Question Description
The Constitution which lays down the basic structure of a nation's polity is built on the foundations of certain fundamental values. The vision of socio-economic change through the Constitution is reflected in its lofty Preamble.The Preamble expresses the ideals and aspirations of a renascent India. By the year 1949, the Constituent Assembly had completed the drafting of the Fundamental Rights Chapter. Fundamental Rights are constitutional guarantees for the human rights of our people. These rights were one of the persistent demands of our leaders throughout the freedom struggle. The founding fathers were conscious of the fact that mere political democracy, i.e., getting the right to vote once in five years or so was meaningless unless it was accompanied by social and economic democracy. Dr. Ambedkar had said:"We do not want merely to lay down a mechanism to enable people to come and capture power. The Constitution also wishes to lay down an ideal before those who would be forming the government. That ideal is of economic democracy."Our founding fathers, however, were far-sighted people therefore they consolidated the principles of good governance as Directive Principles contradistinguished from issues of rights, government and politics.That is how the vision of our founding fathers and the aims and objectives which they wanted to achieve through the Constitution are contained in the Preamble, the Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles. These three may be described as the soul of the Constitution and the testament of the founding fathers to the succeeding generations together with the later Part on Fundamental Duties.Q. The Supreme Court held that access to Internet is a fundamental right under Article 19 of the Constitution.Abhishek has recently finished his MBA degree and after appearing for few interviews, came back to his native town, Muzafarnagar in Uttar Pradesh. Due to the ongoing protests in the Muzaffarnagar, the government decided to take away internet access from the residents. Abhishek received a mail stating that he has been offered a job in one of the companies he interviewed for and he needs to send an email confirming his assent for the job within 48 hours.Due to lack of internet access in his region he was unable to send his confirmation and the job was offered to someone else. Abhishek wants to file a case against the government as his fundamental right of access to internet was violated.Taking away access to internet is thus unconstitutionala)The main idea behind the constitution was to provide social economic and political democracy.b)Government is responsible to maintain order in the state. Hence taking away internet is constitutional as it was necessary to maintain law and orderc)There is no valid basis for Abhishek to file a case as he could have taken precautionary measures in order to avoid a situation like this.d)Abhishek is bound by the decision of the government. Hence he cannot file a case against it.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about The Constitution which lays down the basic structure of a nation's polity is built on the foundations of certain fundamental values. The vision of socio-economic change through the Constitution is reflected in its lofty Preamble.The Preamble expresses the ideals and aspirations of a renascent India. By the year 1949, the Constituent Assembly had completed the drafting of the Fundamental Rights Chapter. Fundamental Rights are constitutional guarantees for the human rights of our people. These rights were one of the persistent demands of our leaders throughout the freedom struggle. The founding fathers were conscious of the fact that mere political democracy, i.e., getting the right to vote once in five years or so was meaningless unless it was accompanied by social and economic democracy. Dr. Ambedkar had said:"We do not want merely to lay down a mechanism to enable people to come and capture power. The Constitution also wishes to lay down an ideal before those who would be forming the government. That ideal is of economic democracy."Our founding fathers, however, were far-sighted people therefore they consolidated the principles of good governance as Directive Principles contradistinguished from issues of rights, government and politics.That is how the vision of our founding fathers and the aims and objectives which they wanted to achieve through the Constitution are contained in the Preamble, the Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles. These three may be described as the soul of the Constitution and the testament of the founding fathers to the succeeding generations together with the later Part on Fundamental Duties.Q. The Supreme Court held that access to Internet is a fundamental right under Article 19 of the Constitution.Abhishek has recently finished his MBA degree and after appearing for few interviews, came back to his native town, Muzafarnagar in Uttar Pradesh. Due to the ongoing protests in the Muzaffarnagar, the government decided to take away internet access from the residents. Abhishek received a mail stating that he has been offered a job in one of the companies he interviewed for and he needs to send an email confirming his assent for the job within 48 hours.Due to lack of internet access in his region he was unable to send his confirmation and the job was offered to someone else. Abhishek wants to file a case against the government as his fundamental right of access to internet was violated.Taking away access to internet is thus unconstitutionala)The main idea behind the constitution was to provide social economic and political democracy.b)Government is responsible to maintain order in the state. Hence taking away internet is constitutional as it was necessary to maintain law and orderc)There is no valid basis for Abhishek to file a case as he could have taken precautionary measures in order to avoid a situation like this.d)Abhishek is bound by the decision of the government. Hence he cannot file a case against it.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The Constitution which lays down the basic structure of a nation's polity is built on the foundations of certain fundamental values. The vision of socio-economic change through the Constitution is reflected in its lofty Preamble.The Preamble expresses the ideals and aspirations of a renascent India. By the year 1949, the Constituent Assembly had completed the drafting of the Fundamental Rights Chapter. Fundamental Rights are constitutional guarantees for the human rights of our people. These rights were one of the persistent demands of our leaders throughout the freedom struggle. The founding fathers were conscious of the fact that mere political democracy, i.e., getting the right to vote once in five years or so was meaningless unless it was accompanied by social and economic democracy. Dr. Ambedkar had said:"We do not want merely to lay down a mechanism to enable people to come and capture power. The Constitution also wishes to lay down an ideal before those who would be forming the government. That ideal is of economic democracy."Our founding fathers, however, were far-sighted people therefore they consolidated the principles of good governance as Directive Principles contradistinguished from issues of rights, government and politics.That is how the vision of our founding fathers and the aims and objectives which they wanted to achieve through the Constitution are contained in the Preamble, the Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles. These three may be described as the soul of the Constitution and the testament of the founding fathers to the succeeding generations together with the later Part on Fundamental Duties.Q. The Supreme Court held that access to Internet is a fundamental right under Article 19 of the Constitution.Abhishek has recently finished his MBA degree and after appearing for few interviews, came back to his native town, Muzafarnagar in Uttar Pradesh. Due to the ongoing protests in the Muzaffarnagar, the government decided to take away internet access from the residents. Abhishek received a mail stating that he has been offered a job in one of the companies he interviewed for and he needs to send an email confirming his assent for the job within 48 hours.Due to lack of internet access in his region he was unable to send his confirmation and the job was offered to someone else. Abhishek wants to file a case against the government as his fundamental right of access to internet was violated.Taking away access to internet is thus unconstitutionala)The main idea behind the constitution was to provide social economic and political democracy.b)Government is responsible to maintain order in the state. Hence taking away internet is constitutional as it was necessary to maintain law and orderc)There is no valid basis for Abhishek to file a case as he could have taken precautionary measures in order to avoid a situation like this.d)Abhishek is bound by the decision of the government. Hence he cannot file a case against it.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for The Constitution which lays down the basic structure of a nation's polity is built on the foundations of certain fundamental values. The vision of socio-economic change through the Constitution is reflected in its lofty Preamble.The Preamble expresses the ideals and aspirations of a renascent India. By the year 1949, the Constituent Assembly had completed the drafting of the Fundamental Rights Chapter. Fundamental Rights are constitutional guarantees for the human rights of our people. These rights were one of the persistent demands of our leaders throughout the freedom struggle. The founding fathers were conscious of the fact that mere political democracy, i.e., getting the right to vote once in five years or so was meaningless unless it was accompanied by social and economic democracy. Dr. Ambedkar had said:"We do not want merely to lay down a mechanism to enable people to come and capture power. The Constitution also wishes to lay down an ideal before those who would be forming the government. That ideal is of economic democracy."Our founding fathers, however, were far-sighted people therefore they consolidated the principles of good governance as Directive Principles contradistinguished from issues of rights, government and politics.That is how the vision of our founding fathers and the aims and objectives which they wanted to achieve through the Constitution are contained in the Preamble, the Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles. These three may be described as the soul of the Constitution and the testament of the founding fathers to the succeeding generations together with the later Part on Fundamental Duties.Q. The Supreme Court held that access to Internet is a fundamental right under Article 19 of the Constitution.Abhishek has recently finished his MBA degree and after appearing for few interviews, came back to his native town, Muzafarnagar in Uttar Pradesh. Due to the ongoing protests in the Muzaffarnagar, the government decided to take away internet access from the residents. Abhishek received a mail stating that he has been offered a job in one of the companies he interviewed for and he needs to send an email confirming his assent for the job within 48 hours.Due to lack of internet access in his region he was unable to send his confirmation and the job was offered to someone else. Abhishek wants to file a case against the government as his fundamental right of access to internet was violated.Taking away access to internet is thus unconstitutionala)The main idea behind the constitution was to provide social economic and political democracy.b)Government is responsible to maintain order in the state. Hence taking away internet is constitutional as it was necessary to maintain law and orderc)There is no valid basis for Abhishek to file a case as he could have taken precautionary measures in order to avoid a situation like this.d)Abhishek is bound by the decision of the government. Hence he cannot file a case against it.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of The Constitution which lays down the basic structure of a nation's polity is built on the foundations of certain fundamental values. The vision of socio-economic change through the Constitution is reflected in its lofty Preamble.The Preamble expresses the ideals and aspirations of a renascent India. By the year 1949, the Constituent Assembly had completed the drafting of the Fundamental Rights Chapter. Fundamental Rights are constitutional guarantees for the human rights of our people. These rights were one of the persistent demands of our leaders throughout the freedom struggle. The founding fathers were conscious of the fact that mere political democracy, i.e., getting the right to vote once in five years or so was meaningless unless it was accompanied by social and economic democracy. Dr. Ambedkar had said:"We do not want merely to lay down a mechanism to enable people to come and capture power. The Constitution also wishes to lay down an ideal before those who would be forming the government. That ideal is of economic democracy."Our founding fathers, however, were far-sighted people therefore they consolidated the principles of good governance as Directive Principles contradistinguished from issues of rights, government and politics.That is how the vision of our founding fathers and the aims and objectives which they wanted to achieve through the Constitution are contained in the Preamble, the Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles. These three may be described as the soul of the Constitution and the testament of the founding fathers to the succeeding generations together with the later Part on Fundamental Duties.Q. The Supreme Court held that access to Internet is a fundamental right under Article 19 of the Constitution.Abhishek has recently finished his MBA degree and after appearing for few interviews, came back to his native town, Muzafarnagar in Uttar Pradesh. Due to the ongoing protests in the Muzaffarnagar, the government decided to take away internet access from the residents. Abhishek received a mail stating that he has been offered a job in one of the companies he interviewed for and he needs to send an email confirming his assent for the job within 48 hours.Due to lack of internet access in his region he was unable to send his confirmation and the job was offered to someone else. Abhishek wants to file a case against the government as his fundamental right of access to internet was violated.Taking away access to internet is thus unconstitutionala)The main idea behind the constitution was to provide social economic and political democracy.b)Government is responsible to maintain order in the state. Hence taking away internet is constitutional as it was necessary to maintain law and orderc)There is no valid basis for Abhishek to file a case as he could have taken precautionary measures in order to avoid a situation like this.d)Abhishek is bound by the decision of the government. Hence he cannot file a case against it.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The Constitution which lays down the basic structure of a nation's polity is built on the foundations of certain fundamental values. The vision of socio-economic change through the Constitution is reflected in its lofty Preamble.The Preamble expresses the ideals and aspirations of a renascent India. By the year 1949, the Constituent Assembly had completed the drafting of the Fundamental Rights Chapter. Fundamental Rights are constitutional guarantees for the human rights of our people. These rights were one of the persistent demands of our leaders throughout the freedom struggle. The founding fathers were conscious of the fact that mere political democracy, i.e., getting the right to vote once in five years or so was meaningless unless it was accompanied by social and economic democracy. Dr. Ambedkar had said:"We do not want merely to lay down a mechanism to enable people to come and capture power. The Constitution also wishes to lay down an ideal before those who would be forming the government. That ideal is of economic democracy."Our founding fathers, however, were far-sighted people therefore they consolidated the principles of good governance as Directive Principles contradistinguished from issues of rights, government and politics.That is how the vision of our founding fathers and the aims and objectives which they wanted to achieve through the Constitution are contained in the Preamble, the Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles. These three may be described as the soul of the Constitution and the testament of the founding fathers to the succeeding generations together with the later Part on Fundamental Duties.Q. The Supreme Court held that access to Internet is a fundamental right under Article 19 of the Constitution.Abhishek has recently finished his MBA degree and after appearing for few interviews, came back to his native town, Muzafarnagar in Uttar Pradesh. Due to the ongoing protests in the Muzaffarnagar, the government decided to take away internet access from the residents. Abhishek received a mail stating that he has been offered a job in one of the companies he interviewed for and he needs to send an email confirming his assent for the job within 48 hours.Due to lack of internet access in his region he was unable to send his confirmation and the job was offered to someone else. Abhishek wants to file a case against the government as his fundamental right of access to internet was violated.Taking away access to internet is thus unconstitutionala)The main idea behind the constitution was to provide social economic and political democracy.b)Government is responsible to maintain order in the state. Hence taking away internet is constitutional as it was necessary to maintain law and orderc)There is no valid basis for Abhishek to file a case as he could have taken precautionary measures in order to avoid a situation like this.d)Abhishek is bound by the decision of the government. Hence he cannot file a case against it.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The Constitution which lays down the basic structure of a nation's polity is built on the foundations of certain fundamental values. The vision of socio-economic change through the Constitution is reflected in its lofty Preamble.The Preamble expresses the ideals and aspirations of a renascent India. By the year 1949, the Constituent Assembly had completed the drafting of the Fundamental Rights Chapter. Fundamental Rights are constitutional guarantees for the human rights of our people. These rights were one of the persistent demands of our leaders throughout the freedom struggle. The founding fathers were conscious of the fact that mere political democracy, i.e., getting the right to vote once in five years or so was meaningless unless it was accompanied by social and economic democracy. Dr. Ambedkar had said:"We do not want merely to lay down a mechanism to enable people to come and capture power. The Constitution also wishes to lay down an ideal before those who would be forming the government. That ideal is of economic democracy."Our founding fathers, however, were far-sighted people therefore they consolidated the principles of good governance as Directive Principles contradistinguished from issues of rights, government and politics.That is how the vision of our founding fathers and the aims and objectives which they wanted to achieve through the Constitution are contained in the Preamble, the Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles. These three may be described as the soul of the Constitution and the testament of the founding fathers to the succeeding generations together with the later Part on Fundamental Duties.Q. The Supreme Court held that access to Internet is a fundamental right under Article 19 of the Constitution.Abhishek has recently finished his MBA degree and after appearing for few interviews, came back to his native town, Muzafarnagar in Uttar Pradesh. Due to the ongoing protests in the Muzaffarnagar, the government decided to take away internet access from the residents. Abhishek received a mail stating that he has been offered a job in one of the companies he interviewed for and he needs to send an email confirming his assent for the job within 48 hours.Due to lack of internet access in his region he was unable to send his confirmation and the job was offered to someone else. Abhishek wants to file a case against the government as his fundamental right of access to internet was violated.Taking away access to internet is thus unconstitutionala)The main idea behind the constitution was to provide social economic and political democracy.b)Government is responsible to maintain order in the state. Hence taking away internet is constitutional as it was necessary to maintain law and orderc)There is no valid basis for Abhishek to file a case as he could have taken precautionary measures in order to avoid a situation like this.d)Abhishek is bound by the decision of the government. Hence he cannot file a case against it.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The Constitution which lays down the basic structure of a nation's polity is built on the foundations of certain fundamental values. The vision of socio-economic change through the Constitution is reflected in its lofty Preamble.The Preamble expresses the ideals and aspirations of a renascent India. By the year 1949, the Constituent Assembly had completed the drafting of the Fundamental Rights Chapter. Fundamental Rights are constitutional guarantees for the human rights of our people. These rights were one of the persistent demands of our leaders throughout the freedom struggle. The founding fathers were conscious of the fact that mere political democracy, i.e., getting the right to vote once in five years or so was meaningless unless it was accompanied by social and economic democracy. Dr. Ambedkar had said:"We do not want merely to lay down a mechanism to enable people to come and capture power. The Constitution also wishes to lay down an ideal before those who would be forming the government. That ideal is of economic democracy."Our founding fathers, however, were far-sighted people therefore they consolidated the principles of good governance as Directive Principles contradistinguished from issues of rights, government and politics.That is how the vision of our founding fathers and the aims and objectives which they wanted to achieve through the Constitution are contained in the Preamble, the Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles. These three may be described as the soul of the Constitution and the testament of the founding fathers to the succeeding generations together with the later Part on Fundamental Duties.Q. The Supreme Court held that access to Internet is a fundamental right under Article 19 of the Constitution.Abhishek has recently finished his MBA degree and after appearing for few interviews, came back to his native town, Muzafarnagar in Uttar Pradesh. Due to the ongoing protests in the Muzaffarnagar, the government decided to take away internet access from the residents. Abhishek received a mail stating that he has been offered a job in one of the companies he interviewed for and he needs to send an email confirming his assent for the job within 48 hours.Due to lack of internet access in his region he was unable to send his confirmation and the job was offered to someone else. Abhishek wants to file a case against the government as his fundamental right of access to internet was violated.Taking away access to internet is thus unconstitutionala)The main idea behind the constitution was to provide social economic and political democracy.b)Government is responsible to maintain order in the state. Hence taking away internet is constitutional as it was necessary to maintain law and orderc)There is no valid basis for Abhishek to file a case as he could have taken precautionary measures in order to avoid a situation like this.d)Abhishek is bound by the decision of the government. Hence he cannot file a case against it.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The Constitution which lays down the basic structure of a nation's polity is built on the foundations of certain fundamental values. The vision of socio-economic change through the Constitution is reflected in its lofty Preamble.The Preamble expresses the ideals and aspirations of a renascent India. By the year 1949, the Constituent Assembly had completed the drafting of the Fundamental Rights Chapter. Fundamental Rights are constitutional guarantees for the human rights of our people. These rights were one of the persistent demands of our leaders throughout the freedom struggle. The founding fathers were conscious of the fact that mere political democracy, i.e., getting the right to vote once in five years or so was meaningless unless it was accompanied by social and economic democracy. Dr. Ambedkar had said:"We do not want merely to lay down a mechanism to enable people to come and capture power. The Constitution also wishes to lay down an ideal before those who would be forming the government. That ideal is of economic democracy."Our founding fathers, however, were far-sighted people therefore they consolidated the principles of good governance as Directive Principles contradistinguished from issues of rights, government and politics.That is how the vision of our founding fathers and the aims and objectives which they wanted to achieve through the Constitution are contained in the Preamble, the Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles. These three may be described as the soul of the Constitution and the testament of the founding fathers to the succeeding generations together with the later Part on Fundamental Duties.Q. The Supreme Court held that access to Internet is a fundamental right under Article 19 of the Constitution.Abhishek has recently finished his MBA degree and after appearing for few interviews, came back to his native town, Muzafarnagar in Uttar Pradesh. Due to the ongoing protests in the Muzaffarnagar, the government decided to take away internet access from the residents. Abhishek received a mail stating that he has been offered a job in one of the companies he interviewed for and he needs to send an email confirming his assent for the job within 48 hours.Due to lack of internet access in his region he was unable to send his confirmation and the job was offered to someone else. Abhishek wants to file a case against the government as his fundamental right of access to internet was violated.Taking away access to internet is thus unconstitutionala)The main idea behind the constitution was to provide social economic and political democracy.b)Government is responsible to maintain order in the state. Hence taking away internet is constitutional as it was necessary to maintain law and orderc)There is no valid basis for Abhishek to file a case as he could have taken precautionary measures in order to avoid a situation like this.d)Abhishek is bound by the decision of the government. Hence he cannot file a case against it.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.