CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Direction: In the question below is given a ...
Start Learning for Free
Direction: In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
Statement:
If you are a good orator, then we definitely have a job for you.
Conclusions:
I. Good orator is never jobless
II. We are in need of a good orator.
- a)Only conclusion I follows
- b)Only conclusion II follows
- c)Both I and II follow
- d)Neither I nor II follows
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Most Upvoted Answer
Direction: In the question below is given a statement followed by two...
Statement: If you are a good orator, then we definitely have a job for you.
Conclusion I: A good orator is never jobless.
Conclusion II: We are in need of a good orator.
Explanation:
To determine whether the conclusions logically follow from the given statement, we need to analyze the statement and the conclusions separately.
Analysis of the Statement:
The statement states that if someone is a good orator, then there is definitely a job available for them. This implies that being a good orator is a desirable skill and that there is a demand for good orators.
Analysis of Conclusion I:
Conclusion I states that a good orator is never jobless. This conclusion cannot be logically deduced from the given statement. The statement only mentions that if someone is a good orator, there is a job available for them. It does not imply that all good orators will always have a job. There could be other factors such as competition, availability of job opportunities, etc. that determine whether a good orator is jobless or not. Therefore, conclusion I does not logically follow from the given statement.
Analysis of Conclusion II:
Conclusion II states that we are in need of a good orator. This conclusion can be logically deduced from the given statement. The statement clearly states that if someone is a good orator, there is a job available for them. Therefore, it can be inferred that the organization or the person making the statement is in need of a good orator. Hence, conclusion II logically follows from the given statement.
Conclusion:
Based on the analysis, only conclusion II logically follows from the given statement. Therefore, the correct answer is option B - Only conclusion II follows.
Conclusion I: A good orator is never jobless.
Conclusion II: We are in need of a good orator.
Explanation:
To determine whether the conclusions logically follow from the given statement, we need to analyze the statement and the conclusions separately.
Analysis of the Statement:
The statement states that if someone is a good orator, then there is definitely a job available for them. This implies that being a good orator is a desirable skill and that there is a demand for good orators.
Analysis of Conclusion I:
Conclusion I states that a good orator is never jobless. This conclusion cannot be logically deduced from the given statement. The statement only mentions that if someone is a good orator, there is a job available for them. It does not imply that all good orators will always have a job. There could be other factors such as competition, availability of job opportunities, etc. that determine whether a good orator is jobless or not. Therefore, conclusion I does not logically follow from the given statement.
Analysis of Conclusion II:
Conclusion II states that we are in need of a good orator. This conclusion can be logically deduced from the given statement. The statement clearly states that if someone is a good orator, there is a job available for them. Therefore, it can be inferred that the organization or the person making the statement is in need of a good orator. Hence, conclusion II logically follows from the given statement.
Conclusion:
Based on the analysis, only conclusion II logically follows from the given statement. Therefore, the correct answer is option B - Only conclusion II follows.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
Direction: In the question below is given a statement followed by two...
The given statement tells about the requirement of good orators which does not exclusively say that good orators are jobless or not. Therefore conclusion I is not logical.
Conclusion II follows the statement because in the statement it is given that if you are a good orator then we definitely have job for you. From this it is clear that we are in need of a good orator.
Hence, the correct option is (B).
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Similar CLAT Doubts
Top Courses for CLATView all
Direction: In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement:If you are a good orator, then we definitely have a job for you.Conclusions:I. Good orator is never joblessII. We are in need of a good orator.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Both I and II followd)Neither I nor II followsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Direction: In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement:If you are a good orator, then we definitely have a job for you.Conclusions:I. Good orator is never joblessII. We are in need of a good orator.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Both I and II followd)Neither I nor II followsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement:If you are a good orator, then we definitely have a job for you.Conclusions:I. Good orator is never joblessII. We are in need of a good orator.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Both I and II followd)Neither I nor II followsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement:If you are a good orator, then we definitely have a job for you.Conclusions:I. Good orator is never joblessII. We are in need of a good orator.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Both I and II followd)Neither I nor II followsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Direction: In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement:If you are a good orator, then we definitely have a job for you.Conclusions:I. Good orator is never joblessII. We are in need of a good orator.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Both I and II followd)Neither I nor II followsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement:If you are a good orator, then we definitely have a job for you.Conclusions:I. Good orator is never joblessII. We are in need of a good orator.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Both I and II followd)Neither I nor II followsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement:If you are a good orator, then we definitely have a job for you.Conclusions:I. Good orator is never joblessII. We are in need of a good orator.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Both I and II followd)Neither I nor II followsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Direction: In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement:If you are a good orator, then we definitely have a job for you.Conclusions:I. Good orator is never joblessII. We are in need of a good orator.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Both I and II followd)Neither I nor II followsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Direction: In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement:If you are a good orator, then we definitely have a job for you.Conclusions:I. Good orator is never joblessII. We are in need of a good orator.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Both I and II followd)Neither I nor II followsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Direction: In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement:If you are a good orator, then we definitely have a job for you.Conclusions:I. Good orator is never joblessII. We are in need of a good orator.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Both I and II followd)Neither I nor II followsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement:If you are a good orator, then we definitely have a job for you.Conclusions:I. Good orator is never joblessII. We are in need of a good orator.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Both I and II followd)Neither I nor II followsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement:If you are a good orator, then we definitely have a job for you.Conclusions:I. Good orator is never joblessII. We are in need of a good orator.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Both I and II followd)Neither I nor II followsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Direction: In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement:If you are a good orator, then we definitely have a job for you.Conclusions:I. Good orator is never joblessII. We are in need of a good orator.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Both I and II followd)Neither I nor II followsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup