Question Description
Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. The Constitutional right to free speech entails the right to express opinions without censorship or restraint. It is, however, subject to reasonable restrictions. V is a mysterious crusader in dictatorial England. One evening, he hijacks the communication lines and broadcasts a message saying "…there's something seriously wrong with this country, isn't there? Cruelty and injustice, intolerance and oppression. And where once you had the freedom to object, to think and speak as you saw fit, you now have systems of surveillance…" He is caught and brought to trial, and sought to be executed for his words. Decide.a)V will be guilty because under a dictatorship, free speech doesn't hold.b)V will not be guilty because he was only expressing his opinion on the current political state.c)V will be guilty because free speech is subject to reasonable restrictions, and reasonability acquires a twisted meaning in dictatorships.d)V will not be guilty because he was only having a friendly chat with the people of England.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. The Constitutional right to free speech entails the right to express opinions without censorship or restraint. It is, however, subject to reasonable restrictions. V is a mysterious crusader in dictatorial England. One evening, he hijacks the communication lines and broadcasts a message saying "…there's something seriously wrong with this country, isn't there? Cruelty and injustice, intolerance and oppression. And where once you had the freedom to object, to think and speak as you saw fit, you now have systems of surveillance…" He is caught and brought to trial, and sought to be executed for his words. Decide.a)V will be guilty because under a dictatorship, free speech doesn't hold.b)V will not be guilty because he was only expressing his opinion on the current political state.c)V will be guilty because free speech is subject to reasonable restrictions, and reasonability acquires a twisted meaning in dictatorships.d)V will not be guilty because he was only having a friendly chat with the people of England.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. The Constitutional right to free speech entails the right to express opinions without censorship or restraint. It is, however, subject to reasonable restrictions. V is a mysterious crusader in dictatorial England. One evening, he hijacks the communication lines and broadcasts a message saying "…there's something seriously wrong with this country, isn't there? Cruelty and injustice, intolerance and oppression. And where once you had the freedom to object, to think and speak as you saw fit, you now have systems of surveillance…" He is caught and brought to trial, and sought to be executed for his words. Decide.a)V will be guilty because under a dictatorship, free speech doesn't hold.b)V will not be guilty because he was only expressing his opinion on the current political state.c)V will be guilty because free speech is subject to reasonable restrictions, and reasonability acquires a twisted meaning in dictatorships.d)V will not be guilty because he was only having a friendly chat with the people of England.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. The Constitutional right to free speech entails the right to express opinions without censorship or restraint. It is, however, subject to reasonable restrictions. V is a mysterious crusader in dictatorial England. One evening, he hijacks the communication lines and broadcasts a message saying "…there's something seriously wrong with this country, isn't there? Cruelty and injustice, intolerance and oppression. And where once you had the freedom to object, to think and speak as you saw fit, you now have systems of surveillance…" He is caught and brought to trial, and sought to be executed for his words. Decide.a)V will be guilty because under a dictatorship, free speech doesn't hold.b)V will not be guilty because he was only expressing his opinion on the current political state.c)V will be guilty because free speech is subject to reasonable restrictions, and reasonability acquires a twisted meaning in dictatorships.d)V will not be guilty because he was only having a friendly chat with the people of England.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. The Constitutional right to free speech entails the right to express opinions without censorship or restraint. It is, however, subject to reasonable restrictions. V is a mysterious crusader in dictatorial England. One evening, he hijacks the communication lines and broadcasts a message saying "…there's something seriously wrong with this country, isn't there? Cruelty and injustice, intolerance and oppression. And where once you had the freedom to object, to think and speak as you saw fit, you now have systems of surveillance…" He is caught and brought to trial, and sought to be executed for his words. Decide.a)V will be guilty because under a dictatorship, free speech doesn't hold.b)V will not be guilty because he was only expressing his opinion on the current political state.c)V will be guilty because free speech is subject to reasonable restrictions, and reasonability acquires a twisted meaning in dictatorships.d)V will not be guilty because he was only having a friendly chat with the people of England.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. The Constitutional right to free speech entails the right to express opinions without censorship or restraint. It is, however, subject to reasonable restrictions. V is a mysterious crusader in dictatorial England. One evening, he hijacks the communication lines and broadcasts a message saying "…there's something seriously wrong with this country, isn't there? Cruelty and injustice, intolerance and oppression. And where once you had the freedom to object, to think and speak as you saw fit, you now have systems of surveillance…" He is caught and brought to trial, and sought to be executed for his words. Decide.a)V will be guilty because under a dictatorship, free speech doesn't hold.b)V will not be guilty because he was only expressing his opinion on the current political state.c)V will be guilty because free speech is subject to reasonable restrictions, and reasonability acquires a twisted meaning in dictatorships.d)V will not be guilty because he was only having a friendly chat with the people of England.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. The Constitutional right to free speech entails the right to express opinions without censorship or restraint. It is, however, subject to reasonable restrictions. V is a mysterious crusader in dictatorial England. One evening, he hijacks the communication lines and broadcasts a message saying "…there's something seriously wrong with this country, isn't there? Cruelty and injustice, intolerance and oppression. And where once you had the freedom to object, to think and speak as you saw fit, you now have systems of surveillance…" He is caught and brought to trial, and sought to be executed for his words. Decide.a)V will be guilty because under a dictatorship, free speech doesn't hold.b)V will not be guilty because he was only expressing his opinion on the current political state.c)V will be guilty because free speech is subject to reasonable restrictions, and reasonability acquires a twisted meaning in dictatorships.d)V will not be guilty because he was only having a friendly chat with the people of England.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. The Constitutional right to free speech entails the right to express opinions without censorship or restraint. It is, however, subject to reasonable restrictions. V is a mysterious crusader in dictatorial England. One evening, he hijacks the communication lines and broadcasts a message saying "…there's something seriously wrong with this country, isn't there? Cruelty and injustice, intolerance and oppression. And where once you had the freedom to object, to think and speak as you saw fit, you now have systems of surveillance…" He is caught and brought to trial, and sought to be executed for his words. Decide.a)V will be guilty because under a dictatorship, free speech doesn't hold.b)V will not be guilty because he was only expressing his opinion on the current political state.c)V will be guilty because free speech is subject to reasonable restrictions, and reasonability acquires a twisted meaning in dictatorships.d)V will not be guilty because he was only having a friendly chat with the people of England.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. The Constitutional right to free speech entails the right to express opinions without censorship or restraint. It is, however, subject to reasonable restrictions. V is a mysterious crusader in dictatorial England. One evening, he hijacks the communication lines and broadcasts a message saying "…there's something seriously wrong with this country, isn't there? Cruelty and injustice, intolerance and oppression. And where once you had the freedom to object, to think and speak as you saw fit, you now have systems of surveillance…" He is caught and brought to trial, and sought to be executed for his words. Decide.a)V will be guilty because under a dictatorship, free speech doesn't hold.b)V will not be guilty because he was only expressing his opinion on the current political state.c)V will be guilty because free speech is subject to reasonable restrictions, and reasonability acquires a twisted meaning in dictatorships.d)V will not be guilty because he was only having a friendly chat with the people of England.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.