CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > The Government has constituted a Commission ...
Start Learning for Free
The Government has constituted a Commission on 2nd October, 2017 under article 340 of the Constitution to examine the issues of the sub-categorization of Other Backward Classes with the following terms of reference:
To examine the extent of inequitable distribution of benefits of reservation among the castes or communities included in the broad category of Other Backward Classes with reference to such classes included in the Central List;
To work out the mechanism , criteria, norm s and parameters in a scientific approach for sub categorisation within such Other Backward Classes; and
To take up the exercise of identifying the respective castes or communities or sub-castes or synonyms in the Central List of Other Backward Classes and classifying them into their respective sub-categories.
The Cabinet also approved an addition to the commission's terms of reference. The commission will now also "study the various entries in the Central list of OBCs and recommend correction of any repetitions, ambiguities, inconsistencies and errors of spelling or transcription".
The commission has been formed under Article 340 of the Constitution which was also used to establish landmark Mandal Commission (set up in 1979) more than two decades ago which recommended 27% reservation for socially and educationally backward classes in higher education and government jobs. Over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups.
Q. Parminder is an OBC category candidate and belongs to the Gujjar community falling under the OBC category. He ought to have been considered for the post of Constable (GD) under the OBC category. Parminder contended that as he was not considered as an OBC candidate. During enquiry it came out that he didn't furnish the OBC certificate. If Parminder's selection is challenged, would the petition deserve to be dismissed?
- a)Petition does not deserve to be dismissed since Parminder belong to Gujjar community.
- b)Petition deserves to be dismissed since Parminder is a non-meritorious candidate.
- c)Petition does not deserve to be dismissed since Parminder is a rightful beneficiary of reservation policy.
- d)Petition deserves to be dismissed since Parminder has failed to furnish the requisite documents therefore his candidature is suspect.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
The Government has constituted a Commission on 2nd October, 2017 unde...
Correct Answer is (d)
It can be inferred from the passage that author is in favour of reservation policy however the identification are done through the certificate showing the category. In this case Parminder has failed to furnish the requisite documents therefore his candidature is liable to be rejected. Thus, only option which is aligned is option c.
Incorrect AnswersNone of the other options sets out views that are consistent with those of the author in the passage above.
- Choice (a) - Given choice is contrary to the facts given whereupon the enquiry it was found Parminder is not a rightful candidate.
- Choice (b) - There is nothing in the passage to support the argument about the non-meritorious candidate.
- Choice (c) - Given choice is contrary to the facts given whereupon the enquiry it was found Parminder is not a rightful candidate.
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Similar CLAT Doubts
Top Courses for CLATView all
The Government has constituted a Commission on 2nd October, 2017 under article 340 of the Constitution to examine the issues of the sub-categorization of Other Backward Classes with the following terms of reference: To examine the extent of inequitable distribution of benefits of reservation among the castes or communities included in the broad category of Other Backward Classes with reference to such classes included in the Central List; To work out the mechanism , criteria, norm s and parameters in a scientific approach for sub categorisation within such Other Backward Classes; and To take up the exercise of identifying the respective castes or communities or sub-castes or synonyms in the Central List of Other Backward Classes and classifying them into their respective sub-categories. The Cabinet also approved an addition to the commission's terms of reference. The commission will now also "study the various entries in the Central list of OBCs and recommend correction of any repetitions, ambiguities, inconsistencies and errors of spelling or transcription".The commission has been formed under Article 340 of the Constitution which was also used to establish landmark Mandal Commission (set up in 1979) more than two decades ago which recommended 27% reservation for socially and educationally backward classes in higher education and government jobs. Over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups.Q. Parminder is an OBC category candidate and belongs to the Gujjar community falling under the OBC category. He ought to have been considered for the post of Constable (GD) under the OBC category. Parminder contended that as he was not considered as an OBC candidate. During enquiry it came out that he didn't furnish the OBC certificate. If Parminder's selection is challenged, would the petition deserve to be dismissed?a)Petition does not deserve to be dismissed since Parminder belong to Gujjar community.b)Petition deserves to be dismissed since Parminder is a non-meritorious candidate.c)Petition does not deserve to be dismissed since Parminder is a rightful beneficiary of reservation policy.d)Petition deserves to be dismissed since Parminder has failed to furnish the requisite documents therefore his candidature is suspect.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The Government has constituted a Commission on 2nd October, 2017 under article 340 of the Constitution to examine the issues of the sub-categorization of Other Backward Classes with the following terms of reference: To examine the extent of inequitable distribution of benefits of reservation among the castes or communities included in the broad category of Other Backward Classes with reference to such classes included in the Central List; To work out the mechanism , criteria, norm s and parameters in a scientific approach for sub categorisation within such Other Backward Classes; and To take up the exercise of identifying the respective castes or communities or sub-castes or synonyms in the Central List of Other Backward Classes and classifying them into their respective sub-categories. The Cabinet also approved an addition to the commission's terms of reference. The commission will now also "study the various entries in the Central list of OBCs and recommend correction of any repetitions, ambiguities, inconsistencies and errors of spelling or transcription".The commission has been formed under Article 340 of the Constitution which was also used to establish landmark Mandal Commission (set up in 1979) more than two decades ago which recommended 27% reservation for socially and educationally backward classes in higher education and government jobs. Over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups.Q. Parminder is an OBC category candidate and belongs to the Gujjar community falling under the OBC category. He ought to have been considered for the post of Constable (GD) under the OBC category. Parminder contended that as he was not considered as an OBC candidate. During enquiry it came out that he didn't furnish the OBC certificate. If Parminder's selection is challenged, would the petition deserve to be dismissed?a)Petition does not deserve to be dismissed since Parminder belong to Gujjar community.b)Petition deserves to be dismissed since Parminder is a non-meritorious candidate.c)Petition does not deserve to be dismissed since Parminder is a rightful beneficiary of reservation policy.d)Petition deserves to be dismissed since Parminder has failed to furnish the requisite documents therefore his candidature is suspect.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about The Government has constituted a Commission on 2nd October, 2017 under article 340 of the Constitution to examine the issues of the sub-categorization of Other Backward Classes with the following terms of reference: To examine the extent of inequitable distribution of benefits of reservation among the castes or communities included in the broad category of Other Backward Classes with reference to such classes included in the Central List; To work out the mechanism , criteria, norm s and parameters in a scientific approach for sub categorisation within such Other Backward Classes; and To take up the exercise of identifying the respective castes or communities or sub-castes or synonyms in the Central List of Other Backward Classes and classifying them into their respective sub-categories. The Cabinet also approved an addition to the commission's terms of reference. The commission will now also "study the various entries in the Central list of OBCs and recommend correction of any repetitions, ambiguities, inconsistencies and errors of spelling or transcription".The commission has been formed under Article 340 of the Constitution which was also used to establish landmark Mandal Commission (set up in 1979) more than two decades ago which recommended 27% reservation for socially and educationally backward classes in higher education and government jobs. Over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups.Q. Parminder is an OBC category candidate and belongs to the Gujjar community falling under the OBC category. He ought to have been considered for the post of Constable (GD) under the OBC category. Parminder contended that as he was not considered as an OBC candidate. During enquiry it came out that he didn't furnish the OBC certificate. If Parminder's selection is challenged, would the petition deserve to be dismissed?a)Petition does not deserve to be dismissed since Parminder belong to Gujjar community.b)Petition deserves to be dismissed since Parminder is a non-meritorious candidate.c)Petition does not deserve to be dismissed since Parminder is a rightful beneficiary of reservation policy.d)Petition deserves to be dismissed since Parminder has failed to furnish the requisite documents therefore his candidature is suspect.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The Government has constituted a Commission on 2nd October, 2017 under article 340 of the Constitution to examine the issues of the sub-categorization of Other Backward Classes with the following terms of reference: To examine the extent of inequitable distribution of benefits of reservation among the castes or communities included in the broad category of Other Backward Classes with reference to such classes included in the Central List; To work out the mechanism , criteria, norm s and parameters in a scientific approach for sub categorisation within such Other Backward Classes; and To take up the exercise of identifying the respective castes or communities or sub-castes or synonyms in the Central List of Other Backward Classes and classifying them into their respective sub-categories. The Cabinet also approved an addition to the commission's terms of reference. The commission will now also "study the various entries in the Central list of OBCs and recommend correction of any repetitions, ambiguities, inconsistencies and errors of spelling or transcription".The commission has been formed under Article 340 of the Constitution which was also used to establish landmark Mandal Commission (set up in 1979) more than two decades ago which recommended 27% reservation for socially and educationally backward classes in higher education and government jobs. Over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups.Q. Parminder is an OBC category candidate and belongs to the Gujjar community falling under the OBC category. He ought to have been considered for the post of Constable (GD) under the OBC category. Parminder contended that as he was not considered as an OBC candidate. During enquiry it came out that he didn't furnish the OBC certificate. If Parminder's selection is challenged, would the petition deserve to be dismissed?a)Petition does not deserve to be dismissed since Parminder belong to Gujjar community.b)Petition deserves to be dismissed since Parminder is a non-meritorious candidate.c)Petition does not deserve to be dismissed since Parminder is a rightful beneficiary of reservation policy.d)Petition deserves to be dismissed since Parminder has failed to furnish the requisite documents therefore his candidature is suspect.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
The Government has constituted a Commission on 2nd October, 2017 under article 340 of the Constitution to examine the issues of the sub-categorization of Other Backward Classes with the following terms of reference: To examine the extent of inequitable distribution of benefits of reservation among the castes or communities included in the broad category of Other Backward Classes with reference to such classes included in the Central List; To work out the mechanism , criteria, norm s and parameters in a scientific approach for sub categorisation within such Other Backward Classes; and To take up the exercise of identifying the respective castes or communities or sub-castes or synonyms in the Central List of Other Backward Classes and classifying them into their respective sub-categories. The Cabinet also approved an addition to the commission's terms of reference. The commission will now also "study the various entries in the Central list of OBCs and recommend correction of any repetitions, ambiguities, inconsistencies and errors of spelling or transcription".The commission has been formed under Article 340 of the Constitution which was also used to establish landmark Mandal Commission (set up in 1979) more than two decades ago which recommended 27% reservation for socially and educationally backward classes in higher education and government jobs. Over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups.Q. Parminder is an OBC category candidate and belongs to the Gujjar community falling under the OBC category. He ought to have been considered for the post of Constable (GD) under the OBC category. Parminder contended that as he was not considered as an OBC candidate. During enquiry it came out that he didn't furnish the OBC certificate. If Parminder's selection is challenged, would the petition deserve to be dismissed?a)Petition does not deserve to be dismissed since Parminder belong to Gujjar community.b)Petition deserves to be dismissed since Parminder is a non-meritorious candidate.c)Petition does not deserve to be dismissed since Parminder is a rightful beneficiary of reservation policy.d)Petition deserves to be dismissed since Parminder has failed to furnish the requisite documents therefore his candidature is suspect.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about The Government has constituted a Commission on 2nd October, 2017 under article 340 of the Constitution to examine the issues of the sub-categorization of Other Backward Classes with the following terms of reference: To examine the extent of inequitable distribution of benefits of reservation among the castes or communities included in the broad category of Other Backward Classes with reference to such classes included in the Central List; To work out the mechanism , criteria, norm s and parameters in a scientific approach for sub categorisation within such Other Backward Classes; and To take up the exercise of identifying the respective castes or communities or sub-castes or synonyms in the Central List of Other Backward Classes and classifying them into their respective sub-categories. The Cabinet also approved an addition to the commission's terms of reference. The commission will now also "study the various entries in the Central list of OBCs and recommend correction of any repetitions, ambiguities, inconsistencies and errors of spelling or transcription".The commission has been formed under Article 340 of the Constitution which was also used to establish landmark Mandal Commission (set up in 1979) more than two decades ago which recommended 27% reservation for socially and educationally backward classes in higher education and government jobs. Over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups.Q. Parminder is an OBC category candidate and belongs to the Gujjar community falling under the OBC category. He ought to have been considered for the post of Constable (GD) under the OBC category. Parminder contended that as he was not considered as an OBC candidate. During enquiry it came out that he didn't furnish the OBC certificate. If Parminder's selection is challenged, would the petition deserve to be dismissed?a)Petition does not deserve to be dismissed since Parminder belong to Gujjar community.b)Petition deserves to be dismissed since Parminder is a non-meritorious candidate.c)Petition does not deserve to be dismissed since Parminder is a rightful beneficiary of reservation policy.d)Petition deserves to be dismissed since Parminder has failed to furnish the requisite documents therefore his candidature is suspect.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The Government has constituted a Commission on 2nd October, 2017 under article 340 of the Constitution to examine the issues of the sub-categorization of Other Backward Classes with the following terms of reference: To examine the extent of inequitable distribution of benefits of reservation among the castes or communities included in the broad category of Other Backward Classes with reference to such classes included in the Central List; To work out the mechanism , criteria, norm s and parameters in a scientific approach for sub categorisation within such Other Backward Classes; and To take up the exercise of identifying the respective castes or communities or sub-castes or synonyms in the Central List of Other Backward Classes and classifying them into their respective sub-categories. The Cabinet also approved an addition to the commission's terms of reference. The commission will now also "study the various entries in the Central list of OBCs and recommend correction of any repetitions, ambiguities, inconsistencies and errors of spelling or transcription".The commission has been formed under Article 340 of the Constitution which was also used to establish landmark Mandal Commission (set up in 1979) more than two decades ago which recommended 27% reservation for socially and educationally backward classes in higher education and government jobs. Over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups.Q. Parminder is an OBC category candidate and belongs to the Gujjar community falling under the OBC category. He ought to have been considered for the post of Constable (GD) under the OBC category. Parminder contended that as he was not considered as an OBC candidate. During enquiry it came out that he didn't furnish the OBC certificate. If Parminder's selection is challenged, would the petition deserve to be dismissed?a)Petition does not deserve to be dismissed since Parminder belong to Gujjar community.b)Petition deserves to be dismissed since Parminder is a non-meritorious candidate.c)Petition does not deserve to be dismissed since Parminder is a rightful beneficiary of reservation policy.d)Petition deserves to be dismissed since Parminder has failed to furnish the requisite documents therefore his candidature is suspect.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The Government has constituted a Commission on 2nd October, 2017 under article 340 of the Constitution to examine the issues of the sub-categorization of Other Backward Classes with the following terms of reference: To examine the extent of inequitable distribution of benefits of reservation among the castes or communities included in the broad category of Other Backward Classes with reference to such classes included in the Central List; To work out the mechanism , criteria, norm s and parameters in a scientific approach for sub categorisation within such Other Backward Classes; and To take up the exercise of identifying the respective castes or communities or sub-castes or synonyms in the Central List of Other Backward Classes and classifying them into their respective sub-categories. The Cabinet also approved an addition to the commission's terms of reference. The commission will now also "study the various entries in the Central list of OBCs and recommend correction of any repetitions, ambiguities, inconsistencies and errors of spelling or transcription".The commission has been formed under Article 340 of the Constitution which was also used to establish landmark Mandal Commission (set up in 1979) more than two decades ago which recommended 27% reservation for socially and educationally backward classes in higher education and government jobs. Over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups.Q. Parminder is an OBC category candidate and belongs to the Gujjar community falling under the OBC category. He ought to have been considered for the post of Constable (GD) under the OBC category. Parminder contended that as he was not considered as an OBC candidate. During enquiry it came out that he didn't furnish the OBC certificate. If Parminder's selection is challenged, would the petition deserve to be dismissed?a)Petition does not deserve to be dismissed since Parminder belong to Gujjar community.b)Petition deserves to be dismissed since Parminder is a non-meritorious candidate.c)Petition does not deserve to be dismissed since Parminder is a rightful beneficiary of reservation policy.d)Petition deserves to be dismissed since Parminder has failed to furnish the requisite documents therefore his candidature is suspect.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The Government has constituted a Commission on 2nd October, 2017 under article 340 of the Constitution to examine the issues of the sub-categorization of Other Backward Classes with the following terms of reference: To examine the extent of inequitable distribution of benefits of reservation among the castes or communities included in the broad category of Other Backward Classes with reference to such classes included in the Central List; To work out the mechanism , criteria, norm s and parameters in a scientific approach for sub categorisation within such Other Backward Classes; and To take up the exercise of identifying the respective castes or communities or sub-castes or synonyms in the Central List of Other Backward Classes and classifying them into their respective sub-categories. The Cabinet also approved an addition to the commission's terms of reference. The commission will now also "study the various entries in the Central list of OBCs and recommend correction of any repetitions, ambiguities, inconsistencies and errors of spelling or transcription".The commission has been formed under Article 340 of the Constitution which was also used to establish landmark Mandal Commission (set up in 1979) more than two decades ago which recommended 27% reservation for socially and educationally backward classes in higher education and government jobs. Over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups.Q. Parminder is an OBC category candidate and belongs to the Gujjar community falling under the OBC category. He ought to have been considered for the post of Constable (GD) under the OBC category. Parminder contended that as he was not considered as an OBC candidate. During enquiry it came out that he didn't furnish the OBC certificate. If Parminder's selection is challenged, would the petition deserve to be dismissed?a)Petition does not deserve to be dismissed since Parminder belong to Gujjar community.b)Petition deserves to be dismissed since Parminder is a non-meritorious candidate.c)Petition does not deserve to be dismissed since Parminder is a rightful beneficiary of reservation policy.d)Petition deserves to be dismissed since Parminder has failed to furnish the requisite documents therefore his candidature is suspect.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
The Government has constituted a Commission on 2nd October, 2017 under article 340 of the Constitution to examine the issues of the sub-categorization of Other Backward Classes with the following terms of reference: To examine the extent of inequitable distribution of benefits of reservation among the castes or communities included in the broad category of Other Backward Classes with reference to such classes included in the Central List; To work out the mechanism , criteria, norm s and parameters in a scientific approach for sub categorisation within such Other Backward Classes; and To take up the exercise of identifying the respective castes or communities or sub-castes or synonyms in the Central List of Other Backward Classes and classifying them into their respective sub-categories. The Cabinet also approved an addition to the commission's terms of reference. The commission will now also "study the various entries in the Central list of OBCs and recommend correction of any repetitions, ambiguities, inconsistencies and errors of spelling or transcription".The commission has been formed under Article 340 of the Constitution which was also used to establish landmark Mandal Commission (set up in 1979) more than two decades ago which recommended 27% reservation for socially and educationally backward classes in higher education and government jobs. Over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups.Q. Parminder is an OBC category candidate and belongs to the Gujjar community falling under the OBC category. He ought to have been considered for the post of Constable (GD) under the OBC category. Parminder contended that as he was not considered as an OBC candidate. During enquiry it came out that he didn't furnish the OBC certificate. If Parminder's selection is challenged, would the petition deserve to be dismissed?a)Petition does not deserve to be dismissed since Parminder belong to Gujjar community.b)Petition deserves to be dismissed since Parminder is a non-meritorious candidate.c)Petition does not deserve to be dismissed since Parminder is a rightful beneficiary of reservation policy.d)Petition deserves to be dismissed since Parminder has failed to furnish the requisite documents therefore his candidature is suspect.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The Government has constituted a Commission on 2nd October, 2017 under article 340 of the Constitution to examine the issues of the sub-categorization of Other Backward Classes with the following terms of reference: To examine the extent of inequitable distribution of benefits of reservation among the castes or communities included in the broad category of Other Backward Classes with reference to such classes included in the Central List; To work out the mechanism , criteria, norm s and parameters in a scientific approach for sub categorisation within such Other Backward Classes; and To take up the exercise of identifying the respective castes or communities or sub-castes or synonyms in the Central List of Other Backward Classes and classifying them into their respective sub-categories. The Cabinet also approved an addition to the commission's terms of reference. The commission will now also "study the various entries in the Central list of OBCs and recommend correction of any repetitions, ambiguities, inconsistencies and errors of spelling or transcription".The commission has been formed under Article 340 of the Constitution which was also used to establish landmark Mandal Commission (set up in 1979) more than two decades ago which recommended 27% reservation for socially and educationally backward classes in higher education and government jobs. Over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups.Q. Parminder is an OBC category candidate and belongs to the Gujjar community falling under the OBC category. He ought to have been considered for the post of Constable (GD) under the OBC category. Parminder contended that as he was not considered as an OBC candidate. During enquiry it came out that he didn't furnish the OBC certificate. If Parminder's selection is challenged, would the petition deserve to be dismissed?a)Petition does not deserve to be dismissed since Parminder belong to Gujjar community.b)Petition deserves to be dismissed since Parminder is a non-meritorious candidate.c)Petition does not deserve to be dismissed since Parminder is a rightful beneficiary of reservation policy.d)Petition deserves to be dismissed since Parminder has failed to furnish the requisite documents therefore his candidature is suspect.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The Government has constituted a Commission on 2nd October, 2017 under article 340 of the Constitution to examine the issues of the sub-categorization of Other Backward Classes with the following terms of reference: To examine the extent of inequitable distribution of benefits of reservation among the castes or communities included in the broad category of Other Backward Classes with reference to such classes included in the Central List; To work out the mechanism , criteria, norm s and parameters in a scientific approach for sub categorisation within such Other Backward Classes; and To take up the exercise of identifying the respective castes or communities or sub-castes or synonyms in the Central List of Other Backward Classes and classifying them into their respective sub-categories. The Cabinet also approved an addition to the commission's terms of reference. The commission will now also "study the various entries in the Central list of OBCs and recommend correction of any repetitions, ambiguities, inconsistencies and errors of spelling or transcription".The commission has been formed under Article 340 of the Constitution which was also used to establish landmark Mandal Commission (set up in 1979) more than two decades ago which recommended 27% reservation for socially and educationally backward classes in higher education and government jobs. Over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups.Q. Parminder is an OBC category candidate and belongs to the Gujjar community falling under the OBC category. He ought to have been considered for the post of Constable (GD) under the OBC category. Parminder contended that as he was not considered as an OBC candidate. During enquiry it came out that he didn't furnish the OBC certificate. If Parminder's selection is challenged, would the petition deserve to be dismissed?a)Petition does not deserve to be dismissed since Parminder belong to Gujjar community.b)Petition deserves to be dismissed since Parminder is a non-meritorious candidate.c)Petition does not deserve to be dismissed since Parminder is a rightful beneficiary of reservation policy.d)Petition deserves to be dismissed since Parminder has failed to furnish the requisite documents therefore his candidature is suspect.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice The Government has constituted a Commission on 2nd October, 2017 under article 340 of the Constitution to examine the issues of the sub-categorization of Other Backward Classes with the following terms of reference: To examine the extent of inequitable distribution of benefits of reservation among the castes or communities included in the broad category of Other Backward Classes with reference to such classes included in the Central List; To work out the mechanism , criteria, norm s and parameters in a scientific approach for sub categorisation within such Other Backward Classes; and To take up the exercise of identifying the respective castes or communities or sub-castes or synonyms in the Central List of Other Backward Classes and classifying them into their respective sub-categories. The Cabinet also approved an addition to the commission's terms of reference. The commission will now also "study the various entries in the Central list of OBCs and recommend correction of any repetitions, ambiguities, inconsistencies and errors of spelling or transcription".The commission has been formed under Article 340 of the Constitution which was also used to establish landmark Mandal Commission (set up in 1979) more than two decades ago which recommended 27% reservation for socially and educationally backward classes in higher education and government jobs. Over the years, benefits of this reservation were mostly cornered mostly by dominant OBC groups.Q. Parminder is an OBC category candidate and belongs to the Gujjar community falling under the OBC category. He ought to have been considered for the post of Constable (GD) under the OBC category. Parminder contended that as he was not considered as an OBC candidate. During enquiry it came out that he didn't furnish the OBC certificate. If Parminder's selection is challenged, would the petition deserve to be dismissed?a)Petition does not deserve to be dismissed since Parminder belong to Gujjar community.b)Petition deserves to be dismissed since Parminder is a non-meritorious candidate.c)Petition does not deserve to be dismissed since Parminder is a rightful beneficiary of reservation policy.d)Petition deserves to be dismissed since Parminder has failed to furnish the requisite documents therefore his candidature is suspect.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Signup to solve all Doubts
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup on EduRev and stay on top of your study goals
10M+ students crushing their study goals daily