CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  What is the meaning of the Latin Maxim/Legal ... Start Learning for Free
What is the meaning of the Latin Maxim/Legal Word/ Legal Term ‘Impotentia excusat legem”?
  • a)
    Impossibility in Law is excluded.
  • b)
    Impossibility is an excuse in law.
  • c)
    Impossible Excuses are an exception in law.
  • d)
    Impossible excuses are not legally approved.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
What is the meaning of the Latin Maxim/Legal Word/ Legal Term ‘I...
The Latin Maxim/word/term stands for the impossibility of performing a legal obligation due to a reasonably unforeseeable situation.
Hence option B is the right answer.
Free Test
Community Answer
What is the meaning of the Latin Maxim/Legal Word/ Legal Term ‘I...
Meaning of the Term:
"Impotentia excusat legem" is a Latin legal maxim that translates to "Impossibility is an excuse in law."

Explanation:
- Impossibility as an Excuse: The legal principle behind this term is that if it is impossible for someone to comply with a law or legal requirement due to circumstances beyond their control, then they may be excused from liability or punishment.
- Recognition of Impossibility: In legal terms, impossibility refers to situations where it is not physically or legally possible for an individual to fulfill their legal obligations. This could be due to reasons such as a natural disaster, unforeseen circumstances, or the actions of a third party.
- Exemption from Liability: By invoking the principle of "Impotentia excusat legem," individuals can argue that their inability to comply with the law should excuse them from any legal consequences or penalties that would normally apply for non-compliance.
- Application in Legal Cases: Courts may consider this legal maxim when assessing cases where individuals have failed to meet their legal obligations due to reasons beyond their control. It serves as a defense mechanism for individuals facing legal action in situations of genuine impossibility.
- Legal Interpretation: The principle of impossibility as an excuse in law aims to strike a balance between upholding legal standards and recognizing that there are circumstances where individuals should not be held accountable for actions that were impossible for them to perform.
In conclusion, "Impotentia excusat legem" underscores the importance of considering impossibility as a valid excuse in legal contexts where individuals are unable to meet their legal obligations due to external factors.
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Passage:The Nirbhaya case constitutes a crime which fits into the category of the ‘rarest of the rare’ cases because it violated collective conscience. The death penalty, as an exceptional punishment, follows from the judgment that the case fit the criteria of the ‘rarest of the rare’. Ideally an exception should be unknown until it occurs: it is exceptional because it is not documented under the rule.Conversely, once an exception has been codified through law, it loses its exceptional character. Hence ideally, there can be no pre-existing category of the ‘rarest of the rare’.Judges already know what these ‘exceptions’ are going to be because they understand exceptions for a category like ‘murder’.The ‘rarest of the rare’ proves to be an empty, floating category which seems to stand at once inside and outside the law, due to its ability to accommodate exceptionality. In the Nirbhaya judgment, the Supreme Court said that the ‘rarest of the rare’ case is one in which “the crime is committed… may result in intense and extreme indignation of the community and shock the collective conscience of the society”.The category of the ‘rarest of the rare’ is always evolving. It is the evaluation of certain cases that makes them fit into the category of the ‘rarest of the rare’, and not the nature of the crimes as such. In such cases, the legal judgment says that the judicial power is obligated to the collective to repair the moral fabric of society which the crime has torn.Q.In the last line of the extract, what does the term “collective” mean?

Passage:The Nirbhaya case constitutes a crime which fits into the category of the ‘rarest of the rare’ cases because it violated collective conscience. The death penalty, as an exceptional punishment, follows from the judgment that the case fit the criteria of the ‘rarest of the rare’. Ideally an exception should be unknown until it occurs: it is exceptional because it is not documented under the rule.Conversely, once an exception has been codified through law, it loses its exceptional character. Hence ideally, there can be no pre-existing category of the ‘rarest of the rare’.Judges already know what these ‘exceptions’ are going to be because they understand exceptions for a category like ‘murder’.The ‘rarest of the rare’ proves to be an empty, floating category which seems to stand at once inside and outside the law, due to its ability to accommodate exceptionality. In the Nirbhaya judgment, the Supreme Court said that the ‘rarest of the rare’ case is one in which “the crime is committed… may result in intense and extreme indignation of the community and shock the collective conscience of the society”.The category of the ‘rarest of the rare’ is always evolving. It is the evaluation of certain cases that makes them fit into the category of the ‘rarest of the rare’, and not the nature of the crimes as such. In such cases, the legal judgment says that the judicial power is obligated to the collective to repair the moral fabric of society which the crime has torn.Q.What makes the “Rarest of the Rare” a floating category?

Passage:The Nirbhaya case constitutes a crime which fits into the category of the ‘rarest of the rare’ cases because it violated collective conscience. The death penalty, as an exceptional punishment, follows from the judgment that the case fit the criteria of the ‘rarest of the rare’. Ideally an exception should be unknown until it occurs: it is exceptional because it is not documented under the rule.Conversely, once an exception has been codified through law, it loses its exceptional character. Hence ideally, there can be no pre-existing category of the ‘rarest of the rare’.Judges already know what these ‘exceptions’ are going to be because they understand exceptions for a category like ‘murder’.The ‘rarest of the rare’ proves to be an empty, floating category which seems to stand at once inside and outside the law, due to its ability to accommodate exceptionality. In the Nirbhaya judgment, the Supreme Court said that the ‘rarest of the rare’ case is one in which “the crime is committed… may result in intense and extreme indignation of the community and shock the collective conscience of the society”.The category of the ‘rarest of the rare’ is always evolving. It is the evaluation of certain cases that makes them fit into the category of the ‘rarest of the rare’, and not the nature of the crimes as such. In such cases, the legal judgment says that the judicial power is obligated to the collective to repair the moral fabric of society which the crime has torn.Q.Why does the Nirbhaya case fit into the category of “Rarest of the rare”?

Top Courses for CLAT

What is the meaning of the Latin Maxim/Legal Word/ Legal Term ‘Impotentia excusat legem”?a)Impossibility in Law is excluded.b)Impossibility is an excuse in law.c)Impossible Excuses are an exception in law.d)Impossible excuses are not legally approved.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
What is the meaning of the Latin Maxim/Legal Word/ Legal Term ‘Impotentia excusat legem”?a)Impossibility in Law is excluded.b)Impossibility is an excuse in law.c)Impossible Excuses are an exception in law.d)Impossible excuses are not legally approved.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about What is the meaning of the Latin Maxim/Legal Word/ Legal Term ‘Impotentia excusat legem”?a)Impossibility in Law is excluded.b)Impossibility is an excuse in law.c)Impossible Excuses are an exception in law.d)Impossible excuses are not legally approved.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for What is the meaning of the Latin Maxim/Legal Word/ Legal Term ‘Impotentia excusat legem”?a)Impossibility in Law is excluded.b)Impossibility is an excuse in law.c)Impossible Excuses are an exception in law.d)Impossible excuses are not legally approved.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for What is the meaning of the Latin Maxim/Legal Word/ Legal Term ‘Impotentia excusat legem”?a)Impossibility in Law is excluded.b)Impossibility is an excuse in law.c)Impossible Excuses are an exception in law.d)Impossible excuses are not legally approved.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of What is the meaning of the Latin Maxim/Legal Word/ Legal Term ‘Impotentia excusat legem”?a)Impossibility in Law is excluded.b)Impossibility is an excuse in law.c)Impossible Excuses are an exception in law.d)Impossible excuses are not legally approved.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of What is the meaning of the Latin Maxim/Legal Word/ Legal Term ‘Impotentia excusat legem”?a)Impossibility in Law is excluded.b)Impossibility is an excuse in law.c)Impossible Excuses are an exception in law.d)Impossible excuses are not legally approved.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for What is the meaning of the Latin Maxim/Legal Word/ Legal Term ‘Impotentia excusat legem”?a)Impossibility in Law is excluded.b)Impossibility is an excuse in law.c)Impossible Excuses are an exception in law.d)Impossible excuses are not legally approved.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of What is the meaning of the Latin Maxim/Legal Word/ Legal Term ‘Impotentia excusat legem”?a)Impossibility in Law is excluded.b)Impossibility is an excuse in law.c)Impossible Excuses are an exception in law.d)Impossible excuses are not legally approved.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice What is the meaning of the Latin Maxim/Legal Word/ Legal Term ‘Impotentia excusat legem”?a)Impossibility in Law is excluded.b)Impossibility is an excuse in law.c)Impossible Excuses are an exception in law.d)Impossible excuses are not legally approved.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev