Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala andamp; Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.Q.Rahul has been charged with forgery in a case. He is not yet in custody and is free on anticipatory bail. The magistrate requests samples of Rahuls signature and handwriting for the purpose of identification in connection with the forgery case, depending on the clarification offered by the Kerala High Court. Based on the legal observation and interpretation provided in the case, which of the following claims is truest?a)Since Rahul has merely been released on anticipatory bail and hasnt been arrested, the magistrates order is void.b)According to the interpretation of Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, the magistrates order is legitimate.c)Rahul can only be ordered to produce samples if he is accused of forgery and taken into custody as a result.d)Rahul must willingly agree to deliver the samples in order for the magistrates order to be enforceable.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Direction: Read the following passage careful...

Join the Discussion on the App

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.

The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala & Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.

Q. Rahul has been charged with forgery in a case. He is not yet in custody and is free on anticipatory bail. The magistrate requests samples of Rahul's signature and handwriting for the purpose of identification in connection with the forgery case, depending on the clarification offered by the Kerala High Court. Based on the legal observation and interpretation provided in the case, which of the following claims is truest?

a)
Since Rahul has merely been released on anticipatory bail and hasn't been arrested, the magistrate's order is void.
b)
According to the interpretation of Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, the magistrate's order is legitimate.
c)
Rahul can only be ordered to produce samples if he is accused of forgery and taken into custody as a result.
d)
Rahul must willingly agree to deliver the samples in order for the magistrate's order to be enforceable.

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Test: CLAT Mock Test - 14

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questio...

The Kerala High Court clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate has the authority to order a person accused in a criminal case to provide samples of signatures and handwriting, even if the person has not been arrested. This was highlighted in the case of Faizal KV v. State of Kerala & Anr. The magistrate is free to issue such an order for the purpose of identification in connection with the forgery case despite Rahul now being free on anticipatory bail. Hence option B is the right answer.

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

Attention CLAT Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

CLAT Mock Test Series 2025

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala & Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.Q.Rahul is currently free on anticipatory bail as a suspect in a forgery case. Under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act of 2022, the magistrate issues an order requiring him to submit a sample of his handwriting for the investigation. Rahul defies orders. What penalties could Rahul encounter in accordance with the Acts provisions?

View answer

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala & Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.Q.What is the consequence of resistance or refusal by any person to allow the collection of measurements under the 2022 Act?

View answer

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala & Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.Q.Nisha has been detained by police after being arrested as a suspect in a criminal case. To help with the investigation, the investigating officer needs a sample of Nishas handwriting. Which statute allows the officer to force Nisha to submit a sample of her handwriting?

View answer

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala & Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.Q.Under which section of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, can a magistrate direct a person accused in a criminal case to provide samples of signatures and handwriting, even if the person has not been arrested?

View answer

Directions: Read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.It has been repeatedly held that the PMLA (Prevention of Money Laundering Act) is a sui generis legislation, enacted to tackle money laundering through white-collar crimes. According to Section 3 of the PMLA, the act of projecting or claiming proceeds of crime to be untainted property constitutes the offense of money laundering. Under the Schedule to the PMLA, a number of offenses under the Indian Penal Code and other special statutes have been included, which serve as the basis for the offense of money laundering. In other words, the existence of predicate offense is sine qua non to charge someone with money laundering. It is crucial to note that the investigation and prosecution of the predicate offense are done typically by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) or the State Police.Section 50 of the PMLA provides powers of a civil court to the ED authorities for summoning persons suspected of money laundering and recording statements. However, the Supreme Court held that ED authorities are not police officers. It observed in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary v. Union of India (2022) that “the process envisaged by Section 50 of the PMLA is in the nature of an inquiry against the proceeds of crime and is not ‘investigation’ in strict sense of the term for initiating prosecution.” There are other dissimilarities between ED authorities and the police. While the police are required to register a First Information Report (FIR) for a cognizable offense before conducting an investigation, ED authorities begin with search procedures and undertake their investigation for the purpose of gathering materials and tracing the ‘proceeds of crime’ by issuing summons. Any statement made by an accused to the police is inadmissible as evidence in court, whereas a statement made to an ED authority is admissible. A copy of the FIR is accessible to the accused, whereas the Enforcement Case Information Report is seldom available.While the police investigating the predicate offense are empowered to arrest and seek custody of the accused, the ED is meant to focus on recovering the proceeds of crime in order to redistribute the same to victims. It is not clear whether the ED has managed to do this. Per contra, the Proceeds of Crime Act, 2002, the analogous legislation in the U.K., almost entirely concentrates on the confiscation of assets through dedicated civil proceedings. Unfortunately, of late, much of the ED’s powers have been discharged in effecting pretrial arrests, which used to be the prerogative of the police investigating the predicate offence. In the past, the CBI was used to impart fear among political opponents. In the process, the agency received the condemnation of various courts and earned the nickname “caged parrot”. Whether the ED will go down the same path or reorient its approach will entirely depend on the intervention of the country’s constitutional courts.Q.Which of the following is not the appropriate cause-and-effect relationship in the passages context?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

CLAT Mock Test Series 2025

Crash Course for CLAT

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala & Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.Q.Rahul has been charged with forgery in a case. He is not yet in custody and is free on anticipatory bail. The magistrate requests samples of Rahuls signature and handwriting for the purpose of identification in connection with the forgery case, depending on the clarification offered by the Kerala High Court. Based on the legal observation and interpretation provided in the case, which of the following claims is truest?a)Since Rahul has merely been released on anticipatory bail and hasnt been arrested, the magistrates order is void.b)According to the interpretation of Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, the magistrates order is legitimate.c)Rahul can only be ordered to produce samples if he is accused of forgery and taken into custody as a result.d)Rahul must willingly agree to deliver the samples in order for the magistrates order to be enforceable.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala & Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.Q.Rahul has been charged with forgery in a case. He is not yet in custody and is free on anticipatory bail. The magistrate requests samples of Rahuls signature and handwriting for the purpose of identification in connection with the forgery case, depending on the clarification offered by the Kerala High Court. Based on the legal observation and interpretation provided in the case, which of the following claims is truest?a)Since Rahul has merely been released on anticipatory bail and hasnt been arrested, the magistrates order is void.b)According to the interpretation of Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, the magistrates order is legitimate.c)Rahul can only be ordered to produce samples if he is accused of forgery and taken into custody as a result.d)Rahul must willingly agree to deliver the samples in order for the magistrates order to be enforceable.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala & Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.Q.Rahul has been charged with forgery in a case. He is not yet in custody and is free on anticipatory bail. The magistrate requests samples of Rahuls signature and handwriting for the purpose of identification in connection with the forgery case, depending on the clarification offered by the Kerala High Court. Based on the legal observation and interpretation provided in the case, which of the following claims is truest?a)Since Rahul has merely been released on anticipatory bail and hasnt been arrested, the magistrates order is void.b)According to the interpretation of Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, the magistrates order is legitimate.c)Rahul can only be ordered to produce samples if he is accused of forgery and taken into custody as a result.d)Rahul must willingly agree to deliver the samples in order for the magistrates order to be enforceable.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala & Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.Q.Rahul has been charged with forgery in a case. He is not yet in custody and is free on anticipatory bail. The magistrate requests samples of Rahuls signature and handwriting for the purpose of identification in connection with the forgery case, depending on the clarification offered by the Kerala High Court. Based on the legal observation and interpretation provided in the case, which of the following claims is truest?a)Since Rahul has merely been released on anticipatory bail and hasnt been arrested, the magistrates order is void.b)According to the interpretation of Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, the magistrates order is legitimate.c)Rahul can only be ordered to produce samples if he is accused of forgery and taken into custody as a result.d)Rahul must willingly agree to deliver the samples in order for the magistrates order to be enforceable.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala & Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.Q.Rahul has been charged with forgery in a case. He is not yet in custody and is free on anticipatory bail. The magistrate requests samples of Rahuls signature and handwriting for the purpose of identification in connection with the forgery case, depending on the clarification offered by the Kerala High Court. Based on the legal observation and interpretation provided in the case, which of the following claims is truest?a)Since Rahul has merely been released on anticipatory bail and hasnt been arrested, the magistrates order is void.b)According to the interpretation of Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, the magistrates order is legitimate.c)Rahul can only be ordered to produce samples if he is accused of forgery and taken into custody as a result.d)Rahul must willingly agree to deliver the samples in order for the magistrates order to be enforceable.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala & Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.Q.Rahul has been charged with forgery in a case. He is not yet in custody and is free on anticipatory bail. The magistrate requests samples of Rahuls signature and handwriting for the purpose of identification in connection with the forgery case, depending on the clarification offered by the Kerala High Court. Based on the legal observation and interpretation provided in the case, which of the following claims is truest?a)Since Rahul has merely been released on anticipatory bail and hasnt been arrested, the magistrates order is void.b)According to the interpretation of Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, the magistrates order is legitimate.c)Rahul can only be ordered to produce samples if he is accused of forgery and taken into custody as a result.d)Rahul must willingly agree to deliver the samples in order for the magistrates order to be enforceable.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala & Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.Q.Rahul has been charged with forgery in a case. He is not yet in custody and is free on anticipatory bail. The magistrate requests samples of Rahuls signature and handwriting for the purpose of identification in connection with the forgery case, depending on the clarification offered by the Kerala High Court. Based on the legal observation and interpretation provided in the case, which of the following claims is truest?a)Since Rahul has merely been released on anticipatory bail and hasnt been arrested, the magistrates order is void.b)According to the interpretation of Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, the magistrates order is legitimate.c)Rahul can only be ordered to produce samples if he is accused of forgery and taken into custody as a result.d)Rahul must willingly agree to deliver the samples in order for the magistrates order to be enforceable.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala & Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.Q.Rahul has been charged with forgery in a case. He is not yet in custody and is free on anticipatory bail. The magistrate requests samples of Rahuls signature and handwriting for the purpose of identification in connection with the forgery case, depending on the clarification offered by the Kerala High Court. Based on the legal observation and interpretation provided in the case, which of the following claims is truest?a)Since Rahul has merely been released on anticipatory bail and hasnt been arrested, the magistrates order is void.b)According to the interpretation of Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, the magistrates order is legitimate.c)Rahul can only be ordered to produce samples if he is accused of forgery and taken into custody as a result.d)Rahul must willingly agree to deliver the samples in order for the magistrates order to be enforceable.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala & Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.Q.Rahul has been charged with forgery in a case. He is not yet in custody and is free on anticipatory bail. The magistrate requests samples of Rahuls signature and handwriting for the purpose of identification in connection with the forgery case, depending on the clarification offered by the Kerala High Court. Based on the legal observation and interpretation provided in the case, which of the following claims is truest?a)Since Rahul has merely been released on anticipatory bail and hasnt been arrested, the magistrates order is void.b)According to the interpretation of Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, the magistrates order is legitimate.c)Rahul can only be ordered to produce samples if he is accused of forgery and taken into custody as a result.d)Rahul must willingly agree to deliver the samples in order for the magistrates order to be enforceable.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala & Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.Q.Rahul has been charged with forgery in a case. He is not yet in custody and is free on anticipatory bail. The magistrate requests samples of Rahuls signature and handwriting for the purpose of identification in connection with the forgery case, depending on the clarification offered by the Kerala High Court. Based on the legal observation and interpretation provided in the case, which of the following claims is truest?a)Since Rahul has merely been released on anticipatory bail and hasnt been arrested, the magistrates order is void.b)According to the interpretation of Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, the magistrates order is legitimate.c)Rahul can only be ordered to produce samples if he is accused of forgery and taken into custody as a result.d)Rahul must willingly agree to deliver the samples in order for the magistrates order to be enforceable.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam