Question Description
The fundamental rights were included in the constitution because they were considered essential for the development of the personality of every individual and to preserve human dignity. All people, irrespective of race, religion, caste or sex, have been given the right to move the Supreme Court and the High Courts for the enforcement of their fundamental rights. There are seven categories of Fundamental Rights (FR) which are covered from Articles 12-35. Fundamental right shall be made applicable only to the legislative or administrative actions of the state and not the private actions. Any law in contravention of fundamental rights is void, unconstitutional and therefore cannot bind any person.It is a fundamental right that no person shall be denied admission into any educational institution maintained by State or receiving funds from the State only on the ground of religion, race, case, language or any of them.It is a fundamental right of all minorities whether based on religion or language shall have the right to institute or administer educational institution of their choice.State shall not, in granting aid to the educational institution, discriminate against any educational institution on the ground that it is under the management of a minority, based on religion or language. It is a directive principle of state policy to promote with special care, educational interest of weaker section of people including scheduled tribes and castes. Directive principles are not justiciable in a court of law.Q. If the parliament by law directs all minority schools, funded or non-funded, to admit Hindu students, then:a)Such a law would be violative of directive principle of state policy although it cannot be challenged in a court of law.b)Such a law would be justified if it is applied only to funded schools.c)Such a law would be justified as it seeks to promote education.d)Such a law would violate fundamental right of the non-funded schools to administer minority educational institutions. And hence is not binding.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about The fundamental rights were included in the constitution because they were considered essential for the development of the personality of every individual and to preserve human dignity. All people, irrespective of race, religion, caste or sex, have been given the right to move the Supreme Court and the High Courts for the enforcement of their fundamental rights. There are seven categories of Fundamental Rights (FR) which are covered from Articles 12-35. Fundamental right shall be made applicable only to the legislative or administrative actions of the state and not the private actions. Any law in contravention of fundamental rights is void, unconstitutional and therefore cannot bind any person.It is a fundamental right that no person shall be denied admission into any educational institution maintained by State or receiving funds from the State only on the ground of religion, race, case, language or any of them.It is a fundamental right of all minorities whether based on religion or language shall have the right to institute or administer educational institution of their choice.State shall not, in granting aid to the educational institution, discriminate against any educational institution on the ground that it is under the management of a minority, based on religion or language. It is a directive principle of state policy to promote with special care, educational interest of weaker section of people including scheduled tribes and castes. Directive principles are not justiciable in a court of law.Q. If the parliament by law directs all minority schools, funded or non-funded, to admit Hindu students, then:a)Such a law would be violative of directive principle of state policy although it cannot be challenged in a court of law.b)Such a law would be justified if it is applied only to funded schools.c)Such a law would be justified as it seeks to promote education.d)Such a law would violate fundamental right of the non-funded schools to administer minority educational institutions. And hence is not binding.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The fundamental rights were included in the constitution because they were considered essential for the development of the personality of every individual and to preserve human dignity. All people, irrespective of race, religion, caste or sex, have been given the right to move the Supreme Court and the High Courts for the enforcement of their fundamental rights. There are seven categories of Fundamental Rights (FR) which are covered from Articles 12-35. Fundamental right shall be made applicable only to the legislative or administrative actions of the state and not the private actions. Any law in contravention of fundamental rights is void, unconstitutional and therefore cannot bind any person.It is a fundamental right that no person shall be denied admission into any educational institution maintained by State or receiving funds from the State only on the ground of religion, race, case, language or any of them.It is a fundamental right of all minorities whether based on religion or language shall have the right to institute or administer educational institution of their choice.State shall not, in granting aid to the educational institution, discriminate against any educational institution on the ground that it is under the management of a minority, based on religion or language. It is a directive principle of state policy to promote with special care, educational interest of weaker section of people including scheduled tribes and castes. Directive principles are not justiciable in a court of law.Q. If the parliament by law directs all minority schools, funded or non-funded, to admit Hindu students, then:a)Such a law would be violative of directive principle of state policy although it cannot be challenged in a court of law.b)Such a law would be justified if it is applied only to funded schools.c)Such a law would be justified as it seeks to promote education.d)Such a law would violate fundamental right of the non-funded schools to administer minority educational institutions. And hence is not binding.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for The fundamental rights were included in the constitution because they were considered essential for the development of the personality of every individual and to preserve human dignity. All people, irrespective of race, religion, caste or sex, have been given the right to move the Supreme Court and the High Courts for the enforcement of their fundamental rights. There are seven categories of Fundamental Rights (FR) which are covered from Articles 12-35. Fundamental right shall be made applicable only to the legislative or administrative actions of the state and not the private actions. Any law in contravention of fundamental rights is void, unconstitutional and therefore cannot bind any person.It is a fundamental right that no person shall be denied admission into any educational institution maintained by State or receiving funds from the State only on the ground of religion, race, case, language or any of them.It is a fundamental right of all minorities whether based on religion or language shall have the right to institute or administer educational institution of their choice.State shall not, in granting aid to the educational institution, discriminate against any educational institution on the ground that it is under the management of a minority, based on religion or language. It is a directive principle of state policy to promote with special care, educational interest of weaker section of people including scheduled tribes and castes. Directive principles are not justiciable in a court of law.Q. If the parliament by law directs all minority schools, funded or non-funded, to admit Hindu students, then:a)Such a law would be violative of directive principle of state policy although it cannot be challenged in a court of law.b)Such a law would be justified if it is applied only to funded schools.c)Such a law would be justified as it seeks to promote education.d)Such a law would violate fundamental right of the non-funded schools to administer minority educational institutions. And hence is not binding.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of The fundamental rights were included in the constitution because they were considered essential for the development of the personality of every individual and to preserve human dignity. All people, irrespective of race, religion, caste or sex, have been given the right to move the Supreme Court and the High Courts for the enforcement of their fundamental rights. There are seven categories of Fundamental Rights (FR) which are covered from Articles 12-35. Fundamental right shall be made applicable only to the legislative or administrative actions of the state and not the private actions. Any law in contravention of fundamental rights is void, unconstitutional and therefore cannot bind any person.It is a fundamental right that no person shall be denied admission into any educational institution maintained by State or receiving funds from the State only on the ground of religion, race, case, language or any of them.It is a fundamental right of all minorities whether based on religion or language shall have the right to institute or administer educational institution of their choice.State shall not, in granting aid to the educational institution, discriminate against any educational institution on the ground that it is under the management of a minority, based on religion or language. It is a directive principle of state policy to promote with special care, educational interest of weaker section of people including scheduled tribes and castes. Directive principles are not justiciable in a court of law.Q. If the parliament by law directs all minority schools, funded or non-funded, to admit Hindu students, then:a)Such a law would be violative of directive principle of state policy although it cannot be challenged in a court of law.b)Such a law would be justified if it is applied only to funded schools.c)Such a law would be justified as it seeks to promote education.d)Such a law would violate fundamental right of the non-funded schools to administer minority educational institutions. And hence is not binding.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The fundamental rights were included in the constitution because they were considered essential for the development of the personality of every individual and to preserve human dignity. All people, irrespective of race, religion, caste or sex, have been given the right to move the Supreme Court and the High Courts for the enforcement of their fundamental rights. There are seven categories of Fundamental Rights (FR) which are covered from Articles 12-35. Fundamental right shall be made applicable only to the legislative or administrative actions of the state and not the private actions. Any law in contravention of fundamental rights is void, unconstitutional and therefore cannot bind any person.It is a fundamental right that no person shall be denied admission into any educational institution maintained by State or receiving funds from the State only on the ground of religion, race, case, language or any of them.It is a fundamental right of all minorities whether based on religion or language shall have the right to institute or administer educational institution of their choice.State shall not, in granting aid to the educational institution, discriminate against any educational institution on the ground that it is under the management of a minority, based on religion or language. It is a directive principle of state policy to promote with special care, educational interest of weaker section of people including scheduled tribes and castes. Directive principles are not justiciable in a court of law.Q. If the parliament by law directs all minority schools, funded or non-funded, to admit Hindu students, then:a)Such a law would be violative of directive principle of state policy although it cannot be challenged in a court of law.b)Such a law would be justified if it is applied only to funded schools.c)Such a law would be justified as it seeks to promote education.d)Such a law would violate fundamental right of the non-funded schools to administer minority educational institutions. And hence is not binding.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The fundamental rights were included in the constitution because they were considered essential for the development of the personality of every individual and to preserve human dignity. All people, irrespective of race, religion, caste or sex, have been given the right to move the Supreme Court and the High Courts for the enforcement of their fundamental rights. There are seven categories of Fundamental Rights (FR) which are covered from Articles 12-35. Fundamental right shall be made applicable only to the legislative or administrative actions of the state and not the private actions. Any law in contravention of fundamental rights is void, unconstitutional and therefore cannot bind any person.It is a fundamental right that no person shall be denied admission into any educational institution maintained by State or receiving funds from the State only on the ground of religion, race, case, language or any of them.It is a fundamental right of all minorities whether based on religion or language shall have the right to institute or administer educational institution of their choice.State shall not, in granting aid to the educational institution, discriminate against any educational institution on the ground that it is under the management of a minority, based on religion or language. It is a directive principle of state policy to promote with special care, educational interest of weaker section of people including scheduled tribes and castes. Directive principles are not justiciable in a court of law.Q. If the parliament by law directs all minority schools, funded or non-funded, to admit Hindu students, then:a)Such a law would be violative of directive principle of state policy although it cannot be challenged in a court of law.b)Such a law would be justified if it is applied only to funded schools.c)Such a law would be justified as it seeks to promote education.d)Such a law would violate fundamental right of the non-funded schools to administer minority educational institutions. And hence is not binding.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The fundamental rights were included in the constitution because they were considered essential for the development of the personality of every individual and to preserve human dignity. All people, irrespective of race, religion, caste or sex, have been given the right to move the Supreme Court and the High Courts for the enforcement of their fundamental rights. There are seven categories of Fundamental Rights (FR) which are covered from Articles 12-35. Fundamental right shall be made applicable only to the legislative or administrative actions of the state and not the private actions. Any law in contravention of fundamental rights is void, unconstitutional and therefore cannot bind any person.It is a fundamental right that no person shall be denied admission into any educational institution maintained by State or receiving funds from the State only on the ground of religion, race, case, language or any of them.It is a fundamental right of all minorities whether based on religion or language shall have the right to institute or administer educational institution of their choice.State shall not, in granting aid to the educational institution, discriminate against any educational institution on the ground that it is under the management of a minority, based on religion or language. It is a directive principle of state policy to promote with special care, educational interest of weaker section of people including scheduled tribes and castes. Directive principles are not justiciable in a court of law.Q. If the parliament by law directs all minority schools, funded or non-funded, to admit Hindu students, then:a)Such a law would be violative of directive principle of state policy although it cannot be challenged in a court of law.b)Such a law would be justified if it is applied only to funded schools.c)Such a law would be justified as it seeks to promote education.d)Such a law would violate fundamental right of the non-funded schools to administer minority educational institutions. And hence is not binding.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The fundamental rights were included in the constitution because they were considered essential for the development of the personality of every individual and to preserve human dignity. All people, irrespective of race, religion, caste or sex, have been given the right to move the Supreme Court and the High Courts for the enforcement of their fundamental rights. There are seven categories of Fundamental Rights (FR) which are covered from Articles 12-35. Fundamental right shall be made applicable only to the legislative or administrative actions of the state and not the private actions. Any law in contravention of fundamental rights is void, unconstitutional and therefore cannot bind any person.It is a fundamental right that no person shall be denied admission into any educational institution maintained by State or receiving funds from the State only on the ground of religion, race, case, language or any of them.It is a fundamental right of all minorities whether based on religion or language shall have the right to institute or administer educational institution of their choice.State shall not, in granting aid to the educational institution, discriminate against any educational institution on the ground that it is under the management of a minority, based on religion or language. It is a directive principle of state policy to promote with special care, educational interest of weaker section of people including scheduled tribes and castes. Directive principles are not justiciable in a court of law.Q. If the parliament by law directs all minority schools, funded or non-funded, to admit Hindu students, then:a)Such a law would be violative of directive principle of state policy although it cannot be challenged in a court of law.b)Such a law would be justified if it is applied only to funded schools.c)Such a law would be justified as it seeks to promote education.d)Such a law would violate fundamental right of the non-funded schools to administer minority educational institutions. And hence is not binding.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.