Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: All persons shall have protection against the application of ex-post facto laws.Facts: A law has been amended and a section was inserted on 21st December, 2006, creating a distinct offence of accidental death and providing a minimum sentence of 7 years of imprisonment. Prem, who was accused of an accidental death in the year 2004, which happened due to his negligent and careless driving, was punished with imprisonment of 10 years. Prem challenged the decision.Decide.a)Prem will not succeed as he needs to be punished for committing the offence of causing death by careless driving.b)Prem will not succeed as he has committed an offence out of negligence.c)Prem will succeed because he cannot be punished with the penalty, which was not in force earlier.d)It is at the discretion of the court.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Directions: In this question, one or more pr...

Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.

Principle: All persons shall have protection against the application of ex-post facto laws.

Facts: A law has been amended and a section was inserted on 21st December, 2006, creating a distinct offence of accidental death and providing a minimum sentence of 7 years of imprisonment. Prem, who was accused of an accidental death in the year 2004, which happened due to his negligent and careless driving, was punished with imprisonment of 10 years. Prem challenged the decision.

Decide.

a)
Prem will not succeed as he needs to be punished for committing the offence of causing death by careless driving.
b)
Prem will not succeed as he has committed an offence out of negligence.
c)
Prem will succeed because he cannot be punished with the penalty, which was not in force earlier.
d)
It is at the discretion of the court.

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given follow...

Prem will succeed because of the protection against the application of ex-post facto laws.

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principles:1. All persons shall have protection against the application of ex-post facto laws.2. No person shall be subjected to a penalty greater than that which might have been inflicted under the law in force at the time of the commission of the offence.Facts: A minor had been punished for an offence for 14 years. While he was serving the sentence for imprisonment, a new law was made, containing provision that no minor could be put in jail for more than 10 years. He appealed before the court to be protected under the amended provision for the same.

View answer

Directions: This question consists of one or more principles followed by certain facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully and select the best option accordingly.Principle: No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once. This rule is known as double jeopardy.Facts: Nisha was a government employee. Embezzlement of funds was reported in her department. After the investigation, it came out that Nisha was responsible for this. So, she was handed over to the police for further criminal proceedings. She was convicted by the court and was given a punishment of 2 years of imprisonment. After this, a departmental inquiry was ordered to probe into the acts of Nisha by a government department. Nisha challenged this inquiry on the ground of above given principle.Decide

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Initially, Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code came under much flak as it didnt prescribe death penalty which was provided for in case of murder. There was a proposal to amend this section and provide stricter punishment for dowry deaths. The 202nd report of Law Commission presented in 2007 did not approve of the proposed amendment as prosecution under Section 304B is no bar to prosecution for murder. Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code states that if a woman dies within seven years of marriage by any burns or bodily injury or it was revealed that before her death she was exposed to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any other relative of the husband in connection to demand dowry, then the death of the woman will be considered a dowry death. Punishment for dowry death is a minimum sentence of imprisonment for seven years or a maximum sentence of imprisonment for life.To hold a person under this section, it is required that death should be caused by burns or bodily injury or by any other circumstances and it must occur within the seven years of marriage. Also, it must be revealed that soon before her marriage she was exposed to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any other relative and that it was so in connection with the demand for dowry.As per Section 2 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, dowry is any property or valuable security directly or indirectly agreed to be given by one party to a marriage to the other party to the marriage or by the parent of either party to a marriage or by any other person, to either party to the marriage or to any other person, at or before or any time after the marriage in connection with the marriage of the said parties.Section 304B deals with both homicidal and suicidal deaths. These provisions show a marked departure from the ordinary principles of criminal law wherein its entirely upon the prosecution to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. In cases of dowry death, the prosecution has to discharge the initial burden of ruling out the possibility of a natural death and adducing evidence of link between the death of the woman and cruelty related to dowry demand. Beyond this, the onus shifts onto the accused to prove his innocence.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from Dowry Death under Section 304b of IPC & 113 B of Evidence Act, blog by Ipleaders]Q.What is the minimum punishment for a dowry death under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code?

View answer

Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: A contract can be avoided if consent was not freely given.Facts: Sumita is eligible to get a passport and therefore, she applies for the same. Mahesh, the official at the passport counter, tells her that in order to get her application speedily processed, she must pay a bribe of Rs. 5000. Sumita pays, but later seeks to recover.Decide.

View answer

Direction:In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple-choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choicesPrinciple:It may be necessary that documents, things and other materials relevant for investigation, inquiry or trial should be made available for conducting proceedings before the Court. While a person in possession of the aforementioned things should produce them when required, if he/she fails to produce it, the competent couri can pass necessary orders and issue directions to the police for search and seizure of such documents and things.Facts: Assuming in the above facts, that Miku had the only copy of the will in question and refused to bring it to Court. Bhiku claimed he had evidence to prove that his father had left the two houses at Brixton Road to him while his fathers assistant, Brijlal claimed that he had left the houses to him. Bhiku and Brijlal did not produce any documents to support their claims for two Court hearings.Q. Which of the following statements is incorrect?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Crash Course for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: All persons shall have protection against the application of ex-post facto laws.Facts: A law has been amended and a section was inserted on 21st December, 2006, creating a distinct offence of accidental death and providing a minimum sentence of 7 years of imprisonment. Prem, who was accused of an accidental death in the year 2004, which happened due to his negligent and careless driving, was punished with imprisonment of 10 years. Prem challenged the decision.Decide.a)Prem will not succeed as he needs to be punished for committing the offence of causing death by careless driving.b)Prem will not succeed as he has committed an offence out of negligence.c)Prem will succeed because he cannot be punished with the penalty, which was not in force earlier.d)It is at the discretion of the court.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: All persons shall have protection against the application of ex-post facto laws.Facts: A law has been amended and a section was inserted on 21st December, 2006, creating a distinct offence of accidental death and providing a minimum sentence of 7 years of imprisonment. Prem, who was accused of an accidental death in the year 2004, which happened due to his negligent and careless driving, was punished with imprisonment of 10 years. Prem challenged the decision.Decide.a)Prem will not succeed as he needs to be punished for committing the offence of causing death by careless driving.b)Prem will not succeed as he has committed an offence out of negligence.c)Prem will succeed because he cannot be punished with the penalty, which was not in force earlier.d)It is at the discretion of the court.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: All persons shall have protection against the application of ex-post facto laws.Facts: A law has been amended and a section was inserted on 21st December, 2006, creating a distinct offence of accidental death and providing a minimum sentence of 7 years of imprisonment. Prem, who was accused of an accidental death in the year 2004, which happened due to his negligent and careless driving, was punished with imprisonment of 10 years. Prem challenged the decision.Decide.a)Prem will not succeed as he needs to be punished for committing the offence of causing death by careless driving.b)Prem will not succeed as he has committed an offence out of negligence.c)Prem will succeed because he cannot be punished with the penalty, which was not in force earlier.d)It is at the discretion of the court.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: All persons shall have protection against the application of ex-post facto laws.Facts: A law has been amended and a section was inserted on 21st December, 2006, creating a distinct offence of accidental death and providing a minimum sentence of 7 years of imprisonment. Prem, who was accused of an accidental death in the year 2004, which happened due to his negligent and careless driving, was punished with imprisonment of 10 years. Prem challenged the decision.Decide.a)Prem will not succeed as he needs to be punished for committing the offence of causing death by careless driving.b)Prem will not succeed as he has committed an offence out of negligence.c)Prem will succeed because he cannot be punished with the penalty, which was not in force earlier.d)It is at the discretion of the court.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: All persons shall have protection against the application of ex-post facto laws.Facts: A law has been amended and a section was inserted on 21st December, 2006, creating a distinct offence of accidental death and providing a minimum sentence of 7 years of imprisonment. Prem, who was accused of an accidental death in the year 2004, which happened due to his negligent and careless driving, was punished with imprisonment of 10 years. Prem challenged the decision.Decide.a)Prem will not succeed as he needs to be punished for committing the offence of causing death by careless driving.b)Prem will not succeed as he has committed an offence out of negligence.c)Prem will succeed because he cannot be punished with the penalty, which was not in force earlier.d)It is at the discretion of the court.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: All persons shall have protection against the application of ex-post facto laws.Facts: A law has been amended and a section was inserted on 21st December, 2006, creating a distinct offence of accidental death and providing a minimum sentence of 7 years of imprisonment. Prem, who was accused of an accidental death in the year 2004, which happened due to his negligent and careless driving, was punished with imprisonment of 10 years. Prem challenged the decision.Decide.a)Prem will not succeed as he needs to be punished for committing the offence of causing death by careless driving.b)Prem will not succeed as he has committed an offence out of negligence.c)Prem will succeed because he cannot be punished with the penalty, which was not in force earlier.d)It is at the discretion of the court.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: All persons shall have protection against the application of ex-post facto laws.Facts: A law has been amended and a section was inserted on 21st December, 2006, creating a distinct offence of accidental death and providing a minimum sentence of 7 years of imprisonment. Prem, who was accused of an accidental death in the year 2004, which happened due to his negligent and careless driving, was punished with imprisonment of 10 years. Prem challenged the decision.Decide.a)Prem will not succeed as he needs to be punished for committing the offence of causing death by careless driving.b)Prem will not succeed as he has committed an offence out of negligence.c)Prem will succeed because he cannot be punished with the penalty, which was not in force earlier.d)It is at the discretion of the court.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: All persons shall have protection against the application of ex-post facto laws.Facts: A law has been amended and a section was inserted on 21st December, 2006, creating a distinct offence of accidental death and providing a minimum sentence of 7 years of imprisonment. Prem, who was accused of an accidental death in the year 2004, which happened due to his negligent and careless driving, was punished with imprisonment of 10 years. Prem challenged the decision.Decide.a)Prem will not succeed as he needs to be punished for committing the offence of causing death by careless driving.b)Prem will not succeed as he has committed an offence out of negligence.c)Prem will succeed because he cannot be punished with the penalty, which was not in force earlier.d)It is at the discretion of the court.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: All persons shall have protection against the application of ex-post facto laws.Facts: A law has been amended and a section was inserted on 21st December, 2006, creating a distinct offence of accidental death and providing a minimum sentence of 7 years of imprisonment. Prem, who was accused of an accidental death in the year 2004, which happened due to his negligent and careless driving, was punished with imprisonment of 10 years. Prem challenged the decision.Decide.a)Prem will not succeed as he needs to be punished for committing the offence of causing death by careless driving.b)Prem will not succeed as he has committed an offence out of negligence.c)Prem will succeed because he cannot be punished with the penalty, which was not in force earlier.d)It is at the discretion of the court.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: All persons shall have protection against the application of ex-post facto laws.Facts: A law has been amended and a section was inserted on 21st December, 2006, creating a distinct offence of accidental death and providing a minimum sentence of 7 years of imprisonment. Prem, who was accused of an accidental death in the year 2004, which happened due to his negligent and careless driving, was punished with imprisonment of 10 years. Prem challenged the decision.Decide.a)Prem will not succeed as he needs to be punished for committing the offence of causing death by careless driving.b)Prem will not succeed as he has committed an offence out of negligence.c)Prem will succeed because he cannot be punished with the penalty, which was not in force earlier.d)It is at the discretion of the court.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam