All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   Directions: The question consists of two sta... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully and select the best option.
Principle: Nothing is an offence, which is done by accident or misfortune and without any criminal intention or knowledge in the doing of a lawful act in a lawful manner by lawful means and with proper care and caution.
Facts: A is a woodcutter. When he was at work one day, a number of children flocked to him and asked him to make a cricket bat for them. Without listening to them, he continued to chop woods using a heavy axe. Suddenly, a piece of chopped wood flew and struck one child, who was standing just two feet away from him. As a result, the child lost one eye.
Is A liable for the injury caused to the boy?
  • a)
    A is liable for causing injury to a child.
  • b)
    A is not liable because it was merely an accident.
  • c)
    A is not liable because children flocked to him.
  • d)
    A is liable because he has the knowledge that the boys standing near him may get hurt.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as ...
Principle:

Nothing is an offence, which is done by accident or misfortune and without any criminal intention or knowledge in the doing of a lawful act in a lawful manner by lawful means and with proper care and caution.

Facts:

A is a woodcutter. When he was at work one day, a number of children flocked to him and asked him to make a cricket bat for them. Without listening to them, he continued to chop woods using a heavy axe. Suddenly, a piece of chopped wood flew and struck one child, who was standing just two feet away from him. As a result, the child lost one eye.

Explanation:
- A is liable for causing injury to a child: A is liable for the injury caused to the boy because even though the act was unintentional, he had the knowledge that children were standing close to him while he was using a heavy axe. This lack of proper care and caution on his part led to the unfortunate incident.
- A is not liable because it was merely an accident: While the incident may have been accidental, A's lack of attention to the children's presence and failure to exercise proper care and caution makes him responsible for the injury caused to the child.
- A is not liable because children flocked to him: The fact that children approached A does not absolve him of responsibility for the injury caused. As a woodcutter, it was his duty to ensure the safety of those around him while using sharp tools.
- A is liable because he has the knowledge that the boys standing near him may get hurt: This statement accurately reflects the situation. A, being aware of the children's proximity to him, should have taken precautions to prevent any harm. His negligence in this regard makes him liable for the injury suffered by the child.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as ...
A is liable for causing injury to the boys. When he knew that the boys are standing nearby, he should not have continued cutting wood. This shows that he did not act with proper care and caution.
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the principles and apply them to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Principles:1. Property of a Christian male dying intestate is inherited by his wife and daughters and if all of them are alive, then it will be shared equally among them.2. Property does not include any legal obligation on part of dying Christian male, especially debt associated with his property and investment made in his assets.Facts: Dennis is a Christian. Dennis got funded handsomely for his new venture by Angel Investors, so that he can develop his product. He was married to Salma and had a son named Raju from her. Dennis passed away in a railway accident weeks later. His wife was sued for returning the investment money by Angel Investors.Decide.

Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given statements carefully and select the best option.Principle: An offer will be considered to be a valid offer only if a person intends for it to result in a binding legal obligation.Facts: Amit is Naina's younger brother, and one day, on returning home, exhausted from his cricket tournament, asks his sister to bring him glucose water from the kitchen. She refuses to do so. Then, he says, If you bring me glucose water, I'll become your slave for a whole week. She brings him the water and the next day, demands that he clean the garden, take the dog out for a walk, cook, wash the car and take her out for shopping. Amit clearly refuses to do so. Angered by this, Naina decides to file a suit against her brother, claiming that he was her slave.Will she succeed?

Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: No person attending any educational institution recognised by the state or receiving aid out of state funds shall be required to take part in any religious instruction that may be imparted in such institution or to attend any religious worship that may be conducted in such institution or in any premises attached thereto unless such person or, if such person is a minor, his guardian has given his consent thereto.Facts: Junaid was a boy of a Muslim family and son of Mr. Ajiz Khan. He went to the school nearby called St. Barbosa. The school had predominantly the students coming from the Christian religion. In the morning assembly, the students were asked to sing hymns of Bible and other Christian literature praising Lord Jesus. Junaid was reluctant to do so, and he was punished for that. His father sued the school.Decide. Correct answer is option ''. Can you explain this answer?

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Principle: Nothing is an offence, which is done by accident or misfortune and without any criminal intention or knowledge in the doing of a lawful act in a lawful manner by lawful means and with proper care and caution.Facts: A is a woodcutter. When he was at work one day, a number of children flocked to him and asked him to make a cricket bat for them. Without listening to them, he continued to chop woods using a heavy axe. Suddenly, a piece of chopped wood flew and struck one child, who was standing just two feet away from him. As a result, the child lost one eye.Is A liable for the injury caused to the boy?a)A is liable for causing injury to a child.b)A is not liable because it was merely an accident.c)A is not liable because children flocked to him.d)A is liable because he has the knowledge that the boys standing near him may get hurt.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Principle: Nothing is an offence, which is done by accident or misfortune and without any criminal intention or knowledge in the doing of a lawful act in a lawful manner by lawful means and with proper care and caution.Facts: A is a woodcutter. When he was at work one day, a number of children flocked to him and asked him to make a cricket bat for them. Without listening to them, he continued to chop woods using a heavy axe. Suddenly, a piece of chopped wood flew and struck one child, who was standing just two feet away from him. As a result, the child lost one eye.Is A liable for the injury caused to the boy?a)A is liable for causing injury to a child.b)A is not liable because it was merely an accident.c)A is not liable because children flocked to him.d)A is liable because he has the knowledge that the boys standing near him may get hurt.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Principle: Nothing is an offence, which is done by accident or misfortune and without any criminal intention or knowledge in the doing of a lawful act in a lawful manner by lawful means and with proper care and caution.Facts: A is a woodcutter. When he was at work one day, a number of children flocked to him and asked him to make a cricket bat for them. Without listening to them, he continued to chop woods using a heavy axe. Suddenly, a piece of chopped wood flew and struck one child, who was standing just two feet away from him. As a result, the child lost one eye.Is A liable for the injury caused to the boy?a)A is liable for causing injury to a child.b)A is not liable because it was merely an accident.c)A is not liable because children flocked to him.d)A is liable because he has the knowledge that the boys standing near him may get hurt.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Principle: Nothing is an offence, which is done by accident or misfortune and without any criminal intention or knowledge in the doing of a lawful act in a lawful manner by lawful means and with proper care and caution.Facts: A is a woodcutter. When he was at work one day, a number of children flocked to him and asked him to make a cricket bat for them. Without listening to them, he continued to chop woods using a heavy axe. Suddenly, a piece of chopped wood flew and struck one child, who was standing just two feet away from him. As a result, the child lost one eye.Is A liable for the injury caused to the boy?a)A is liable for causing injury to a child.b)A is not liable because it was merely an accident.c)A is not liable because children flocked to him.d)A is liable because he has the knowledge that the boys standing near him may get hurt.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Principle: Nothing is an offence, which is done by accident or misfortune and without any criminal intention or knowledge in the doing of a lawful act in a lawful manner by lawful means and with proper care and caution.Facts: A is a woodcutter. When he was at work one day, a number of children flocked to him and asked him to make a cricket bat for them. Without listening to them, he continued to chop woods using a heavy axe. Suddenly, a piece of chopped wood flew and struck one child, who was standing just two feet away from him. As a result, the child lost one eye.Is A liable for the injury caused to the boy?a)A is liable for causing injury to a child.b)A is not liable because it was merely an accident.c)A is not liable because children flocked to him.d)A is liable because he has the knowledge that the boys standing near him may get hurt.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Principle: Nothing is an offence, which is done by accident or misfortune and without any criminal intention or knowledge in the doing of a lawful act in a lawful manner by lawful means and with proper care and caution.Facts: A is a woodcutter. When he was at work one day, a number of children flocked to him and asked him to make a cricket bat for them. Without listening to them, he continued to chop woods using a heavy axe. Suddenly, a piece of chopped wood flew and struck one child, who was standing just two feet away from him. As a result, the child lost one eye.Is A liable for the injury caused to the boy?a)A is liable for causing injury to a child.b)A is not liable because it was merely an accident.c)A is not liable because children flocked to him.d)A is liable because he has the knowledge that the boys standing near him may get hurt.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Principle: Nothing is an offence, which is done by accident or misfortune and without any criminal intention or knowledge in the doing of a lawful act in a lawful manner by lawful means and with proper care and caution.Facts: A is a woodcutter. When he was at work one day, a number of children flocked to him and asked him to make a cricket bat for them. Without listening to them, he continued to chop woods using a heavy axe. Suddenly, a piece of chopped wood flew and struck one child, who was standing just two feet away from him. As a result, the child lost one eye.Is A liable for the injury caused to the boy?a)A is liable for causing injury to a child.b)A is not liable because it was merely an accident.c)A is not liable because children flocked to him.d)A is liable because he has the knowledge that the boys standing near him may get hurt.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Principle: Nothing is an offence, which is done by accident or misfortune and without any criminal intention or knowledge in the doing of a lawful act in a lawful manner by lawful means and with proper care and caution.Facts: A is a woodcutter. When he was at work one day, a number of children flocked to him and asked him to make a cricket bat for them. Without listening to them, he continued to chop woods using a heavy axe. Suddenly, a piece of chopped wood flew and struck one child, who was standing just two feet away from him. As a result, the child lost one eye.Is A liable for the injury caused to the boy?a)A is liable for causing injury to a child.b)A is not liable because it was merely an accident.c)A is not liable because children flocked to him.d)A is liable because he has the knowledge that the boys standing near him may get hurt.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Principle: Nothing is an offence, which is done by accident or misfortune and without any criminal intention or knowledge in the doing of a lawful act in a lawful manner by lawful means and with proper care and caution.Facts: A is a woodcutter. When he was at work one day, a number of children flocked to him and asked him to make a cricket bat for them. Without listening to them, he continued to chop woods using a heavy axe. Suddenly, a piece of chopped wood flew and struck one child, who was standing just two feet away from him. As a result, the child lost one eye.Is A liable for the injury caused to the boy?a)A is liable for causing injury to a child.b)A is not liable because it was merely an accident.c)A is not liable because children flocked to him.d)A is liable because he has the knowledge that the boys standing near him may get hurt.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Principle: Nothing is an offence, which is done by accident or misfortune and without any criminal intention or knowledge in the doing of a lawful act in a lawful manner by lawful means and with proper care and caution.Facts: A is a woodcutter. When he was at work one day, a number of children flocked to him and asked him to make a cricket bat for them. Without listening to them, he continued to chop woods using a heavy axe. Suddenly, a piece of chopped wood flew and struck one child, who was standing just two feet away from him. As a result, the child lost one eye.Is A liable for the injury caused to the boy?a)A is liable for causing injury to a child.b)A is not liable because it was merely an accident.c)A is not liable because children flocked to him.d)A is liable because he has the knowledge that the boys standing near him may get hurt.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup