All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   Britain's foreign secretary has said that ta... Start Learning for Free
Britain's foreign secretary has said that targeting cultural sites in Iran would breach international warfare conventions in an implicit rebuke to Donald Trump for threatening to bomb protected heritage sites. Dominic Raab did not criticise the US president directly over his threats, but said: "We have been very clear that cultural sites are protected under international law and we would expect that to be respected." The senior British minister was speaking after Trump said he could target 52 Iranian sites if Iran retaliated over the assassination of Qassem Suleimani - "some at a very high level and important to Iran and the Iranian culture".
Q. Out of the following options, which one can be an appropriate logical corollary to the given passage?
  • a)
    Raab was speaking immediately after a meeting of senior British ministers chaired by the prime minister, Boris Johnson, to discuss the Iran crisis.
  • b)
    The number refers to the 1988 shooting down of a civilian plane - Iran Air Flight 655 - by a US warship stationed in the Gulf.
  • c)
    The foreign secretary spoke to the Iraqi president and prime minister this weekend.
  • d)
    Trump's comments amount to threatening a war crime because such action would violate international treaties that the US has signed up to.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your CLAT doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
Britain's foreign secretary has said that targeting cultural sites in...
Options (a), (b) and (c) are out of scope. They cannot be corollaries. There is no mention of Raab in the passage and so, option (a) is out. Since the passage talks about a threat by Trump, option (d) is the most suitable alternative.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

In his historic address to the Parliament of the World's Religions in Chicago in 1893, Swami Vivekananda declared, "I am proud to belong to a nation which has sheltered the persecuted and the refugees of all religions and all nations of the earth." It is ironical that a political party which conspicuously proclaims its allegiance to Swami Vivekananda has restricted by law, about 127 years later, citizenship to people on the grounds of both religion and nation.Looking back, it is pertinent to ask why Jawaharlal Nehru, an international statesperson and a leading moral voice in the community of nations, refused to sign the 1951 Refugee Convention relating to the Status of Refugees.Scholars suggest that whereas he was committed to the principles enshrined in the Convention, he was unwilling to legally bind the country to its obligations.The Convention first defines refugees as persons fleeing persecution on grounds of race, religion, nationality, social group or political opinion. Refugees get legal rights, most important of which are "non-refoulement", which prevents states from sending back refugees to persecution in their home countries. They also get secondary rights, such as to education, work and property.India needs to bring in a refugee law which conforms to international conventions. This would, first, recognise eligible undocumented immigrants as refugees, based on evidence determined by due process of their persecution in their home countries. This would also assure them a set of binding rights. The most important of these is the guarantee that they would not be forced to return to the conditions of persecution, threatening their lives and liberty, which they escaped. The second is that they would be assured lives of dignity within India, with education, health care and livelihoods. Only then would India become the country which Swami Vivekananda was so proud of: a haven to the persecuted of the world, untainted by discrimination based on religion or nation.Q. Refugees' accounts of the latest wave of violence in Beleriand have typically described shootings by soldiers and arson attacks on villages, but there are at least several cases that point to anti-personnel mines or other explosives. Reporters from Associated Press on the Eriadorside of the border said they had seen an elderly woman with devastating leg wounds: one leg with the calf apparently blown off and the other also badly injured. Relatives said she had stepped on a landmine. If the above paragraph is true, which one of the following must necessarily be true?

In his historic address to the Parliament of the World's Religions in Chicago in 1893, Swami Vivekananda declared, "I am proud to belong to a nation which has sheltered the persecuted and the refugees of all religions and all nations of the earth." It is ironical that a political party which conspicuously proclaims its allegiance to Swami Vivekananda has restricted by law, about 127 years later, citizenship to people on the grounds of both religion and nation.Looking back, it is pertinent to ask why Jawaharlal Nehru, an international statesperson and a leading moral voice in the community of nations, refused to sign the 1951 Refugee Convention relating to the Status of Refugees.Scholars suggest that whereas he was committed to the principles enshrined in the Convention, he was unwilling to legally bind the country to its obligations.The Convention first defines refugees as persons fleeing persecution on grounds of race, religion, nationality, social group or political opinion. Refugees get legal rights, most important of which are "non-refoulement", which prevents states from sending back refugees to persecution in their home countries. They also get secondary rights, such as to education, work and property.India needs to bring in a refugee law which conforms to international conventions. This would, first, recognise eligible undocumented immigrants as refugees, based on evidence determined by due process of their persecution in their home countries. This would also assure them a set of binding rights. The most important of these is the guarantee that they would not be forced to return to the conditions of persecution, threatening their lives and liberty, which they escaped. The second is that they would be assured lives of dignity within India, with education, health care and livelihoods. Only then would India become the country which Swami Vivekananda was so proud of: a haven to the persecuted of the world, untainted by discrimination based on religion or nation.Q. Under International Law on Refugees it is the moral obligation of state to admit refugees who have no other place of residence subject to security of the state. Rohingyas are a group of Muslim refugees from Myanmar. They have settled in Bangladesh, India and other nearby countries due to violence by other groups against them. They have been official indicted by intelligence agencies in terrorist activities in collusion with some militant organizations. The government of India passed an executive order banning their further entry. Decide.

Directions:Read the following passage and answer the question.There are two principal theories on the relationship between international law and domestic law - Monism and Dualism. The monistic theory maintains that the subjects of two systems of law, i.e. international law and municipal law are essentially one. The monistic theory asserts that international law and municipal law are fundamentally the same in nature, and arise from the same science of law, and are manifestations of a single conception of law. The followers of this theory view international law and municipal law as part of a universal body of legal rules binding all human beings, collectively or singly. In a monist system, international law does not need to be incorporated into domestic law because international law immediately becomes incorporated in domestic legal system upon ratification of an international treaty. According to this theory, domestic law is subordinate to international law. The Statute of the International Criminal Court, therefore, can be directly applied and adjudicated in national courts according to the monistic theory. According to dualism theory, international law and municipal law represent two entirely distinct legal systems, i.e. international has an intrinsically different character from that of municipal law. International law is not directly applicable in the domestic system under dualism. First, international law must be translated into State legislation before the domestic courts can apply it. For example, under dualism, ratification of the Statute of the International Criminal Court is not enough-it must be implemented through State legislation into the domestic system. Most States and courts presumptively view national and international legal systems as discrete entities and routinely discuss in dualist fashion incorporation of rules from one system to the other.Q.X is a developing country. X ratified the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in 1995, and incorporated the provisions of the said convention in its domestic legislation addressing climate change in 1996. However, X has been widely criticized in the international community for its failure in meeting the obligations under the said convention. Y is a developed country. Y ratified the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in 1995, and has not incorporated the provisions of the said convention in its domestic legislation till date. Y has been appreciated by the international community for its success in meeting the obligations under the said convention. In the given situation, which of the following statements is correct?

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

Britain's foreign secretary has said that targeting cultural sites in Iran would breach international warfare conventions in an implicit rebuke to Donald Trump for threatening to bomb protected heritage sites. Dominic Raab did not criticise the US president directly over his threats, but said: "We have been very clear that cultural sites are protected under international law and we would expect that to be respected." The senior British minister was speaking after Trump said he could target 52 Iranian sites if Iran retaliated over the assassination of Qassem Suleimani - "some at a very high level and important to Iran and the Iranian culture".Q. Out of the following options, which one can be an appropriate logical corollary to the given passage?a)Raab was speaking immediately after a meeting of senior British ministers chaired by the prime minister, Boris Johnson, to discuss the Iran crisis.b)The number refers to the 1988 shooting down of a civilian plane - Iran Air Flight 655 - by a US warship stationed in the Gulf.c)The foreign secretary spoke to the Iraqi president and prime minister this weekend.d)Trump's comments amount to threatening a war crime because such action would violate international treaties that the US has signed up to.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Britain's foreign secretary has said that targeting cultural sites in Iran would breach international warfare conventions in an implicit rebuke to Donald Trump for threatening to bomb protected heritage sites. Dominic Raab did not criticise the US president directly over his threats, but said: "We have been very clear that cultural sites are protected under international law and we would expect that to be respected." The senior British minister was speaking after Trump said he could target 52 Iranian sites if Iran retaliated over the assassination of Qassem Suleimani - "some at a very high level and important to Iran and the Iranian culture".Q. Out of the following options, which one can be an appropriate logical corollary to the given passage?a)Raab was speaking immediately after a meeting of senior British ministers chaired by the prime minister, Boris Johnson, to discuss the Iran crisis.b)The number refers to the 1988 shooting down of a civilian plane - Iran Air Flight 655 - by a US warship stationed in the Gulf.c)The foreign secretary spoke to the Iraqi president and prime minister this weekend.d)Trump's comments amount to threatening a war crime because such action would violate international treaties that the US has signed up to.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Britain's foreign secretary has said that targeting cultural sites in Iran would breach international warfare conventions in an implicit rebuke to Donald Trump for threatening to bomb protected heritage sites. Dominic Raab did not criticise the US president directly over his threats, but said: "We have been very clear that cultural sites are protected under international law and we would expect that to be respected." The senior British minister was speaking after Trump said he could target 52 Iranian sites if Iran retaliated over the assassination of Qassem Suleimani - "some at a very high level and important to Iran and the Iranian culture".Q. Out of the following options, which one can be an appropriate logical corollary to the given passage?a)Raab was speaking immediately after a meeting of senior British ministers chaired by the prime minister, Boris Johnson, to discuss the Iran crisis.b)The number refers to the 1988 shooting down of a civilian plane - Iran Air Flight 655 - by a US warship stationed in the Gulf.c)The foreign secretary spoke to the Iraqi president and prime minister this weekend.d)Trump's comments amount to threatening a war crime because such action would violate international treaties that the US has signed up to.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Britain's foreign secretary has said that targeting cultural sites in Iran would breach international warfare conventions in an implicit rebuke to Donald Trump for threatening to bomb protected heritage sites. Dominic Raab did not criticise the US president directly over his threats, but said: "We have been very clear that cultural sites are protected under international law and we would expect that to be respected." The senior British minister was speaking after Trump said he could target 52 Iranian sites if Iran retaliated over the assassination of Qassem Suleimani - "some at a very high level and important to Iran and the Iranian culture".Q. Out of the following options, which one can be an appropriate logical corollary to the given passage?a)Raab was speaking immediately after a meeting of senior British ministers chaired by the prime minister, Boris Johnson, to discuss the Iran crisis.b)The number refers to the 1988 shooting down of a civilian plane - Iran Air Flight 655 - by a US warship stationed in the Gulf.c)The foreign secretary spoke to the Iraqi president and prime minister this weekend.d)Trump's comments amount to threatening a war crime because such action would violate international treaties that the US has signed up to.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Britain's foreign secretary has said that targeting cultural sites in Iran would breach international warfare conventions in an implicit rebuke to Donald Trump for threatening to bomb protected heritage sites. Dominic Raab did not criticise the US president directly over his threats, but said: "We have been very clear that cultural sites are protected under international law and we would expect that to be respected." The senior British minister was speaking after Trump said he could target 52 Iranian sites if Iran retaliated over the assassination of Qassem Suleimani - "some at a very high level and important to Iran and the Iranian culture".Q. Out of the following options, which one can be an appropriate logical corollary to the given passage?a)Raab was speaking immediately after a meeting of senior British ministers chaired by the prime minister, Boris Johnson, to discuss the Iran crisis.b)The number refers to the 1988 shooting down of a civilian plane - Iran Air Flight 655 - by a US warship stationed in the Gulf.c)The foreign secretary spoke to the Iraqi president and prime minister this weekend.d)Trump's comments amount to threatening a war crime because such action would violate international treaties that the US has signed up to.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Britain's foreign secretary has said that targeting cultural sites in Iran would breach international warfare conventions in an implicit rebuke to Donald Trump for threatening to bomb protected heritage sites. Dominic Raab did not criticise the US president directly over his threats, but said: "We have been very clear that cultural sites are protected under international law and we would expect that to be respected." The senior British minister was speaking after Trump said he could target 52 Iranian sites if Iran retaliated over the assassination of Qassem Suleimani - "some at a very high level and important to Iran and the Iranian culture".Q. Out of the following options, which one can be an appropriate logical corollary to the given passage?a)Raab was speaking immediately after a meeting of senior British ministers chaired by the prime minister, Boris Johnson, to discuss the Iran crisis.b)The number refers to the 1988 shooting down of a civilian plane - Iran Air Flight 655 - by a US warship stationed in the Gulf.c)The foreign secretary spoke to the Iraqi president and prime minister this weekend.d)Trump's comments amount to threatening a war crime because such action would violate international treaties that the US has signed up to.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Britain's foreign secretary has said that targeting cultural sites in Iran would breach international warfare conventions in an implicit rebuke to Donald Trump for threatening to bomb protected heritage sites. Dominic Raab did not criticise the US president directly over his threats, but said: "We have been very clear that cultural sites are protected under international law and we would expect that to be respected." The senior British minister was speaking after Trump said he could target 52 Iranian sites if Iran retaliated over the assassination of Qassem Suleimani - "some at a very high level and important to Iran and the Iranian culture".Q. Out of the following options, which one can be an appropriate logical corollary to the given passage?a)Raab was speaking immediately after a meeting of senior British ministers chaired by the prime minister, Boris Johnson, to discuss the Iran crisis.b)The number refers to the 1988 shooting down of a civilian plane - Iran Air Flight 655 - by a US warship stationed in the Gulf.c)The foreign secretary spoke to the Iraqi president and prime minister this weekend.d)Trump's comments amount to threatening a war crime because such action would violate international treaties that the US has signed up to.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Britain's foreign secretary has said that targeting cultural sites in Iran would breach international warfare conventions in an implicit rebuke to Donald Trump for threatening to bomb protected heritage sites. Dominic Raab did not criticise the US president directly over his threats, but said: "We have been very clear that cultural sites are protected under international law and we would expect that to be respected." The senior British minister was speaking after Trump said he could target 52 Iranian sites if Iran retaliated over the assassination of Qassem Suleimani - "some at a very high level and important to Iran and the Iranian culture".Q. Out of the following options, which one can be an appropriate logical corollary to the given passage?a)Raab was speaking immediately after a meeting of senior British ministers chaired by the prime minister, Boris Johnson, to discuss the Iran crisis.b)The number refers to the 1988 shooting down of a civilian plane - Iran Air Flight 655 - by a US warship stationed in the Gulf.c)The foreign secretary spoke to the Iraqi president and prime minister this weekend.d)Trump's comments amount to threatening a war crime because such action would violate international treaties that the US has signed up to.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Britain's foreign secretary has said that targeting cultural sites in Iran would breach international warfare conventions in an implicit rebuke to Donald Trump for threatening to bomb protected heritage sites. Dominic Raab did not criticise the US president directly over his threats, but said: "We have been very clear that cultural sites are protected under international law and we would expect that to be respected." The senior British minister was speaking after Trump said he could target 52 Iranian sites if Iran retaliated over the assassination of Qassem Suleimani - "some at a very high level and important to Iran and the Iranian culture".Q. Out of the following options, which one can be an appropriate logical corollary to the given passage?a)Raab was speaking immediately after a meeting of senior British ministers chaired by the prime minister, Boris Johnson, to discuss the Iran crisis.b)The number refers to the 1988 shooting down of a civilian plane - Iran Air Flight 655 - by a US warship stationed in the Gulf.c)The foreign secretary spoke to the Iraqi president and prime minister this weekend.d)Trump's comments amount to threatening a war crime because such action would violate international treaties that the US has signed up to.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Britain's foreign secretary has said that targeting cultural sites in Iran would breach international warfare conventions in an implicit rebuke to Donald Trump for threatening to bomb protected heritage sites. Dominic Raab did not criticise the US president directly over his threats, but said: "We have been very clear that cultural sites are protected under international law and we would expect that to be respected." The senior British minister was speaking after Trump said he could target 52 Iranian sites if Iran retaliated over the assassination of Qassem Suleimani - "some at a very high level and important to Iran and the Iranian culture".Q. Out of the following options, which one can be an appropriate logical corollary to the given passage?a)Raab was speaking immediately after a meeting of senior British ministers chaired by the prime minister, Boris Johnson, to discuss the Iran crisis.b)The number refers to the 1988 shooting down of a civilian plane - Iran Air Flight 655 - by a US warship stationed in the Gulf.c)The foreign secretary spoke to the Iraqi president and prime minister this weekend.d)Trump's comments amount to threatening a war crime because such action would violate international treaties that the US has signed up to.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup