Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. A public interest litigation (PIL) may be filed by any person for a social cause representing a disadvantaged group of people who do not have the necessary financial means or legal knowledge to take action in a court of law. Smriti appeared in CLAT 2018. She got a AIR 2000. On tallying her score with the released answer key she found many blatant discrepancies. She consulted with her coaching mentor who also confirmed the discrepancies. Many other students across the country found similar problems. This had a great impact on their marks and therefore the colleges they are allotted as the meritcum-allotment list was based on it. A fresh graduate from one of the premier institutes, Kalraj filed a PIL in the Supreme Court to look into the matter and take urgent steps as once the admission starts it would do irrevocable damages to the students. Decide.a)The PIL by Kalraj is maintainable in the court.b)The PIL by Kalraj is a mere sham. Kalraj is doing a media stunt to promote himself.c)The PIL by Kalraj is not maintainable in the court.d)Kalraj has no locus in the matter as he has already graduated from one of the premier colleges.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in ...

No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.

Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.

It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.

Q. A public interest litigation (PIL) may be filed by any person for a social cause representing a disadvantaged group of people who do not have the necessary financial means or legal knowledge to take action in a court of law. Smriti appeared in CLAT 2018. She got a AIR 2000. On tallying her score with the released answer key she found many blatant discrepancies. She consulted with her coaching mentor who also confirmed the discrepancies. Many other students across the country found similar problems. This had a great impact on their marks and therefore the colleges they are allotted as the meritcum-allotment list was based on it. A fresh graduate from one of the premier institutes, Kalraj filed a PIL in the Supreme Court to look into the matter and take urgent steps as once the admission starts it would do irrevocable damages to the students. Decide.

a)
The PIL by Kalraj is maintainable in the court.
b)
The PIL by Kalraj is a mere sham. Kalraj is doing a media stunt to promote himself.
c)
The PIL by Kalraj is not maintainable in the court.
d)
Kalraj has no locus in the matter as he has already graduated from one of the premier colleges.

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India...

Correct Answer is (a)

The PIL by Kalraj is maintainable in the court. There is a social cause as it affects thousands of students career. The students are disadvantaged as they are just senior secondary school pass-outs and appearing for college admission.

Incorrect Answers

None of the other options sets out views that are consistent with those of the author in the passage above.

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. No person shall be convicted of any offence except for violation of a law in force at the time of commission of the act charged as an offence, nor subjected to a penalty greater than that which might have been inflicted under the law in force at the time of the commission of the offence. This is the principle of non-retrospectivity in the infliction of punishment. The Joker is a notorious psychopathic criminal in Gotham city. There is no law in Gotham forbidding anyone from holding up two ferries and threatening to blow both of them unless one of them blows up the other one first. His attempt to turn the people on the ferries against one another fails, and he is tried in Court by Harvey Dent. Decide.

View answer

Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. In case of irreconcilable conflict between Directiv e Principles of State Policy and Fundamental Rights, the latter shall prevail. Promotion of public health is a Directive Principle of State Policy. Hema is a rural women recently married. There is no LPG in their village and she cooks food on 'chullas' (brick-wood oven) which is the only way to cook food in her village.According to a study by World Health Organization, prolonged exposure to the smoke from chullas leads to lung cancer. The government of India banned all chullas. Hema seeks your advice.

View answer

Read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below it. Certain words/phrases have been given in bold to help locate them while answering some of the questions.The union government’s present position vis-à-vis the upcoming United Nations conference on racial and related discrimination world-wide seems to be the following: discuss race please, not a caste; caste is our very own and not at all bad as you think. The gross hypocrisy of that position has been lucidly underscored by Kancha Ilaiah. Explicitly, the world community is to be cheated out of considering the matter on the technicality that caste is not, as a concept, tantamount to a racial category. Internally, however, allowing the issue to be put on agenda at the said conference would, we are patriotically admonished, damage the country’s image. Somehow, India’s ritual beliefs elbow out concrete actualities. Inverted representations, as we know, have often been deployed in human histories as a "balm for the forsaken" – religion being the most persistent of such inversions.Yet, we would humbly submit that if globalizing our markets are thought good for the ‘national’ pocket, "globalizing our social inequities" might not be so bad for the mass of our people. After all, racism was uniquely institutionalized in South Africa as caste discrimination has been within our society: why then can’t we permit the world community to express itself on the latter with a function of the zeal with which, through the years, we pronounced what on the former?As to the technically about whether or not caste is admissible into an agenda about race (that the conference is also about ‘related discriminations’ tends to be forgotten), a reputed sociologist has recently argued that where race is a "biological" construct, caste is a "social" one. Having earlier fiercely opposed implementation of the Mandal Commission Report, the said sociologist is at least to be complemented now for admitting, however tangentially, that caste discrimination is a reality, although, in his view, incompatible with racial discrimination. One would like quickly to offer the hypothesis that biology, in important ways that affect the lives of many millions, is in itself perhaps a social construct. But let us look at the matter in another way.If it is agreed – as per the position today at which anthropological and allied scientific determinations rest – that the entire race of homo sapiens derived from an original black African female (called ‘Eve’) then one is hard put to understand how, on some subsequent ground, ontological distinctions are to be drawn either between races or castes. Let us also underline the distinction between the supposition that we are all God's children and the rather more substantiated argument about our descent from ‘Eve’, lest both positions are thought to be equally diversionary. It then stands to reason that all subsequent distinctions are, in modern parlance, ‘constructed’ ones, and, like all ideological constructions, attributable to changing equations between knowledge and power among human communities through contested histories here, there, and elsewhere.This line of thought receives, thankfully, extremely consequential buttress from the findings of the Human Genome project. Contrary to earlier (chiefly 19th-century colonial) persuasions on the subject of race, as well as, one might add, the somewhat infamous Jensen offerings in the 20th century from America, those findings deny the genetic difference between "races". If anything, they suggest that environmental factors impinge on gene-function, as dialectic seems to unfold between nature and culture. It would thus seem that ‘biology’ as the constitution of pigmentation enters the picture first only as a part of that dialectic. Taken together, the original mother stipulation and the Genome findings ought indeed to furnish ground for human equality across the board, as well as yield policy initiatives towards equitable material dispensations aimed at building a global order where, in Hegel’s stirring formulation, only the rational constitutes the right. Such, sadly, is not the case as every day, fresh arbitrary grounds for discrimination are constructed in the interests of sectional dominance.Q. When the author writes “globalizing our social inequities”, the reference is toQ.When the author writes “globalizing our social inequities”, the reference is to

View answer

Passage - 3"Nobody has the right to not be offended. That right doesnt exist in any declaration I have ever read. If you are offended, it is your problem, and frankly lots of things offend lots of people." Acclaimed novelist Salman Rushdies words, however, will have very few takers in todays India. In a pluralistic society like India, the periphery of free speech is always opaque, and the nebulous distinction between right to dissent and right to offend is even more vague, leaving even the absolutists in an enigmatic dilemma. The right to offend and hate speech are inextricable. Though there is no legal definition of hate speech, a Law Commission report released in March enlists a few criteria to identify it. The report says that the speech must be offensive and project the extreme form of emotion. "The term hate speech has been used invariably to mean expression which is abusive, insulting, intimidating, harassing or which incites violence, hatred or discrimination against groups identified by characteristics such as ones race, religion, language, caste or community, sexual orientation or personal convictions." Sounds like a farrago? The fact that defining feature of sentiments is subjective leads to the rampant misuse of this clause and ultimately to the suppression of free speech. [Extracted with edits and revisions from: "Right to speech, dissent, offend: a conundrum of sorts", by Vinod V.K., The Week, August 2017]Which one of the following is the main conclusion of the passage?

View answer

"Nobody has the right to not be offended. That right doesn't exist in any declaration I have ever read. If you are offended, it is your problem, and frankly lots of things offend lots of people." Acclaimed novelist Salman Rushdie's words, however, will have very few takers in today's India. In a pluralistic society like India, the periphery of free speech is always opaque, and the nebulous distinction between right to dissent and right to offend is even more vague, leaving even the absolutists in an enigmatic dilemma.The right to offend and hate speech are inextricable. Though there is no legal definition of hate speech, a Law Commission report released in March enlists a few criteria to identify it. The report says that the speech must be 'offensive' and project the 'extreme' form of emotion. "The term hate speech has been used invariably to mean expression which is abusive, insulting, intimidating, harassing or which incites violence, hatred or discrimination against groups identified by characteristics such as one's race, religion, language, caste or community, sexual orientation or personal convictions." Sounds like a farrago?The fact that defining feature of sentiments is subjective leads to the rampant misuse of this clause and ultimately to the suppression of free speech.Q. Which one of the following is the main conclusion of the passage?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Crash Course for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. A public interest litigation (PIL) may be filed by any person for a social cause representing a disadvantaged group of people who do not have the necessary financial means or legal knowledge to take action in a court of law. Smriti appeared in CLAT 2018. She got a AIR 2000. On tallying her score with the released answer key she found many blatant discrepancies. She consulted with her coaching mentor who also confirmed the discrepancies. Many other students across the country found similar problems. This had a great impact on their marks and therefore the colleges they are allotted as the meritcum-allotment list was based on it. A fresh graduate from one of the premier institutes, Kalraj filed a PIL in the Supreme Court to look into the matter and take urgent steps as once the admission starts it would do irrevocable damages to the students. Decide.a)The PIL by Kalraj is maintainable in the court.b)The PIL by Kalraj is a mere sham. Kalraj is doing a media stunt to promote himself.c)The PIL by Kalraj is not maintainable in the court.d)Kalraj has no locus in the matter as he has already graduated from one of the premier colleges.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. A public interest litigation (PIL) may be filed by any person for a social cause representing a disadvantaged group of people who do not have the necessary financial means or legal knowledge to take action in a court of law. Smriti appeared in CLAT 2018. She got a AIR 2000. On tallying her score with the released answer key she found many blatant discrepancies. She consulted with her coaching mentor who also confirmed the discrepancies. Many other students across the country found similar problems. This had a great impact on their marks and therefore the colleges they are allotted as the meritcum-allotment list was based on it. A fresh graduate from one of the premier institutes, Kalraj filed a PIL in the Supreme Court to look into the matter and take urgent steps as once the admission starts it would do irrevocable damages to the students. Decide.a)The PIL by Kalraj is maintainable in the court.b)The PIL by Kalraj is a mere sham. Kalraj is doing a media stunt to promote himself.c)The PIL by Kalraj is not maintainable in the court.d)Kalraj has no locus in the matter as he has already graduated from one of the premier colleges.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. A public interest litigation (PIL) may be filed by any person for a social cause representing a disadvantaged group of people who do not have the necessary financial means or legal knowledge to take action in a court of law. Smriti appeared in CLAT 2018. She got a AIR 2000. On tallying her score with the released answer key she found many blatant discrepancies. She consulted with her coaching mentor who also confirmed the discrepancies. Many other students across the country found similar problems. This had a great impact on their marks and therefore the colleges they are allotted as the meritcum-allotment list was based on it. A fresh graduate from one of the premier institutes, Kalraj filed a PIL in the Supreme Court to look into the matter and take urgent steps as once the admission starts it would do irrevocable damages to the students. Decide.a)The PIL by Kalraj is maintainable in the court.b)The PIL by Kalraj is a mere sham. Kalraj is doing a media stunt to promote himself.c)The PIL by Kalraj is not maintainable in the court.d)Kalraj has no locus in the matter as he has already graduated from one of the premier colleges.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. A public interest litigation (PIL) may be filed by any person for a social cause representing a disadvantaged group of people who do not have the necessary financial means or legal knowledge to take action in a court of law. Smriti appeared in CLAT 2018. She got a AIR 2000. On tallying her score with the released answer key she found many blatant discrepancies. She consulted with her coaching mentor who also confirmed the discrepancies. Many other students across the country found similar problems. This had a great impact on their marks and therefore the colleges they are allotted as the meritcum-allotment list was based on it. A fresh graduate from one of the premier institutes, Kalraj filed a PIL in the Supreme Court to look into the matter and take urgent steps as once the admission starts it would do irrevocable damages to the students. Decide.a)The PIL by Kalraj is maintainable in the court.b)The PIL by Kalraj is a mere sham. Kalraj is doing a media stunt to promote himself.c)The PIL by Kalraj is not maintainable in the court.d)Kalraj has no locus in the matter as he has already graduated from one of the premier colleges.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. A public interest litigation (PIL) may be filed by any person for a social cause representing a disadvantaged group of people who do not have the necessary financial means or legal knowledge to take action in a court of law. Smriti appeared in CLAT 2018. She got a AIR 2000. On tallying her score with the released answer key she found many blatant discrepancies. She consulted with her coaching mentor who also confirmed the discrepancies. Many other students across the country found similar problems. This had a great impact on their marks and therefore the colleges they are allotted as the meritcum-allotment list was based on it. A fresh graduate from one of the premier institutes, Kalraj filed a PIL in the Supreme Court to look into the matter and take urgent steps as once the admission starts it would do irrevocable damages to the students. Decide.a)The PIL by Kalraj is maintainable in the court.b)The PIL by Kalraj is a mere sham. Kalraj is doing a media stunt to promote himself.c)The PIL by Kalraj is not maintainable in the court.d)Kalraj has no locus in the matter as he has already graduated from one of the premier colleges.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. A public interest litigation (PIL) may be filed by any person for a social cause representing a disadvantaged group of people who do not have the necessary financial means or legal knowledge to take action in a court of law. Smriti appeared in CLAT 2018. She got a AIR 2000. On tallying her score with the released answer key she found many blatant discrepancies. She consulted with her coaching mentor who also confirmed the discrepancies. Many other students across the country found similar problems. This had a great impact on their marks and therefore the colleges they are allotted as the meritcum-allotment list was based on it. A fresh graduate from one of the premier institutes, Kalraj filed a PIL in the Supreme Court to look into the matter and take urgent steps as once the admission starts it would do irrevocable damages to the students. Decide.a)The PIL by Kalraj is maintainable in the court.b)The PIL by Kalraj is a mere sham. Kalraj is doing a media stunt to promote himself.c)The PIL by Kalraj is not maintainable in the court.d)Kalraj has no locus in the matter as he has already graduated from one of the premier colleges.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. A public interest litigation (PIL) may be filed by any person for a social cause representing a disadvantaged group of people who do not have the necessary financial means or legal knowledge to take action in a court of law. Smriti appeared in CLAT 2018. She got a AIR 2000. On tallying her score with the released answer key she found many blatant discrepancies. She consulted with her coaching mentor who also confirmed the discrepancies. Many other students across the country found similar problems. This had a great impact on their marks and therefore the colleges they are allotted as the meritcum-allotment list was based on it. A fresh graduate from one of the premier institutes, Kalraj filed a PIL in the Supreme Court to look into the matter and take urgent steps as once the admission starts it would do irrevocable damages to the students. Decide.a)The PIL by Kalraj is maintainable in the court.b)The PIL by Kalraj is a mere sham. Kalraj is doing a media stunt to promote himself.c)The PIL by Kalraj is not maintainable in the court.d)Kalraj has no locus in the matter as he has already graduated from one of the premier colleges.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. A public interest litigation (PIL) may be filed by any person for a social cause representing a disadvantaged group of people who do not have the necessary financial means or legal knowledge to take action in a court of law. Smriti appeared in CLAT 2018. She got a AIR 2000. On tallying her score with the released answer key she found many blatant discrepancies. She consulted with her coaching mentor who also confirmed the discrepancies. Many other students across the country found similar problems. This had a great impact on their marks and therefore the colleges they are allotted as the meritcum-allotment list was based on it. A fresh graduate from one of the premier institutes, Kalraj filed a PIL in the Supreme Court to look into the matter and take urgent steps as once the admission starts it would do irrevocable damages to the students. Decide.a)The PIL by Kalraj is maintainable in the court.b)The PIL by Kalraj is a mere sham. Kalraj is doing a media stunt to promote himself.c)The PIL by Kalraj is not maintainable in the court.d)Kalraj has no locus in the matter as he has already graduated from one of the premier colleges.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. A public interest litigation (PIL) may be filed by any person for a social cause representing a disadvantaged group of people who do not have the necessary financial means or legal knowledge to take action in a court of law. Smriti appeared in CLAT 2018. She got a AIR 2000. On tallying her score with the released answer key she found many blatant discrepancies. She consulted with her coaching mentor who also confirmed the discrepancies. Many other students across the country found similar problems. This had a great impact on their marks and therefore the colleges they are allotted as the meritcum-allotment list was based on it. A fresh graduate from one of the premier institutes, Kalraj filed a PIL in the Supreme Court to look into the matter and take urgent steps as once the admission starts it would do irrevocable damages to the students. Decide.a)The PIL by Kalraj is maintainable in the court.b)The PIL by Kalraj is a mere sham. Kalraj is doing a media stunt to promote himself.c)The PIL by Kalraj is not maintainable in the court.d)Kalraj has no locus in the matter as he has already graduated from one of the premier colleges.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. A public interest litigation (PIL) may be filed by any person for a social cause representing a disadvantaged group of people who do not have the necessary financial means or legal knowledge to take action in a court of law. Smriti appeared in CLAT 2018. She got a AIR 2000. On tallying her score with the released answer key she found many blatant discrepancies. She consulted with her coaching mentor who also confirmed the discrepancies. Many other students across the country found similar problems. This had a great impact on their marks and therefore the colleges they are allotted as the meritcum-allotment list was based on it. A fresh graduate from one of the premier institutes, Kalraj filed a PIL in the Supreme Court to look into the matter and take urgent steps as once the admission starts it would do irrevocable damages to the students. Decide.a)The PIL by Kalraj is maintainable in the court.b)The PIL by Kalraj is a mere sham. Kalraj is doing a media stunt to promote himself.c)The PIL by Kalraj is not maintainable in the court.d)Kalraj has no locus in the matter as he has already graduated from one of the premier colleges.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam