CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Direction: Read the following passage careful... Start Learning for Free
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala & Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.
Q. Rahul is currently free on anticipatory bail as a suspect in a forgery case. Under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act of 2022, the magistrate issues an order requiring him to submit a sample of his handwriting for the investigation. Rahul defies orders. What penalties could Rahul encounter in accordance with the Act's provisions?
  • a)
    Rahul may receive a fine of up to 500 INR, but jail is not a potential punishment.
  • b)
    Rahul might receive a sentence of up to three months in jail, a fine of up to 500 rupees, or even both.
  • c)
    Rahul may be required to provide a handwriting sample, but refusal carries no legal consequences.
  • d)
    Rahul might be fined up to INR 500 without the possibility of imprisonment.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questio...
According to Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or a refusal to submit measures may constitute a violation of Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, punishable by up to three months in jail, a fine of up to 500 rupees, or both. Hence option B is the right answer.
Free Test
Community Answer
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questio...
Understanding the Penalties under the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022
The scenario involves Rahul, who is on anticipatory bail as a suspect in a forgery case. Under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, the magistrate has the authority to require him to provide a handwriting sample. If Rahul defies this order, he may face specific penalties.
Key Provisions of the Act
- The 2022 Act criminalizes the refusal or resistance to provide measurements, including handwriting samples.
- According to Section 6 of the Act, such refusal is considered an offense under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which pertains to obstructing a public servant.
Possible Penalties for Non-Compliance
- Imprisonment: Rahul could be sentenced to imprisonment for up to three months.
- Fine: He could also be fined up to INR 500.
- Combination of Both: It is possible for the court to impose both a fine and imprisonment.
Conclusion
Given these provisions, the correct answer regarding the penalties Rahul could face for defying the magistrate's order is option 'B': Rahul might receive a sentence of up to three months in jail, a fine of up to INR 500, or even both. This highlights the serious legal implications of resisting a magistrate’s directive under the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022.
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala & Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.Q.Rahul has been charged with forgery in a case. He is not yet in custody and is free on anticipatory bail. The magistrate requests samples of Rahuls signature and handwriting for the purpose of identification in connection with the forgery case, depending on the clarification offered by the Kerala High Court. Based on the legal observation and interpretation provided in the case, which of the following claims is truest?

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala & Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.Q.Nisha has been detained by police after being arrested as a suspect in a criminal case. To help with the investigation, the investigating officer needs a sample of Nishas handwriting. Which statute allows the officer to force Nisha to submit a sample of her handwriting?

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala & Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.Q.What is the consequence of resistance or refusal by any person to allow the collection of measurements under the 2022 Act?

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala & Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.Q.Under which section of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, can a magistrate direct a person accused in a criminal case to provide samples of signatures and handwriting, even if the person has not been arrested?

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022 authorizes law enforcement agencies to collect, store and analyse physical and biological samples of convicts and other persons to identify and investigate criminal matters. The Act repeals the existing “The Identification of Prisoners Act, 1920”, which authorizes the police to collect finger and footprint impressions and photographs.mNational Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) is empowered to collect the record of measurements from the State Government or Union territory Administration or any other law enforcement agencies. It shall store, preserve and destroy the record of measurements at the national level. The magistrate is empowered to direct a person to give measurements for the purpose of any investigation or proceeding under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 or any other law for the time being in force. The police officer or prison officer is empowered to take measurements if any person resists or refuses to allow the taking of such measurements. The Central Government or the State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make rules for carrying out the purposes of this Act.Any person convicted, arrested or held under any preventive detention law is required to provide “measurements” to a police officer or a prison official. The record of these measurements will be retained in digital or electronic form for a period of 75 years from the date of collection. The records are to be destroyed in case any person, who has not been previously convicted of an offence punishable under any law with imprisonment for any term and had his/her measurements taken according to the provisions of this Act, is released without trial or discharged or acquitted by the court, after exhausting all legal remedies.Q.John faced arrest and criminal charges. During the investigation, a police officer collected Johns physical and biological samples as per the guidelines outlined in the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022. Subsequently, John was acquitted by the court after exhausting all legal remedies. However, the police department declined to destroy Johns measurement records, citing the Acts requirement to retain them for 75 years from the date of collection. Did the police departments decision to retain Johns measurement records violate the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022?

Top Courses for CLAT

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala & Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.Q.Rahul is currently free on anticipatory bail as a suspect in a forgery case. Under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act of 2022, the magistrate issues an order requiring him to submit a sample of his handwriting for the investigation. Rahul defies orders. What penalties could Rahul encounter in accordance with the Acts provisions?a)Rahul may receive a fine of up to 500 INR, but jail is not a potential punishment.b)Rahul might receive a sentence of up to three months in jail, a fine of up to 500 rupees, or even both.c)Rahul may be required to provide a handwriting sample, but refusal carries no legal consequences.d)Rahul might be fined up to INR 500 without the possibility of imprisonment.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala & Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.Q.Rahul is currently free on anticipatory bail as a suspect in a forgery case. Under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act of 2022, the magistrate issues an order requiring him to submit a sample of his handwriting for the investigation. Rahul defies orders. What penalties could Rahul encounter in accordance with the Acts provisions?a)Rahul may receive a fine of up to 500 INR, but jail is not a potential punishment.b)Rahul might receive a sentence of up to three months in jail, a fine of up to 500 rupees, or even both.c)Rahul may be required to provide a handwriting sample, but refusal carries no legal consequences.d)Rahul might be fined up to INR 500 without the possibility of imprisonment.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala & Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.Q.Rahul is currently free on anticipatory bail as a suspect in a forgery case. Under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act of 2022, the magistrate issues an order requiring him to submit a sample of his handwriting for the investigation. Rahul defies orders. What penalties could Rahul encounter in accordance with the Acts provisions?a)Rahul may receive a fine of up to 500 INR, but jail is not a potential punishment.b)Rahul might receive a sentence of up to three months in jail, a fine of up to 500 rupees, or even both.c)Rahul may be required to provide a handwriting sample, but refusal carries no legal consequences.d)Rahul might be fined up to INR 500 without the possibility of imprisonment.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala & Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.Q.Rahul is currently free on anticipatory bail as a suspect in a forgery case. Under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act of 2022, the magistrate issues an order requiring him to submit a sample of his handwriting for the investigation. Rahul defies orders. What penalties could Rahul encounter in accordance with the Acts provisions?a)Rahul may receive a fine of up to 500 INR, but jail is not a potential punishment.b)Rahul might receive a sentence of up to three months in jail, a fine of up to 500 rupees, or even both.c)Rahul may be required to provide a handwriting sample, but refusal carries no legal consequences.d)Rahul might be fined up to INR 500 without the possibility of imprisonment.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala & Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.Q.Rahul is currently free on anticipatory bail as a suspect in a forgery case. Under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act of 2022, the magistrate issues an order requiring him to submit a sample of his handwriting for the investigation. Rahul defies orders. What penalties could Rahul encounter in accordance with the Acts provisions?a)Rahul may receive a fine of up to 500 INR, but jail is not a potential punishment.b)Rahul might receive a sentence of up to three months in jail, a fine of up to 500 rupees, or even both.c)Rahul may be required to provide a handwriting sample, but refusal carries no legal consequences.d)Rahul might be fined up to INR 500 without the possibility of imprisonment.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala & Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.Q.Rahul is currently free on anticipatory bail as a suspect in a forgery case. Under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act of 2022, the magistrate issues an order requiring him to submit a sample of his handwriting for the investigation. Rahul defies orders. What penalties could Rahul encounter in accordance with the Acts provisions?a)Rahul may receive a fine of up to 500 INR, but jail is not a potential punishment.b)Rahul might receive a sentence of up to three months in jail, a fine of up to 500 rupees, or even both.c)Rahul may be required to provide a handwriting sample, but refusal carries no legal consequences.d)Rahul might be fined up to INR 500 without the possibility of imprisonment.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala & Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.Q.Rahul is currently free on anticipatory bail as a suspect in a forgery case. Under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act of 2022, the magistrate issues an order requiring him to submit a sample of his handwriting for the investigation. Rahul defies orders. What penalties could Rahul encounter in accordance with the Acts provisions?a)Rahul may receive a fine of up to 500 INR, but jail is not a potential punishment.b)Rahul might receive a sentence of up to three months in jail, a fine of up to 500 rupees, or even both.c)Rahul may be required to provide a handwriting sample, but refusal carries no legal consequences.d)Rahul might be fined up to INR 500 without the possibility of imprisonment.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala & Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.Q.Rahul is currently free on anticipatory bail as a suspect in a forgery case. Under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act of 2022, the magistrate issues an order requiring him to submit a sample of his handwriting for the investigation. Rahul defies orders. What penalties could Rahul encounter in accordance with the Acts provisions?a)Rahul may receive a fine of up to 500 INR, but jail is not a potential punishment.b)Rahul might receive a sentence of up to three months in jail, a fine of up to 500 rupees, or even both.c)Rahul may be required to provide a handwriting sample, but refusal carries no legal consequences.d)Rahul might be fined up to INR 500 without the possibility of imprisonment.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala & Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.Q.Rahul is currently free on anticipatory bail as a suspect in a forgery case. Under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act of 2022, the magistrate issues an order requiring him to submit a sample of his handwriting for the investigation. Rahul defies orders. What penalties could Rahul encounter in accordance with the Acts provisions?a)Rahul may receive a fine of up to 500 INR, but jail is not a potential punishment.b)Rahul might receive a sentence of up to three months in jail, a fine of up to 500 rupees, or even both.c)Rahul may be required to provide a handwriting sample, but refusal carries no legal consequences.d)Rahul might be fined up to INR 500 without the possibility of imprisonment.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Kerala High Court recently clarified that under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, a magistrate can direct a person accused in a criminal case to give samples of signatures and handwriting, even if such person has not been arrested. [Faizal KV v State of Kerala & Anr.]. Justice Raja Vijayaraghanav V made the observation while upholding a magistrate court order by which an accused, who was out on anticipatory bail, was ordered to furnish his handwriting sample in connection with a forgery case. The 2022 Act attaches criminal liability for resistance or refusal by any person to allow taking measurements. As per Section 6 of the 2022 Act, resistance or refusal shall be deemed to be an offence under Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides punishment for obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, wherein the person may be imprisoned for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to INR 500 or both. The 2022 Act covers the collection of measurements not only from convicted persons but also persons under preventive detention or arrested for any punishable offence. The 2022 Act authorizes the police or prison officials to compel a person to give measurements. In order to aid in an investigation or proceeding under the CRPC, the 2022 Act empowers a Magistrate to pass an order directing any person to give measurements.Q.Rahul is currently free on anticipatory bail as a suspect in a forgery case. Under Section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act of 2022, the magistrate issues an order requiring him to submit a sample of his handwriting for the investigation. Rahul defies orders. What penalties could Rahul encounter in accordance with the Acts provisions?a)Rahul may receive a fine of up to 500 INR, but jail is not a potential punishment.b)Rahul might receive a sentence of up to three months in jail, a fine of up to 500 rupees, or even both.c)Rahul may be required to provide a handwriting sample, but refusal carries no legal consequences.d)Rahul might be fined up to INR 500 without the possibility of imprisonment.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev