, in yet another major ruling titled Sanjivani Ramchandra Kondalkar vs Ramchandra Bhimrao Kondalkar, State of Maharashtra has once again reiterated what even the Supreme Court has time and again reiterated that if allegations of adultery are proved against the wife in a marriage, she is not entitled to maintenance. A wife is entitled to claim maintenance only if she is able to prove that all the allegations of adultery are wrong. A wife cannot maintain relation with some other man and yet claim maintenance from her husband. That's immoral on part of the woman to do so.In sum, the Bombay High Court has very rightly concluded in this latest, landmark and extremely laudable judgment that wife is not entitled to maintenance if allegations of adultery is proved against her. What is important to note here is that the Bombay High Court has also made it clear that just allegations of adultery by the husband are not enough. Those allegations must certainly be proved against her. If they are proved as have been proved in this noteworthy case only then the women will be denied maintenance as she will be held not entitled to do so as we have seen in this latest case also. The fact remains that, there is an expressed embargo on the right of a woman to claim maintenance, pursuant to the provisions under Sub-section (4) of section 125 of the Act. If the allegation of adultery is proved against such a women or inspite of the husband being ready to maintain her and she refuses to cohabit the women/wife can be refused payment of maintenance."Q. Based on the information prov ided, which of the following can be attributed to the author?a)The author is unhappy with the judgment.b)The author is confused regarding the status of maintenance claimed by divorced wife.c)The author is happy that immoral acts are not being supported by the Indian Legal system.d)The author does not approve of the reasons mentioned for the claim of maintenance of the divorced wife.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about As anticipated, in yet another major ruling titled Sanjivani Ramchandra Kondalkar vs Ramchandra Bhimrao Kondalkar, State of Maharashtra has once again reiterated what even the Supreme Court has time and again reiterated that if allegations of adultery are proved against the wife in a marriage, she is not entitled to maintenance. A wife is entitled to claim maintenance only if she is able to prove that all the allegations of adultery are wrong. A wife cannot maintain relation with some other man and yet claim maintenance from her husband. That's immoral on part of the woman to do so.In sum, the Bombay High Court has very rightly concluded in this latest, landmark and extremely laudable judgment that wife is not entitled to maintenance if allegations of adultery is proved against her. What is important to note here is that the Bombay High Court has also made it clear that just allegations of adultery by the husband are not enough. Those allegations must certainly be proved against her. If they are proved as have been proved in this noteworthy case only then the women will be denied maintenance as she will be held not entitled to do so as we have seen in this latest case also. The fact remains that, there is an expressed embargo on the right of a woman to claim maintenance, pursuant to the provisions under Sub-section (4) of section 125 of the Act. If the allegation of adultery is proved against such a women or inspite of the husband being ready to maintain her and she refuses to cohabit the women/wife can be refused payment of maintenance."Q. Based on the information prov ided, which of the following can be attributed to the author?a)The author is unhappy with the judgment.b)The author is confused regarding the status of maintenance claimed by divorced wife.c)The author is happy that immoral acts are not being supported by the Indian Legal system.d)The author does not approve of the reasons mentioned for the claim of maintenance of the divorced wife.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for As anticipated, in yet another major ruling titled Sanjivani Ramchandra Kondalkar vs Ramchandra Bhimrao Kondalkar, State of Maharashtra has once again reiterated what even the Supreme Court has time and again reiterated that if allegations of adultery are proved against the wife in a marriage, she is not entitled to maintenance. A wife is entitled to claim maintenance only if she is able to prove that all the allegations of adultery are wrong. A wife cannot maintain relation with some other man and yet claim maintenance from her husband. That's immoral on part of the woman to do so.In sum, the Bombay High Court has very rightly concluded in this latest, landmark and extremely laudable judgment that wife is not entitled to maintenance if allegations of adultery is proved against her. What is important to note here is that the Bombay High Court has also made it clear that just allegations of adultery by the husband are not enough. Those allegations must certainly be proved against her. If they are proved as have been proved in this noteworthy case only then the women will be denied maintenance as she will be held not entitled to do so as we have seen in this latest case also. The fact remains that, there is an expressed embargo on the right of a woman to claim maintenance, pursuant to the provisions under Sub-section (4) of section 125 of the Act. If the allegation of adultery is proved against such a women or inspite of the husband being ready to maintain her and she refuses to cohabit the women/wife can be refused payment of maintenance."Q. Based on the information prov ided, which of the following can be attributed to the author?a)The author is unhappy with the judgment.b)The author is confused regarding the status of maintenance claimed by divorced wife.c)The author is happy that immoral acts are not being supported by the Indian Legal system.d)The author does not approve of the reasons mentioned for the claim of maintenance of the divorced wife.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for As anticipated, in yet another major ruling titled Sanjivani Ramchandra Kondalkar vs Ramchandra Bhimrao Kondalkar, State of Maharashtra has once again reiterated what even the Supreme Court has time and again reiterated that if allegations of adultery are proved against the wife in a marriage, she is not entitled to maintenance. A wife is entitled to claim maintenance only if she is able to prove that all the allegations of adultery are wrong. A wife cannot maintain relation with some other man and yet claim maintenance from her husband. That's immoral on part of the woman to do so.In sum, the Bombay High Court has very rightly concluded in this latest, landmark and extremely laudable judgment that wife is not entitled to maintenance if allegations of adultery is proved against her. What is important to note here is that the Bombay High Court has also made it clear that just allegations of adultery by the husband are not enough. Those allegations must certainly be proved against her. If they are proved as have been proved in this noteworthy case only then the women will be denied maintenance as she will be held not entitled to do so as we have seen in this latest case also. The fact remains that, there is an expressed embargo on the right of a woman to claim maintenance, pursuant to the provisions under Sub-section (4) of section 125 of the Act. If the allegation of adultery is proved against such a women or inspite of the husband being ready to maintain her and she refuses to cohabit the women/wife can be refused payment of maintenance."Q. Based on the information prov ided, which of the following can be attributed to the author?a)The author is unhappy with the judgment.b)The author is confused regarding the status of maintenance claimed by divorced wife.c)The author is happy that immoral acts are not being supported by the Indian Legal system.d)The author does not approve of the reasons mentioned for the claim of maintenance of the divorced wife.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of As anticipated, in yet another major ruling titled Sanjivani Ramchandra Kondalkar vs Ramchandra Bhimrao Kondalkar, State of Maharashtra has once again reiterated what even the Supreme Court has time and again reiterated that if allegations of adultery are proved against the wife in a marriage, she is not entitled to maintenance. A wife is entitled to claim maintenance only if she is able to prove that all the allegations of adultery are wrong. A wife cannot maintain relation with some other man and yet claim maintenance from her husband. That's immoral on part of the woman to do so.In sum, the Bombay High Court has very rightly concluded in this latest, landmark and extremely laudable judgment that wife is not entitled to maintenance if allegations of adultery is proved against her. What is important to note here is that the Bombay High Court has also made it clear that just allegations of adultery by the husband are not enough. Those allegations must certainly be proved against her. If they are proved as have been proved in this noteworthy case only then the women will be denied maintenance as she will be held not entitled to do so as we have seen in this latest case also. The fact remains that, there is an expressed embargo on the right of a woman to claim maintenance, pursuant to the provisions under Sub-section (4) of section 125 of the Act. If the allegation of adultery is proved against such a women or inspite of the husband being ready to maintain her and she refuses to cohabit the women/wife can be refused payment of maintenance."Q. Based on the information prov ided, which of the following can be attributed to the author?a)The author is unhappy with the judgment.b)The author is confused regarding the status of maintenance claimed by divorced wife.c)The author is happy that immoral acts are not being supported by the Indian Legal system.d)The author does not approve of the reasons mentioned for the claim of maintenance of the divorced wife.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of As anticipated, in yet another major ruling titled Sanjivani Ramchandra Kondalkar vs Ramchandra Bhimrao Kondalkar, State of Maharashtra has once again reiterated what even the Supreme Court has time and again reiterated that if allegations of adultery are proved against the wife in a marriage, she is not entitled to maintenance. A wife is entitled to claim maintenance only if she is able to prove that all the allegations of adultery are wrong. A wife cannot maintain relation with some other man and yet claim maintenance from her husband. That's immoral on part of the woman to do so.In sum, the Bombay High Court has very rightly concluded in this latest, landmark and extremely laudable judgment that wife is not entitled to maintenance if allegations of adultery is proved against her. What is important to note here is that the Bombay High Court has also made it clear that just allegations of adultery by the husband are not enough. Those allegations must certainly be proved against her. If they are proved as have been proved in this noteworthy case only then the women will be denied maintenance as she will be held not entitled to do so as we have seen in this latest case also. The fact remains that, there is an expressed embargo on the right of a woman to claim maintenance, pursuant to the provisions under Sub-section (4) of section 125 of the Act. If the allegation of adultery is proved against such a women or inspite of the husband being ready to maintain her and she refuses to cohabit the women/wife can be refused payment of maintenance."Q. Based on the information prov ided, which of the following can be attributed to the author?a)The author is unhappy with the judgment.b)The author is confused regarding the status of maintenance claimed by divorced wife.c)The author is happy that immoral acts are not being supported by the Indian Legal system.d)The author does not approve of the reasons mentioned for the claim of maintenance of the divorced wife.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for As anticipated, in yet another major ruling titled Sanjivani Ramchandra Kondalkar vs Ramchandra Bhimrao Kondalkar, State of Maharashtra has once again reiterated what even the Supreme Court has time and again reiterated that if allegations of adultery are proved against the wife in a marriage, she is not entitled to maintenance. A wife is entitled to claim maintenance only if she is able to prove that all the allegations of adultery are wrong. A wife cannot maintain relation with some other man and yet claim maintenance from her husband. That's immoral on part of the woman to do so.In sum, the Bombay High Court has very rightly concluded in this latest, landmark and extremely laudable judgment that wife is not entitled to maintenance if allegations of adultery is proved against her. What is important to note here is that the Bombay High Court has also made it clear that just allegations of adultery by the husband are not enough. Those allegations must certainly be proved against her. If they are proved as have been proved in this noteworthy case only then the women will be denied maintenance as she will be held not entitled to do so as we have seen in this latest case also. The fact remains that, there is an expressed embargo on the right of a woman to claim maintenance, pursuant to the provisions under Sub-section (4) of section 125 of the Act. If the allegation of adultery is proved against such a women or inspite of the husband being ready to maintain her and she refuses to cohabit the women/wife can be refused payment of maintenance."Q. Based on the information prov ided, which of the following can be attributed to the author?a)The author is unhappy with the judgment.b)The author is confused regarding the status of maintenance claimed by divorced wife.c)The author is happy that immoral acts are not being supported by the Indian Legal system.d)The author does not approve of the reasons mentioned for the claim of maintenance of the divorced wife.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of As anticipated, in yet another major ruling titled Sanjivani Ramchandra Kondalkar vs Ramchandra Bhimrao Kondalkar, State of Maharashtra has once again reiterated what even the Supreme Court has time and again reiterated that if allegations of adultery are proved against the wife in a marriage, she is not entitled to maintenance. A wife is entitled to claim maintenance only if she is able to prove that all the allegations of adultery are wrong. A wife cannot maintain relation with some other man and yet claim maintenance from her husband. That's immoral on part of the woman to do so.In sum, the Bombay High Court has very rightly concluded in this latest, landmark and extremely laudable judgment that wife is not entitled to maintenance if allegations of adultery is proved against her. What is important to note here is that the Bombay High Court has also made it clear that just allegations of adultery by the husband are not enough. Those allegations must certainly be proved against her. If they are proved as have been proved in this noteworthy case only then the women will be denied maintenance as she will be held not entitled to do so as we have seen in this latest case also. The fact remains that, there is an expressed embargo on the right of a woman to claim maintenance, pursuant to the provisions under Sub-section (4) of section 125 of the Act. If the allegation of adultery is proved against such a women or inspite of the husband being ready to maintain her and she refuses to cohabit the women/wife can be refused payment of maintenance."Q. Based on the information prov ided, which of the following can be attributed to the author?a)The author is unhappy with the judgment.b)The author is confused regarding the status of maintenance claimed by divorced wife.c)The author is happy that immoral acts are not being supported by the Indian Legal system.d)The author does not approve of the reasons mentioned for the claim of maintenance of the divorced wife.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice As anticipated, in yet another major ruling titled Sanjivani Ramchandra Kondalkar vs Ramchandra Bhimrao Kondalkar, State of Maharashtra has once again reiterated what even the Supreme Court has time and again reiterated that if allegations of adultery are proved against the wife in a marriage, she is not entitled to maintenance. A wife is entitled to claim maintenance only if she is able to prove that all the allegations of adultery are wrong. A wife cannot maintain relation with some other man and yet claim maintenance from her husband. That's immoral on part of the woman to do so.In sum, the Bombay High Court has very rightly concluded in this latest, landmark and extremely laudable judgment that wife is not entitled to maintenance if allegations of adultery is proved against her. What is important to note here is that the Bombay High Court has also made it clear that just allegations of adultery by the husband are not enough. Those allegations must certainly be proved against her. If they are proved as have been proved in this noteworthy case only then the women will be denied maintenance as she will be held not entitled to do so as we have seen in this latest case also. The fact remains that, there is an expressed embargo on the right of a woman to claim maintenance, pursuant to the provisions under Sub-section (4) of section 125 of the Act. If the allegation of adultery is proved against such a women or inspite of the husband being ready to maintain her and she refuses to cohabit the women/wife can be refused payment of maintenance."Q. Based on the information prov ided, which of the following can be attributed to the author?a)The author is unhappy with the judgment.b)The author is confused regarding the status of maintenance claimed by divorced wife.c)The author is happy that immoral acts are not being supported by the Indian Legal system.d)The author does not approve of the reasons mentioned for the claim of maintenance of the divorced wife.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.