Question Description
Direction: Given below is a statement of legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer.Legal Principles:1. Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken, that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard, or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile, or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person.2. The statement must tend to lower the claimant in the estimation of right thinking members of society.3. A mere vulgar abuse is not defamation.4. Defamation encompasses both written statements, known as libel, and spoken statements, called slander.5. A public official or public figure can recover damages for defamation on a matter of public concern only if he proves that the speaker acted with actual malice.Facts: In 2018, a police officer, Suresh Singh, shot and killed Dayal. After the officer was convicted of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, Dayal's family retained a lawyer, Kaushal, to represent them in civil litigation against the officer. In a magazine called Indian Opinion, the Anti-Communist Society accused Kaushal of being a “Naxalite” and a “Communist-fronter” because he chose to represent clients who were suing a law enforcement officer. Because the statements contained serious inaccuracies, Kaushal filed a libel action against the editors of the magazine.Q. Decide whether he will succeed.a)No, as it is mere vulgar abuse.b)The statement may be defamatory but the editors of the magazine are not liable unless Kaushal is able to establish actual malice in making the statement.c)No, as the statement does not tend to lower Kaushal in the estimation of right-thinking members of society and print media is known for such type of journalism.d)Yes, as statement is defamatory and Kaushal is not required to establish actual malice to successfully bring a claim of defamationCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Given below is a statement of legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer.Legal Principles:1. Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken, that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard, or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile, or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person.2. The statement must tend to lower the claimant in the estimation of right thinking members of society.3. A mere vulgar abuse is not defamation.4. Defamation encompasses both written statements, known as libel, and spoken statements, called slander.5. A public official or public figure can recover damages for defamation on a matter of public concern only if he proves that the speaker acted with actual malice.Facts: In 2018, a police officer, Suresh Singh, shot and killed Dayal. After the officer was convicted of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, Dayal's family retained a lawyer, Kaushal, to represent them in civil litigation against the officer. In a magazine called Indian Opinion, the Anti-Communist Society accused Kaushal of being a “Naxalite” and a “Communist-fronter” because he chose to represent clients who were suing a law enforcement officer. Because the statements contained serious inaccuracies, Kaushal filed a libel action against the editors of the magazine.Q. Decide whether he will succeed.a)No, as it is mere vulgar abuse.b)The statement may be defamatory but the editors of the magazine are not liable unless Kaushal is able to establish actual malice in making the statement.c)No, as the statement does not tend to lower Kaushal in the estimation of right-thinking members of society and print media is known for such type of journalism.d)Yes, as statement is defamatory and Kaushal is not required to establish actual malice to successfully bring a claim of defamationCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Given below is a statement of legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer.Legal Principles:1. Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken, that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard, or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile, or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person.2. The statement must tend to lower the claimant in the estimation of right thinking members of society.3. A mere vulgar abuse is not defamation.4. Defamation encompasses both written statements, known as libel, and spoken statements, called slander.5. A public official or public figure can recover damages for defamation on a matter of public concern only if he proves that the speaker acted with actual malice.Facts: In 2018, a police officer, Suresh Singh, shot and killed Dayal. After the officer was convicted of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, Dayal's family retained a lawyer, Kaushal, to represent them in civil litigation against the officer. In a magazine called Indian Opinion, the Anti-Communist Society accused Kaushal of being a “Naxalite” and a “Communist-fronter” because he chose to represent clients who were suing a law enforcement officer. Because the statements contained serious inaccuracies, Kaushal filed a libel action against the editors of the magazine.Q. Decide whether he will succeed.a)No, as it is mere vulgar abuse.b)The statement may be defamatory but the editors of the magazine are not liable unless Kaushal is able to establish actual malice in making the statement.c)No, as the statement does not tend to lower Kaushal in the estimation of right-thinking members of society and print media is known for such type of journalism.d)Yes, as statement is defamatory and Kaushal is not required to establish actual malice to successfully bring a claim of defamationCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: Given below is a statement of legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer.Legal Principles:1. Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken, that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard, or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile, or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person.2. The statement must tend to lower the claimant in the estimation of right thinking members of society.3. A mere vulgar abuse is not defamation.4. Defamation encompasses both written statements, known as libel, and spoken statements, called slander.5. A public official or public figure can recover damages for defamation on a matter of public concern only if he proves that the speaker acted with actual malice.Facts: In 2018, a police officer, Suresh Singh, shot and killed Dayal. After the officer was convicted of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, Dayal's family retained a lawyer, Kaushal, to represent them in civil litigation against the officer. In a magazine called Indian Opinion, the Anti-Communist Society accused Kaushal of being a “Naxalite” and a “Communist-fronter” because he chose to represent clients who were suing a law enforcement officer. Because the statements contained serious inaccuracies, Kaushal filed a libel action against the editors of the magazine.Q. Decide whether he will succeed.a)No, as it is mere vulgar abuse.b)The statement may be defamatory but the editors of the magazine are not liable unless Kaushal is able to establish actual malice in making the statement.c)No, as the statement does not tend to lower Kaushal in the estimation of right-thinking members of society and print media is known for such type of journalism.d)Yes, as statement is defamatory and Kaushal is not required to establish actual malice to successfully bring a claim of defamationCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Given below is a statement of legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer.Legal Principles:1. Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken, that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard, or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile, or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person.2. The statement must tend to lower the claimant in the estimation of right thinking members of society.3. A mere vulgar abuse is not defamation.4. Defamation encompasses both written statements, known as libel, and spoken statements, called slander.5. A public official or public figure can recover damages for defamation on a matter of public concern only if he proves that the speaker acted with actual malice.Facts: In 2018, a police officer, Suresh Singh, shot and killed Dayal. After the officer was convicted of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, Dayal's family retained a lawyer, Kaushal, to represent them in civil litigation against the officer. In a magazine called Indian Opinion, the Anti-Communist Society accused Kaushal of being a “Naxalite” and a “Communist-fronter” because he chose to represent clients who were suing a law enforcement officer. Because the statements contained serious inaccuracies, Kaushal filed a libel action against the editors of the magazine.Q. Decide whether he will succeed.a)No, as it is mere vulgar abuse.b)The statement may be defamatory but the editors of the magazine are not liable unless Kaushal is able to establish actual malice in making the statement.c)No, as the statement does not tend to lower Kaushal in the estimation of right-thinking members of society and print media is known for such type of journalism.d)Yes, as statement is defamatory and Kaushal is not required to establish actual malice to successfully bring a claim of defamationCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: Given below is a statement of legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer.Legal Principles:1. Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken, that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard, or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile, or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person.2. The statement must tend to lower the claimant in the estimation of right thinking members of society.3. A mere vulgar abuse is not defamation.4. Defamation encompasses both written statements, known as libel, and spoken statements, called slander.5. A public official or public figure can recover damages for defamation on a matter of public concern only if he proves that the speaker acted with actual malice.Facts: In 2018, a police officer, Suresh Singh, shot and killed Dayal. After the officer was convicted of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, Dayal's family retained a lawyer, Kaushal, to represent them in civil litigation against the officer. In a magazine called Indian Opinion, the Anti-Communist Society accused Kaushal of being a “Naxalite” and a “Communist-fronter” because he chose to represent clients who were suing a law enforcement officer. Because the statements contained serious inaccuracies, Kaushal filed a libel action against the editors of the magazine.Q. Decide whether he will succeed.a)No, as it is mere vulgar abuse.b)The statement may be defamatory but the editors of the magazine are not liable unless Kaushal is able to establish actual malice in making the statement.c)No, as the statement does not tend to lower Kaushal in the estimation of right-thinking members of society and print media is known for such type of journalism.d)Yes, as statement is defamatory and Kaushal is not required to establish actual malice to successfully bring a claim of defamationCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Given below is a statement of legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer.Legal Principles:1. Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken, that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard, or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile, or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person.2. The statement must tend to lower the claimant in the estimation of right thinking members of society.3. A mere vulgar abuse is not defamation.4. Defamation encompasses both written statements, known as libel, and spoken statements, called slander.5. A public official or public figure can recover damages for defamation on a matter of public concern only if he proves that the speaker acted with actual malice.Facts: In 2018, a police officer, Suresh Singh, shot and killed Dayal. After the officer was convicted of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, Dayal's family retained a lawyer, Kaushal, to represent them in civil litigation against the officer. In a magazine called Indian Opinion, the Anti-Communist Society accused Kaushal of being a “Naxalite” and a “Communist-fronter” because he chose to represent clients who were suing a law enforcement officer. Because the statements contained serious inaccuracies, Kaushal filed a libel action against the editors of the magazine.Q. Decide whether he will succeed.a)No, as it is mere vulgar abuse.b)The statement may be defamatory but the editors of the magazine are not liable unless Kaushal is able to establish actual malice in making the statement.c)No, as the statement does not tend to lower Kaushal in the estimation of right-thinking members of society and print media is known for such type of journalism.d)Yes, as statement is defamatory and Kaushal is not required to establish actual malice to successfully bring a claim of defamationCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Given below is a statement of legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer.Legal Principles:1. Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken, that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard, or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile, or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person.2. The statement must tend to lower the claimant in the estimation of right thinking members of society.3. A mere vulgar abuse is not defamation.4. Defamation encompasses both written statements, known as libel, and spoken statements, called slander.5. A public official or public figure can recover damages for defamation on a matter of public concern only if he proves that the speaker acted with actual malice.Facts: In 2018, a police officer, Suresh Singh, shot and killed Dayal. After the officer was convicted of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, Dayal's family retained a lawyer, Kaushal, to represent them in civil litigation against the officer. In a magazine called Indian Opinion, the Anti-Communist Society accused Kaushal of being a “Naxalite” and a “Communist-fronter” because he chose to represent clients who were suing a law enforcement officer. Because the statements contained serious inaccuracies, Kaushal filed a libel action against the editors of the magazine.Q. Decide whether he will succeed.a)No, as it is mere vulgar abuse.b)The statement may be defamatory but the editors of the magazine are not liable unless Kaushal is able to establish actual malice in making the statement.c)No, as the statement does not tend to lower Kaushal in the estimation of right-thinking members of society and print media is known for such type of journalism.d)Yes, as statement is defamatory and Kaushal is not required to establish actual malice to successfully bring a claim of defamationCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: Given below is a statement of legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer.Legal Principles:1. Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken, that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard, or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile, or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person.2. The statement must tend to lower the claimant in the estimation of right thinking members of society.3. A mere vulgar abuse is not defamation.4. Defamation encompasses both written statements, known as libel, and spoken statements, called slander.5. A public official or public figure can recover damages for defamation on a matter of public concern only if he proves that the speaker acted with actual malice.Facts: In 2018, a police officer, Suresh Singh, shot and killed Dayal. After the officer was convicted of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, Dayal's family retained a lawyer, Kaushal, to represent them in civil litigation against the officer. In a magazine called Indian Opinion, the Anti-Communist Society accused Kaushal of being a “Naxalite” and a “Communist-fronter” because he chose to represent clients who were suing a law enforcement officer. Because the statements contained serious inaccuracies, Kaushal filed a libel action against the editors of the magazine.Q. Decide whether he will succeed.a)No, as it is mere vulgar abuse.b)The statement may be defamatory but the editors of the magazine are not liable unless Kaushal is able to establish actual malice in making the statement.c)No, as the statement does not tend to lower Kaushal in the estimation of right-thinking members of society and print media is known for such type of journalism.d)Yes, as statement is defamatory and Kaushal is not required to establish actual malice to successfully bring a claim of defamationCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.