Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: The parties to a contract must either perform, or offer to perform, their respective promises, unless such performance is dispensed with or excused under the provisions of the Contract Act, or of any other law.Facts: A promises to deliver goods to B on a certain day on payment of Rs. 1,000. A dies before that day. What would be the next step in this situation?Decide.a)B is not entitled to get anything because the party to contract, i.e. A died.b)B is entitled to get his payment back from the representatives of A.c)A's representatives are bound to deliver the goods to B as the contract could not be performed.d)A's representatives would have to return money to B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Directions: The question consists of two sta...

Principle: The parties to a contract must either perform, or offer to perform, their respective promises, unless such performance is dispensed with or excused under the provisions of the Contract Act, or of any other law.

Facts: A promises to deliver goods to B on a certain day on payment of Rs. 1,000. A dies before that day. What would be the next step in this situation?

Decide.

a)
B is not entitled to get anything because the party to contract, i.e. A died.
b)
B is entitled to get his payment back from the representatives of A.
c)
A's representatives are bound to deliver the goods to B as the contract could not be performed.
d)
A's representatives would have to return money to B.

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as ...

A's representatives are bound to deliver the goods to B, and B is bound to pay Rs. 1,000 to A's representatives on the fact that the parties to a contract must either perform, or offer to perform, their respective promises, unless such performance is dispensed with or excused under the provisions of this Act, or of any other law.

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

Free Test

FREE

SLAT Mock Test - 2 (New Pattern)
60 Ques | 60 Min

Start Free Test

View all free CLAT tests

Community Answer

Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as ...

Understanding the Principle
The principle states that parties involved in a contract must fulfill their promises unless there are valid reasons for non-performance as per the Contract Act or other relevant laws. This emphasizes the binding nature of contractual obligations.
Analyzing the Facts
In the given scenario:
- A had a contractual obligation to deliver goods to B in exchange for Rs. 1,000.
- A’s death occurred before the delivery of goods.
Implications of A's Death
- A's death does not automatically terminate the contract.
- According to contract law, obligations can often be fulfilled by the representatives or estate of the deceased party.
Why Option C is Correct
- Contractual Obligations Remain: The contract remains enforceable against A's representatives. They inherit the obligation to perform as part of A's estate.
- Delivery of Goods: As per the principle, A's representatives must carry out A's promise to deliver the goods to B, fulfilling the contractual obligation that existed prior to A's death.
Why Other Options are Incorrect
- Option A: Incorrect, as B is entitled to performance despite A's death.
- Option B: Not applicable, since the representatives must fulfill the contract before discussing refunds.
- Option D: Incorrect, since the representatives are bound to deliver the goods, not return the payment.
Conclusion
In summary, A's representatives are obligated to deliver the goods to B, upholding the principle that contractual obligations survive the death of a party unless explicitly stated otherwise. Thus, option C is the most appropriate response.

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: If it appears from the nature of the case that it was the intention of the parties to a contract that any promise contained in it should be performed by the promisor himself, such promise must be performed by the promisor. In other cases, the promisor or his representative may employ a competent person to perform it.Facts: A promises to pay B a sum of money. A may perform this promise, either by personally paying the money to B or by causing it to be paid to B by another. What if A dies in this case before the due date of payment?Decide.

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions.The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld the validity of the Tamil Nadu Highways Act, stating that the Act cannot be struck down on the ground that its provisions discriminate or are arbitrary when compared with the provisions of the central law - the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (LA Act 2013). A State law could be contrary to the central law but would stand protected under Article 254(2) after it receives the assent of the President of India. Hence, merely because there is discrimination between the two statutes would not be ground to invalidate the State law, the bench ruled. Article 254 of the C.O.I states that if any provision of a law made by the Legislature of a State is repugnant to any provision of a law made by Parliament which Parliament is competent to enact, or to any provision of an existing law with respect to one of the matters enumerated in the Concurrent List, then, subject to the provisions of clause (2), the law made by Parliament, whether passed before or after the law made by the Legislature of such State, or, as the case may be, the existing law, shall prevail and the law made by the Legislature of the State shall, to the extent of the repugnancy, be void. Clause 2 of the Article states that where a law made by the Legislature of a State with respect to one of the matters enumerated in the concurrent List contains any provision repugnant to the provisions of an earlier law made by Parliament or an existing law with respect to that matter, then, the law so made by the Legislature of such State shall, if it has been reserved for the consideration of the President and has received his assent, prevail in that State: Provided that nothing in this clause shall prevent Parliament from enacting at any time any law with respect to the same matter including a law adding to, amending, varying or repealing the law so made by the Legislature of the State.Q.Which of the following statements best reflects the likely outcome in the case of Patel Pharmaceuticals v. Union of India, where the Gujarat Drug Control (Amendment) Act, 2023 (GDCA Act) amends provisions of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 (DC

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions.The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld the validity of the Tamil Nadu Highways Act, stating that the Act cannot be struck down on the ground that its provisions discriminate or are arbitrary when compared with the provisions of the central law - the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (LA Act 2013). A State law could be contrary to the central law but would stand protected under Article 254(2) after it receives the assent of the President of India. Hence, merely because there is discrimination between the two statutes would not be ground to invalidate the State law, the bench ruled. Article 254 of the C.O.I states that if any provision of a law made by the Legislature of a State is repugnant to any provision of a law made by Parliament which Parliament is competent to enact, or to any provision of an existing law with respect to one of the matters enumerated in the Concurrent List, then, subject to the provisions of clause (2), the law made by Parliament, whether passed before or after the law made by the Legislature of such State, or, as the case may be, the existing law, shall prevail and the law made by the Legislature of the State shall, to the extent of the repugnancy, be void. Clause 2 of the Article states that where a law made by the Legislature of a State with respect to one of the matters enumerated in the concurrent List contains any provision repugnant to the provisions of an earlier law made by Parliament or an existing law with respect to that matter, then, the law so made by the Legislature of such State shall, if it has been reserved for the consideration of the President and has received his assent, prevail in that State: Provided that nothing in this clause shall prevent Parliament from enacting at any time any law with respect to the same matter including a law adding to, amending, varying or repealing the law so made by the Legislature of the State.Q.The Gujarat State Legislature passed the Gujarat Labor Welfare (Amendment) Act, 2023 (GLWA Act) to change certain provisions of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 (ESI Act) in the case of Patel Constructions v. State of Gujarat. The Indian President has not yet approved the Act. The GLWA Act was contested on the basis that, in contrast to the ESI Acts provisions, it discriminates against employees.

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions.The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld the validity of the Tamil Nadu Highways Act, stating that the Act cannot be struck down on the ground that its provisions discriminate or are arbitrary when compared with the provisions of the central law - the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (LA Act 2013). A State law could be contrary to the central law but would stand protected under Article 254(2) after it receives the assent of the President of India. Hence, merely because there is discrimination between the two statutes would not be ground to invalidate the State law, the bench ruled. Article 254 of the C.O.I states that if any provision of a law made by the Legislature of a State is repugnant to any provision of a law made by Parliament which Parliament is competent to enact, or to any provision of an existing law with respect to one of the matters enumerated in the Concurrent List, then, subject to the provisions of clause (2), the law made by Parliament, whether passed before or after the law made by the Legislature of such State, or, as the case may be, the existing law, shall prevail and the law made by the Legislature of the State shall, to the extent of the repugnancy, be void. Clause 2 of the Article states that where a law made by the Legislature of a State with respect to one of the matters enumerated in the concurrent List contains any provision repugnant to the provisions of an earlier law made by Parliament or an existing law with respect to that matter, then, the law so made by the Legislature of such State shall, if it has been reserved for the consideration of the President and has received his assent, prevail in that State: Provided that nothing in this clause shall prevent Parliament from enacting at any time any law with respect to the same matter including a law adding to, amending, varying or repealing the law so made by the Legislature of the State.Q.The Karnataka Agricultural Produce selling (Regulation) Act, 2019 (KAPM Act) was passed by the state legislature in the Ramakrishna v. State of Karnataka case to control the selling of agricultural products in the state. The Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 2003 (APM Act), which was passed by Parliament, was cited as the central statute that the provisions of the KAPM Act violated.

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions.The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld the validity of the Tamil Nadu Highways Act, stating that the Act cannot be struck down on the ground that its provisions discriminate or are arbitrary when compared with the provisions of the central law - the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (LA Act 2013). A State law could be contrary to the central law but would stand protected under Article 254(2) after it receives the assent of the President of India. Hence, merely because there is discrimination between the two statutes would not be ground to invalidate the State law, the bench ruled. Article 254 of the C.O.I states that if any provision of a law made by the Legislature of a State is repugnant to any provision of a law made by Parliament which Parliament is competent to enact, or to any provision of an existing law with respect to one of the matters enumerated in the Concurrent List, then, subject to the provisions of clause (2), the law made by Parliament, whether passed before or after the law made by the Legislature of such State, or, as the case may be, the existing law, shall prevail and the law made by the Legislature of the State shall, to the extent of the repugnancy, be void. Clause 2 of the Article states that where a law made by the Legislature of a State with respect to one of the matters enumerated in the concurrent List contains any provision repugnant to the provisions of an earlier law made by Parliament or an existing law with respect to that matter, then, the law so made by the Legislature of such State shall, if it has been reserved for the consideration of the President and has received his assent, prevail in that State: Provided that nothing in this clause shall prevent Parliament from enacting at any time any law with respect to the same matter including a law adding to, amending, varying or repealing the law so made by the Legislature of the State.Q.What does Article 254(1) of the Constitution of India state regarding the relationship between state and central laws?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Crash Course for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: The parties to a contract must either perform, or offer to perform, their respective promises, unless such performance is dispensed with or excused under the provisions of the Contract Act, or of any other law.Facts: A promises to deliver goods to B on a certain day on payment of Rs. 1,000. A dies before that day. What would be the next step in this situation?Decide.a)B is not entitled to get anything because the party to contract, i.e. A died.b)B is entitled to get his payment back from the representatives of A.c)A's representatives are bound to deliver the goods to B as the contract could not be performed.d)A's representatives would have to return money to B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: The parties to a contract must either perform, or offer to perform, their respective promises, unless such performance is dispensed with or excused under the provisions of the Contract Act, or of any other law.Facts: A promises to deliver goods to B on a certain day on payment of Rs. 1,000. A dies before that day. What would be the next step in this situation?Decide.a)B is not entitled to get anything because the party to contract, i.e. A died.b)B is entitled to get his payment back from the representatives of A.c)A's representatives are bound to deliver the goods to B as the contract could not be performed.d)A's representatives would have to return money to B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: The parties to a contract must either perform, or offer to perform, their respective promises, unless such performance is dispensed with or excused under the provisions of the Contract Act, or of any other law.Facts: A promises to deliver goods to B on a certain day on payment of Rs. 1,000. A dies before that day. What would be the next step in this situation?Decide.a)B is not entitled to get anything because the party to contract, i.e. A died.b)B is entitled to get his payment back from the representatives of A.c)A's representatives are bound to deliver the goods to B as the contract could not be performed.d)A's representatives would have to return money to B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: The parties to a contract must either perform, or offer to perform, their respective promises, unless such performance is dispensed with or excused under the provisions of the Contract Act, or of any other law.Facts: A promises to deliver goods to B on a certain day on payment of Rs. 1,000. A dies before that day. What would be the next step in this situation?Decide.a)B is not entitled to get anything because the party to contract, i.e. A died.b)B is entitled to get his payment back from the representatives of A.c)A's representatives are bound to deliver the goods to B as the contract could not be performed.d)A's representatives would have to return money to B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: The parties to a contract must either perform, or offer to perform, their respective promises, unless such performance is dispensed with or excused under the provisions of the Contract Act, or of any other law.Facts: A promises to deliver goods to B on a certain day on payment of Rs. 1,000. A dies before that day. What would be the next step in this situation?Decide.a)B is not entitled to get anything because the party to contract, i.e. A died.b)B is entitled to get his payment back from the representatives of A.c)A's representatives are bound to deliver the goods to B as the contract could not be performed.d)A's representatives would have to return money to B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: The parties to a contract must either perform, or offer to perform, their respective promises, unless such performance is dispensed with or excused under the provisions of the Contract Act, or of any other law.Facts: A promises to deliver goods to B on a certain day on payment of Rs. 1,000. A dies before that day. What would be the next step in this situation?Decide.a)B is not entitled to get anything because the party to contract, i.e. A died.b)B is entitled to get his payment back from the representatives of A.c)A's representatives are bound to deliver the goods to B as the contract could not be performed.d)A's representatives would have to return money to B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: The parties to a contract must either perform, or offer to perform, their respective promises, unless such performance is dispensed with or excused under the provisions of the Contract Act, or of any other law.Facts: A promises to deliver goods to B on a certain day on payment of Rs. 1,000. A dies before that day. What would be the next step in this situation?Decide.a)B is not entitled to get anything because the party to contract, i.e. A died.b)B is entitled to get his payment back from the representatives of A.c)A's representatives are bound to deliver the goods to B as the contract could not be performed.d)A's representatives would have to return money to B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: The parties to a contract must either perform, or offer to perform, their respective promises, unless such performance is dispensed with or excused under the provisions of the Contract Act, or of any other law.Facts: A promises to deliver goods to B on a certain day on payment of Rs. 1,000. A dies before that day. What would be the next step in this situation?Decide.a)B is not entitled to get anything because the party to contract, i.e. A died.b)B is entitled to get his payment back from the representatives of A.c)A's representatives are bound to deliver the goods to B as the contract could not be performed.d)A's representatives would have to return money to B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: The parties to a contract must either perform, or offer to perform, their respective promises, unless such performance is dispensed with or excused under the provisions of the Contract Act, or of any other law.Facts: A promises to deliver goods to B on a certain day on payment of Rs. 1,000. A dies before that day. What would be the next step in this situation?Decide.a)B is not entitled to get anything because the party to contract, i.e. A died.b)B is entitled to get his payment back from the representatives of A.c)A's representatives are bound to deliver the goods to B as the contract could not be performed.d)A's representatives would have to return money to B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: The parties to a contract must either perform, or offer to perform, their respective promises, unless such performance is dispensed with or excused under the provisions of the Contract Act, or of any other law.Facts: A promises to deliver goods to B on a certain day on payment of Rs. 1,000. A dies before that day. What would be the next step in this situation?Decide.a)B is not entitled to get anything because the party to contract, i.e. A died.b)B is entitled to get his payment back from the representatives of A.c)A's representatives are bound to deliver the goods to B as the contract could not be performed.d)A's representatives would have to return money to B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam