Question Description
Directions: This question consists of one or more principles followed by certain facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully and select the best option accordingly.Principle: No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once. This rule is known as double jeopardy.Facts: Nisha was a government employee. Embezzlement of funds was reported in her department. After the investigation, it came out that Nisha was responsible for this. So, she was handed over to the police for further criminal proceedings. She was convicted by the court and was given a punishment of 2 years of imprisonment. After this, a departmental inquiry was ordered to probe into the acts of Nisha by a government department. Nisha challenged this inquiry on the ground of above given principle.Decidea)Nisha will succeed since she has already been prosecuted and punished by the court once.b)Nisha will succeed since departmental inquiry is of no use after she has already been punished by the court.c)Nisha will not succeed since an inquiry at the departmental level is essential to find out the actual monetary loss that has been caused to the department.d)Nisha will not succeed since a departmental inquiry is not a criminal prosecution and is independent of criminal prosecution.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: This question consists of one or more principles followed by certain facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully and select the best option accordingly.Principle: No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once. This rule is known as double jeopardy.Facts: Nisha was a government employee. Embezzlement of funds was reported in her department. After the investigation, it came out that Nisha was responsible for this. So, she was handed over to the police for further criminal proceedings. She was convicted by the court and was given a punishment of 2 years of imprisonment. After this, a departmental inquiry was ordered to probe into the acts of Nisha by a government department. Nisha challenged this inquiry on the ground of above given principle.Decidea)Nisha will succeed since she has already been prosecuted and punished by the court once.b)Nisha will succeed since departmental inquiry is of no use after she has already been punished by the court.c)Nisha will not succeed since an inquiry at the departmental level is essential to find out the actual monetary loss that has been caused to the department.d)Nisha will not succeed since a departmental inquiry is not a criminal prosecution and is independent of criminal prosecution.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: This question consists of one or more principles followed by certain facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully and select the best option accordingly.Principle: No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once. This rule is known as double jeopardy.Facts: Nisha was a government employee. Embezzlement of funds was reported in her department. After the investigation, it came out that Nisha was responsible for this. So, she was handed over to the police for further criminal proceedings. She was convicted by the court and was given a punishment of 2 years of imprisonment. After this, a departmental inquiry was ordered to probe into the acts of Nisha by a government department. Nisha challenged this inquiry on the ground of above given principle.Decidea)Nisha will succeed since she has already been prosecuted and punished by the court once.b)Nisha will succeed since departmental inquiry is of no use after she has already been punished by the court.c)Nisha will not succeed since an inquiry at the departmental level is essential to find out the actual monetary loss that has been caused to the department.d)Nisha will not succeed since a departmental inquiry is not a criminal prosecution and is independent of criminal prosecution.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: This question consists of one or more principles followed by certain facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully and select the best option accordingly.Principle: No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once. This rule is known as double jeopardy.Facts: Nisha was a government employee. Embezzlement of funds was reported in her department. After the investigation, it came out that Nisha was responsible for this. So, she was handed over to the police for further criminal proceedings. She was convicted by the court and was given a punishment of 2 years of imprisonment. After this, a departmental inquiry was ordered to probe into the acts of Nisha by a government department. Nisha challenged this inquiry on the ground of above given principle.Decidea)Nisha will succeed since she has already been prosecuted and punished by the court once.b)Nisha will succeed since departmental inquiry is of no use after she has already been punished by the court.c)Nisha will not succeed since an inquiry at the departmental level is essential to find out the actual monetary loss that has been caused to the department.d)Nisha will not succeed since a departmental inquiry is not a criminal prosecution and is independent of criminal prosecution.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: This question consists of one or more principles followed by certain facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully and select the best option accordingly.Principle: No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once. This rule is known as double jeopardy.Facts: Nisha was a government employee. Embezzlement of funds was reported in her department. After the investigation, it came out that Nisha was responsible for this. So, she was handed over to the police for further criminal proceedings. She was convicted by the court and was given a punishment of 2 years of imprisonment. After this, a departmental inquiry was ordered to probe into the acts of Nisha by a government department. Nisha challenged this inquiry on the ground of above given principle.Decidea)Nisha will succeed since she has already been prosecuted and punished by the court once.b)Nisha will succeed since departmental inquiry is of no use after she has already been punished by the court.c)Nisha will not succeed since an inquiry at the departmental level is essential to find out the actual monetary loss that has been caused to the department.d)Nisha will not succeed since a departmental inquiry is not a criminal prosecution and is independent of criminal prosecution.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: This question consists of one or more principles followed by certain facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully and select the best option accordingly.Principle: No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once. This rule is known as double jeopardy.Facts: Nisha was a government employee. Embezzlement of funds was reported in her department. After the investigation, it came out that Nisha was responsible for this. So, she was handed over to the police for further criminal proceedings. She was convicted by the court and was given a punishment of 2 years of imprisonment. After this, a departmental inquiry was ordered to probe into the acts of Nisha by a government department. Nisha challenged this inquiry on the ground of above given principle.Decidea)Nisha will succeed since she has already been prosecuted and punished by the court once.b)Nisha will succeed since departmental inquiry is of no use after she has already been punished by the court.c)Nisha will not succeed since an inquiry at the departmental level is essential to find out the actual monetary loss that has been caused to the department.d)Nisha will not succeed since a departmental inquiry is not a criminal prosecution and is independent of criminal prosecution.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: This question consists of one or more principles followed by certain facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully and select the best option accordingly.Principle: No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once. This rule is known as double jeopardy.Facts: Nisha was a government employee. Embezzlement of funds was reported in her department. After the investigation, it came out that Nisha was responsible for this. So, she was handed over to the police for further criminal proceedings. She was convicted by the court and was given a punishment of 2 years of imprisonment. After this, a departmental inquiry was ordered to probe into the acts of Nisha by a government department. Nisha challenged this inquiry on the ground of above given principle.Decidea)Nisha will succeed since she has already been prosecuted and punished by the court once.b)Nisha will succeed since departmental inquiry is of no use after she has already been punished by the court.c)Nisha will not succeed since an inquiry at the departmental level is essential to find out the actual monetary loss that has been caused to the department.d)Nisha will not succeed since a departmental inquiry is not a criminal prosecution and is independent of criminal prosecution.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: This question consists of one or more principles followed by certain facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully and select the best option accordingly.Principle: No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once. This rule is known as double jeopardy.Facts: Nisha was a government employee. Embezzlement of funds was reported in her department. After the investigation, it came out that Nisha was responsible for this. So, she was handed over to the police for further criminal proceedings. She was convicted by the court and was given a punishment of 2 years of imprisonment. After this, a departmental inquiry was ordered to probe into the acts of Nisha by a government department. Nisha challenged this inquiry on the ground of above given principle.Decidea)Nisha will succeed since she has already been prosecuted and punished by the court once.b)Nisha will succeed since departmental inquiry is of no use after she has already been punished by the court.c)Nisha will not succeed since an inquiry at the departmental level is essential to find out the actual monetary loss that has been caused to the department.d)Nisha will not succeed since a departmental inquiry is not a criminal prosecution and is independent of criminal prosecution.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: This question consists of one or more principles followed by certain facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully and select the best option accordingly.Principle: No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once. This rule is known as double jeopardy.Facts: Nisha was a government employee. Embezzlement of funds was reported in her department. After the investigation, it came out that Nisha was responsible for this. So, she was handed over to the police for further criminal proceedings. She was convicted by the court and was given a punishment of 2 years of imprisonment. After this, a departmental inquiry was ordered to probe into the acts of Nisha by a government department. Nisha challenged this inquiry on the ground of above given principle.Decidea)Nisha will succeed since she has already been prosecuted and punished by the court once.b)Nisha will succeed since departmental inquiry is of no use after she has already been punished by the court.c)Nisha will not succeed since an inquiry at the departmental level is essential to find out the actual monetary loss that has been caused to the department.d)Nisha will not succeed since a departmental inquiry is not a criminal prosecution and is independent of criminal prosecution.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.