All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   Hungamaland is known for exotic wines, beers... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Hungamaland is known for exotic wines, beers and other alcoholic drinks. Hungamaland liquor is one of the best attractions of the world. Recently, Hungamaland witnessed a change in ruling political party which came to power on the promise of prohibition of alcohol. In pursuance of the political promise, Govt. of Hungamaland notified the closure of breweries. Closure order led to huge unemployment.
Reports pointed a rise in criminal activities by the unemployed populace. To remedy the situation, Govt. notified the employment of the brewery workers in Coal mines. This notification successfully led to a decline in the crimes. However after two years, Hungamaland Govt. closed the sulphur emitting coal mines by withdrawing the employment notification. Govt. argued due to Paris commitment, achievement of the climate targets has become imminent.
Later on, Government of Hungamaland announced tax exemptions and subsidies to promote industrial production.
To bridge inter-regional disparities, investment allowances were announced for investors who set up industries in the rural areas. Laws and notifications were formulated to give effect to the announcements. Hungamaland to raise revenue, withdrawn the tax exemptions, subsidies & investment allowances laws and notifications. Investors and Industrialists pleaded for the right of being heard before the withdrawal which was not conceded.
In due course, Hungamaland policies gave a big boost to the economy. To deal with any dispute arising out of the terms, conditions and contract of services, Tribunal was established by the Hungamaland Legislature. Tribunal was headed by a Chairman. Law stipulated that Chairman shall continue for 5 years from the date of joining the services or till the attainment of 65 years, whichever is earlier. After two years, Legislature abolished the Tribunal by passing a Tribunal (Repeal) law. Government Contracts are useful instrument to deliver public service. Contract/Tender notifications lay down the following guidelines:-
A person has a legal expectation of being treated in a certain way by administrative/legislative authority.
  • The expectation may arise either from a representation or promise made by the authority, including an implied representation, or from consistent past practice.
  • Principle of legal expectation requires opportunity of being heard to the person affected where a promise is made and is withdrawn.
  • Change in Govt. Policy due to overriding public interest must be given due weight while considering claim of legal expectation.
    Q. Unemployed workers challenged the action of Govt. on account of legal expectation of continuous employment. Has Government violated the law?
    Choose the option with the correct answer and explanation.
    • a)
      Yes, Legal Expectation of the workers is violated as they have rightly assumed the promise of continued employment on the basis of the notification.
    • b)
      No, Case of legal expectation will be negatived due to overriding public interest of environmental concerns.
    • c)
      Yes, Worker's claims shall succeed as they were not provided the opportunity of being heard which a Fundamental Right.
    • d)
      No, Hungamaland should intelligibly exercise their Right to Vote to prevent recurrence of such situations.
    Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
    FREE This question is part of
    Download PDF Attempt Test
    		Download PDF Attempt this Test
    Most Upvoted Answer
    Hungamaland is known for exotic wines, beers and other alcoholic drin...
    Hungamaland government's withdrawal of notification though violated the claim of legitimate expectation of the workers but it was done to fulfill international commitment and larger public interest of environmental safety. Cumulative reading of guidelines makes Option b a safe, appropriate and close answer. Guideline 2 has no application when the related facts are not mentioned.
    Attention CLAT Students!
    To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
    < Previous Question Next Question >
    Explore Courses for CLAT exam

    Similar CLAT Doubts

    Hungamaland is known for exotic wines, beers and other alcoholic drinks. Hungamaland liquor is one of the best attractions of the world. Recently, Hungamaland witnessed a change in ruling political party which came to power on the promise of prohibition of alcohol. In pursuance of the political promise, Govt. of Hungamaland notified the closure of breweries. Closure order led to huge unemployment.Reports pointed a rise in criminal activities by the unemployed populace. To remedy the situation, Govt. notified the employment of the brewery workers in Coal mines. This notification successfully led to a decline in the crimes. However after two years, Hungamaland Govt. closed the sulphur emitting coal mines by withdrawing the employment notification. Govt. argued due to Paris commitment, achievement of the climate targets has become imminent.Later on, Government of Hungamaland announced tax exemptions and subsidies to promote industrial production.To bridge inter-regional disparities, investment allowances were announced for investors who set up industries in the rural areas. Laws and notifications were formulated to give effect to the announcements. Hungamaland to raise revenue, withdrawn the tax exemptions, subsidies & investment allowances laws and notifications. Investors and Industrialists pleaded for the right of being heard before the withdrawal which was not conceded.In due course, Hungamaland policies gave a big boost to the economy. To deal with any dispute arising out of the terms, conditions and contract of services, Tribunal was established by the Hungamaland Legislature. Tribunal was headed by a Chairman. Law stipulated that Chairman shall continue for 5 years from the date of joining the services or till the attainment of 65 years, whichever is earlier. After two years, Legislature abolished the Tribunal by passing a Tribunal (Repeal) law. Government Contracts are useful instrument to deliver public service. Contract/Tender notifications lay down the following guidelines:- A person has a legal expectation of being treated in a certain way by administrative/legislative authority. The expectation may arise either from a representation or promise made by the authority, including an implied representation, or from consistent past practice. Principle of legal expectation requires opportunity of being heard to the person affected where a promise is made and is withdrawn. Change in Govt. Policy due to overriding public interest must be given due weight while considering claim of legal expectation. Q. Alex Hale who was appointed as chairman could not complete the 65 years or 5 years tenure. Hale attacked the law on the ground of legal expectation of uninterrupted employment. Did the Government breach the requirements of contract guidelines?

    Hungamaland is known for exotic wines, beers and other alcoholic drinks. Hungamaland liquor is one of the best attractions of the world. Recently, Hungamaland witnessed a change in ruling political party which came to power on the promise of prohibition of alcohol. In pursuance of the political promise, Govt. of Hungamaland notified the closure of breweries. Closure order led to huge unemployment.Reports pointed a rise in criminal activities by the unemployed populace. To remedy the situation, Govt. notified the employment of the brewery workers in Coal mines. This notification successfully led to a decline in the crimes. However after two years, Hungamaland Govt. closed the sulphur emitting coal mines by withdrawing the employment notification. Govt. argued due to Paris commitment, achievement of the climate targets has become imminent.Later on, Government of Hungamaland announced tax exemptions and subsidies to promote industrial production.To bridge inter-regional disparities, investment allowances were announced for investors who set up industries in the rural areas. Laws and notifications were formulated to give effect to the announcements. Hungamaland to raise revenue, withdrawn the tax exemptions, subsidies & investment allowances laws and notifications. Investors and Industrialists pleaded for the right of being heard before the withdrawal which was not conceded.In due course, Hungamaland policies gave a big boost to the economy. To deal with any dispute arising out of the terms, conditions and contract of services, Tribunal was established by the Hungamaland Legislature. Tribunal was headed by a Chairman. Law stipulated that Chairman shall continue for 5 years from the date of joining the services or till the attainment of 65 years, whichever is earlier. After two years, Legislature abolished the Tribunal by passing a Tribunal (Repeal) law. Government Contracts are useful instrument to deliver public service. Contract/Tender notifications lay down the following guidelines:- A person has a legal expectation of being treated in a certain way by administrative/legislative authority. The expectation may arise either from a representation or promise made by the authority, including an implied representation, or from consistent past practice. Principle of legal expectation requires opportunity of being heard to the person affected where a promise is made and is withdrawn. Change in Govt. Policy due to overriding public interest must be given due weight while considering claim of legal expectation. Q. The appellants questioned the legality directing discontinuance of benefits. Can Investors successfully raise the claim of violation of legal expectation? Decide.

    Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.India is one of the few countries with elaborate provisions for the environment in the legal framework. The courts in India largely relied on Article 21 for applying the law to the decision making process on various perspectives and provisional duties related to the environment. Protection of the environment can give rise to many challenges in a developing country. Hence, administrative and legal strategies are extremely important to ensure environmental harmony. T Damodar Rao v Special Officer, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabadwas a landmark case for High Courts in India to take up responsibility in specific and concrete decision making. Despite severe penalties, environmental laws in certain places seem erratic in their implementation and ineffective at many levels of administrative mechanisms.The courts have also laid down that protection and improvement of the environment is mandated for all institutions across the country and is a right as well. India being a developing nation with interests in growth and burgeoning developmental ideologies, the mandates of Courts are envisioned in a development-oriented manner, where the concept of Sustainable Development arises. A relatively new concept for India to focus on in terms of resource utilisation is reducing our collective carbon footprint and pollution levels. Sustainable development law is found at the intersection of three primary fields of law: international economic law, international environmental law and international social law. It refers to an emerging substantive body of legal instruments, norms and treaties, supported by distinctive procedural elements. This is incorporated on the justification that future generations may benefit from policies and laws that advocate environmental protection as well as developmental goals. This has recently been recognised by the Supreme Court in the M.C. Mehta (Taj Trapezium Matter) v. Union of India case.A notable action that could be taken is making the system more accommodating and approachable- Making it easier to read and understand the law provisions and statutes regarding Environmental Law for the general population and better mechanisms for efficiency as well as transparency within (courts) and outside (public spaces) the systems of administrative, legislature and judiciary can go a long way. Law is generally regarded as a Utopian system of action. Making it a more approachable and public-friendly system would allow it to work on an easier transition for the public. Systems such as Public Interest Litigations are focused on allowing people to issue and procure information from within the legal system on the matter of interest at hand. The Law is trying to focus on easier access for appeals and better capabilities of integrating the public interest within judgements and cases.Q.Akshat lives in house in a very packed and congested colony. Recently 5-6 families with adjoining houses in the colony have reconstructed their houses to start a new company to manufacture eco friendly home utilities. They want to contribute in creating better environment. As there manufacturing unit is purifying everything being created in the process it throws out lot of chemical waste on road which is collected by government vehicle after a day. Akshat believes this is pollution and sues them. Based on the principles and information set out in the given passage

    Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.India is one of the few countries with elaborate provisions for the environment in the legal framework. The courts in India largely relied on Article 21 for applying the law to the decision making process on various perspectives and provisional duties related to the environment. Protection of the environment can give rise to many challenges in a developing country. Hence, administrative and legal strategies are extremely important to ensure environmental harmony. T Damodar Rao v Special Officer, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabadwas a landmark case for High Courts in India to take up responsibility in specific and concrete decision making. Despite severe penalties, environmental laws in certain places seem erratic in their implementation and ineffective at many levels of administrative mechanisms.The courts have also laid down that protection and improvement of the environment is mandated for all institutions across the country and is a right as well. India being a developing nation with interests in growth and burgeoning developmental ideologies, the mandates of Courts are envisioned in a development-oriented manner, where the concept of Sustainable Development arises. A relatively new concept for India to focus on in terms of resource utilisation is reducing our collective carbon footprint and pollution levels. Sustainable development law is found at the intersection of three primary fields of law: international economic law, international environmental law and international social law. It refers to an emerging substantive body of legal instruments, norms and treaties, supported by distinctive procedural elements. This is incorporated on the justification that future generations may benefit from policies and laws that advocate environmental protection as well as developmental goals. This has recently been recognised by the Supreme Court in the M.C. Mehta (Taj Trapezium Matter) v. Union of India case.A notable action that could be taken is making the system more accommodating and approachable- Making it easier to read and understand the law provisions and statutes regarding Environmental Law for the general population and better mechanisms for efficiency as well as transparency within (courts) and outside (public spaces) the systems of administrative, legislature and judiciary can go a long way. Law is generally regarded as a Utopian system of action. Making it a more approachable and public-friendly system would allow it to work on an easier transition for the public. Systems such as Public Interest Litigations are focused on allowing people to issue and procure information from within the legal system on the matter of interest at hand. The Law is trying to focus on easier access for appeals and better capabilities of integrating the public interest within judgements and cases.Q.Based on the principles and information set out in the given passage

    Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.India is one of the few countries with elaborate provisions for the environment in the legal framework. The courts in India largely relied on Article 21 for applying the law to the decision making process on various perspectives and provisional duties related to the environment. Protection of the environment can give rise to many challenges in a developing country. Hence, administrative and legal strategies are extremely important to ensure environmental harmony. T Damodar Rao v Special Officer, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabadwas a landmark case for High Courts in India to take up responsibility in specific and concrete decision making. Despite severe penalties, environmental laws in certain places seem erratic in their implementation and ineffective at many levels of administrative mechanisms.The courts have also laid down that protection and improvement of the environment is mandated for all institutions across the country and is a right as well. India being a developing nation with interests in growth and burgeoning developmental ideologies, the mandates of Courts are envisioned in a development-oriented manner, where the concept of Sustainable Development arises. A relatively new concept for India to focus on in terms of resource utilisation is reducing our collective carbon footprint and pollution levels. Sustainable development law is found at the intersection of three primary fields of law: international economic law, international environmental law and international social law. It refers to an emerging substantive body of legal instruments, norms and treaties, supported by distinctive procedural elements. This is incorporated on the justification that future generations may benefit from policies and laws that advocate environmental protection as well as developmental goals. This has recently been recognised by the Supreme Court in the M.C. Mehta (Taj Trapezium Matter) v. Union of India case.A notable action that could be taken is making the system more accommodating and approachable- Making it easier to read and understand the law provisions and statutes regarding Environmental Law for the general population and better mechanisms for efficiency as well as transparency within (courts) and outside (public spaces) the systems of administrative, legislature and judiciary can go a long way. Law is generally regarded as a Utopian system of action. Making it a more approachable and public-friendly system would allow it to work on an easier transition for the public. Systems such as Public Interest Litigations are focused on allowing people to issue and procure information from within the legal system on the matter of interest at hand. The Law is trying to focus on easier access for appeals and better capabilities of integrating the public interest within judgements and cases.Q.Lets us government bans single use plastic completely. Based on the principles and information set out in the given passage

    Top Courses for CLATView all

    Top Courses for CLAT

    Hungamaland is known for exotic wines, beers and other alcoholic drinks. Hungamaland liquor is one of the best attractions of the world. Recently, Hungamaland witnessed a change in ruling political party which came to power on the promise of prohibition of alcohol. In pursuance of the political promise, Govt. of Hungamaland notified the closure of breweries. Closure order led to huge unemployment.Reports pointed a rise in criminal activities by the unemployed populace. To remedy the situation, Govt. notified the employment of the brewery workers in Coal mines. This notification successfully led to a decline in the crimes. However after two years, Hungamaland Govt. closed the sulphur emitting coal mines by withdrawing the employment notification. Govt. argued due to Paris commitment, achievement of the climate targets has become imminent.Later on, Government of Hungamaland announced tax exemptions and subsidies to promote industrial production.To bridge inter-regional disparities, investment allowances were announced for investors who set up industries in the rural areas. Laws and notifications were formulated to give effect to the announcements. Hungamaland to raise revenue, withdrawn the tax exemptions, subsidies & investment allowances laws and notifications. Investors and Industrialists pleaded for the right of being heard before the withdrawal which was not conceded.In due course, Hungamaland policies gave a big boost to the economy. To deal with any dispute arising out of the terms, conditions and contract of services, Tribunal was established by the Hungamaland Legislature. Tribunal was headed by a Chairman. Law stipulated that Chairman shall continue for 5 years from the date of joining the services or till the attainment of 65 years, whichever is earlier. After two years, Legislature abolished the Tribunal by passing a Tribunal (Repeal) law. Government Contracts are useful instrument to deliver public service. Contract/Tender notifications lay down the following guidelines:- A person has a legal expectation of being treated in a certain way by administrative/legislative authority. The expectation may arise either from a representation or promise made by the authority, including an implied representation, or from consistent past practice. Principle of legal expectation requires opportunity of being heard to the person affected where a promise is made and is withdrawn. Change in Govt. Policy due to overriding public interest must be given due weight while considering claim of legal expectation. Q. Unemployed workers challenged the action of Govt. on account of legal expectation of continuous employment. Has Government violated the law?Choose the option with the correct answer and explanation.a)Yes, Legal Expectation of the workers is violated as they have rightly assumed the promise of continued employment on the basis of the notification.b)No, Case of legal expectation will be negatived due to overriding public interest of environmental concerns.c)Yes, Worker's claims shall succeed as they were not provided the opportunity of being heard which a Fundamental Right.d)No, Hungamaland should intelligibly exercise their Right to Vote to prevent recurrence of such situations.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
    Question Description
    Hungamaland is known for exotic wines, beers and other alcoholic drinks. Hungamaland liquor is one of the best attractions of the world. Recently, Hungamaland witnessed a change in ruling political party which came to power on the promise of prohibition of alcohol. In pursuance of the political promise, Govt. of Hungamaland notified the closure of breweries. Closure order led to huge unemployment.Reports pointed a rise in criminal activities by the unemployed populace. To remedy the situation, Govt. notified the employment of the brewery workers in Coal mines. This notification successfully led to a decline in the crimes. However after two years, Hungamaland Govt. closed the sulphur emitting coal mines by withdrawing the employment notification. Govt. argued due to Paris commitment, achievement of the climate targets has become imminent.Later on, Government of Hungamaland announced tax exemptions and subsidies to promote industrial production.To bridge inter-regional disparities, investment allowances were announced for investors who set up industries in the rural areas. Laws and notifications were formulated to give effect to the announcements. Hungamaland to raise revenue, withdrawn the tax exemptions, subsidies & investment allowances laws and notifications. Investors and Industrialists pleaded for the right of being heard before the withdrawal which was not conceded.In due course, Hungamaland policies gave a big boost to the economy. To deal with any dispute arising out of the terms, conditions and contract of services, Tribunal was established by the Hungamaland Legislature. Tribunal was headed by a Chairman. Law stipulated that Chairman shall continue for 5 years from the date of joining the services or till the attainment of 65 years, whichever is earlier. After two years, Legislature abolished the Tribunal by passing a Tribunal (Repeal) law. Government Contracts are useful instrument to deliver public service. Contract/Tender notifications lay down the following guidelines:- A person has a legal expectation of being treated in a certain way by administrative/legislative authority. The expectation may arise either from a representation or promise made by the authority, including an implied representation, or from consistent past practice. Principle of legal expectation requires opportunity of being heard to the person affected where a promise is made and is withdrawn. Change in Govt. Policy due to overriding public interest must be given due weight while considering claim of legal expectation. Q. Unemployed workers challenged the action of Govt. on account of legal expectation of continuous employment. Has Government violated the law?Choose the option with the correct answer and explanation.a)Yes, Legal Expectation of the workers is violated as they have rightly assumed the promise of continued employment on the basis of the notification.b)No, Case of legal expectation will be negatived due to overriding public interest of environmental concerns.c)Yes, Worker's claims shall succeed as they were not provided the opportunity of being heard which a Fundamental Right.d)No, Hungamaland should intelligibly exercise their Right to Vote to prevent recurrence of such situations.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Hungamaland is known for exotic wines, beers and other alcoholic drinks. Hungamaland liquor is one of the best attractions of the world. Recently, Hungamaland witnessed a change in ruling political party which came to power on the promise of prohibition of alcohol. In pursuance of the political promise, Govt. of Hungamaland notified the closure of breweries. Closure order led to huge unemployment.Reports pointed a rise in criminal activities by the unemployed populace. To remedy the situation, Govt. notified the employment of the brewery workers in Coal mines. This notification successfully led to a decline in the crimes. However after two years, Hungamaland Govt. closed the sulphur emitting coal mines by withdrawing the employment notification. Govt. argued due to Paris commitment, achievement of the climate targets has become imminent.Later on, Government of Hungamaland announced tax exemptions and subsidies to promote industrial production.To bridge inter-regional disparities, investment allowances were announced for investors who set up industries in the rural areas. Laws and notifications were formulated to give effect to the announcements. Hungamaland to raise revenue, withdrawn the tax exemptions, subsidies & investment allowances laws and notifications. Investors and Industrialists pleaded for the right of being heard before the withdrawal which was not conceded.In due course, Hungamaland policies gave a big boost to the economy. To deal with any dispute arising out of the terms, conditions and contract of services, Tribunal was established by the Hungamaland Legislature. Tribunal was headed by a Chairman. Law stipulated that Chairman shall continue for 5 years from the date of joining the services or till the attainment of 65 years, whichever is earlier. After two years, Legislature abolished the Tribunal by passing a Tribunal (Repeal) law. Government Contracts are useful instrument to deliver public service. Contract/Tender notifications lay down the following guidelines:- A person has a legal expectation of being treated in a certain way by administrative/legislative authority. The expectation may arise either from a representation or promise made by the authority, including an implied representation, or from consistent past practice. Principle of legal expectation requires opportunity of being heard to the person affected where a promise is made and is withdrawn. Change in Govt. Policy due to overriding public interest must be given due weight while considering claim of legal expectation. Q. Unemployed workers challenged the action of Govt. on account of legal expectation of continuous employment. Has Government violated the law?Choose the option with the correct answer and explanation.a)Yes, Legal Expectation of the workers is violated as they have rightly assumed the promise of continued employment on the basis of the notification.b)No, Case of legal expectation will be negatived due to overriding public interest of environmental concerns.c)Yes, Worker's claims shall succeed as they were not provided the opportunity of being heard which a Fundamental Right.d)No, Hungamaland should intelligibly exercise their Right to Vote to prevent recurrence of such situations.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Hungamaland is known for exotic wines, beers and other alcoholic drinks. Hungamaland liquor is one of the best attractions of the world. Recently, Hungamaland witnessed a change in ruling political party which came to power on the promise of prohibition of alcohol. In pursuance of the political promise, Govt. of Hungamaland notified the closure of breweries. Closure order led to huge unemployment.Reports pointed a rise in criminal activities by the unemployed populace. To remedy the situation, Govt. notified the employment of the brewery workers in Coal mines. This notification successfully led to a decline in the crimes. However after two years, Hungamaland Govt. closed the sulphur emitting coal mines by withdrawing the employment notification. Govt. argued due to Paris commitment, achievement of the climate targets has become imminent.Later on, Government of Hungamaland announced tax exemptions and subsidies to promote industrial production.To bridge inter-regional disparities, investment allowances were announced for investors who set up industries in the rural areas. Laws and notifications were formulated to give effect to the announcements. Hungamaland to raise revenue, withdrawn the tax exemptions, subsidies & investment allowances laws and notifications. Investors and Industrialists pleaded for the right of being heard before the withdrawal which was not conceded.In due course, Hungamaland policies gave a big boost to the economy. To deal with any dispute arising out of the terms, conditions and contract of services, Tribunal was established by the Hungamaland Legislature. Tribunal was headed by a Chairman. Law stipulated that Chairman shall continue for 5 years from the date of joining the services or till the attainment of 65 years, whichever is earlier. After two years, Legislature abolished the Tribunal by passing a Tribunal (Repeal) law. Government Contracts are useful instrument to deliver public service. Contract/Tender notifications lay down the following guidelines:- A person has a legal expectation of being treated in a certain way by administrative/legislative authority. The expectation may arise either from a representation or promise made by the authority, including an implied representation, or from consistent past practice. Principle of legal expectation requires opportunity of being heard to the person affected where a promise is made and is withdrawn. Change in Govt. Policy due to overriding public interest must be given due weight while considering claim of legal expectation. Q. Unemployed workers challenged the action of Govt. on account of legal expectation of continuous employment. Has Government violated the law?Choose the option with the correct answer and explanation.a)Yes, Legal Expectation of the workers is violated as they have rightly assumed the promise of continued employment on the basis of the notification.b)No, Case of legal expectation will be negatived due to overriding public interest of environmental concerns.c)Yes, Worker's claims shall succeed as they were not provided the opportunity of being heard which a Fundamental Right.d)No, Hungamaland should intelligibly exercise their Right to Vote to prevent recurrence of such situations.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
    Solutions for Hungamaland is known for exotic wines, beers and other alcoholic drinks. Hungamaland liquor is one of the best attractions of the world. Recently, Hungamaland witnessed a change in ruling political party which came to power on the promise of prohibition of alcohol. In pursuance of the political promise, Govt. of Hungamaland notified the closure of breweries. Closure order led to huge unemployment.Reports pointed a rise in criminal activities by the unemployed populace. To remedy the situation, Govt. notified the employment of the brewery workers in Coal mines. This notification successfully led to a decline in the crimes. However after two years, Hungamaland Govt. closed the sulphur emitting coal mines by withdrawing the employment notification. Govt. argued due to Paris commitment, achievement of the climate targets has become imminent.Later on, Government of Hungamaland announced tax exemptions and subsidies to promote industrial production.To bridge inter-regional disparities, investment allowances were announced for investors who set up industries in the rural areas. Laws and notifications were formulated to give effect to the announcements. Hungamaland to raise revenue, withdrawn the tax exemptions, subsidies & investment allowances laws and notifications. Investors and Industrialists pleaded for the right of being heard before the withdrawal which was not conceded.In due course, Hungamaland policies gave a big boost to the economy. To deal with any dispute arising out of the terms, conditions and contract of services, Tribunal was established by the Hungamaland Legislature. Tribunal was headed by a Chairman. Law stipulated that Chairman shall continue for 5 years from the date of joining the services or till the attainment of 65 years, whichever is earlier. After two years, Legislature abolished the Tribunal by passing a Tribunal (Repeal) law. Government Contracts are useful instrument to deliver public service. Contract/Tender notifications lay down the following guidelines:- A person has a legal expectation of being treated in a certain way by administrative/legislative authority. The expectation may arise either from a representation or promise made by the authority, including an implied representation, or from consistent past practice. Principle of legal expectation requires opportunity of being heard to the person affected where a promise is made and is withdrawn. Change in Govt. Policy due to overriding public interest must be given due weight while considering claim of legal expectation. Q. Unemployed workers challenged the action of Govt. on account of legal expectation of continuous employment. Has Government violated the law?Choose the option with the correct answer and explanation.a)Yes, Legal Expectation of the workers is violated as they have rightly assumed the promise of continued employment on the basis of the notification.b)No, Case of legal expectation will be negatived due to overriding public interest of environmental concerns.c)Yes, Worker's claims shall succeed as they were not provided the opportunity of being heard which a Fundamental Right.d)No, Hungamaland should intelligibly exercise their Right to Vote to prevent recurrence of such situations.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
    Here you can find the meaning of Hungamaland is known for exotic wines, beers and other alcoholic drinks. Hungamaland liquor is one of the best attractions of the world. Recently, Hungamaland witnessed a change in ruling political party which came to power on the promise of prohibition of alcohol. In pursuance of the political promise, Govt. of Hungamaland notified the closure of breweries. Closure order led to huge unemployment.Reports pointed a rise in criminal activities by the unemployed populace. To remedy the situation, Govt. notified the employment of the brewery workers in Coal mines. This notification successfully led to a decline in the crimes. However after two years, Hungamaland Govt. closed the sulphur emitting coal mines by withdrawing the employment notification. Govt. argued due to Paris commitment, achievement of the climate targets has become imminent.Later on, Government of Hungamaland announced tax exemptions and subsidies to promote industrial production.To bridge inter-regional disparities, investment allowances were announced for investors who set up industries in the rural areas. Laws and notifications were formulated to give effect to the announcements. Hungamaland to raise revenue, withdrawn the tax exemptions, subsidies & investment allowances laws and notifications. Investors and Industrialists pleaded for the right of being heard before the withdrawal which was not conceded.In due course, Hungamaland policies gave a big boost to the economy. To deal with any dispute arising out of the terms, conditions and contract of services, Tribunal was established by the Hungamaland Legislature. Tribunal was headed by a Chairman. Law stipulated that Chairman shall continue for 5 years from the date of joining the services or till the attainment of 65 years, whichever is earlier. After two years, Legislature abolished the Tribunal by passing a Tribunal (Repeal) law. Government Contracts are useful instrument to deliver public service. Contract/Tender notifications lay down the following guidelines:- A person has a legal expectation of being treated in a certain way by administrative/legislative authority. The expectation may arise either from a representation or promise made by the authority, including an implied representation, or from consistent past practice. Principle of legal expectation requires opportunity of being heard to the person affected where a promise is made and is withdrawn. Change in Govt. Policy due to overriding public interest must be given due weight while considering claim of legal expectation. Q. Unemployed workers challenged the action of Govt. on account of legal expectation of continuous employment. Has Government violated the law?Choose the option with the correct answer and explanation.a)Yes, Legal Expectation of the workers is violated as they have rightly assumed the promise of continued employment on the basis of the notification.b)No, Case of legal expectation will be negatived due to overriding public interest of environmental concerns.c)Yes, Worker's claims shall succeed as they were not provided the opportunity of being heard which a Fundamental Right.d)No, Hungamaland should intelligibly exercise their Right to Vote to prevent recurrence of such situations.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Hungamaland is known for exotic wines, beers and other alcoholic drinks. Hungamaland liquor is one of the best attractions of the world. Recently, Hungamaland witnessed a change in ruling political party which came to power on the promise of prohibition of alcohol. In pursuance of the political promise, Govt. of Hungamaland notified the closure of breweries. Closure order led to huge unemployment.Reports pointed a rise in criminal activities by the unemployed populace. To remedy the situation, Govt. notified the employment of the brewery workers in Coal mines. This notification successfully led to a decline in the crimes. However after two years, Hungamaland Govt. closed the sulphur emitting coal mines by withdrawing the employment notification. Govt. argued due to Paris commitment, achievement of the climate targets has become imminent.Later on, Government of Hungamaland announced tax exemptions and subsidies to promote industrial production.To bridge inter-regional disparities, investment allowances were announced for investors who set up industries in the rural areas. Laws and notifications were formulated to give effect to the announcements. Hungamaland to raise revenue, withdrawn the tax exemptions, subsidies & investment allowances laws and notifications. Investors and Industrialists pleaded for the right of being heard before the withdrawal which was not conceded.In due course, Hungamaland policies gave a big boost to the economy. To deal with any dispute arising out of the terms, conditions and contract of services, Tribunal was established by the Hungamaland Legislature. Tribunal was headed by a Chairman. Law stipulated that Chairman shall continue for 5 years from the date of joining the services or till the attainment of 65 years, whichever is earlier. After two years, Legislature abolished the Tribunal by passing a Tribunal (Repeal) law. Government Contracts are useful instrument to deliver public service. Contract/Tender notifications lay down the following guidelines:- A person has a legal expectation of being treated in a certain way by administrative/legislative authority. The expectation may arise either from a representation or promise made by the authority, including an implied representation, or from consistent past practice. Principle of legal expectation requires opportunity of being heard to the person affected where a promise is made and is withdrawn. Change in Govt. Policy due to overriding public interest must be given due weight while considering claim of legal expectation. Q. Unemployed workers challenged the action of Govt. on account of legal expectation of continuous employment. Has Government violated the law?Choose the option with the correct answer and explanation.a)Yes, Legal Expectation of the workers is violated as they have rightly assumed the promise of continued employment on the basis of the notification.b)No, Case of legal expectation will be negatived due to overriding public interest of environmental concerns.c)Yes, Worker's claims shall succeed as they were not provided the opportunity of being heard which a Fundamental Right.d)No, Hungamaland should intelligibly exercise their Right to Vote to prevent recurrence of such situations.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Hungamaland is known for exotic wines, beers and other alcoholic drinks. Hungamaland liquor is one of the best attractions of the world. Recently, Hungamaland witnessed a change in ruling political party which came to power on the promise of prohibition of alcohol. In pursuance of the political promise, Govt. of Hungamaland notified the closure of breweries. Closure order led to huge unemployment.Reports pointed a rise in criminal activities by the unemployed populace. To remedy the situation, Govt. notified the employment of the brewery workers in Coal mines. This notification successfully led to a decline in the crimes. However after two years, Hungamaland Govt. closed the sulphur emitting coal mines by withdrawing the employment notification. Govt. argued due to Paris commitment, achievement of the climate targets has become imminent.Later on, Government of Hungamaland announced tax exemptions and subsidies to promote industrial production.To bridge inter-regional disparities, investment allowances were announced for investors who set up industries in the rural areas. Laws and notifications were formulated to give effect to the announcements. Hungamaland to raise revenue, withdrawn the tax exemptions, subsidies & investment allowances laws and notifications. Investors and Industrialists pleaded for the right of being heard before the withdrawal which was not conceded.In due course, Hungamaland policies gave a big boost to the economy. To deal with any dispute arising out of the terms, conditions and contract of services, Tribunal was established by the Hungamaland Legislature. Tribunal was headed by a Chairman. Law stipulated that Chairman shall continue for 5 years from the date of joining the services or till the attainment of 65 years, whichever is earlier. After two years, Legislature abolished the Tribunal by passing a Tribunal (Repeal) law. Government Contracts are useful instrument to deliver public service. Contract/Tender notifications lay down the following guidelines:- A person has a legal expectation of being treated in a certain way by administrative/legislative authority. The expectation may arise either from a representation or promise made by the authority, including an implied representation, or from consistent past practice. Principle of legal expectation requires opportunity of being heard to the person affected where a promise is made and is withdrawn. Change in Govt. Policy due to overriding public interest must be given due weight while considering claim of legal expectation. Q. Unemployed workers challenged the action of Govt. on account of legal expectation of continuous employment. Has Government violated the law?Choose the option with the correct answer and explanation.a)Yes, Legal Expectation of the workers is violated as they have rightly assumed the promise of continued employment on the basis of the notification.b)No, Case of legal expectation will be negatived due to overriding public interest of environmental concerns.c)Yes, Worker's claims shall succeed as they were not provided the opportunity of being heard which a Fundamental Right.d)No, Hungamaland should intelligibly exercise their Right to Vote to prevent recurrence of such situations.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Hungamaland is known for exotic wines, beers and other alcoholic drinks. Hungamaland liquor is one of the best attractions of the world. Recently, Hungamaland witnessed a change in ruling political party which came to power on the promise of prohibition of alcohol. In pursuance of the political promise, Govt. of Hungamaland notified the closure of breweries. Closure order led to huge unemployment.Reports pointed a rise in criminal activities by the unemployed populace. To remedy the situation, Govt. notified the employment of the brewery workers in Coal mines. This notification successfully led to a decline in the crimes. However after two years, Hungamaland Govt. closed the sulphur emitting coal mines by withdrawing the employment notification. Govt. argued due to Paris commitment, achievement of the climate targets has become imminent.Later on, Government of Hungamaland announced tax exemptions and subsidies to promote industrial production.To bridge inter-regional disparities, investment allowances were announced for investors who set up industries in the rural areas. Laws and notifications were formulated to give effect to the announcements. Hungamaland to raise revenue, withdrawn the tax exemptions, subsidies & investment allowances laws and notifications. Investors and Industrialists pleaded for the right of being heard before the withdrawal which was not conceded.In due course, Hungamaland policies gave a big boost to the economy. To deal with any dispute arising out of the terms, conditions and contract of services, Tribunal was established by the Hungamaland Legislature. Tribunal was headed by a Chairman. Law stipulated that Chairman shall continue for 5 years from the date of joining the services or till the attainment of 65 years, whichever is earlier. After two years, Legislature abolished the Tribunal by passing a Tribunal (Repeal) law. Government Contracts are useful instrument to deliver public service. Contract/Tender notifications lay down the following guidelines:- A person has a legal expectation of being treated in a certain way by administrative/legislative authority. The expectation may arise either from a representation or promise made by the authority, including an implied representation, or from consistent past practice. Principle of legal expectation requires opportunity of being heard to the person affected where a promise is made and is withdrawn. Change in Govt. Policy due to overriding public interest must be given due weight while considering claim of legal expectation. Q. Unemployed workers challenged the action of Govt. on account of legal expectation of continuous employment. Has Government violated the law?Choose the option with the correct answer and explanation.a)Yes, Legal Expectation of the workers is violated as they have rightly assumed the promise of continued employment on the basis of the notification.b)No, Case of legal expectation will be negatived due to overriding public interest of environmental concerns.c)Yes, Worker's claims shall succeed as they were not provided the opportunity of being heard which a Fundamental Right.d)No, Hungamaland should intelligibly exercise their Right to Vote to prevent recurrence of such situations.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Hungamaland is known for exotic wines, beers and other alcoholic drinks. Hungamaland liquor is one of the best attractions of the world. Recently, Hungamaland witnessed a change in ruling political party which came to power on the promise of prohibition of alcohol. In pursuance of the political promise, Govt. of Hungamaland notified the closure of breweries. Closure order led to huge unemployment.Reports pointed a rise in criminal activities by the unemployed populace. To remedy the situation, Govt. notified the employment of the brewery workers in Coal mines. This notification successfully led to a decline in the crimes. However after two years, Hungamaland Govt. closed the sulphur emitting coal mines by withdrawing the employment notification. Govt. argued due to Paris commitment, achievement of the climate targets has become imminent.Later on, Government of Hungamaland announced tax exemptions and subsidies to promote industrial production.To bridge inter-regional disparities, investment allowances were announced for investors who set up industries in the rural areas. Laws and notifications were formulated to give effect to the announcements. Hungamaland to raise revenue, withdrawn the tax exemptions, subsidies & investment allowances laws and notifications. Investors and Industrialists pleaded for the right of being heard before the withdrawal which was not conceded.In due course, Hungamaland policies gave a big boost to the economy. To deal with any dispute arising out of the terms, conditions and contract of services, Tribunal was established by the Hungamaland Legislature. Tribunal was headed by a Chairman. Law stipulated that Chairman shall continue for 5 years from the date of joining the services or till the attainment of 65 years, whichever is earlier. After two years, Legislature abolished the Tribunal by passing a Tribunal (Repeal) law. Government Contracts are useful instrument to deliver public service. Contract/Tender notifications lay down the following guidelines:- A person has a legal expectation of being treated in a certain way by administrative/legislative authority. The expectation may arise either from a representation or promise made by the authority, including an implied representation, or from consistent past practice. Principle of legal expectation requires opportunity of being heard to the person affected where a promise is made and is withdrawn. Change in Govt. Policy due to overriding public interest must be given due weight while considering claim of legal expectation. Q. Unemployed workers challenged the action of Govt. on account of legal expectation of continuous employment. Has Government violated the law?Choose the option with the correct answer and explanation.a)Yes, Legal Expectation of the workers is violated as they have rightly assumed the promise of continued employment on the basis of the notification.b)No, Case of legal expectation will be negatived due to overriding public interest of environmental concerns.c)Yes, Worker's claims shall succeed as they were not provided the opportunity of being heard which a Fundamental Right.d)No, Hungamaland should intelligibly exercise their Right to Vote to prevent recurrence of such situations.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
    Explore Courses for CLAT exam

    Top Courses for CLAT

    Explore Courses

    Suggested Free Tests

    Signup for Free!
    Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
    10M+ students study on EduRev
    Get App
    © EduRev
    Education Revolution
    Follow Us
    Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
    Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
    Takes less than 10 seconds to signup