CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of ... Start Learning for Free
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.
Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."
Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.
If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.
The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.
Q. Master Bholu was convicted for offence of murder, possessing illegal Arms and conspiring in a terrorist activity. Bholu has been found as a juvenile. He was fined heavily and given exemplary punishment.
Will Bholu be afforded the protection of Section 21 of Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015?
  • a)
    Yes, he will be afforded the protection, being a juvenile Bholu cannot be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.
  • b)
    No, he will not be afforded the protection, as murder, possessing illegal Arms and conspiring in a terrorist activity are serious crime against the unity, integrity and sovereignty of India.
  • c)
    No, he will not be afforded the protection, because he has failed to adduce any age determining certificate like School Leaving Certificate, Boards Mark sheets etc.
  • d)
    No, he will not be afforded the protection, since Section 21 is not attracted in this case in the first place.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related ...
The correct answer is option (D)
Explanation:
In this case, Master Bholu was convicted for the offense of murder, possessing illegal arms, and conspiring in a terrorist activity. He was found to be a juvenile and was fined heavily and given exemplary punishment.

According to the principle of law provided, "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offense, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."

Considering this principle, we can analyze the options provided:

- Option (a) states that Bholu will be afforded the protection of Section 21, but this is incorrect as Section 21 is only applicable when a child is sentenced to death or life imprisonment, which is not the case here.

- Option (b) states that Bholu will not be afforded the protection because the crimes committed are serious, but this is not relevant to the application of Section 21.

- Option (c) states that Bholu will not be afforded the protection due to the absence of age-determining certificates. However, the fact remains that he was found to be a juvenile, which means that his age was already determined.

- Option (d) states that Bholu will not be afforded the protection since Section 21 is not attracted in this case in the first place. This is the correct answer because Section 21 only applies when a child is sentenced to death or life imprisonment, which is not the case for Bholu.

In conclusion, Master Bholu will not be afforded the protection of Section 21 of the Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, as he was not sentenced to death or life imprisonment. The fact that he was fined heavily and given exemplary punishment does not fall under the purview of Section 21.
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. JJ Act mandates that no juvenile shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment or committed to prison.Gopinath was convicted for having committed murder of Rabi Ghosh. The trial court convicted Gopinath and sentenced him to observatory home. After reappreciation of the evidence, it was found Gopinath has furnished false certificates and documents.Based on the author's reasoning, should Gopinath's age be investigated and determined again?Correct Answer is ( c) Principle of law says that "that no juvenile shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment or committed to prison." Therefore, age should be investigated, since Gopinath has adduced false certificates and documents therefore determination of right age for right sentencing is necessary.Thus, only option (c) aligns with the author's reasoning.Incorrect Answers None of the other options sets out views that are consistent with those of the author in the passage above and principle of law given.

The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. A juvenile convict in the case has been released from a reformation home after serving a three-year term.Is it consistent with the Juvenile Act?

The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. Supreme Court would be reluctant to entertain a plea about the determination of the age of a convict.Simultaneously, Supreme Court cannot ignore, overlook or nullify the beneficial provisions of the Act.Guddu, a juvenile, convicted for having committed rape and murder of 4 years old girl. He was sentenced to death penalty. However, Guddu only raised the plea of juvenility in the Supreme Court. Based on the authors reasoning and principle of law, choose the appropriate option with best course of action on the plea of juvenility?

The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. When any juvenile is arrested such person shall be released on bail unless his release would not pose harm to a larger society. Arun is being prosecuted before the Juvenile Justice Board for having committed murder of one Maharaj by inflicting knife wounds. Arun is admittedly a juvenile. He is volatile by nature, shameless and has no guilty conscious. Based on the authors reasoning and principle of law cited, should the Juvenile Justice Board grant the bail to Arun?

The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. It has come to light that Juvenile Justice Board(JJB) are acting as silent spectators and they only take note of the factual situation if it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lock up. Based on the authors reasoning, are the JJBs acting in conformity to the law?

Top Courses for CLAT

The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. Master Bholu was convicted for offence of murder, possessing illegal Arms and conspiring in a terrorist activity. Bholu has been found as a juvenile. He was fined heavily and given exemplary punishment.Will Bholu be afforded the protection of Section 21 of Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015?a)Yes, he will be afforded the protection, being a juvenile Bholu cannot be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.b)No, he will not be afforded the protection, as murder, possessing illegal Arms and conspiring in a terrorist activity are serious crime against the unity, integrity and sovereignty of India.c)No, he will not be afforded the protection, because he has failed to adduce any age determining certificate like School Leaving Certificate, Boards Mark sheets etc.d)No, he will not be afforded the protection, since Section 21 is not attracted in this case in the first place.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. Master Bholu was convicted for offence of murder, possessing illegal Arms and conspiring in a terrorist activity. Bholu has been found as a juvenile. He was fined heavily and given exemplary punishment.Will Bholu be afforded the protection of Section 21 of Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015?a)Yes, he will be afforded the protection, being a juvenile Bholu cannot be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.b)No, he will not be afforded the protection, as murder, possessing illegal Arms and conspiring in a terrorist activity are serious crime against the unity, integrity and sovereignty of India.c)No, he will not be afforded the protection, because he has failed to adduce any age determining certificate like School Leaving Certificate, Boards Mark sheets etc.d)No, he will not be afforded the protection, since Section 21 is not attracted in this case in the first place.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. Master Bholu was convicted for offence of murder, possessing illegal Arms and conspiring in a terrorist activity. Bholu has been found as a juvenile. He was fined heavily and given exemplary punishment.Will Bholu be afforded the protection of Section 21 of Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015?a)Yes, he will be afforded the protection, being a juvenile Bholu cannot be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.b)No, he will not be afforded the protection, as murder, possessing illegal Arms and conspiring in a terrorist activity are serious crime against the unity, integrity and sovereignty of India.c)No, he will not be afforded the protection, because he has failed to adduce any age determining certificate like School Leaving Certificate, Boards Mark sheets etc.d)No, he will not be afforded the protection, since Section 21 is not attracted in this case in the first place.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. Master Bholu was convicted for offence of murder, possessing illegal Arms and conspiring in a terrorist activity. Bholu has been found as a juvenile. He was fined heavily and given exemplary punishment.Will Bholu be afforded the protection of Section 21 of Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015?a)Yes, he will be afforded the protection, being a juvenile Bholu cannot be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.b)No, he will not be afforded the protection, as murder, possessing illegal Arms and conspiring in a terrorist activity are serious crime against the unity, integrity and sovereignty of India.c)No, he will not be afforded the protection, because he has failed to adduce any age determining certificate like School Leaving Certificate, Boards Mark sheets etc.d)No, he will not be afforded the protection, since Section 21 is not attracted in this case in the first place.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. Master Bholu was convicted for offence of murder, possessing illegal Arms and conspiring in a terrorist activity. Bholu has been found as a juvenile. He was fined heavily and given exemplary punishment.Will Bholu be afforded the protection of Section 21 of Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015?a)Yes, he will be afforded the protection, being a juvenile Bholu cannot be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.b)No, he will not be afforded the protection, as murder, possessing illegal Arms and conspiring in a terrorist activity are serious crime against the unity, integrity and sovereignty of India.c)No, he will not be afforded the protection, because he has failed to adduce any age determining certificate like School Leaving Certificate, Boards Mark sheets etc.d)No, he will not be afforded the protection, since Section 21 is not attracted in this case in the first place.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. Master Bholu was convicted for offence of murder, possessing illegal Arms and conspiring in a terrorist activity. Bholu has been found as a juvenile. He was fined heavily and given exemplary punishment.Will Bholu be afforded the protection of Section 21 of Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015?a)Yes, he will be afforded the protection, being a juvenile Bholu cannot be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.b)No, he will not be afforded the protection, as murder, possessing illegal Arms and conspiring in a terrorist activity are serious crime against the unity, integrity and sovereignty of India.c)No, he will not be afforded the protection, because he has failed to adduce any age determining certificate like School Leaving Certificate, Boards Mark sheets etc.d)No, he will not be afforded the protection, since Section 21 is not attracted in this case in the first place.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. Master Bholu was convicted for offence of murder, possessing illegal Arms and conspiring in a terrorist activity. Bholu has been found as a juvenile. He was fined heavily and given exemplary punishment.Will Bholu be afforded the protection of Section 21 of Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015?a)Yes, he will be afforded the protection, being a juvenile Bholu cannot be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.b)No, he will not be afforded the protection, as murder, possessing illegal Arms and conspiring in a terrorist activity are serious crime against the unity, integrity and sovereignty of India.c)No, he will not be afforded the protection, because he has failed to adduce any age determining certificate like School Leaving Certificate, Boards Mark sheets etc.d)No, he will not be afforded the protection, since Section 21 is not attracted in this case in the first place.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. Master Bholu was convicted for offence of murder, possessing illegal Arms and conspiring in a terrorist activity. Bholu has been found as a juvenile. He was fined heavily and given exemplary punishment.Will Bholu be afforded the protection of Section 21 of Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015?a)Yes, he will be afforded the protection, being a juvenile Bholu cannot be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.b)No, he will not be afforded the protection, as murder, possessing illegal Arms and conspiring in a terrorist activity are serious crime against the unity, integrity and sovereignty of India.c)No, he will not be afforded the protection, because he has failed to adduce any age determining certificate like School Leaving Certificate, Boards Mark sheets etc.d)No, he will not be afforded the protection, since Section 21 is not attracted in this case in the first place.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. Master Bholu was convicted for offence of murder, possessing illegal Arms and conspiring in a terrorist activity. Bholu has been found as a juvenile. He was fined heavily and given exemplary punishment.Will Bholu be afforded the protection of Section 21 of Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015?a)Yes, he will be afforded the protection, being a juvenile Bholu cannot be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.b)No, he will not be afforded the protection, as murder, possessing illegal Arms and conspiring in a terrorist activity are serious crime against the unity, integrity and sovereignty of India.c)No, he will not be afforded the protection, because he has failed to adduce any age determining certificate like School Leaving Certificate, Boards Mark sheets etc.d)No, he will not be afforded the protection, since Section 21 is not attracted in this case in the first place.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. Master Bholu was convicted for offence of murder, possessing illegal Arms and conspiring in a terrorist activity. Bholu has been found as a juvenile. He was fined heavily and given exemplary punishment.Will Bholu be afforded the protection of Section 21 of Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015?a)Yes, he will be afforded the protection, being a juvenile Bholu cannot be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.b)No, he will not be afforded the protection, as murder, possessing illegal Arms and conspiring in a terrorist activity are serious crime against the unity, integrity and sovereignty of India.c)No, he will not be afforded the protection, because he has failed to adduce any age determining certificate like School Leaving Certificate, Boards Mark sheets etc.d)No, he will not be afforded the protection, since Section 21 is not attracted in this case in the first place.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev