Question Description
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. Supreme Court would be reluctant to entertain a plea about the determination of the age of a convict.Simultaneously, Supreme Court cannot ignore, overlook or nullify the beneficial provisions of the Act.Guddu, a juvenile, convicted for having committed rape and murder of 4 years old girl. He was sentenced to death penalty. However, Guddu only raised the plea of juvenility in the Supreme Court. Based on the authors reasoning and principle of law, choose the appropriate option with best course of action on the plea of juvenility?a)Yes, apex court should entertain the plea of juvenility, since Guddu being a child deserves protection and security from the coercive action of the State.b)No, apex court should not entertain the plea of juvenility, since Guddu has not shown any remorse and repentance, and committed the crime with a calculated strategy and design.c)Yes, apex court should entertain the plea of juvenility, since the age of Guddu is undetermined as well as he cannot be disqualified from the protective JJ Act.d)No, apex court should not entertain the plea of juvenility, since Guddu has shown strong criminal determination which cannot be wiped off easily.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. Supreme Court would be reluctant to entertain a plea about the determination of the age of a convict.Simultaneously, Supreme Court cannot ignore, overlook or nullify the beneficial provisions of the Act.Guddu, a juvenile, convicted for having committed rape and murder of 4 years old girl. He was sentenced to death penalty. However, Guddu only raised the plea of juvenility in the Supreme Court. Based on the authors reasoning and principle of law, choose the appropriate option with best course of action on the plea of juvenility?a)Yes, apex court should entertain the plea of juvenility, since Guddu being a child deserves protection and security from the coercive action of the State.b)No, apex court should not entertain the plea of juvenility, since Guddu has not shown any remorse and repentance, and committed the crime with a calculated strategy and design.c)Yes, apex court should entertain the plea of juvenility, since the age of Guddu is undetermined as well as he cannot be disqualified from the protective JJ Act.d)No, apex court should not entertain the plea of juvenility, since Guddu has shown strong criminal determination which cannot be wiped off easily.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. Supreme Court would be reluctant to entertain a plea about the determination of the age of a convict.Simultaneously, Supreme Court cannot ignore, overlook or nullify the beneficial provisions of the Act.Guddu, a juvenile, convicted for having committed rape and murder of 4 years old girl. He was sentenced to death penalty. However, Guddu only raised the plea of juvenility in the Supreme Court. Based on the authors reasoning and principle of law, choose the appropriate option with best course of action on the plea of juvenility?a)Yes, apex court should entertain the plea of juvenility, since Guddu being a child deserves protection and security from the coercive action of the State.b)No, apex court should not entertain the plea of juvenility, since Guddu has not shown any remorse and repentance, and committed the crime with a calculated strategy and design.c)Yes, apex court should entertain the plea of juvenility, since the age of Guddu is undetermined as well as he cannot be disqualified from the protective JJ Act.d)No, apex court should not entertain the plea of juvenility, since Guddu has shown strong criminal determination which cannot be wiped off easily.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. Supreme Court would be reluctant to entertain a plea about the determination of the age of a convict.Simultaneously, Supreme Court cannot ignore, overlook or nullify the beneficial provisions of the Act.Guddu, a juvenile, convicted for having committed rape and murder of 4 years old girl. He was sentenced to death penalty. However, Guddu only raised the plea of juvenility in the Supreme Court. Based on the authors reasoning and principle of law, choose the appropriate option with best course of action on the plea of juvenility?a)Yes, apex court should entertain the plea of juvenility, since Guddu being a child deserves protection and security from the coercive action of the State.b)No, apex court should not entertain the plea of juvenility, since Guddu has not shown any remorse and repentance, and committed the crime with a calculated strategy and design.c)Yes, apex court should entertain the plea of juvenility, since the age of Guddu is undetermined as well as he cannot be disqualified from the protective JJ Act.d)No, apex court should not entertain the plea of juvenility, since Guddu has shown strong criminal determination which cannot be wiped off easily.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. Supreme Court would be reluctant to entertain a plea about the determination of the age of a convict.Simultaneously, Supreme Court cannot ignore, overlook or nullify the beneficial provisions of the Act.Guddu, a juvenile, convicted for having committed rape and murder of 4 years old girl. He was sentenced to death penalty. However, Guddu only raised the plea of juvenility in the Supreme Court. Based on the authors reasoning and principle of law, choose the appropriate option with best course of action on the plea of juvenility?a)Yes, apex court should entertain the plea of juvenility, since Guddu being a child deserves protection and security from the coercive action of the State.b)No, apex court should not entertain the plea of juvenility, since Guddu has not shown any remorse and repentance, and committed the crime with a calculated strategy and design.c)Yes, apex court should entertain the plea of juvenility, since the age of Guddu is undetermined as well as he cannot be disqualified from the protective JJ Act.d)No, apex court should not entertain the plea of juvenility, since Guddu has shown strong criminal determination which cannot be wiped off easily.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. Supreme Court would be reluctant to entertain a plea about the determination of the age of a convict.Simultaneously, Supreme Court cannot ignore, overlook or nullify the beneficial provisions of the Act.Guddu, a juvenile, convicted for having committed rape and murder of 4 years old girl. He was sentenced to death penalty. However, Guddu only raised the plea of juvenility in the Supreme Court. Based on the authors reasoning and principle of law, choose the appropriate option with best course of action on the plea of juvenility?a)Yes, apex court should entertain the plea of juvenility, since Guddu being a child deserves protection and security from the coercive action of the State.b)No, apex court should not entertain the plea of juvenility, since Guddu has not shown any remorse and repentance, and committed the crime with a calculated strategy and design.c)Yes, apex court should entertain the plea of juvenility, since the age of Guddu is undetermined as well as he cannot be disqualified from the protective JJ Act.d)No, apex court should not entertain the plea of juvenility, since Guddu has shown strong criminal determination which cannot be wiped off easily.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. Supreme Court would be reluctant to entertain a plea about the determination of the age of a convict.Simultaneously, Supreme Court cannot ignore, overlook or nullify the beneficial provisions of the Act.Guddu, a juvenile, convicted for having committed rape and murder of 4 years old girl. He was sentenced to death penalty. However, Guddu only raised the plea of juvenility in the Supreme Court. Based on the authors reasoning and principle of law, choose the appropriate option with best course of action on the plea of juvenility?a)Yes, apex court should entertain the plea of juvenility, since Guddu being a child deserves protection and security from the coercive action of the State.b)No, apex court should not entertain the plea of juvenility, since Guddu has not shown any remorse and repentance, and committed the crime with a calculated strategy and design.c)Yes, apex court should entertain the plea of juvenility, since the age of Guddu is undetermined as well as he cannot be disqualified from the protective JJ Act.d)No, apex court should not entertain the plea of juvenility, since Guddu has shown strong criminal determination which cannot be wiped off easily.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. Supreme Court would be reluctant to entertain a plea about the determination of the age of a convict.Simultaneously, Supreme Court cannot ignore, overlook or nullify the beneficial provisions of the Act.Guddu, a juvenile, convicted for having committed rape and murder of 4 years old girl. He was sentenced to death penalty. However, Guddu only raised the plea of juvenility in the Supreme Court. Based on the authors reasoning and principle of law, choose the appropriate option with best course of action on the plea of juvenility?a)Yes, apex court should entertain the plea of juvenility, since Guddu being a child deserves protection and security from the coercive action of the State.b)No, apex court should not entertain the plea of juvenility, since Guddu has not shown any remorse and repentance, and committed the crime with a calculated strategy and design.c)Yes, apex court should entertain the plea of juvenility, since the age of Guddu is undetermined as well as he cannot be disqualified from the protective JJ Act.d)No, apex court should not entertain the plea of juvenility, since Guddu has shown strong criminal determination which cannot be wiped off easily.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act is related to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection by catering to their basic needs through proper care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, by adopting a child-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children and for their rehabilitation. A juvenile in conflict with law, if apprehended, has to be placed immediately under the care of the special juvenile police unit or a designated child welfare officer. The child has to be produced before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The Supreme Court has made it clear that the police have no right to detain children in conflict with law in a lockup or a jail.Additionally, Section 21 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 says "No child in conflict with law shall be sentenced to death or for life imprisonment without the possibility of release, for any such offence, either under the provisions of this Act or under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code or any other law for the time being in force."Maximum sentence which can be imposed is 3 years not beyond that. Once a child is produced before a JJB, bail is the rule. And even if, for some reason, bail is not granted, a child cannot be put behind bars. He has to be lodged either in an observation home or in a place of safety. The law is meant to protect children and not detain them in jail or keep them in police custody. The police cannot torture children.If it comes to the knowledge of the JJBs that a child has been detained in prison or police lockup, they should ensure that the child is immediately granted bail or sent to an observation home or a place of safety.The Act cannot be flouted by anybody, least of all by the police. The concept of justice is limited in itself, and does not address the needs of the child and family. Several times, the victims have an emotional turmoil around the court system itself. It aims to address what the child victim really needs and could even be after the criminal justice system.Q. Supreme Court would be reluctant to entertain a plea about the determination of the age of a convict.Simultaneously, Supreme Court cannot ignore, overlook or nullify the beneficial provisions of the Act.Guddu, a juvenile, convicted for having committed rape and murder of 4 years old girl. He was sentenced to death penalty. However, Guddu only raised the plea of juvenility in the Supreme Court. Based on the authors reasoning and principle of law, choose the appropriate option with best course of action on the plea of juvenility?a)Yes, apex court should entertain the plea of juvenility, since Guddu being a child deserves protection and security from the coercive action of the State.b)No, apex court should not entertain the plea of juvenility, since Guddu has not shown any remorse and repentance, and committed the crime with a calculated strategy and design.c)Yes, apex court should entertain the plea of juvenility, since the age of Guddu is undetermined as well as he cannot be disqualified from the protective JJ Act.d)No, apex court should not entertain the plea of juvenility, since Guddu has shown strong criminal determination which cannot be wiped off easily.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.