CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   Principles: An unlawful interference with a ... Start Learning for Free
Principles: An unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land , or some right over, or in connection with it, is a nuisance in law of tort.
Facts: During the scarcity of onions , long queues were made outside the defendant's shop who having a licence to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 kg of onion per ration card. The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighbouring shops. The neighbouring shopkeepers filed a suit for nuisance against the defendant. which
one of the following decisions will be correct in this suit?
  • a)
    The shopkeeper is liable to pay damages to all the plaintiffs.
  • b)
    The shopkeeper is liable under strict liability
  • c)
    The shopkeeper is not liable for nuisance
  • d)
    The shopkeeper is liable for nuisance.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Principles: An unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment...
Although the shopkeeper has not committed any wrongful act but indirectly his act was the cause of unlawful interference with the other' use and enjoyment of land.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Top Courses for CLAT

Principles: An unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land , or some right over, or in connection with it, is a nuisance in law of tort.Facts: During the scarcity of onions , long queues were made outside the defendant's shop who having a licence to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 kg of onion per ration card. The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighbouring shops. The neighbouring shopkeepers filed a suit for nuisance against the defendant. whichone of the following decisions will be correct in this suit?a)The shopkeeper is liable to pay damages to all the plaintiffs.b)The shopkeeper is liable under strict liabilityc)The shopkeeper is not liable for nuisanced)The shopkeeper is liable for nuisance.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Principles: An unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land , or some right over, or in connection with it, is a nuisance in law of tort.Facts: During the scarcity of onions , long queues were made outside the defendant's shop who having a licence to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 kg of onion per ration card. The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighbouring shops. The neighbouring shopkeepers filed a suit for nuisance against the defendant. whichone of the following decisions will be correct in this suit?a)The shopkeeper is liable to pay damages to all the plaintiffs.b)The shopkeeper is liable under strict liabilityc)The shopkeeper is not liable for nuisanced)The shopkeeper is liable for nuisance.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principles: An unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land , or some right over, or in connection with it, is a nuisance in law of tort.Facts: During the scarcity of onions , long queues were made outside the defendant's shop who having a licence to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 kg of onion per ration card. The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighbouring shops. The neighbouring shopkeepers filed a suit for nuisance against the defendant. whichone of the following decisions will be correct in this suit?a)The shopkeeper is liable to pay damages to all the plaintiffs.b)The shopkeeper is liable under strict liabilityc)The shopkeeper is not liable for nuisanced)The shopkeeper is liable for nuisance.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principles: An unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land , or some right over, or in connection with it, is a nuisance in law of tort.Facts: During the scarcity of onions , long queues were made outside the defendant's shop who having a licence to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 kg of onion per ration card. The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighbouring shops. The neighbouring shopkeepers filed a suit for nuisance against the defendant. whichone of the following decisions will be correct in this suit?a)The shopkeeper is liable to pay damages to all the plaintiffs.b)The shopkeeper is liable under strict liabilityc)The shopkeeper is not liable for nuisanced)The shopkeeper is liable for nuisance.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Principles: An unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land , or some right over, or in connection with it, is a nuisance in law of tort.Facts: During the scarcity of onions , long queues were made outside the defendant's shop who having a licence to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 kg of onion per ration card. The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighbouring shops. The neighbouring shopkeepers filed a suit for nuisance against the defendant. whichone of the following decisions will be correct in this suit?a)The shopkeeper is liable to pay damages to all the plaintiffs.b)The shopkeeper is liable under strict liabilityc)The shopkeeper is not liable for nuisanced)The shopkeeper is liable for nuisance.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Principles: An unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land , or some right over, or in connection with it, is a nuisance in law of tort.Facts: During the scarcity of onions , long queues were made outside the defendant's shop who having a licence to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 kg of onion per ration card. The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighbouring shops. The neighbouring shopkeepers filed a suit for nuisance against the defendant. whichone of the following decisions will be correct in this suit?a)The shopkeeper is liable to pay damages to all the plaintiffs.b)The shopkeeper is liable under strict liabilityc)The shopkeeper is not liable for nuisanced)The shopkeeper is liable for nuisance.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Principles: An unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land , or some right over, or in connection with it, is a nuisance in law of tort.Facts: During the scarcity of onions , long queues were made outside the defendant's shop who having a licence to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 kg of onion per ration card. The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighbouring shops. The neighbouring shopkeepers filed a suit for nuisance against the defendant. whichone of the following decisions will be correct in this suit?a)The shopkeeper is liable to pay damages to all the plaintiffs.b)The shopkeeper is liable under strict liabilityc)The shopkeeper is not liable for nuisanced)The shopkeeper is liable for nuisance.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principles: An unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land , or some right over, or in connection with it, is a nuisance in law of tort.Facts: During the scarcity of onions , long queues were made outside the defendant's shop who having a licence to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 kg of onion per ration card. The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighbouring shops. The neighbouring shopkeepers filed a suit for nuisance against the defendant. whichone of the following decisions will be correct in this suit?a)The shopkeeper is liable to pay damages to all the plaintiffs.b)The shopkeeper is liable under strict liabilityc)The shopkeeper is not liable for nuisanced)The shopkeeper is liable for nuisance.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principles: An unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land , or some right over, or in connection with it, is a nuisance in law of tort.Facts: During the scarcity of onions , long queues were made outside the defendant's shop who having a licence to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 kg of onion per ration card. The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighbouring shops. The neighbouring shopkeepers filed a suit for nuisance against the defendant. whichone of the following decisions will be correct in this suit?a)The shopkeeper is liable to pay damages to all the plaintiffs.b)The shopkeeper is liable under strict liabilityc)The shopkeeper is not liable for nuisanced)The shopkeeper is liable for nuisance.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Principles: An unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land , or some right over, or in connection with it, is a nuisance in law of tort.Facts: During the scarcity of onions , long queues were made outside the defendant's shop who having a licence to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 kg of onion per ration card. The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighbouring shops. The neighbouring shopkeepers filed a suit for nuisance against the defendant. whichone of the following decisions will be correct in this suit?a)The shopkeeper is liable to pay damages to all the plaintiffs.b)The shopkeeper is liable under strict liabilityc)The shopkeeper is not liable for nuisanced)The shopkeeper is liable for nuisance.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev