CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   Hungamaland is known for exotic wines, beers... Start Learning for Free
Hungamaland is known for exotic wines, beers and other alcoholic drinks. Hungamaland liquor is one of the best attractions of the world. Recently, Hungamaland witnessed a change in ruling political party which came to power on the promise of prohibition of alcohol. In pursuance of the political promise, Govt. of Hungamaland notified the closure of breweries. Closure order led to huge unemployment.
Reports pointed a rise in criminal activities by the unemployed populace. To remedy the situation, Govt. notified the employment of the brewery workers in Coal mines. This notification successfully led to a decline in the crimes. However after two years, Hungamaland Govt. closed the sulphur emitting coal mines by withdrawing the employment notification. Govt. argued due to Paris commitment, achievement of the climate targets has become imminent.
Later on, Government of Hungamaland announced tax exemptions and subsidies to promote industrial production.
To bridge inter-regional disparities, investment allowances were announced for investors who set up industries in the rural areas. Laws and notifications were formulated to give effect to the announcements. Hungamaland to raise revenue, withdrawn the tax exemptions, subsidies & investment allowances laws and notifications. Investors and Industrialists pleaded for the right of being heard before the withdrawal which was not conceded.
In due course, Hungamaland policies gave a big boost to the economy. To deal with any dispute arising out of the terms, conditions and contract of services, Tribunal was established by the Hungamaland Legislature. Tribunal was headed by a Chairman. Law stipulated that Chairman shall continue for 5 years from the date of joining the services or till the attainment of 65 years, whichever is earlier. After two years, Legislature abolished the Tribunal by passing a Tribunal (Repeal) law. Government Contracts are useful instrument to deliver public service. Contract/Tender notifications lay down the following guidelines:-
A person has a legal expectation of being treated in a certain way by administrative/legislative authority.
  • The expectation may arise either from a representation or promise made by the authority, including an implied representation, or from consistent past practice.
  • Principle of legal expectation requires opportunity of being heard to the person affected where a promise is made and is withdrawn.
  • Change in Govt. Policy due to overriding public interest must be given due weight while considering claim of legal expectation.
    Q. Alex Hale who was appointed as chairman could not complete the 65 years or 5 years tenure. Hale attacked the law on the ground of legal expectation of uninterrupted employment. Did the Government breach the requirements of contract guidelines?
    • a)
      Yes, Alex Hale's legal Expectation stands contravened due to arbitrary and unreasonable abolition of Tribunal.
    • b)
      Yes, Alex Hale should have been provided the opportunity of being heard.
    • c)
      No, Principle of legal expectation is inapplicable since no representation or promise was made by any authority including the Legislature.
    • d)
      No, Legal Expectation is not a matter of right thus unenforceable.
    Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
    Most Upvoted Answer
    Hungamaland is known for exotic wines, beers and other alcoholic drin...
    From the facts it is abundantly clear that NO authority has given any representation or promise giving rise to legitimate expectation claims by Alex Hale. Guideline 2 has no application in the given facts
    Attention CLAT Students!
    To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
    Explore Courses for CLAT exam

    Similar CLAT Doubts

    Hungamaland is known for exotic wines, beers and other alcoholic drinks. Hungamaland liquor is one of the best attractions of the world. Recently, Hungamaland witnessed a change in ruling political party which came to power on the promise of prohibition of alcohol. In pursuance of the political promise, Govt. of Hungamaland notified the closure of breweries. Closure order led to huge unemployment.Reports pointed a rise in criminal activities by the unemployed populace. To remedy the situation, Govt. notified the employment of the brewery workers in Coal mines. This notification successfully led to a decline in the crimes. However after two years, Hungamaland Govt. closed the sulphur emitting coal mines by withdrawing the employment notification. Govt. argued due to Paris commitment, achievement of the climate targets has become imminent.Later on, Government of Hungamaland announced tax exemptions and subsidies to promote industrial production.To bridge inter-regional disparities, investment allowances were announced for investors who set up industries in the rural areas. Laws and notifications were formulated to give effect to the announcements. Hungamaland to raise revenue, withdrawn the tax exemptions, subsidies & investment allowances laws and notifications. Investors and Industrialists pleaded for the right of being heard before the withdrawal which was not conceded.In due course, Hungamaland policies gave a big boost to the economy. To deal with any dispute arising out of the terms, conditions and contract of services, Tribunal was established by the Hungamaland Legislature. Tribunal was headed by a Chairman. Law stipulated that Chairman shall continue for 5 years from the date of joining the services or till the attainment of 65 years, whichever is earlier. After two years, Legislature abolished the Tribunal by passing a Tribunal (Repeal) law. Government Contracts are useful instrument to deliver public service. Contract/Tender notifications lay down the following guidelines:- A person has a legal expectation of being treated in a certain way by administrative/legislative authority. The expectation may arise either from a representation or promise made by the authority, including an implied representation, or from consistent past practice. Principle of legal expectation requires opportunity of being heard to the person affected where a promise is made and is withdrawn. Change in Govt. Policy due to overriding public interest must be given due weight while considering claim of legal expectation. Q. The appellants questioned the legality directing discontinuance of benefits. Can Investors successfully raise the claim of violation of legal expectation? Decide.

    Hungamaland is known for exotic wines, beers and other alcoholic drinks. Hungamaland liquor is one of the best attractions of the world. Recently, Hungamaland witnessed a change in ruling political party which came to power on the promise of prohibition of alcohol. In pursuance of the political promise, Govt. of Hungamaland notified the closure of breweries. Closure order led to huge unemployment.Reports pointed a rise in criminal activities by the unemployed populace. To remedy the situation, Govt. notified the employment of the brewery workers in Coal mines. This notification successfully led to a decline in the crimes. However after two years, Hungamaland Govt. closed the sulphur emitting coal mines by withdrawing the employment notification. Govt. argued due to Paris commitment, achievement of the climate targets has become imminent.Later on, Government of Hungamaland announced tax exemptions and subsidies to promote industrial production.To bridge inter-regional disparities, investment allowances were announced for investors who set up industries in the rural areas. Laws and notifications were formulated to give effect to the announcements. Hungamaland to raise revenue, withdrawn the tax exemptions, subsidies & investment allowances laws and notifications. Investors and Industrialists pleaded for the right of being heard before the withdrawal which was not conceded.In due course, Hungamaland policies gave a big boost to the economy. To deal with any dispute arising out of the terms, conditions and contract of services, Tribunal was established by the Hungamaland Legislature. Tribunal was headed by a Chairman. Law stipulated that Chairman shall continue for 5 years from the date of joining the services or till the attainment of 65 years, whichever is earlier. After two years, Legislature abolished the Tribunal by passing a Tribunal (Repeal) law. Government Contracts are useful instrument to deliver public service. Contract/Tender notifications lay down the following guidelines:- A person has a legal expectation of being treated in a certain way by administrative/legislative authority. The expectation may arise either from a representation or promise made by the authority, including an implied representation, or from consistent past practice. Principle of legal expectation requires opportunity of being heard to the person affected where a promise is made and is withdrawn. Change in Govt. Policy due to overriding public interest must be given due weight while considering claim of legal expectation. Q. Unemployed workers challenged the action of Govt. on account of legal expectation of continuous employment. Has Government violated the law?Choose the option with the correct answer and explanation.

    The Union government has called upon the Supreme Court to form a seven-judge Bench to reconsider the formulation in M. Nagaraj vs Union of India (2006) that it should be applied to the SC and ST communities.This verdict was a reality check to the concept of reservation. Even while upholding Constitution amendments meant to preserve reservation in promotions as well as consequential seniority; it contained an exposition of the equality principle that hedged reservation against a set of constitutional requirements, without which the structure of equal opportunity would collapse. These were 'quantifiable data' to show the backwardness of a community, the inadequacy of its representation in service, and the lack of adverse impact on "the overall efficiency of administration". In Jarnail Singh (2018), another Constitution Bench reaffirmed the applicability of creamy layer norms to SC/STs. However, it ruled that Nagaraj was wrong to require a demonstration of backwardness for the Scheduled Castes and Tribes, as it was directly contrary to the nine-judge Bench judgment in Indra Sawhney (1992).It is curious that Jarnail Singh accepted the presumption of the backwardness of Scheduled Castes and Tribes, but favoured applying the 'means test' to exclude from the purview of SC/ST reservation those who had achieved some level of economic advancement. While the Centre has accepted that the 'creamy layer' norm is needed to ensure that only those genuinely backward get reservation benefits, it is justifiably upset that this principle has been extended to Dalits, who have been acknowledged to be the most backward among the backward sections. Another problem is the question whether the exclusion of the advanced sections among SC/ST candidates can be disallowed only for promotions.Most of them may not fall under the 'creamy layer' category at the entry level, but after some years of service and promotions, they may reach an income level at which they fall under the 'creamy layer'. This may result in the defeat of the object of the Constitution amendments that the court itself had upheld to protect reservation in promotions as well as consequential seniority. Another landmark verdict in the history of affirmative action jurisprudence may be needed to settle these questions.Q. Constitution has no provision for the reservation in the private sector. Government has notified the reservation in jobs in the private sector companies where Government has even partial shares. In the absence of Constitutional provision, the notification is challenged, would the petition deserve to be dismissed?

    Passage: Article 25 guarantees the right to “profess, practice and propagate religion, but also permits the State to regulate „economic, financial, political or other secular activity associated with religious practice, as well as provide for „social welfare and reform of Hindu religious institutions. Article 26 guarantees religious denominations, among other things, freedom to manage their religious affairs. However, the protection is extended only to the practices considered essential to the religion. The State can still restrict the right on the grounds of public order, health and morality.Litigation around these two Articles has broadly centred on two issues. The first is the distinction between the religious and secular, particularly in the case of Hinduism. The Court has dealt with this by bringing into play an „essential practices test to decide what is essential to Hinduism and used it to distinguish between the sacred and the secular. The Court’s intervention to decide what is religious and what is not in a secular, constitutional culture is hardly peculiar to India. As Pratap Bhanu Mehta points out, in most constitutional settings courts „have to determine whether or not a policy places a substantial burden on the free exercise of religion. This might require the court to have not just a definition of religion but also to determine whether a particular practice counts as falling under that definition. What is unusual, however, is the Indian Supreme Court’s activism in fashioning religion in the way the State or the judges would likeit to be, rather than accept religion as practised by believers. The courts have upheld several practices as essential, but not along with the added elements and their outgrowths.(Ronojoy Sen, Secularism and Religious Freedom).Q.Riots have just taken place in the small town of Mirzapur. Religious tempers were simmering. In this atmosphere, a small group of violent people from each religion decided to start announcing that the only path to salvation was the annihilation of the people of the other sect. The government decided to outlaw any public religious announcements in Mirzapur. Both the groups challenged this action. Their challenge will –

    President's rule has been imposed in Puducherry. President’s Rule was imposed in Puducherry following a recommendation by the Union Cabinet after a Congress-led government lost power in the Union Territory in a vote of confidence. The notification, signed by President Ram Nath Kovind, said the decision was taken after the president received a report from the administrator of the Union Territory of Puducherry on February 22.It said after considering the report and other information received by him, the president was satisfied that a situation had arisen in which the administration of the Union Territory of Puducherry could not carry on in accordance with the provisions of the [X]. The notification also said the Legislative Assembly of the Union Territory is placed under suspended animation.V Narayanasamy, who led the Congress government in Puducherry, resigned on Monday ahead of the confidence vote after his government was reduced to a minority following a spate of resignations by his party MLAs and a DMK legislator in recent days.The Ministry of Home Affairs on Thursday issued a notification of imposing President's rule in Puducherry after President Ram Nath Kovind was satisfied with the report of the Administrator of the Union Territory. Polls are due in the union territory soon and the BJP and its allies have not staked claim to form government.""I, Ram Nath Kovind, President of India, have received a report from the Administrator of the Union territory of Puducherry dated 22nd February 2021 and after considering the report and other information received by me, I am satisfied that a situation has arisen in which the administration of the Union territory of Puducherry cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of the [X]."Q. Which of the following committees DID NOT give recommendations concerning president's rule?

    Top Courses for CLAT

    Hungamaland is known for exotic wines, beers and other alcoholic drinks. Hungamaland liquor is one of the best attractions of the world. Recently, Hungamaland witnessed a change in ruling political party which came to power on the promise of prohibition of alcohol. In pursuance of the political promise, Govt. of Hungamaland notified the closure of breweries. Closure order led to huge unemployment.Reports pointed a rise in criminal activities by the unemployed populace. To remedy the situation, Govt. notified the employment of the brewery workers in Coal mines. This notification successfully led to a decline in the crimes. However after two years, Hungamaland Govt. closed the sulphur emitting coal mines by withdrawing the employment notification. Govt. argued due to Paris commitment, achievement of the climate targets has become imminent.Later on, Government of Hungamaland announced tax exemptions and subsidies to promote industrial production.To bridge inter-regional disparities, investment allowances were announced for investors who set up industries in the rural areas. Laws and notifications were formulated to give effect to the announcements. Hungamaland to raise revenue, withdrawn the tax exemptions, subsidies & investment allowances laws and notifications. Investors and Industrialists pleaded for the right of being heard before the withdrawal which was not conceded.In due course, Hungamaland policies gave a big boost to the economy. To deal with any dispute arising out of the terms, conditions and contract of services, Tribunal was established by the Hungamaland Legislature. Tribunal was headed by a Chairman. Law stipulated that Chairman shall continue for 5 years from the date of joining the services or till the attainment of 65 years, whichever is earlier. After two years, Legislature abolished the Tribunal by passing a Tribunal (Repeal) law. Government Contracts are useful instrument to deliver public service. Contract/Tender notifications lay down the following guidelines:- A person has a legal expectation of being treated in a certain way by administrative/legislative authority. The expectation may arise either from a representation or promise made by the authority, including an implied representation, or from consistent past practice. Principle of legal expectation requires opportunity of being heard to the person affected where a promise is made and is withdrawn. Change in Govt. Policy due to overriding public interest must be given due weight while considering claim of legal expectation. Q. Alex Hale who was appointed as chairman could not complete the 65 years or 5 years tenure. Hale attacked the law on the ground of legal expectation of uninterrupted employment. Did the Government breach the requirements of contract guidelines?a)Yes, Alex Hale's legal Expectation stands contravened due to arbitrary and unreasonable abolition of Tribunal.b)Yes, Alex Hale should have been provided the opportunity of being heard.c)No, Principle of legal expectation is inapplicable since no representation or promise was made by any authority including the Legislature.d)No, Legal Expectation is not a matter of right thus unenforceable.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
    Question Description
    Hungamaland is known for exotic wines, beers and other alcoholic drinks. Hungamaland liquor is one of the best attractions of the world. Recently, Hungamaland witnessed a change in ruling political party which came to power on the promise of prohibition of alcohol. In pursuance of the political promise, Govt. of Hungamaland notified the closure of breweries. Closure order led to huge unemployment.Reports pointed a rise in criminal activities by the unemployed populace. To remedy the situation, Govt. notified the employment of the brewery workers in Coal mines. This notification successfully led to a decline in the crimes. However after two years, Hungamaland Govt. closed the sulphur emitting coal mines by withdrawing the employment notification. Govt. argued due to Paris commitment, achievement of the climate targets has become imminent.Later on, Government of Hungamaland announced tax exemptions and subsidies to promote industrial production.To bridge inter-regional disparities, investment allowances were announced for investors who set up industries in the rural areas. Laws and notifications were formulated to give effect to the announcements. Hungamaland to raise revenue, withdrawn the tax exemptions, subsidies & investment allowances laws and notifications. Investors and Industrialists pleaded for the right of being heard before the withdrawal which was not conceded.In due course, Hungamaland policies gave a big boost to the economy. To deal with any dispute arising out of the terms, conditions and contract of services, Tribunal was established by the Hungamaland Legislature. Tribunal was headed by a Chairman. Law stipulated that Chairman shall continue for 5 years from the date of joining the services or till the attainment of 65 years, whichever is earlier. After two years, Legislature abolished the Tribunal by passing a Tribunal (Repeal) law. Government Contracts are useful instrument to deliver public service. Contract/Tender notifications lay down the following guidelines:- A person has a legal expectation of being treated in a certain way by administrative/legislative authority. The expectation may arise either from a representation or promise made by the authority, including an implied representation, or from consistent past practice. Principle of legal expectation requires opportunity of being heard to the person affected where a promise is made and is withdrawn. Change in Govt. Policy due to overriding public interest must be given due weight while considering claim of legal expectation. Q. Alex Hale who was appointed as chairman could not complete the 65 years or 5 years tenure. Hale attacked the law on the ground of legal expectation of uninterrupted employment. Did the Government breach the requirements of contract guidelines?a)Yes, Alex Hale's legal Expectation stands contravened due to arbitrary and unreasonable abolition of Tribunal.b)Yes, Alex Hale should have been provided the opportunity of being heard.c)No, Principle of legal expectation is inapplicable since no representation or promise was made by any authority including the Legislature.d)No, Legal Expectation is not a matter of right thus unenforceable.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Hungamaland is known for exotic wines, beers and other alcoholic drinks. Hungamaland liquor is one of the best attractions of the world. Recently, Hungamaland witnessed a change in ruling political party which came to power on the promise of prohibition of alcohol. In pursuance of the political promise, Govt. of Hungamaland notified the closure of breweries. Closure order led to huge unemployment.Reports pointed a rise in criminal activities by the unemployed populace. To remedy the situation, Govt. notified the employment of the brewery workers in Coal mines. This notification successfully led to a decline in the crimes. However after two years, Hungamaland Govt. closed the sulphur emitting coal mines by withdrawing the employment notification. Govt. argued due to Paris commitment, achievement of the climate targets has become imminent.Later on, Government of Hungamaland announced tax exemptions and subsidies to promote industrial production.To bridge inter-regional disparities, investment allowances were announced for investors who set up industries in the rural areas. Laws and notifications were formulated to give effect to the announcements. Hungamaland to raise revenue, withdrawn the tax exemptions, subsidies & investment allowances laws and notifications. Investors and Industrialists pleaded for the right of being heard before the withdrawal which was not conceded.In due course, Hungamaland policies gave a big boost to the economy. To deal with any dispute arising out of the terms, conditions and contract of services, Tribunal was established by the Hungamaland Legislature. Tribunal was headed by a Chairman. Law stipulated that Chairman shall continue for 5 years from the date of joining the services or till the attainment of 65 years, whichever is earlier. After two years, Legislature abolished the Tribunal by passing a Tribunal (Repeal) law. Government Contracts are useful instrument to deliver public service. Contract/Tender notifications lay down the following guidelines:- A person has a legal expectation of being treated in a certain way by administrative/legislative authority. The expectation may arise either from a representation or promise made by the authority, including an implied representation, or from consistent past practice. Principle of legal expectation requires opportunity of being heard to the person affected where a promise is made and is withdrawn. Change in Govt. Policy due to overriding public interest must be given due weight while considering claim of legal expectation. Q. Alex Hale who was appointed as chairman could not complete the 65 years or 5 years tenure. Hale attacked the law on the ground of legal expectation of uninterrupted employment. Did the Government breach the requirements of contract guidelines?a)Yes, Alex Hale's legal Expectation stands contravened due to arbitrary and unreasonable abolition of Tribunal.b)Yes, Alex Hale should have been provided the opportunity of being heard.c)No, Principle of legal expectation is inapplicable since no representation or promise was made by any authority including the Legislature.d)No, Legal Expectation is not a matter of right thus unenforceable.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Hungamaland is known for exotic wines, beers and other alcoholic drinks. Hungamaland liquor is one of the best attractions of the world. Recently, Hungamaland witnessed a change in ruling political party which came to power on the promise of prohibition of alcohol. In pursuance of the political promise, Govt. of Hungamaland notified the closure of breweries. Closure order led to huge unemployment.Reports pointed a rise in criminal activities by the unemployed populace. To remedy the situation, Govt. notified the employment of the brewery workers in Coal mines. This notification successfully led to a decline in the crimes. However after two years, Hungamaland Govt. closed the sulphur emitting coal mines by withdrawing the employment notification. Govt. argued due to Paris commitment, achievement of the climate targets has become imminent.Later on, Government of Hungamaland announced tax exemptions and subsidies to promote industrial production.To bridge inter-regional disparities, investment allowances were announced for investors who set up industries in the rural areas. Laws and notifications were formulated to give effect to the announcements. Hungamaland to raise revenue, withdrawn the tax exemptions, subsidies & investment allowances laws and notifications. Investors and Industrialists pleaded for the right of being heard before the withdrawal which was not conceded.In due course, Hungamaland policies gave a big boost to the economy. To deal with any dispute arising out of the terms, conditions and contract of services, Tribunal was established by the Hungamaland Legislature. Tribunal was headed by a Chairman. Law stipulated that Chairman shall continue for 5 years from the date of joining the services or till the attainment of 65 years, whichever is earlier. After two years, Legislature abolished the Tribunal by passing a Tribunal (Repeal) law. Government Contracts are useful instrument to deliver public service. Contract/Tender notifications lay down the following guidelines:- A person has a legal expectation of being treated in a certain way by administrative/legislative authority. The expectation may arise either from a representation or promise made by the authority, including an implied representation, or from consistent past practice. Principle of legal expectation requires opportunity of being heard to the person affected where a promise is made and is withdrawn. Change in Govt. Policy due to overriding public interest must be given due weight while considering claim of legal expectation. Q. Alex Hale who was appointed as chairman could not complete the 65 years or 5 years tenure. Hale attacked the law on the ground of legal expectation of uninterrupted employment. Did the Government breach the requirements of contract guidelines?a)Yes, Alex Hale's legal Expectation stands contravened due to arbitrary and unreasonable abolition of Tribunal.b)Yes, Alex Hale should have been provided the opportunity of being heard.c)No, Principle of legal expectation is inapplicable since no representation or promise was made by any authority including the Legislature.d)No, Legal Expectation is not a matter of right thus unenforceable.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
    Solutions for Hungamaland is known for exotic wines, beers and other alcoholic drinks. Hungamaland liquor is one of the best attractions of the world. Recently, Hungamaland witnessed a change in ruling political party which came to power on the promise of prohibition of alcohol. In pursuance of the political promise, Govt. of Hungamaland notified the closure of breweries. Closure order led to huge unemployment.Reports pointed a rise in criminal activities by the unemployed populace. To remedy the situation, Govt. notified the employment of the brewery workers in Coal mines. This notification successfully led to a decline in the crimes. However after two years, Hungamaland Govt. closed the sulphur emitting coal mines by withdrawing the employment notification. Govt. argued due to Paris commitment, achievement of the climate targets has become imminent.Later on, Government of Hungamaland announced tax exemptions and subsidies to promote industrial production.To bridge inter-regional disparities, investment allowances were announced for investors who set up industries in the rural areas. Laws and notifications were formulated to give effect to the announcements. Hungamaland to raise revenue, withdrawn the tax exemptions, subsidies & investment allowances laws and notifications. Investors and Industrialists pleaded for the right of being heard before the withdrawal which was not conceded.In due course, Hungamaland policies gave a big boost to the economy. To deal with any dispute arising out of the terms, conditions and contract of services, Tribunal was established by the Hungamaland Legislature. Tribunal was headed by a Chairman. Law stipulated that Chairman shall continue for 5 years from the date of joining the services or till the attainment of 65 years, whichever is earlier. After two years, Legislature abolished the Tribunal by passing a Tribunal (Repeal) law. Government Contracts are useful instrument to deliver public service. Contract/Tender notifications lay down the following guidelines:- A person has a legal expectation of being treated in a certain way by administrative/legislative authority. The expectation may arise either from a representation or promise made by the authority, including an implied representation, or from consistent past practice. Principle of legal expectation requires opportunity of being heard to the person affected where a promise is made and is withdrawn. Change in Govt. Policy due to overriding public interest must be given due weight while considering claim of legal expectation. Q. Alex Hale who was appointed as chairman could not complete the 65 years or 5 years tenure. Hale attacked the law on the ground of legal expectation of uninterrupted employment. Did the Government breach the requirements of contract guidelines?a)Yes, Alex Hale's legal Expectation stands contravened due to arbitrary and unreasonable abolition of Tribunal.b)Yes, Alex Hale should have been provided the opportunity of being heard.c)No, Principle of legal expectation is inapplicable since no representation or promise was made by any authority including the Legislature.d)No, Legal Expectation is not a matter of right thus unenforceable.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
    Here you can find the meaning of Hungamaland is known for exotic wines, beers and other alcoholic drinks. Hungamaland liquor is one of the best attractions of the world. Recently, Hungamaland witnessed a change in ruling political party which came to power on the promise of prohibition of alcohol. In pursuance of the political promise, Govt. of Hungamaland notified the closure of breweries. Closure order led to huge unemployment.Reports pointed a rise in criminal activities by the unemployed populace. To remedy the situation, Govt. notified the employment of the brewery workers in Coal mines. This notification successfully led to a decline in the crimes. However after two years, Hungamaland Govt. closed the sulphur emitting coal mines by withdrawing the employment notification. Govt. argued due to Paris commitment, achievement of the climate targets has become imminent.Later on, Government of Hungamaland announced tax exemptions and subsidies to promote industrial production.To bridge inter-regional disparities, investment allowances were announced for investors who set up industries in the rural areas. Laws and notifications were formulated to give effect to the announcements. Hungamaland to raise revenue, withdrawn the tax exemptions, subsidies & investment allowances laws and notifications. Investors and Industrialists pleaded for the right of being heard before the withdrawal which was not conceded.In due course, Hungamaland policies gave a big boost to the economy. To deal with any dispute arising out of the terms, conditions and contract of services, Tribunal was established by the Hungamaland Legislature. Tribunal was headed by a Chairman. Law stipulated that Chairman shall continue for 5 years from the date of joining the services or till the attainment of 65 years, whichever is earlier. After two years, Legislature abolished the Tribunal by passing a Tribunal (Repeal) law. Government Contracts are useful instrument to deliver public service. Contract/Tender notifications lay down the following guidelines:- A person has a legal expectation of being treated in a certain way by administrative/legislative authority. The expectation may arise either from a representation or promise made by the authority, including an implied representation, or from consistent past practice. Principle of legal expectation requires opportunity of being heard to the person affected where a promise is made and is withdrawn. Change in Govt. Policy due to overriding public interest must be given due weight while considering claim of legal expectation. Q. Alex Hale who was appointed as chairman could not complete the 65 years or 5 years tenure. Hale attacked the law on the ground of legal expectation of uninterrupted employment. Did the Government breach the requirements of contract guidelines?a)Yes, Alex Hale's legal Expectation stands contravened due to arbitrary and unreasonable abolition of Tribunal.b)Yes, Alex Hale should have been provided the opportunity of being heard.c)No, Principle of legal expectation is inapplicable since no representation or promise was made by any authority including the Legislature.d)No, Legal Expectation is not a matter of right thus unenforceable.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Hungamaland is known for exotic wines, beers and other alcoholic drinks. Hungamaland liquor is one of the best attractions of the world. Recently, Hungamaland witnessed a change in ruling political party which came to power on the promise of prohibition of alcohol. In pursuance of the political promise, Govt. of Hungamaland notified the closure of breweries. Closure order led to huge unemployment.Reports pointed a rise in criminal activities by the unemployed populace. To remedy the situation, Govt. notified the employment of the brewery workers in Coal mines. This notification successfully led to a decline in the crimes. However after two years, Hungamaland Govt. closed the sulphur emitting coal mines by withdrawing the employment notification. Govt. argued due to Paris commitment, achievement of the climate targets has become imminent.Later on, Government of Hungamaland announced tax exemptions and subsidies to promote industrial production.To bridge inter-regional disparities, investment allowances were announced for investors who set up industries in the rural areas. Laws and notifications were formulated to give effect to the announcements. Hungamaland to raise revenue, withdrawn the tax exemptions, subsidies & investment allowances laws and notifications. Investors and Industrialists pleaded for the right of being heard before the withdrawal which was not conceded.In due course, Hungamaland policies gave a big boost to the economy. To deal with any dispute arising out of the terms, conditions and contract of services, Tribunal was established by the Hungamaland Legislature. Tribunal was headed by a Chairman. Law stipulated that Chairman shall continue for 5 years from the date of joining the services or till the attainment of 65 years, whichever is earlier. After two years, Legislature abolished the Tribunal by passing a Tribunal (Repeal) law. Government Contracts are useful instrument to deliver public service. Contract/Tender notifications lay down the following guidelines:- A person has a legal expectation of being treated in a certain way by administrative/legislative authority. The expectation may arise either from a representation or promise made by the authority, including an implied representation, or from consistent past practice. Principle of legal expectation requires opportunity of being heard to the person affected where a promise is made and is withdrawn. Change in Govt. Policy due to overriding public interest must be given due weight while considering claim of legal expectation. Q. Alex Hale who was appointed as chairman could not complete the 65 years or 5 years tenure. Hale attacked the law on the ground of legal expectation of uninterrupted employment. Did the Government breach the requirements of contract guidelines?a)Yes, Alex Hale's legal Expectation stands contravened due to arbitrary and unreasonable abolition of Tribunal.b)Yes, Alex Hale should have been provided the opportunity of being heard.c)No, Principle of legal expectation is inapplicable since no representation or promise was made by any authority including the Legislature.d)No, Legal Expectation is not a matter of right thus unenforceable.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Hungamaland is known for exotic wines, beers and other alcoholic drinks. Hungamaland liquor is one of the best attractions of the world. Recently, Hungamaland witnessed a change in ruling political party which came to power on the promise of prohibition of alcohol. In pursuance of the political promise, Govt. of Hungamaland notified the closure of breweries. Closure order led to huge unemployment.Reports pointed a rise in criminal activities by the unemployed populace. To remedy the situation, Govt. notified the employment of the brewery workers in Coal mines. This notification successfully led to a decline in the crimes. However after two years, Hungamaland Govt. closed the sulphur emitting coal mines by withdrawing the employment notification. Govt. argued due to Paris commitment, achievement of the climate targets has become imminent.Later on, Government of Hungamaland announced tax exemptions and subsidies to promote industrial production.To bridge inter-regional disparities, investment allowances were announced for investors who set up industries in the rural areas. Laws and notifications were formulated to give effect to the announcements. Hungamaland to raise revenue, withdrawn the tax exemptions, subsidies & investment allowances laws and notifications. Investors and Industrialists pleaded for the right of being heard before the withdrawal which was not conceded.In due course, Hungamaland policies gave a big boost to the economy. To deal with any dispute arising out of the terms, conditions and contract of services, Tribunal was established by the Hungamaland Legislature. Tribunal was headed by a Chairman. Law stipulated that Chairman shall continue for 5 years from the date of joining the services or till the attainment of 65 years, whichever is earlier. After two years, Legislature abolished the Tribunal by passing a Tribunal (Repeal) law. Government Contracts are useful instrument to deliver public service. Contract/Tender notifications lay down the following guidelines:- A person has a legal expectation of being treated in a certain way by administrative/legislative authority. The expectation may arise either from a representation or promise made by the authority, including an implied representation, or from consistent past practice. Principle of legal expectation requires opportunity of being heard to the person affected where a promise is made and is withdrawn. Change in Govt. Policy due to overriding public interest must be given due weight while considering claim of legal expectation. Q. Alex Hale who was appointed as chairman could not complete the 65 years or 5 years tenure. Hale attacked the law on the ground of legal expectation of uninterrupted employment. Did the Government breach the requirements of contract guidelines?a)Yes, Alex Hale's legal Expectation stands contravened due to arbitrary and unreasonable abolition of Tribunal.b)Yes, Alex Hale should have been provided the opportunity of being heard.c)No, Principle of legal expectation is inapplicable since no representation or promise was made by any authority including the Legislature.d)No, Legal Expectation is not a matter of right thus unenforceable.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Hungamaland is known for exotic wines, beers and other alcoholic drinks. Hungamaland liquor is one of the best attractions of the world. Recently, Hungamaland witnessed a change in ruling political party which came to power on the promise of prohibition of alcohol. In pursuance of the political promise, Govt. of Hungamaland notified the closure of breweries. Closure order led to huge unemployment.Reports pointed a rise in criminal activities by the unemployed populace. To remedy the situation, Govt. notified the employment of the brewery workers in Coal mines. This notification successfully led to a decline in the crimes. However after two years, Hungamaland Govt. closed the sulphur emitting coal mines by withdrawing the employment notification. Govt. argued due to Paris commitment, achievement of the climate targets has become imminent.Later on, Government of Hungamaland announced tax exemptions and subsidies to promote industrial production.To bridge inter-regional disparities, investment allowances were announced for investors who set up industries in the rural areas. Laws and notifications were formulated to give effect to the announcements. Hungamaland to raise revenue, withdrawn the tax exemptions, subsidies & investment allowances laws and notifications. Investors and Industrialists pleaded for the right of being heard before the withdrawal which was not conceded.In due course, Hungamaland policies gave a big boost to the economy. To deal with any dispute arising out of the terms, conditions and contract of services, Tribunal was established by the Hungamaland Legislature. Tribunal was headed by a Chairman. Law stipulated that Chairman shall continue for 5 years from the date of joining the services or till the attainment of 65 years, whichever is earlier. After two years, Legislature abolished the Tribunal by passing a Tribunal (Repeal) law. Government Contracts are useful instrument to deliver public service. Contract/Tender notifications lay down the following guidelines:- A person has a legal expectation of being treated in a certain way by administrative/legislative authority. The expectation may arise either from a representation or promise made by the authority, including an implied representation, or from consistent past practice. Principle of legal expectation requires opportunity of being heard to the person affected where a promise is made and is withdrawn. Change in Govt. Policy due to overriding public interest must be given due weight while considering claim of legal expectation. Q. Alex Hale who was appointed as chairman could not complete the 65 years or 5 years tenure. Hale attacked the law on the ground of legal expectation of uninterrupted employment. Did the Government breach the requirements of contract guidelines?a)Yes, Alex Hale's legal Expectation stands contravened due to arbitrary and unreasonable abolition of Tribunal.b)Yes, Alex Hale should have been provided the opportunity of being heard.c)No, Principle of legal expectation is inapplicable since no representation or promise was made by any authority including the Legislature.d)No, Legal Expectation is not a matter of right thus unenforceable.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Hungamaland is known for exotic wines, beers and other alcoholic drinks. Hungamaland liquor is one of the best attractions of the world. Recently, Hungamaland witnessed a change in ruling political party which came to power on the promise of prohibition of alcohol. In pursuance of the political promise, Govt. of Hungamaland notified the closure of breweries. Closure order led to huge unemployment.Reports pointed a rise in criminal activities by the unemployed populace. To remedy the situation, Govt. notified the employment of the brewery workers in Coal mines. This notification successfully led to a decline in the crimes. However after two years, Hungamaland Govt. closed the sulphur emitting coal mines by withdrawing the employment notification. Govt. argued due to Paris commitment, achievement of the climate targets has become imminent.Later on, Government of Hungamaland announced tax exemptions and subsidies to promote industrial production.To bridge inter-regional disparities, investment allowances were announced for investors who set up industries in the rural areas. Laws and notifications were formulated to give effect to the announcements. Hungamaland to raise revenue, withdrawn the tax exemptions, subsidies & investment allowances laws and notifications. Investors and Industrialists pleaded for the right of being heard before the withdrawal which was not conceded.In due course, Hungamaland policies gave a big boost to the economy. To deal with any dispute arising out of the terms, conditions and contract of services, Tribunal was established by the Hungamaland Legislature. Tribunal was headed by a Chairman. Law stipulated that Chairman shall continue for 5 years from the date of joining the services or till the attainment of 65 years, whichever is earlier. After two years, Legislature abolished the Tribunal by passing a Tribunal (Repeal) law. Government Contracts are useful instrument to deliver public service. Contract/Tender notifications lay down the following guidelines:- A person has a legal expectation of being treated in a certain way by administrative/legislative authority. The expectation may arise either from a representation or promise made by the authority, including an implied representation, or from consistent past practice. Principle of legal expectation requires opportunity of being heard to the person affected where a promise is made and is withdrawn. Change in Govt. Policy due to overriding public interest must be given due weight while considering claim of legal expectation. Q. Alex Hale who was appointed as chairman could not complete the 65 years or 5 years tenure. Hale attacked the law on the ground of legal expectation of uninterrupted employment. Did the Government breach the requirements of contract guidelines?a)Yes, Alex Hale's legal Expectation stands contravened due to arbitrary and unreasonable abolition of Tribunal.b)Yes, Alex Hale should have been provided the opportunity of being heard.c)No, Principle of legal expectation is inapplicable since no representation or promise was made by any authority including the Legislature.d)No, Legal Expectation is not a matter of right thus unenforceable.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
    Explore Courses for CLAT exam

    Top Courses for CLAT

    Explore Courses
    Signup for Free!
    Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
    10M+ students study on EduRev