Question Description
Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: The doctrine of inevitable accident is a significant defense in the law of torts. It concerns a situation where a person, exercising due care, diligence and ordinary prudence, could not have foreseen or avoided an accident.Facts: Bus A of Punjab Roadways was moving towards its destination at a moderate speed. When it reached near a village, a cyclist suddenly came in front of the bus. As the driver applied the brakes to save the cyclist, the bus skidded on the road. As a result of which, it hit the front portion of a car coming from the opposite direction. Car owner sued Punjab Roadways for the damage.Decide.a)It is a case of carelessness of the cyclist. Therefore, the cyclist can be sued, not the Punjab Roadways.b)It is a case of inevitable accident, therefore Punjab Roadways cannot be held liable.c)It is a case of mutual mistake of cyclists and Punjab Roadways. Therefore, both are liable to pay for the damages of the car owner.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: The doctrine of inevitable accident is a significant defense in the law of torts. It concerns a situation where a person, exercising due care, diligence and ordinary prudence, could not have foreseen or avoided an accident.Facts: Bus A of Punjab Roadways was moving towards its destination at a moderate speed. When it reached near a village, a cyclist suddenly came in front of the bus. As the driver applied the brakes to save the cyclist, the bus skidded on the road. As a result of which, it hit the front portion of a car coming from the opposite direction. Car owner sued Punjab Roadways for the damage.Decide.a)It is a case of carelessness of the cyclist. Therefore, the cyclist can be sued, not the Punjab Roadways.b)It is a case of inevitable accident, therefore Punjab Roadways cannot be held liable.c)It is a case of mutual mistake of cyclists and Punjab Roadways. Therefore, both are liable to pay for the damages of the car owner.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: The doctrine of inevitable accident is a significant defense in the law of torts. It concerns a situation where a person, exercising due care, diligence and ordinary prudence, could not have foreseen or avoided an accident.Facts: Bus A of Punjab Roadways was moving towards its destination at a moderate speed. When it reached near a village, a cyclist suddenly came in front of the bus. As the driver applied the brakes to save the cyclist, the bus skidded on the road. As a result of which, it hit the front portion of a car coming from the opposite direction. Car owner sued Punjab Roadways for the damage.Decide.a)It is a case of carelessness of the cyclist. Therefore, the cyclist can be sued, not the Punjab Roadways.b)It is a case of inevitable accident, therefore Punjab Roadways cannot be held liable.c)It is a case of mutual mistake of cyclists and Punjab Roadways. Therefore, both are liable to pay for the damages of the car owner.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: The doctrine of inevitable accident is a significant defense in the law of torts. It concerns a situation where a person, exercising due care, diligence and ordinary prudence, could not have foreseen or avoided an accident.Facts: Bus A of Punjab Roadways was moving towards its destination at a moderate speed. When it reached near a village, a cyclist suddenly came in front of the bus. As the driver applied the brakes to save the cyclist, the bus skidded on the road. As a result of which, it hit the front portion of a car coming from the opposite direction. Car owner sued Punjab Roadways for the damage.Decide.a)It is a case of carelessness of the cyclist. Therefore, the cyclist can be sued, not the Punjab Roadways.b)It is a case of inevitable accident, therefore Punjab Roadways cannot be held liable.c)It is a case of mutual mistake of cyclists and Punjab Roadways. Therefore, both are liable to pay for the damages of the car owner.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: The doctrine of inevitable accident is a significant defense in the law of torts. It concerns a situation where a person, exercising due care, diligence and ordinary prudence, could not have foreseen or avoided an accident.Facts: Bus A of Punjab Roadways was moving towards its destination at a moderate speed. When it reached near a village, a cyclist suddenly came in front of the bus. As the driver applied the brakes to save the cyclist, the bus skidded on the road. As a result of which, it hit the front portion of a car coming from the opposite direction. Car owner sued Punjab Roadways for the damage.Decide.a)It is a case of carelessness of the cyclist. Therefore, the cyclist can be sued, not the Punjab Roadways.b)It is a case of inevitable accident, therefore Punjab Roadways cannot be held liable.c)It is a case of mutual mistake of cyclists and Punjab Roadways. Therefore, both are liable to pay for the damages of the car owner.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: The doctrine of inevitable accident is a significant defense in the law of torts. It concerns a situation where a person, exercising due care, diligence and ordinary prudence, could not have foreseen or avoided an accident.Facts: Bus A of Punjab Roadways was moving towards its destination at a moderate speed. When it reached near a village, a cyclist suddenly came in front of the bus. As the driver applied the brakes to save the cyclist, the bus skidded on the road. As a result of which, it hit the front portion of a car coming from the opposite direction. Car owner sued Punjab Roadways for the damage.Decide.a)It is a case of carelessness of the cyclist. Therefore, the cyclist can be sued, not the Punjab Roadways.b)It is a case of inevitable accident, therefore Punjab Roadways cannot be held liable.c)It is a case of mutual mistake of cyclists and Punjab Roadways. Therefore, both are liable to pay for the damages of the car owner.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: The doctrine of inevitable accident is a significant defense in the law of torts. It concerns a situation where a person, exercising due care, diligence and ordinary prudence, could not have foreseen or avoided an accident.Facts: Bus A of Punjab Roadways was moving towards its destination at a moderate speed. When it reached near a village, a cyclist suddenly came in front of the bus. As the driver applied the brakes to save the cyclist, the bus skidded on the road. As a result of which, it hit the front portion of a car coming from the opposite direction. Car owner sued Punjab Roadways for the damage.Decide.a)It is a case of carelessness of the cyclist. Therefore, the cyclist can be sued, not the Punjab Roadways.b)It is a case of inevitable accident, therefore Punjab Roadways cannot be held liable.c)It is a case of mutual mistake of cyclists and Punjab Roadways. Therefore, both are liable to pay for the damages of the car owner.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: The doctrine of inevitable accident is a significant defense in the law of torts. It concerns a situation where a person, exercising due care, diligence and ordinary prudence, could not have foreseen or avoided an accident.Facts: Bus A of Punjab Roadways was moving towards its destination at a moderate speed. When it reached near a village, a cyclist suddenly came in front of the bus. As the driver applied the brakes to save the cyclist, the bus skidded on the road. As a result of which, it hit the front portion of a car coming from the opposite direction. Car owner sued Punjab Roadways for the damage.Decide.a)It is a case of carelessness of the cyclist. Therefore, the cyclist can be sued, not the Punjab Roadways.b)It is a case of inevitable accident, therefore Punjab Roadways cannot be held liable.c)It is a case of mutual mistake of cyclists and Punjab Roadways. Therefore, both are liable to pay for the damages of the car owner.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principle: The doctrine of inevitable accident is a significant defense in the law of torts. It concerns a situation where a person, exercising due care, diligence and ordinary prudence, could not have foreseen or avoided an accident.Facts: Bus A of Punjab Roadways was moving towards its destination at a moderate speed. When it reached near a village, a cyclist suddenly came in front of the bus. As the driver applied the brakes to save the cyclist, the bus skidded on the road. As a result of which, it hit the front portion of a car coming from the opposite direction. Car owner sued Punjab Roadways for the damage.Decide.a)It is a case of carelessness of the cyclist. Therefore, the cyclist can be sued, not the Punjab Roadways.b)It is a case of inevitable accident, therefore Punjab Roadways cannot be held liable.c)It is a case of mutual mistake of cyclists and Punjab Roadways. Therefore, both are liable to pay for the damages of the car owner.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.