All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of... Start Learning for Free
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.
Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."
Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.
If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.
The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.
Q. JJ Act mandates that no juvenile shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment or committed to prison.
Gopinath was convicted for having committed murder of Rabi Ghosh. The trial court convicted Gopinath and sentenced him to observatory home. After reappreciation of the evidence, it was found Gopinath has furnished false certificates and documents.
Based on the author's reasoning, should Gopinath's age be investigated and determined again?
Correct Answer is (c)
Principle of law says that "that no juvenile shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment or committed to prison." Therefore, age should be investigated, since Gopinath has adduced false certificates and documents therefore determination of right age for right sentencing is necessary.
Thus, only option (c) aligns with the author's reasoning.
Incorrect Answers
None of the other options sets out views that are consistent with those of the author in the passage above and principle of law given.
  • a)
    Yes, age should be investigated and determined, since Gopinath is a juvenile and he must be accorded beneficial provisions of the statute.
  • b)
    No , age should not be investigated and determined, since Gopinath has committed heinous offence which should be nipped in the bud.
  • c)
    Yes, age should be inv estigated, since Gopinath has adduced false certificates and documents. Therefore, determination of right age for right sentencing is necessary.
  • d)
    No, age should not be investigated and determined, if Gopinath isn't punished other children like him will get inspiration to commit crime.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your CLAT doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related...
Correct Answer is (c) : Yes, age should be investigated and determined, since Gopinath has adduced false certificates and documents. Therefore, determination of right age for right sentencing is necessary.

The reasoning behind this answer is as follows:
- The principle of law under the JJ Act states that "no juvenile shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment or committed to prison." This means that if Gopinath is indeed a juvenile, he should be protected by the beneficial provisions of the statute.
- Gopinath has furnished false certificates and documents, which makes it necessary to investigate and determine his actual age to ensure the appropriate sentencing is applied.
- The purpose of the Juvenile Justice Act is to protect children and ensure their proper care, protection, and rehabilitation. Therefore, it is essential to ascertain Gopinath's age to apply the appropriate provisions under the Act.
- The author's reasoning focuses on the importance of following the Juvenile Justice Act and its provisions, and ensuring the correct application of the law based on the child's age. Thus, investigating and determining Gopinath's age aligns with the author's reasoning.

In conclusion, based on the author's reasoning and the principle of law, Gopinath's age should be investigated and determined again, as it is crucial for the proper application of the Juvenile Justice Act and its provisions.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. Abhishek was shot dead. Arnit Das was arrested in connection with the said offence. Arnit Das was remanded to Juvenile home being entitled to protection of the Juvenile Justice Act. However, he was put in an adult prison due to lack of space in the observatory home. Based on the inference drawn, what should be the author's stand on not Arnit into observatory home?

The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. Master Bholu was convicted for offence of murder, possessing illegal Arms and conspiring in a terrorist activity. Bholu has been found as a juvenile. He was fined heavily and given exemplary punishment.Will Bholu be afforded the protection of Section 21 of Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015?

The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. If it is declared that retribution has no Constitutional value in the country. Simultaneously, Section 21 has been amended making way for the life imprisonment and death penalty. Based on the inference drawn, what should be the author's stand on this amendment?Correct Answer is ( d) Principle of law says that "retribution has no Constitutional value in the country." Section 21 is attracted when someone is sentenced to death or for life imprisonment. Herein retribution has been outlawed by the constitution therefore, only option (d) reflects the balanced reasoning and aligns with the given principle of law.Incorrect Answers None of the other options sets out views that are consistent with those of the author in the passage above and principle of law given.

The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. A juvenile convict in the case has been released from a reformation home after serving a three-year term.Is it consistent with the Juvenile Act?

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:In one of the landmark decisions of the Supreme Court, which emphasized that even after the final disposition of a Special Leave Petition, the plea of juvenility may be brought in any court at any time. When the plea of juvenility is raised at a late stage, various medical tests are frequently used to make a determination in the absence of the necessary documentation. While considering the evidence presented on behalf of the accused to support his claim that he is a juvenile, the court shall err on the side of holding the accused to be a juvenile in circumstances where there is a question of fact. This is not a roving inquiry that is being considered. The Court may accept other proof of age, such as documents, certificates, etc. A simple statement that the accused appeared to be one or two years older than the age he claimed to be or that the accused stated his age to be higher than what he claims in the case while being arrested by the police officer would not be very persuasive. The age of a juvenile involved in a legal dispute is often determined by the documentation that has been made public. And the only instances in which the Court, the Juvenile Justice Board, or the Committee must order a medical examination to determine the accuseds age are those in which the documents or certificates submitted by the accused in support of his claim of juvenility are discovered to be falsified or manipulated.Q.A young person is being tried in court on charges of committing a major crime. The defense asserts that the defendant is a minor and provides a birth certificate to substantiate the assertion. Can the court assess the accuseds age purely based on the birth certificate provided by the defense?

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. JJ Act mandates that no juvenile shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment or committed to prison.Gopinath was convicted for having committed murder of Rabi Ghosh. The trial court convicted Gopinath and sentenced him to observatory home. After reappreciation of the evidence, it was found Gopinath has furnished false certificates and documents.Based on the author's reasoning, should Gopinath's age be investigated and determined again?Correct Answer is (c) Principle of law says that "that no juvenile shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment or committed to prison." Therefore, age should be investigated, since Gopinath has adduced false certificates and documents therefore determination of right age for right sentencing is necessary.Thus, only option (c) aligns with the author's reasoning.Incorrect Answers None of the other options sets out views that are consistent with those of the author in the passage above and principle of law given.a)Yes, age should be investigated and determined, since Gopinath is a juvenile and he must be accorded beneficial provisions of the statute.b)No , age should not be investigated and determined, since Gopinath has committed heinous offence which should be nipped in the bud.c)Yes, age should be inv estigated, since Gopinath has adduced false certificates and documents. Therefore, determination of right age for right sentencing is necessary.d)No, age should not be investigated and determined, if Gopinath isn't punished other children like him will get inspiration to commit crime.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. JJ Act mandates that no juvenile shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment or committed to prison.Gopinath was convicted for having committed murder of Rabi Ghosh. The trial court convicted Gopinath and sentenced him to observatory home. After reappreciation of the evidence, it was found Gopinath has furnished false certificates and documents.Based on the author's reasoning, should Gopinath's age be investigated and determined again?Correct Answer is (c) Principle of law says that "that no juvenile shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment or committed to prison." Therefore, age should be investigated, since Gopinath has adduced false certificates and documents therefore determination of right age for right sentencing is necessary.Thus, only option (c) aligns with the author's reasoning.Incorrect Answers None of the other options sets out views that are consistent with those of the author in the passage above and principle of law given.a)Yes, age should be investigated and determined, since Gopinath is a juvenile and he must be accorded beneficial provisions of the statute.b)No , age should not be investigated and determined, since Gopinath has committed heinous offence which should be nipped in the bud.c)Yes, age should be inv estigated, since Gopinath has adduced false certificates and documents. Therefore, determination of right age for right sentencing is necessary.d)No, age should not be investigated and determined, if Gopinath isn't punished other children like him will get inspiration to commit crime.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. JJ Act mandates that no juvenile shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment or committed to prison.Gopinath was convicted for having committed murder of Rabi Ghosh. The trial court convicted Gopinath and sentenced him to observatory home. After reappreciation of the evidence, it was found Gopinath has furnished false certificates and documents.Based on the author's reasoning, should Gopinath's age be investigated and determined again?Correct Answer is (c) Principle of law says that "that no juvenile shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment or committed to prison." Therefore, age should be investigated, since Gopinath has adduced false certificates and documents therefore determination of right age for right sentencing is necessary.Thus, only option (c) aligns with the author's reasoning.Incorrect Answers None of the other options sets out views that are consistent with those of the author in the passage above and principle of law given.a)Yes, age should be investigated and determined, since Gopinath is a juvenile and he must be accorded beneficial provisions of the statute.b)No , age should not be investigated and determined, since Gopinath has committed heinous offence which should be nipped in the bud.c)Yes, age should be inv estigated, since Gopinath has adduced false certificates and documents. Therefore, determination of right age for right sentencing is necessary.d)No, age should not be investigated and determined, if Gopinath isn't punished other children like him will get inspiration to commit crime.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. JJ Act mandates that no juvenile shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment or committed to prison.Gopinath was convicted for having committed murder of Rabi Ghosh. The trial court convicted Gopinath and sentenced him to observatory home. After reappreciation of the evidence, it was found Gopinath has furnished false certificates and documents.Based on the author's reasoning, should Gopinath's age be investigated and determined again?Correct Answer is (c) Principle of law says that "that no juvenile shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment or committed to prison." Therefore, age should be investigated, since Gopinath has adduced false certificates and documents therefore determination of right age for right sentencing is necessary.Thus, only option (c) aligns with the author's reasoning.Incorrect Answers None of the other options sets out views that are consistent with those of the author in the passage above and principle of law given.a)Yes, age should be investigated and determined, since Gopinath is a juvenile and he must be accorded beneficial provisions of the statute.b)No , age should not be investigated and determined, since Gopinath has committed heinous offence which should be nipped in the bud.c)Yes, age should be inv estigated, since Gopinath has adduced false certificates and documents. Therefore, determination of right age for right sentencing is necessary.d)No, age should not be investigated and determined, if Gopinath isn't punished other children like him will get inspiration to commit crime.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. JJ Act mandates that no juvenile shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment or committed to prison.Gopinath was convicted for having committed murder of Rabi Ghosh. The trial court convicted Gopinath and sentenced him to observatory home. After reappreciation of the evidence, it was found Gopinath has furnished false certificates and documents.Based on the author's reasoning, should Gopinath's age be investigated and determined again?Correct Answer is (c) Principle of law says that "that no juvenile shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment or committed to prison." Therefore, age should be investigated, since Gopinath has adduced false certificates and documents therefore determination of right age for right sentencing is necessary.Thus, only option (c) aligns with the author's reasoning.Incorrect Answers None of the other options sets out views that are consistent with those of the author in the passage above and principle of law given.a)Yes, age should be investigated and determined, since Gopinath is a juvenile and he must be accorded beneficial provisions of the statute.b)No , age should not be investigated and determined, since Gopinath has committed heinous offence which should be nipped in the bud.c)Yes, age should be inv estigated, since Gopinath has adduced false certificates and documents. Therefore, determination of right age for right sentencing is necessary.d)No, age should not be investigated and determined, if Gopinath isn't punished other children like him will get inspiration to commit crime.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. JJ Act mandates that no juvenile shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment or committed to prison.Gopinath was convicted for having committed murder of Rabi Ghosh. The trial court convicted Gopinath and sentenced him to observatory home. After reappreciation of the evidence, it was found Gopinath has furnished false certificates and documents.Based on the author's reasoning, should Gopinath's age be investigated and determined again?Correct Answer is (c) Principle of law says that "that no juvenile shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment or committed to prison." Therefore, age should be investigated, since Gopinath has adduced false certificates and documents therefore determination of right age for right sentencing is necessary.Thus, only option (c) aligns with the author's reasoning.Incorrect Answers None of the other options sets out views that are consistent with those of the author in the passage above and principle of law given.a)Yes, age should be investigated and determined, since Gopinath is a juvenile and he must be accorded beneficial provisions of the statute.b)No , age should not be investigated and determined, since Gopinath has committed heinous offence which should be nipped in the bud.c)Yes, age should be inv estigated, since Gopinath has adduced false certificates and documents. Therefore, determination of right age for right sentencing is necessary.d)No, age should not be investigated and determined, if Gopinath isn't punished other children like him will get inspiration to commit crime.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. JJ Act mandates that no juvenile shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment or committed to prison.Gopinath was convicted for having committed murder of Rabi Ghosh. The trial court convicted Gopinath and sentenced him to observatory home. After reappreciation of the evidence, it was found Gopinath has furnished false certificates and documents.Based on the author's reasoning, should Gopinath's age be investigated and determined again?Correct Answer is (c) Principle of law says that "that no juvenile shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment or committed to prison." Therefore, age should be investigated, since Gopinath has adduced false certificates and documents therefore determination of right age for right sentencing is necessary.Thus, only option (c) aligns with the author's reasoning.Incorrect Answers None of the other options sets out views that are consistent with those of the author in the passage above and principle of law given.a)Yes, age should be investigated and determined, since Gopinath is a juvenile and he must be accorded beneficial provisions of the statute.b)No , age should not be investigated and determined, since Gopinath has committed heinous offence which should be nipped in the bud.c)Yes, age should be inv estigated, since Gopinath has adduced false certificates and documents. Therefore, determination of right age for right sentencing is necessary.d)No, age should not be investigated and determined, if Gopinath isn't punished other children like him will get inspiration to commit crime.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. JJ Act mandates that no juvenile shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment or committed to prison.Gopinath was convicted for having committed murder of Rabi Ghosh. The trial court convicted Gopinath and sentenced him to observatory home. After reappreciation of the evidence, it was found Gopinath has furnished false certificates and documents.Based on the author's reasoning, should Gopinath's age be investigated and determined again?Correct Answer is (c) Principle of law says that "that no juvenile shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment or committed to prison." Therefore, age should be investigated, since Gopinath has adduced false certificates and documents therefore determination of right age for right sentencing is necessary.Thus, only option (c) aligns with the author's reasoning.Incorrect Answers None of the other options sets out views that are consistent with those of the author in the passage above and principle of law given.a)Yes, age should be investigated and determined, since Gopinath is a juvenile and he must be accorded beneficial provisions of the statute.b)No , age should not be investigated and determined, since Gopinath has committed heinous offence which should be nipped in the bud.c)Yes, age should be inv estigated, since Gopinath has adduced false certificates and documents. Therefore, determination of right age for right sentencing is necessary.d)No, age should not be investigated and determined, if Gopinath isn't punished other children like him will get inspiration to commit crime.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. JJ Act mandates that no juvenile shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment or committed to prison.Gopinath was convicted for having committed murder of Rabi Ghosh. The trial court convicted Gopinath and sentenced him to observatory home. After reappreciation of the evidence, it was found Gopinath has furnished false certificates and documents.Based on the author's reasoning, should Gopinath's age be investigated and determined again?Correct Answer is (c) Principle of law says that "that no juvenile shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment or committed to prison." Therefore, age should be investigated, since Gopinath has adduced false certificates and documents therefore determination of right age for right sentencing is necessary.Thus, only option (c) aligns with the author's reasoning.Incorrect Answers None of the other options sets out views that are consistent with those of the author in the passage above and principle of law given.a)Yes, age should be investigated and determined, since Gopinath is a juvenile and he must be accorded beneficial provisions of the statute.b)No , age should not be investigated and determined, since Gopinath has committed heinous offence which should be nipped in the bud.c)Yes, age should be inv estigated, since Gopinath has adduced false certificates and documents. Therefore, determination of right age for right sentencing is necessary.d)No, age should not be investigated and determined, if Gopinath isn't punished other children like him will get inspiration to commit crime.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. JJ Act mandates that no juvenile shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment or committed to prison.Gopinath was convicted for having committed murder of Rabi Ghosh. The trial court convicted Gopinath and sentenced him to observatory home. After reappreciation of the evidence, it was found Gopinath has furnished false certificates and documents.Based on the author's reasoning, should Gopinath's age be investigated and determined again?Correct Answer is (c) Principle of law says that "that no juvenile shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment or committed to prison." Therefore, age should be investigated, since Gopinath has adduced false certificates and documents therefore determination of right age for right sentencing is necessary.Thus, only option (c) aligns with the author's reasoning.Incorrect Answers None of the other options sets out views that are consistent with those of the author in the passage above and principle of law given.a)Yes, age should be investigated and determined, since Gopinath is a juvenile and he must be accorded beneficial provisions of the statute.b)No , age should not be investigated and determined, since Gopinath has committed heinous offence which should be nipped in the bud.c)Yes, age should be inv estigated, since Gopinath has adduced false certificates and documents. Therefore, determination of right age for right sentencing is necessary.d)No, age should not be investigated and determined, if Gopinath isn't punished other children like him will get inspiration to commit crime.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup