Question Description
The Government has constituted a Commission on 2nd October, 2017 under article 340 of the Constitution to examine the issues of the sub-categorization of Other Backward Classes with the following terms of reference: To examine the extent of inequitable distribution of benefits of reservation among the castes or communities included in the broad category of Other Backward Classes with reference to such classes included in the Central List; To work out the mechanism , criteria, norm s and parameters in a scientific approach for sub categorisation within such Other Backward Classes; and To take up the exercise of identifying the respective castes or communities or sub-castes or synonyms in the Central List of Other Backward Classes and classifying them into their respective sub-categories. The Cabinet also approved an addition to the commission's terms of reference. The commission will now also "study the various entries in the Central list of OBCs and recommend correction of any repetitions, ambiguities, inconsistencies and errors of spelling or transcription".The commission has been formed under Article 340 of the Constitution which was also used to establish landmark Mandal Commission (set up in 1979) more than two decades ago which recommended 27% reservation for socially and educationally backward classes in higher education and government jobs. Over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups.Q. Based on the author's arguments that over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups, which of the following would be most correct:a)Reservation policy has failed therefore it needs to scrapped.b)Reservation policy created inequity and inequality therefore the dominant castes need to be identified and removed.c)Reservation policy has become unconstitutional and illegal because it has started caused reverse discrimination against the non-reserved category.d)Reservation policy if not annulled it will perpetuate further social injustice and discontent.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about The Government has constituted a Commission on 2nd October, 2017 under article 340 of the Constitution to examine the issues of the sub-categorization of Other Backward Classes with the following terms of reference: To examine the extent of inequitable distribution of benefits of reservation among the castes or communities included in the broad category of Other Backward Classes with reference to such classes included in the Central List; To work out the mechanism , criteria, norm s and parameters in a scientific approach for sub categorisation within such Other Backward Classes; and To take up the exercise of identifying the respective castes or communities or sub-castes or synonyms in the Central List of Other Backward Classes and classifying them into their respective sub-categories. The Cabinet also approved an addition to the commission's terms of reference. The commission will now also "study the various entries in the Central list of OBCs and recommend correction of any repetitions, ambiguities, inconsistencies and errors of spelling or transcription".The commission has been formed under Article 340 of the Constitution which was also used to establish landmark Mandal Commission (set up in 1979) more than two decades ago which recommended 27% reservation for socially and educationally backward classes in higher education and government jobs. Over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups.Q. Based on the author's arguments that over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups, which of the following would be most correct:a)Reservation policy has failed therefore it needs to scrapped.b)Reservation policy created inequity and inequality therefore the dominant castes need to be identified and removed.c)Reservation policy has become unconstitutional and illegal because it has started caused reverse discrimination against the non-reserved category.d)Reservation policy if not annulled it will perpetuate further social injustice and discontent.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The Government has constituted a Commission on 2nd October, 2017 under article 340 of the Constitution to examine the issues of the sub-categorization of Other Backward Classes with the following terms of reference: To examine the extent of inequitable distribution of benefits of reservation among the castes or communities included in the broad category of Other Backward Classes with reference to such classes included in the Central List; To work out the mechanism , criteria, norm s and parameters in a scientific approach for sub categorisation within such Other Backward Classes; and To take up the exercise of identifying the respective castes or communities or sub-castes or synonyms in the Central List of Other Backward Classes and classifying them into their respective sub-categories. The Cabinet also approved an addition to the commission's terms of reference. The commission will now also "study the various entries in the Central list of OBCs and recommend correction of any repetitions, ambiguities, inconsistencies and errors of spelling or transcription".The commission has been formed under Article 340 of the Constitution which was also used to establish landmark Mandal Commission (set up in 1979) more than two decades ago which recommended 27% reservation for socially and educationally backward classes in higher education and government jobs. Over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups.Q. Based on the author's arguments that over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups, which of the following would be most correct:a)Reservation policy has failed therefore it needs to scrapped.b)Reservation policy created inequity and inequality therefore the dominant castes need to be identified and removed.c)Reservation policy has become unconstitutional and illegal because it has started caused reverse discrimination against the non-reserved category.d)Reservation policy if not annulled it will perpetuate further social injustice and discontent.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for The Government has constituted a Commission on 2nd October, 2017 under article 340 of the Constitution to examine the issues of the sub-categorization of Other Backward Classes with the following terms of reference: To examine the extent of inequitable distribution of benefits of reservation among the castes or communities included in the broad category of Other Backward Classes with reference to such classes included in the Central List; To work out the mechanism , criteria, norm s and parameters in a scientific approach for sub categorisation within such Other Backward Classes; and To take up the exercise of identifying the respective castes or communities or sub-castes or synonyms in the Central List of Other Backward Classes and classifying them into their respective sub-categories. The Cabinet also approved an addition to the commission's terms of reference. The commission will now also "study the various entries in the Central list of OBCs and recommend correction of any repetitions, ambiguities, inconsistencies and errors of spelling or transcription".The commission has been formed under Article 340 of the Constitution which was also used to establish landmark Mandal Commission (set up in 1979) more than two decades ago which recommended 27% reservation for socially and educationally backward classes in higher education and government jobs. Over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups.Q. Based on the author's arguments that over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups, which of the following would be most correct:a)Reservation policy has failed therefore it needs to scrapped.b)Reservation policy created inequity and inequality therefore the dominant castes need to be identified and removed.c)Reservation policy has become unconstitutional and illegal because it has started caused reverse discrimination against the non-reserved category.d)Reservation policy if not annulled it will perpetuate further social injustice and discontent.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of The Government has constituted a Commission on 2nd October, 2017 under article 340 of the Constitution to examine the issues of the sub-categorization of Other Backward Classes with the following terms of reference: To examine the extent of inequitable distribution of benefits of reservation among the castes or communities included in the broad category of Other Backward Classes with reference to such classes included in the Central List; To work out the mechanism , criteria, norm s and parameters in a scientific approach for sub categorisation within such Other Backward Classes; and To take up the exercise of identifying the respective castes or communities or sub-castes or synonyms in the Central List of Other Backward Classes and classifying them into their respective sub-categories. The Cabinet also approved an addition to the commission's terms of reference. The commission will now also "study the various entries in the Central list of OBCs and recommend correction of any repetitions, ambiguities, inconsistencies and errors of spelling or transcription".The commission has been formed under Article 340 of the Constitution which was also used to establish landmark Mandal Commission (set up in 1979) more than two decades ago which recommended 27% reservation for socially and educationally backward classes in higher education and government jobs. Over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups.Q. Based on the author's arguments that over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups, which of the following would be most correct:a)Reservation policy has failed therefore it needs to scrapped.b)Reservation policy created inequity and inequality therefore the dominant castes need to be identified and removed.c)Reservation policy has become unconstitutional and illegal because it has started caused reverse discrimination against the non-reserved category.d)Reservation policy if not annulled it will perpetuate further social injustice and discontent.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The Government has constituted a Commission on 2nd October, 2017 under article 340 of the Constitution to examine the issues of the sub-categorization of Other Backward Classes with the following terms of reference: To examine the extent of inequitable distribution of benefits of reservation among the castes or communities included in the broad category of Other Backward Classes with reference to such classes included in the Central List; To work out the mechanism , criteria, norm s and parameters in a scientific approach for sub categorisation within such Other Backward Classes; and To take up the exercise of identifying the respective castes or communities or sub-castes or synonyms in the Central List of Other Backward Classes and classifying them into their respective sub-categories. The Cabinet also approved an addition to the commission's terms of reference. The commission will now also "study the various entries in the Central list of OBCs and recommend correction of any repetitions, ambiguities, inconsistencies and errors of spelling or transcription".The commission has been formed under Article 340 of the Constitution which was also used to establish landmark Mandal Commission (set up in 1979) more than two decades ago which recommended 27% reservation for socially and educationally backward classes in higher education and government jobs. Over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups.Q. Based on the author's arguments that over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups, which of the following would be most correct:a)Reservation policy has failed therefore it needs to scrapped.b)Reservation policy created inequity and inequality therefore the dominant castes need to be identified and removed.c)Reservation policy has become unconstitutional and illegal because it has started caused reverse discrimination against the non-reserved category.d)Reservation policy if not annulled it will perpetuate further social injustice and discontent.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The Government has constituted a Commission on 2nd October, 2017 under article 340 of the Constitution to examine the issues of the sub-categorization of Other Backward Classes with the following terms of reference: To examine the extent of inequitable distribution of benefits of reservation among the castes or communities included in the broad category of Other Backward Classes with reference to such classes included in the Central List; To work out the mechanism , criteria, norm s and parameters in a scientific approach for sub categorisation within such Other Backward Classes; and To take up the exercise of identifying the respective castes or communities or sub-castes or synonyms in the Central List of Other Backward Classes and classifying them into their respective sub-categories. The Cabinet also approved an addition to the commission's terms of reference. The commission will now also "study the various entries in the Central list of OBCs and recommend correction of any repetitions, ambiguities, inconsistencies and errors of spelling or transcription".The commission has been formed under Article 340 of the Constitution which was also used to establish landmark Mandal Commission (set up in 1979) more than two decades ago which recommended 27% reservation for socially and educationally backward classes in higher education and government jobs. Over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups.Q. Based on the author's arguments that over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups, which of the following would be most correct:a)Reservation policy has failed therefore it needs to scrapped.b)Reservation policy created inequity and inequality therefore the dominant castes need to be identified and removed.c)Reservation policy has become unconstitutional and illegal because it has started caused reverse discrimination against the non-reserved category.d)Reservation policy if not annulled it will perpetuate further social injustice and discontent.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The Government has constituted a Commission on 2nd October, 2017 under article 340 of the Constitution to examine the issues of the sub-categorization of Other Backward Classes with the following terms of reference: To examine the extent of inequitable distribution of benefits of reservation among the castes or communities included in the broad category of Other Backward Classes with reference to such classes included in the Central List; To work out the mechanism , criteria, norm s and parameters in a scientific approach for sub categorisation within such Other Backward Classes; and To take up the exercise of identifying the respective castes or communities or sub-castes or synonyms in the Central List of Other Backward Classes and classifying them into their respective sub-categories. The Cabinet also approved an addition to the commission's terms of reference. The commission will now also "study the various entries in the Central list of OBCs and recommend correction of any repetitions, ambiguities, inconsistencies and errors of spelling or transcription".The commission has been formed under Article 340 of the Constitution which was also used to establish landmark Mandal Commission (set up in 1979) more than two decades ago which recommended 27% reservation for socially and educationally backward classes in higher education and government jobs. Over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups.Q. Based on the author's arguments that over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups, which of the following would be most correct:a)Reservation policy has failed therefore it needs to scrapped.b)Reservation policy created inequity and inequality therefore the dominant castes need to be identified and removed.c)Reservation policy has become unconstitutional and illegal because it has started caused reverse discrimination against the non-reserved category.d)Reservation policy if not annulled it will perpetuate further social injustice and discontent.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The Government has constituted a Commission on 2nd October, 2017 under article 340 of the Constitution to examine the issues of the sub-categorization of Other Backward Classes with the following terms of reference: To examine the extent of inequitable distribution of benefits of reservation among the castes or communities included in the broad category of Other Backward Classes with reference to such classes included in the Central List; To work out the mechanism , criteria, norm s and parameters in a scientific approach for sub categorisation within such Other Backward Classes; and To take up the exercise of identifying the respective castes or communities or sub-castes or synonyms in the Central List of Other Backward Classes and classifying them into their respective sub-categories. The Cabinet also approved an addition to the commission's terms of reference. The commission will now also "study the various entries in the Central list of OBCs and recommend correction of any repetitions, ambiguities, inconsistencies and errors of spelling or transcription".The commission has been formed under Article 340 of the Constitution which was also used to establish landmark Mandal Commission (set up in 1979) more than two decades ago which recommended 27% reservation for socially and educationally backward classes in higher education and government jobs. Over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups.Q. Based on the author's arguments that over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups, which of the following would be most correct:a)Reservation policy has failed therefore it needs to scrapped.b)Reservation policy created inequity and inequality therefore the dominant castes need to be identified and removed.c)Reservation policy has become unconstitutional and illegal because it has started caused reverse discrimination against the non-reserved category.d)Reservation policy if not annulled it will perpetuate further social injustice and discontent.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.