UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Questions  >  Which of the following statements is/are corr... Start Learning for Free
Which of the following statements is/are correct regarding the National Food Security Act (NFSA)?
1. It provides for 75% of subsidised foodgrains for rural population only.
2. It provides for Meal and maternity benefit of not less than Rs. 6,000 to pregnant women and lactating mothers.
Choose the correct answer using the codes given below:
  • a)
    1 only
  • b)
    2 only
  • c)
    Both 1 and 2
  • d)
    Neither 1 nor 2
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Which of the following statements is/are correct regarding the Nationa...
  • National Food Security Act (NFSA) provide for food and nutritional security in the human life cycle approach, by ensuring access to adequate quantities of quality food at affordable prices to people to live a life with dignity.
  • It covers 75% of the rural population and upto 50% of the urban population for receiving subsidized foodgrains under Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS). Hence, statement 1 is not correct.
  • It provides for Meal and maternity benefit of not less than Rs. 6,000 to pregnant women and lactating mothers during pregnancy and six months after the child birth. Hence, statement 2 is correct.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Similar UPSC Doubts

Passage 1The NAC proposals go against its earlier proposal of experimenting with universal entitlements in the poorest 150 districts of the country - a retrograde step for a country where half of the population is malnourished. In the final proposals, even this minimum effort to experiment with universalization was given up. The issue is why the NAC went against such universalization.A universal PDS is not only the best possible option from the perspective of a rights based approach, it is also far more realistic in its commitment to ensure food security for the poor. Universalization would also be in line with the larger agenda of the UPA government of changing the architecture of the social service programs to make them more inclusive.Targeting is inherently problematic. The BPL census, which is the primary means of targeting public services and subsidies to the poor, has failed to serve the purpose. The process of targeting is not only administratively costly but also discriminatory to the poor; limiting food security to BPL necessarily involves the exclusion of families who are very similar to other families that have been included. Historically, limiting food security to BPL families has severely impaired the effective access of food for poor families. Large numbers of poor families did not have BPL cards, even when they had cards, access to PDS was not automatic and, even ifthey had access to the PDS, they did not receive the full entitlement of food. But does it really mean that universalization is not feasible? Do we have enough foodgrains for a universal system?The total requirement of a Universal PDS is 96.60 million tonnes if the entire population lifts its foodgrain quota. However, there will be some sections of the population who will not take their quota of foodgrain. This could be because they are well off and therefore do not need the ration food. It could also be a matter of taste and preference and they may not like the PDS foodgrain which is generally of inferior quality. These will largely be the rich and well off in urban areas.Q. Consider the following statements:1. The food grain requirement of the country would in all likelihood be lower than 96.60 million tonnes2. The rich are likely to place more emphasis on taste than the poor Which of the following statements is/are valid?

Directions (Q. 65-71) for the following items:Read the following two passages and answer the items that follow these passages. Your answers to these items should be based on these passages only. Passage 1The NAC proposals go against its earlier proposal of experimenting with universal entitlements in the poorest 150 districts of the country - a retrograde step for a country where half of the population is malnourished. In the final proposals, even this minimum effort to experiment with universalization was given up. The issue is why the NAC went against such universalization.A universal PDS is not only the best possible option from the perspective of a rights based approach, it is also far more realistic in its commitment to ensure food security for the poor. Universalization would also be in line with the larger agenda of the UPA government of changing the architecture of the social service programs to make them more inclusive.Targeting is inherently problematic. The BPL census, which is the primary means of targeting public services and subsidies to the poor, has failed to serve the purpose. The process of targeting is not only administratively costly but also discriminatory to the poor; limiting food security to BPL necessarily involves the exclusion of families who are very similar to other families that have been included. Historically, limiting food security to BPL families has severely impaired the effective access of food for poor families. Large numbers of poor families did not have BPL cards, even when they had cards, access to PDS was not automatic and, even ifthey had access to the PDS, they did not receive the full entitlement of food. But does it really mean that universalization is not feasible? Do we have enough foodgrains for a universal system?The total requirement of a Universal PDS is 96.60 million tonnes if the entire population lifts its foodgrain quota. However, there will be some sections of the population who will not take their quota of foodgrain. This could be because they are well off and therefore do not need the ration food. It could also be a matter of taste and preference and they may not like the PDS foodgrain which is generally of inferior quality. These will largely be the rich and well off in urban areas.Q. It can be inferred from the aim of the passage is to

Passage 1The NAC proposals go against its earlier proposal of experimenting with universal entitlements in the poorest 150 districts of the country - a retrograde step for a country where half of the population is malnourished. In the final proposals, even this minimum effort to experiment with universalization was given up. The issue is why the NAC went against such universalization.A universal PDS is not only the best possible option from the perspective of a rights based approach, it is also far more realistic in its commitment to ensure food security for the poor. Universalization would also be in line with the larger agenda of the UPA government of changing the architecture of the social service programs to make them more inclusive.Targeting is inherently problematic. The BPL census, which is the primary means of targeting public services and subsidies to the poor, has failed to serve the purpose. The process of targeting is not only administratively costly but also discriminatory to the poor; limiting food security to BPL necessarily involves the exclusion of families who are very similar to other families that have been included. Historically, limiting food security to BPL families has severely impaired the effective access of food for poor families. Large numbers of poor families did not have BPL cards, even when they had cards, access to PDS was not automatic and, even ifthey had access to the PDS, they did not receive the full entitlement of food. But does it really mean that universalization is not feasible? Do we have enough foodgrains for a universal system?The total requirement of a Universal PDS is 96.60 million tonnes if the entire population lifts its foodgrain quota. However, there will be some sections of the population who will not take their quota of foodgrain. This could be because they are well off and therefore do not need the ration food. It could also be a matter of taste and preference and they may not like the PDS foodgrain which is generally of inferior quality. These will largely be the rich and well off in urban areas.Q. Which of the following options has not been mentioned as a criticism?

Top Courses for UPSC

Which of the following statements is/are correct regarding the National Food Security Act (NFSA)?1. It provides for 75% of subsidised foodgrains for rural population only.2. It provides for Meal and maternity benefit of not less than Rs. 6,000 to pregnant women and lactating mothers.Choose the correct answer using the codes given below:a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Which of the following statements is/are correct regarding the National Food Security Act (NFSA)?1. It provides for 75% of subsidised foodgrains for rural population only.2. It provides for Meal and maternity benefit of not less than Rs. 6,000 to pregnant women and lactating mothers.Choose the correct answer using the codes given below:a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Which of the following statements is/are correct regarding the National Food Security Act (NFSA)?1. It provides for 75% of subsidised foodgrains for rural population only.2. It provides for Meal and maternity benefit of not less than Rs. 6,000 to pregnant women and lactating mothers.Choose the correct answer using the codes given below:a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Which of the following statements is/are correct regarding the National Food Security Act (NFSA)?1. It provides for 75% of subsidised foodgrains for rural population only.2. It provides for Meal and maternity benefit of not less than Rs. 6,000 to pregnant women and lactating mothers.Choose the correct answer using the codes given below:a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Which of the following statements is/are correct regarding the National Food Security Act (NFSA)?1. It provides for 75% of subsidised foodgrains for rural population only.2. It provides for Meal and maternity benefit of not less than Rs. 6,000 to pregnant women and lactating mothers.Choose the correct answer using the codes given below:a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Which of the following statements is/are correct regarding the National Food Security Act (NFSA)?1. It provides for 75% of subsidised foodgrains for rural population only.2. It provides for Meal and maternity benefit of not less than Rs. 6,000 to pregnant women and lactating mothers.Choose the correct answer using the codes given below:a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Which of the following statements is/are correct regarding the National Food Security Act (NFSA)?1. It provides for 75% of subsidised foodgrains for rural population only.2. It provides for Meal and maternity benefit of not less than Rs. 6,000 to pregnant women and lactating mothers.Choose the correct answer using the codes given below:a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Which of the following statements is/are correct regarding the National Food Security Act (NFSA)?1. It provides for 75% of subsidised foodgrains for rural population only.2. It provides for Meal and maternity benefit of not less than Rs. 6,000 to pregnant women and lactating mothers.Choose the correct answer using the codes given below:a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Which of the following statements is/are correct regarding the National Food Security Act (NFSA)?1. It provides for 75% of subsidised foodgrains for rural population only.2. It provides for Meal and maternity benefit of not less than Rs. 6,000 to pregnant women and lactating mothers.Choose the correct answer using the codes given below:a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Which of the following statements is/are correct regarding the National Food Security Act (NFSA)?1. It provides for 75% of subsidised foodgrains for rural population only.2. It provides for Meal and maternity benefit of not less than Rs. 6,000 to pregnant women and lactating mothers.Choose the correct answer using the codes given below:a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev