Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labeled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Every person who is arrested and detained in custody shall be produced before the nearest magistrate within a period of twenty-four hours of such arrest excluding the time necessary for the journey from the place of arrest to the court of the magistrate and no such person shall be detained in custody beyond the said period without the authority of a magistrate.Facts: Jethalal was the owner of an electronic shop 'Gada Electronics'. One day he got stuck in his godown after the shop closed; with some people's help, he managed to break the lock and get out, but a police patrol team saw him with the broken lock and arrested him for the charge of breaking. Two days went by, and they kept him in custody for interrogation as the senior inspector wasn't around.Decide.a)Jethalal should have been presented before the magistrate within 24 hours.b)Senior inspector wasn't around, so police couldn't do anything else.c)They kept him in custody because he was a suspect of being a member of a notorious gang.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Directions: The question consists of two sta...

Principle: Every person who is arrested and detained in custody shall be produced before the nearest magistrate within a period of twenty-four hours of such arrest excluding the time necessary for the journey from the place of arrest to the court of the magistrate and no such person shall be detained in custody beyond the said period without the authority of a magistrate.

Facts: Jethalal was the owner of an electronic shop 'Gada Electronics'. One day he got stuck in his godown after the shop closed; with some people's help, he managed to break the lock and get out, but a police patrol team saw him with the broken lock and arrested him for the charge of breaking. Two days went by, and they kept him in custody for interrogation as the senior inspector wasn't around.

Decide.

a)
Jethalal should have been presented before the magistrate within 24 hours.
b)
Senior inspector wasn't around, so police couldn't do anything else.
c)
They kept him in custody because he was a suspect of being a member of a notorious gang.
d)
None of the above

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labeled as P...

According to the principle, every person who is arrested and detained in custody shall be produced before the nearest magistrate within a period of twenty-four hours of such arrest excluding the time necessary for the journey from the place of arrest to the court of the magistrate and no such person shall be detained in custody beyond the said period without the authority of a magistrate. Therefore, he should have been produced before a magistrate within 24 hours of arrest. So, the first option is the correct choice.

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Principle Confession is an admission of the commission of the offense by a person before a Judicial Magistrate. A confession is made out of the free will of the person confessing. Based on confession alone there can be a conviction of the person confessing.Facts Mr. Joseph was murdered on 1st April 2006. In this connection, the Police have arrested 5 persons and charged them for the offense of committing murder. Out of the five one, Mr. Rakesh expressed his desire to confess. When he was produced before the Judicial Magistrate he admitted that he had seen the 4 persons committing the murder but he had not informed the Police about it.

View answer

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala & Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.Q.Rahul has been charged with forgery in a case. He is not yet in custody and is free on anticipatory bail. The magistrate requests samples of Rahuls signature and handwriting for the purpose of identification in connection with the forgery case, depending on the clarification offered by the Kerala High Court. Based on the legal observation and interpretation provided in the case, which of the following claims is truest?

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Election Commission (EC) is keen to make the EPIC available in electronic form. In other words, you could soon carry your Voter ID Card on your phone just like an electronic boarding pass that is downloadable ahead of a journey by air.Currently, the EPIC is only available in hard copy, and has to be produced in the original by the voter on election day. For those who cannot produce EPIC, can show an alternative photo ID document permitted by the EC.To avail this facility, an eligible voter will have to provide her mobile number or email address to the EC machinery at the time of applying for enrolment in the voters list.Once her name is included in the electoral roll, she will be intimated through an SMS or email. The new voter can then download the Voter Card through OTP (One Time Passwor d) authentication, The Indian Express has learned.Existing voters may have to reverify their details with the EC (similar to the Bank KYC process) and provide their email or mobile phone number to get their cards in the electronic form.The digital voter card is not expected to look too different from its physical form. It will be available as a PDF file, and can be downloaded on ones phone or computer.The soft copy may also have a QR code that will carry the voters enrolment details such as name and date of birth and address.An electronic card will help the EC save costs on printing and distributing hard copy of EPIC. The EC feels that voters too, will find it useful to have the PDF file of her voter card on her phone, which will do away with the necessity of first producing a voters slip on the day of voting.Q.What is the primary motivation behind the Election Commissions plan to make the EPIC available in electronic form?

View answer

Directions: In this question, a statement is followed by three assumptions labeled A, B and C. You have to consider the statement and the assumptions, and decide which of the assumptions is/are implicit in the statement.Statement: The government has urged all the citizens to use electronic media for carrying out their daily activities, whenever possible, instead of using paper, as the manufacturing of paper requires the cutting down of a large number of trees, causing severe damage to the ecosystem.Assumptions:(

View answer

A has murdered her husband. She goes to the police station with the murder weapon and confesses before the police. In view of the principle below, what would be the most correct action for the police? Principle If any person wishes to give his statement or confession in the course of any investigation, such person may do so before a Metropolitan Magistrate or a Judicial Magistrate under section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Crash Course for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labeled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Every person who is arrested and detained in custody shall be produced before the nearest magistrate within a period of twenty-four hours of such arrest excluding the time necessary for the journey from the place of arrest to the court of the magistrate and no such person shall be detained in custody beyond the said period without the authority of a magistrate.Facts: Jethalal was the owner of an electronic shop 'Gada Electronics'. One day he got stuck in his godown after the shop closed; with some people's help, he managed to break the lock and get out, but a police patrol team saw him with the broken lock and arrested him for the charge of breaking. Two days went by, and they kept him in custody for interrogation as the senior inspector wasn't around.Decide.a)Jethalal should have been presented before the magistrate within 24 hours.b)Senior inspector wasn't around, so police couldn't do anything else.c)They kept him in custody because he was a suspect of being a member of a notorious gang.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labeled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Every person who is arrested and detained in custody shall be produced before the nearest magistrate within a period of twenty-four hours of such arrest excluding the time necessary for the journey from the place of arrest to the court of the magistrate and no such person shall be detained in custody beyond the said period without the authority of a magistrate.Facts: Jethalal was the owner of an electronic shop 'Gada Electronics'. One day he got stuck in his godown after the shop closed; with some people's help, he managed to break the lock and get out, but a police patrol team saw him with the broken lock and arrested him for the charge of breaking. Two days went by, and they kept him in custody for interrogation as the senior inspector wasn't around.Decide.a)Jethalal should have been presented before the magistrate within 24 hours.b)Senior inspector wasn't around, so police couldn't do anything else.c)They kept him in custody because he was a suspect of being a member of a notorious gang.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labeled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Every person who is arrested and detained in custody shall be produced before the nearest magistrate within a period of twenty-four hours of such arrest excluding the time necessary for the journey from the place of arrest to the court of the magistrate and no such person shall be detained in custody beyond the said period without the authority of a magistrate.Facts: Jethalal was the owner of an electronic shop 'Gada Electronics'. One day he got stuck in his godown after the shop closed; with some people's help, he managed to break the lock and get out, but a police patrol team saw him with the broken lock and arrested him for the charge of breaking. Two days went by, and they kept him in custody for interrogation as the senior inspector wasn't around.Decide.a)Jethalal should have been presented before the magistrate within 24 hours.b)Senior inspector wasn't around, so police couldn't do anything else.c)They kept him in custody because he was a suspect of being a member of a notorious gang.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labeled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Every person who is arrested and detained in custody shall be produced before the nearest magistrate within a period of twenty-four hours of such arrest excluding the time necessary for the journey from the place of arrest to the court of the magistrate and no such person shall be detained in custody beyond the said period without the authority of a magistrate.Facts: Jethalal was the owner of an electronic shop 'Gada Electronics'. One day he got stuck in his godown after the shop closed; with some people's help, he managed to break the lock and get out, but a police patrol team saw him with the broken lock and arrested him for the charge of breaking. Two days went by, and they kept him in custody for interrogation as the senior inspector wasn't around.Decide.a)Jethalal should have been presented before the magistrate within 24 hours.b)Senior inspector wasn't around, so police couldn't do anything else.c)They kept him in custody because he was a suspect of being a member of a notorious gang.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labeled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Every person who is arrested and detained in custody shall be produced before the nearest magistrate within a period of twenty-four hours of such arrest excluding the time necessary for the journey from the place of arrest to the court of the magistrate and no such person shall be detained in custody beyond the said period without the authority of a magistrate.Facts: Jethalal was the owner of an electronic shop 'Gada Electronics'. One day he got stuck in his godown after the shop closed; with some people's help, he managed to break the lock and get out, but a police patrol team saw him with the broken lock and arrested him for the charge of breaking. Two days went by, and they kept him in custody for interrogation as the senior inspector wasn't around.Decide.a)Jethalal should have been presented before the magistrate within 24 hours.b)Senior inspector wasn't around, so police couldn't do anything else.c)They kept him in custody because he was a suspect of being a member of a notorious gang.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labeled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Every person who is arrested and detained in custody shall be produced before the nearest magistrate within a period of twenty-four hours of such arrest excluding the time necessary for the journey from the place of arrest to the court of the magistrate and no such person shall be detained in custody beyond the said period without the authority of a magistrate.Facts: Jethalal was the owner of an electronic shop 'Gada Electronics'. One day he got stuck in his godown after the shop closed; with some people's help, he managed to break the lock and get out, but a police patrol team saw him with the broken lock and arrested him for the charge of breaking. Two days went by, and they kept him in custody for interrogation as the senior inspector wasn't around.Decide.a)Jethalal should have been presented before the magistrate within 24 hours.b)Senior inspector wasn't around, so police couldn't do anything else.c)They kept him in custody because he was a suspect of being a member of a notorious gang.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labeled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Every person who is arrested and detained in custody shall be produced before the nearest magistrate within a period of twenty-four hours of such arrest excluding the time necessary for the journey from the place of arrest to the court of the magistrate and no such person shall be detained in custody beyond the said period without the authority of a magistrate.Facts: Jethalal was the owner of an electronic shop 'Gada Electronics'. One day he got stuck in his godown after the shop closed; with some people's help, he managed to break the lock and get out, but a police patrol team saw him with the broken lock and arrested him for the charge of breaking. Two days went by, and they kept him in custody for interrogation as the senior inspector wasn't around.Decide.a)Jethalal should have been presented before the magistrate within 24 hours.b)Senior inspector wasn't around, so police couldn't do anything else.c)They kept him in custody because he was a suspect of being a member of a notorious gang.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labeled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Every person who is arrested and detained in custody shall be produced before the nearest magistrate within a period of twenty-four hours of such arrest excluding the time necessary for the journey from the place of arrest to the court of the magistrate and no such person shall be detained in custody beyond the said period without the authority of a magistrate.Facts: Jethalal was the owner of an electronic shop 'Gada Electronics'. One day he got stuck in his godown after the shop closed; with some people's help, he managed to break the lock and get out, but a police patrol team saw him with the broken lock and arrested him for the charge of breaking. Two days went by, and they kept him in custody for interrogation as the senior inspector wasn't around.Decide.a)Jethalal should have been presented before the magistrate within 24 hours.b)Senior inspector wasn't around, so police couldn't do anything else.c)They kept him in custody because he was a suspect of being a member of a notorious gang.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labeled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Every person who is arrested and detained in custody shall be produced before the nearest magistrate within a period of twenty-four hours of such arrest excluding the time necessary for the journey from the place of arrest to the court of the magistrate and no such person shall be detained in custody beyond the said period without the authority of a magistrate.Facts: Jethalal was the owner of an electronic shop 'Gada Electronics'. One day he got stuck in his godown after the shop closed; with some people's help, he managed to break the lock and get out, but a police patrol team saw him with the broken lock and arrested him for the charge of breaking. Two days went by, and they kept him in custody for interrogation as the senior inspector wasn't around.Decide.a)Jethalal should have been presented before the magistrate within 24 hours.b)Senior inspector wasn't around, so police couldn't do anything else.c)They kept him in custody because he was a suspect of being a member of a notorious gang.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labeled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Every person who is arrested and detained in custody shall be produced before the nearest magistrate within a period of twenty-four hours of such arrest excluding the time necessary for the journey from the place of arrest to the court of the magistrate and no such person shall be detained in custody beyond the said period without the authority of a magistrate.Facts: Jethalal was the owner of an electronic shop 'Gada Electronics'. One day he got stuck in his godown after the shop closed; with some people's help, he managed to break the lock and get out, but a police patrol team saw him with the broken lock and arrested him for the charge of breaking. Two days went by, and they kept him in custody for interrogation as the senior inspector wasn't around.Decide.a)Jethalal should have been presented before the magistrate within 24 hours.b)Senior inspector wasn't around, so police couldn't do anything else.c)They kept him in custody because he was a suspect of being a member of a notorious gang.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam