CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   Directions: In the question below, a stateme... Start Learning for Free
Directions: In the question below, a statement is given, followed by several conclusions. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true and then decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) the information given in the statement.
Statement:
Competitive examinations are conducted by organisations to select bright candidates.
Conclusions:
(I) Organisations need bright candidates.
(II) Bright candidates cannot be selected through any other tests.
(III) The ratio of the number of applicants to that of vacancies is very high.
  • a)
    Only (l) and (III) follow.
  • b)
    Only (III) follows.
  • c)
    Only (I) follows.
  • d)
    All (I), (II) and (III) follow.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: In the question below, a statement is given, followed by ...
Conclusion (I) follows since the resources spent on conduction and administration of competitive examinations get justified only when the organisation selects bright candidates. Organisations need bright candidates; that is why they conduct competitive examinations.
Conclusion (II) does not follow since there may be other ways of selecting bright candidates as well.
Conclusion (III) follows since one of the reasons for conduction of competitive examinations for selection of candidates is the enormous number of candidates desirous of applying for small number of vacancies.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Direction: Read the following passage and answer the following question:In terms of labour, for decades the relatively low cost and high quality of Japanese workers conferred considerable competitive advantage across numerous durable goods and consumer electronics industries (eg. Machinery, automobiles, televisions, radios). Then labour-based advantages shifted to South Korea, then to Malaysia, Mexico and other nations. Today, China appears to be capitalizing best on the basis of labour. Japanese firms still remain competitive in markets for such durable goods, electronics and other products, but the labour force is no longer sufficient for competitive advantage over manufacturers in other industrializing nations. Such shifting of labour-based advantage is clearly not limited to manufacturing industries. Today, a huge number of IT and service jobs are moving from Europe and North America to India, Singapore, and like countries with relatively well-educated, low-cost workforces possessing technical skills. However, as educational levels and technical skills continue to rise in other countries, India, Singapore, and like nations enjoying labour-based competitive advantage today are likely to find such advantage cannot be sustained through the emergence of new competitors.In terms of capital, for centuries the days of gold coins and later even paper money restricted financial flows. Subsequently, regional concentrations were formed where large banks, industries and markets coalesced. But today capital flows internationally at rapid speed. Globa commerce no longer requires regional interactions among business players. Regional capital concentrations in places such as New York, London and Tokyo still persist, of course, but the capital concentrated there is no longer sufficient for competitive advantage over other capitalists distributed worldwide. Only if an organization is able to combine, integrate and apply its resources (eg. Land, labour, capital, IT in an effective manner that is not readily imitable by competitors can such an organization enjoy competitive advantage sustainable overtime.In a knowledge-based theory of the firm, this idea is extended to view organizational knowledge as a resource with at least the same level of power and importance as the traditional economic inputs. An organization with superior knowledge can achieve a competitive advantage in markets that appreciate the application of such knowledge. Semiconductors, genetic engineering, pharmaceuticals, software, military warfare, and like knowledge-intensive competitive arenas provide both time-proven and current examples. Consider semiconductors (e.g. computer chips), which are made principally of sand and common metals. These ubiquitous and powerful electronic devices are designed within common office buildings, using commercially available tools, and fabricated within factories in many industrialized nations. Hence, the land is not the key competitive resource in the semiconductor industry.Q. The passage also mentions the trend of

Direction: Read the following passage and answer the following question:In terms of labour, for decades the relatively low cost and high quality of Japanese workers conferred considerable competitive advantage across numerous durable goods and consumer electronics industries (eg. Machinery, automobiles, televisions, radios). Then labour-based advantages shifted to South Korea, then to Malaysia, Mexico and other nations. Today, China appears to be capitalizing best on the basis of labour. Japanese firms still remain competitive in markets for such durable goods, electronics and other products, but the labour force is no longer sufficient for competitive advantage over manufacturers in other industrializing nations. Such shifting of labour-based advantage is clearly not limited to manufacturing industries. Today, a huge number of IT and service jobs are moving from Europe and North America to India, Singapore, and like countries with relatively well-educated, low-cost workforces possessing technical skills. However, as educational levels and technical skills continue to rise in other countries, India, Singapore, and like nations enjoying labour-based competitive advantage today are likely to find such advantage cannot be sustained through the emergence of new competitors.In terms of capital, for centuries the days of gold coins and later even paper money restricted financial flows. Subsequently, regional concentrations were formed where large banks, industries and markets coalesced. But today capital flows internationally at rapid speed. Globa commerce no longer requires regional interactions among business players. Regional capital concentrations in places such as New York, London and Tokyo still persist, of course, but the capital concentrated there is no longer sufficient for competitive advantage over other capitalists distributed worldwide. Only if an organization is able to combine, integrate and apply its resources (eg. Land, labour, capital, IT in an effective manner that is not readily imitable by competitors can such an organization enjoy competitive advantage sustainable overtime.In a knowledge-based theory of the firm, this idea is extended to view organizational knowledge as a resource with at least the same level of power and importance as the traditional economic inputs. An organization with superior knowledge can achieve a competitive advantage in markets that appreciate the application of such knowledge. Semiconductors, genetic engineering, pharmaceuticals, software, military warfare, and like knowledge-intensive competitive arenas provide both time-proven and current examples. Consider semiconductors (e.g. computer chips), which are made principally of sand and common metals. These ubiquitous and powerful electronic devices are designed within common office buildings, using commercially available tools, and fabricated within factories in many industrialized nations. Hence, the land is not the key competitive resource in the semiconductor industry.Q. How can an organization enjoy a competitive advantage sustainable overtime?

Progress is possible when you are not afraid of competition. Each and every person is unique, but he/she may have better qualities than you. If you want to reach your goal, make sure that you are perfect in it because there are thousands of people out there who want the same goal and who will go out of their way to reach their goal. Here is where competition steps in; many people are scared of it and are against it, but they don’t know the importance of it. Competition makes your goal a living thing; it ignites that fire within you to make your dream possible. Many people dream a new dream every day but the reason why they don’t succeed is because of the lack of better preparation for competition. For example, if a writer knows that there are 80 people out there dreaming the same dream, then he will try to perfect his skill in writing, increase his vocabulary and will do all other things to make himself perfect. This is called preparing for competition in a right way, but, when a person knows the competition but tries to excel in it through unlawful means, then that competition becomes unworthy for him and even though it results in progress, it’s not worth the success. Economics taught us that human wants are unlimited. So beware, don’t let the fire within you burn the goodwill of others. A healthy competition leads to progress: increase in one’s skill, increase in employment capability which in turn results in increase in earning capacity. When competing is treated as a healthy one, it results in national progress. The place where competition is mostly present is, during exams. When you are competing among thousands of individuals, you are merely testing your knowledge and you also get to know where you stand in the crowd. This is the main purpose of the exam, to merely test your knowledge in a competitive way. I think students should know this particular point - competition is just a part of life and not life itself. Sometimes the hunger for success makes your values famished. Now, those people who are not competitive enough or those who don’t stand a chance in the competition, it is an experience for them to know about their flaws and learn from them. Competition is a boon to mankind which leads to progress, progress for him and progress for his country.Q. Which of the following is consistent with the information mentioned in the passage?

Direction: Read the following passage and answer the following question:In terms of labour, for decades the relatively low cost and high quality of Japanese workers conferred considerable competitive advantage across numerous durable goods and consumer electronics industries (eg. Machinery, automobiles, televisions, radios). Then labour-based advantages shifted to South Korea, then to Malaysia, Mexico and other nations. Today, China appears to be capitalizing best on the basis of labour. Japanese firms still remain competitive in markets for such durable goods, electronics and other products, but the labour force is no longer sufficient for competitive advantage over manufacturers in other industrializing nations. Such shifting of labour-based advantage is clearly not limited to manufacturing industries. Today, a huge number of IT and service jobs are moving from Europe and North America to India, Singapore, and like countries with relatively well-educated, low-cost workforces possessing technical skills. However, as educational levels and technical skills continue to rise in other countries, India, Singapore, and like nations enjoying labour-based competitive advantage today are likely to find such advantage cannot be sustained through the emergence of new competitors.In terms of capital, for centuries the days of gold coins and later even paper money restricted financial flows. Subsequently, regional concentrations were formed where large banks, industries and markets coalesced. But today capital flows internationally at rapid speed. Globa commerce no longer requires regional interactions among business players. Regional capital concentrations in places such as New York, London and Tokyo still persist, of course, but the capital concentrated there is no longer sufficient for competitive advantage over other capitalists distributed worldwide. Only if an organization is able to combine, integrate and apply its resources (eg. Land, labour, capital, IT in an effective manner that is not readily imitable by competitors can such an organization enjoy competitive advantage sustainable overtime.In a knowledge-based theory of the firm, this idea is extended to view organizational knowledge as a resource with at least the same level of power and importance as the traditional economic inputs. An organization with superior knowledge can achieve a competitive advantage in markets that appreciate the application of such knowledge. Semiconductors, genetic engineering, pharmaceuticals, software, military warfare, and like knowledge-intensive competitive arenas provide both time-proven and current examples. Consider semiconductors (e.g. computer chips), which are made principally of sand and common metals. These ubiquitous and powerful electronic devices are designed within common office buildings, using commercially available tools, and fabricated within factories in many industrialized nations. Hence, the land is not the key competitive resource in the semiconductor industry.Q. What is required to ensure competitive advantages in specific markets?

Direction: Read the following passage and answer the following question:In terms of labour, for decades the relatively low cost and high quality of Japanese workers conferred considerable competitive advantage across numerous durable goods and consumer electronics industries (eg. Machinery, automobiles, televisions, radios). Then labour-based advantages shifted to South Korea, then to Malaysia, Mexico and other nations. Today, China appears to be capitalizing best on the basis of labour. Japanese firms still remain competitive in markets for such durable goods, electronics and other products, but the labour force is no longer sufficient for competitive advantage over manufacturers in other industrializing nations. Such shifting of labour-based advantage is clearly not limited to manufacturing industries. Today, a huge number of IT and service jobs are moving from Europe and North America to India, Singapore, and like countries with relatively well-educated, low-cost workforces possessing technical skills. However, as educational levels and technical skills continue to rise in other countries, India, Singapore, and like nations enjoying labour-based competitive advantage today are likely to find such advantage cannot be sustained through the emergence of new competitors.In terms of capital, for centuries the days of gold coins and later even paper money restricted financial flows. Subsequently, regional concentrations were formed where large banks, industries and markets coalesced. But today capital flows internationally at rapid speed. Globa commerce no longer requires regional interactions among business players. Regional capital concentrations in places such as New York, London and Tokyo still persist, of course, but the capital concentrated there is no longer sufficient for competitive advantage over other capitalists distributed worldwide. Only if an organization is able to combine, integrate and apply its resources (eg. Land, labour, capital, IT in an effective manner that is not readily imitable by competitors can such an organization enjoy competitive advantage sustainable overtime.In a knowledge-based theory of the firm, this idea is extended to view organizational knowledge as a resource with at least the same level of power and importance as the traditional economic inputs. An organization with superior knowledge can achieve a competitive advantage in markets that appreciate the application of such knowledge. Semiconductors, genetic engineering, pharmaceuticals, software, military warfare, and like knowledge-intensive competitive arenas provide both time-proven and current examples. Consider semiconductors (e.g. computer chips), which are made principally of sand and common metals. These ubiquitous and powerful electronic devices are designed within common office buildings, using commercially available tools, and fabricated within factories in many industrialized nations. Hence, the land is not the key competitive resource in the semiconductor industry.Q. Which country enjoyed competitive advantages in automobile industry for decades?

Top Courses for CLAT

Directions: In the question below, a statement is given, followed by several conclusions. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true and then decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) the information given in the statement.Statement:Competitive examinations are conducted by organisations to select bright candidates.Conclusions:(I) Organisations need bright candidates.(II) Bright candidates cannot be selected through any other tests.(III) The ratio of the number of applicants to that of vacancies is very high.a)Only (l) and (III) follow.b)Only (III) follows.c)Only (I) follows.d)All (I), (II) and (III) follow.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: In the question below, a statement is given, followed by several conclusions. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true and then decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) the information given in the statement.Statement:Competitive examinations are conducted by organisations to select bright candidates.Conclusions:(I) Organisations need bright candidates.(II) Bright candidates cannot be selected through any other tests.(III) The ratio of the number of applicants to that of vacancies is very high.a)Only (l) and (III) follow.b)Only (III) follows.c)Only (I) follows.d)All (I), (II) and (III) follow.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In the question below, a statement is given, followed by several conclusions. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true and then decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) the information given in the statement.Statement:Competitive examinations are conducted by organisations to select bright candidates.Conclusions:(I) Organisations need bright candidates.(II) Bright candidates cannot be selected through any other tests.(III) The ratio of the number of applicants to that of vacancies is very high.a)Only (l) and (III) follow.b)Only (III) follows.c)Only (I) follows.d)All (I), (II) and (III) follow.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In the question below, a statement is given, followed by several conclusions. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true and then decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) the information given in the statement.Statement:Competitive examinations are conducted by organisations to select bright candidates.Conclusions:(I) Organisations need bright candidates.(II) Bright candidates cannot be selected through any other tests.(III) The ratio of the number of applicants to that of vacancies is very high.a)Only (l) and (III) follow.b)Only (III) follows.c)Only (I) follows.d)All (I), (II) and (III) follow.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: In the question below, a statement is given, followed by several conclusions. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true and then decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) the information given in the statement.Statement:Competitive examinations are conducted by organisations to select bright candidates.Conclusions:(I) Organisations need bright candidates.(II) Bright candidates cannot be selected through any other tests.(III) The ratio of the number of applicants to that of vacancies is very high.a)Only (l) and (III) follow.b)Only (III) follows.c)Only (I) follows.d)All (I), (II) and (III) follow.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: In the question below, a statement is given, followed by several conclusions. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true and then decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) the information given in the statement.Statement:Competitive examinations are conducted by organisations to select bright candidates.Conclusions:(I) Organisations need bright candidates.(II) Bright candidates cannot be selected through any other tests.(III) The ratio of the number of applicants to that of vacancies is very high.a)Only (l) and (III) follow.b)Only (III) follows.c)Only (I) follows.d)All (I), (II) and (III) follow.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: In the question below, a statement is given, followed by several conclusions. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true and then decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) the information given in the statement.Statement:Competitive examinations are conducted by organisations to select bright candidates.Conclusions:(I) Organisations need bright candidates.(II) Bright candidates cannot be selected through any other tests.(III) The ratio of the number of applicants to that of vacancies is very high.a)Only (l) and (III) follow.b)Only (III) follows.c)Only (I) follows.d)All (I), (II) and (III) follow.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: In the question below, a statement is given, followed by several conclusions. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true and then decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) the information given in the statement.Statement:Competitive examinations are conducted by organisations to select bright candidates.Conclusions:(I) Organisations need bright candidates.(II) Bright candidates cannot be selected through any other tests.(III) The ratio of the number of applicants to that of vacancies is very high.a)Only (l) and (III) follow.b)Only (III) follows.c)Only (I) follows.d)All (I), (II) and (III) follow.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: In the question below, a statement is given, followed by several conclusions. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true and then decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) the information given in the statement.Statement:Competitive examinations are conducted by organisations to select bright candidates.Conclusions:(I) Organisations need bright candidates.(II) Bright candidates cannot be selected through any other tests.(III) The ratio of the number of applicants to that of vacancies is very high.a)Only (l) and (III) follow.b)Only (III) follows.c)Only (I) follows.d)All (I), (II) and (III) follow.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: In the question below, a statement is given, followed by several conclusions. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true and then decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) the information given in the statement.Statement:Competitive examinations are conducted by organisations to select bright candidates.Conclusions:(I) Organisations need bright candidates.(II) Bright candidates cannot be selected through any other tests.(III) The ratio of the number of applicants to that of vacancies is very high.a)Only (l) and (III) follow.b)Only (III) follows.c)Only (I) follows.d)All (I), (II) and (III) follow.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev