Question Description
Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: Beneficiaries of a contract are entitled to sue and the concept of 'privity of contract' is not applicable in such cases.Facts: Air Hawk, a private airlines, had a contract with Hotel Royal for the stay of its crew. One of the first officers, Mr. Rakesh Ahuja, who was staying there, took a dive in the pool. The pool design was defective and Rakesh's head hit the bottom. He was paralysed because of the injury and died after 15 years. Rakesh's legal representatives want to file a suit.Decide.a)Rakesh was a stranger to the contract and thus, his legal representatives cannot file a suit for damages.b)Rakesh's legal representatives can sue Hotel Royal for the breach of contract as he was the beneficiary of the contract.c)Rakesh's legal representatives cannot sue after a period of 15 years.d)Rakesh's legal representatives cannot do anything. The least they can do is ask for some ex-gratia payment from the hotel.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: Beneficiaries of a contract are entitled to sue and the concept of 'privity of contract' is not applicable in such cases.Facts: Air Hawk, a private airlines, had a contract with Hotel Royal for the stay of its crew. One of the first officers, Mr. Rakesh Ahuja, who was staying there, took a dive in the pool. The pool design was defective and Rakesh's head hit the bottom. He was paralysed because of the injury and died after 15 years. Rakesh's legal representatives want to file a suit.Decide.a)Rakesh was a stranger to the contract and thus, his legal representatives cannot file a suit for damages.b)Rakesh's legal representatives can sue Hotel Royal for the breach of contract as he was the beneficiary of the contract.c)Rakesh's legal representatives cannot sue after a period of 15 years.d)Rakesh's legal representatives cannot do anything. The least they can do is ask for some ex-gratia payment from the hotel.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: Beneficiaries of a contract are entitled to sue and the concept of 'privity of contract' is not applicable in such cases.Facts: Air Hawk, a private airlines, had a contract with Hotel Royal for the stay of its crew. One of the first officers, Mr. Rakesh Ahuja, who was staying there, took a dive in the pool. The pool design was defective and Rakesh's head hit the bottom. He was paralysed because of the injury and died after 15 years. Rakesh's legal representatives want to file a suit.Decide.a)Rakesh was a stranger to the contract and thus, his legal representatives cannot file a suit for damages.b)Rakesh's legal representatives can sue Hotel Royal for the breach of contract as he was the beneficiary of the contract.c)Rakesh's legal representatives cannot sue after a period of 15 years.d)Rakesh's legal representatives cannot do anything. The least they can do is ask for some ex-gratia payment from the hotel.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: Beneficiaries of a contract are entitled to sue and the concept of 'privity of contract' is not applicable in such cases.Facts: Air Hawk, a private airlines, had a contract with Hotel Royal for the stay of its crew. One of the first officers, Mr. Rakesh Ahuja, who was staying there, took a dive in the pool. The pool design was defective and Rakesh's head hit the bottom. He was paralysed because of the injury and died after 15 years. Rakesh's legal representatives want to file a suit.Decide.a)Rakesh was a stranger to the contract and thus, his legal representatives cannot file a suit for damages.b)Rakesh's legal representatives can sue Hotel Royal for the breach of contract as he was the beneficiary of the contract.c)Rakesh's legal representatives cannot sue after a period of 15 years.d)Rakesh's legal representatives cannot do anything. The least they can do is ask for some ex-gratia payment from the hotel.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: Beneficiaries of a contract are entitled to sue and the concept of 'privity of contract' is not applicable in such cases.Facts: Air Hawk, a private airlines, had a contract with Hotel Royal for the stay of its crew. One of the first officers, Mr. Rakesh Ahuja, who was staying there, took a dive in the pool. The pool design was defective and Rakesh's head hit the bottom. He was paralysed because of the injury and died after 15 years. Rakesh's legal representatives want to file a suit.Decide.a)Rakesh was a stranger to the contract and thus, his legal representatives cannot file a suit for damages.b)Rakesh's legal representatives can sue Hotel Royal for the breach of contract as he was the beneficiary of the contract.c)Rakesh's legal representatives cannot sue after a period of 15 years.d)Rakesh's legal representatives cannot do anything. The least they can do is ask for some ex-gratia payment from the hotel.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: Beneficiaries of a contract are entitled to sue and the concept of 'privity of contract' is not applicable in such cases.Facts: Air Hawk, a private airlines, had a contract with Hotel Royal for the stay of its crew. One of the first officers, Mr. Rakesh Ahuja, who was staying there, took a dive in the pool. The pool design was defective and Rakesh's head hit the bottom. He was paralysed because of the injury and died after 15 years. Rakesh's legal representatives want to file a suit.Decide.a)Rakesh was a stranger to the contract and thus, his legal representatives cannot file a suit for damages.b)Rakesh's legal representatives can sue Hotel Royal for the breach of contract as he was the beneficiary of the contract.c)Rakesh's legal representatives cannot sue after a period of 15 years.d)Rakesh's legal representatives cannot do anything. The least they can do is ask for some ex-gratia payment from the hotel.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: Beneficiaries of a contract are entitled to sue and the concept of 'privity of contract' is not applicable in such cases.Facts: Air Hawk, a private airlines, had a contract with Hotel Royal for the stay of its crew. One of the first officers, Mr. Rakesh Ahuja, who was staying there, took a dive in the pool. The pool design was defective and Rakesh's head hit the bottom. He was paralysed because of the injury and died after 15 years. Rakesh's legal representatives want to file a suit.Decide.a)Rakesh was a stranger to the contract and thus, his legal representatives cannot file a suit for damages.b)Rakesh's legal representatives can sue Hotel Royal for the breach of contract as he was the beneficiary of the contract.c)Rakesh's legal representatives cannot sue after a period of 15 years.d)Rakesh's legal representatives cannot do anything. The least they can do is ask for some ex-gratia payment from the hotel.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: Beneficiaries of a contract are entitled to sue and the concept of 'privity of contract' is not applicable in such cases.Facts: Air Hawk, a private airlines, had a contract with Hotel Royal for the stay of its crew. One of the first officers, Mr. Rakesh Ahuja, who was staying there, took a dive in the pool. The pool design was defective and Rakesh's head hit the bottom. He was paralysed because of the injury and died after 15 years. Rakesh's legal representatives want to file a suit.Decide.a)Rakesh was a stranger to the contract and thus, his legal representatives cannot file a suit for damages.b)Rakesh's legal representatives can sue Hotel Royal for the breach of contract as he was the beneficiary of the contract.c)Rakesh's legal representatives cannot sue after a period of 15 years.d)Rakesh's legal representatives cannot do anything. The least they can do is ask for some ex-gratia payment from the hotel.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: Beneficiaries of a contract are entitled to sue and the concept of 'privity of contract' is not applicable in such cases.Facts: Air Hawk, a private airlines, had a contract with Hotel Royal for the stay of its crew. One of the first officers, Mr. Rakesh Ahuja, who was staying there, took a dive in the pool. The pool design was defective and Rakesh's head hit the bottom. He was paralysed because of the injury and died after 15 years. Rakesh's legal representatives want to file a suit.Decide.a)Rakesh was a stranger to the contract and thus, his legal representatives cannot file a suit for damages.b)Rakesh's legal representatives can sue Hotel Royal for the breach of contract as he was the beneficiary of the contract.c)Rakesh's legal representatives cannot sue after a period of 15 years.d)Rakesh's legal representatives cannot do anything. The least they can do is ask for some ex-gratia payment from the hotel.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.