All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   Directions: In this question, one or more pr... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.
Principles:
1. Trespass to the person means a direct or an intentional interference with a person's body or liberty.
2. For the prevention of trespass, only reasonable and justified force should be used and that too be used after warning.
Facts: Ram entered Prakash's bus, but failed to buy the ticket. At a station, he was asked to get off the bus. On his refusal to get down, force was used to make him get off the bus. Ram sued Prakash for his forcible removal.
Decide
  • a)
    Prakash is liable to use unreasonable force against Ram.
  • b)
    Prakash is justified in his actions.
  • c)
    Prakash is liable because every person has a right to travel by bus.
  • d)
    None of these
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given follow...
Principle:

Trespass to the person means a direct or an intentional interference with a person's body or liberty.

For the prevention of trespass, only reasonable and justified force should be used and that too be used after warning.
Explanation:

Facts:
Ram entered Prakash's bus without buying a ticket and refused to get off the bus when asked at a station. Force was used to remove him from the bus.

Analysis:
- Trespass to the person: Ram's refusal to get off the bus after being asked to do so constitutes trespass to the person as it involves interference with his liberty.
- Use of force: Prakash used force to remove Ram from the bus, which was a reasonable and justified action considering Ram's refusal to comply with the instructions.
- Warning: It is not explicitly mentioned in the facts whether a warning was given to Ram before using force. However, considering the situation where Ram was already asked to get off the bus and refused to do so, the use of force can be deemed justifiable even without a warning.

Conclusion:
Prakash is justified in using force to remove Ram from the bus as it was a reasonable and justified action to prevent trespass to the person. Therefore, Prakash is not liable for his actions, and Ram's lawsuit against him is not valid.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given follow...
Prakash is right in his actions. Prakash used some force to get Ram off the bus. His action is totally justified because Ram was travelling without a ticket and was therefore, a trespasser. He was first warned to get off the bus. Upon his refusal to get down, some force had to be used against him.
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Direction:In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple-choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choicesPrinciples:Nuisance as a tort means an unlawful interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it.Facts:During the scarcity of potatoes, long queues were, made outside the defendant’s shop who having a licence to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 kg. of potatoes per ration card. The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighbouring shops. The neighbouring shopkeepers brought an action for nuisance against the defendant. Which one of the following decisions will be correct in this suit?

Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple- choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices Principles:Nuisance as a tort means an unlawful interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it.Facts: During the scarcity of potatoes, long queues were, made outside the defendant’s shop who having a licence to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 kg. of potatoes per ration card. The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighbouring shops. The neighbouring shopkeepers brought an action for nuisance against the defendant. Which one of the following decisions will be correct in this suit?

Direction: Given below is a statement of legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer. Legal Principles:1. Negligence is a legal wrong that is suffered by someone at the hands of another who has a duty to take care but fails to take proper care to avoid what a reasonable person would regard as a foreseeable risk.2. The test of liability requires that the harm must be a reasonably foreseeable result of the defendant's conduct, a relationship of proximity must exist and it must be fair, just and reasonable to impose liability.3. The claimant must prove that harm would not have occurred 'but for' the negligence of the defendant.4. Duty of care is a legal obligation which is imposed on an individual requiring adherence to a standard of reasonable care while performing any acts that could foreseeably harm others.5. Conversations between a doctor and patient are generally confidential but there are few exceptions.Soman was the student of PRQ University. He met Pamela in a youth festival and fell in love with her. However, Pamela was not interested in having any serious relationship with Soman. Due to this, Soman went into emotional crisis and started consulting a psychologist in the PRQ Memorial Hospital. In October 2018, Soman murdered Pamela. Pamela’s parents contended that only a short time prior, Soman had expressed his intention to murder their daughter to his therapist, Dr. Surana, a psychologist employed by the University. They further alleged that Dr. Surana had warned campus police of Soman’s intentions, and that the police had briefly detained him, but then released him. Pamela’s parents filed a case of negligence against the Police Department and the University officials on two grounds: the failure to confine Soman, in spite of his expressed intentions to kill Pamela, and failure to warn Pamela or her parents. Defendants maintained that they owed no duty of care to the victim, and were immune from suit.Q. Which of the following is incorrect?

Direction: Given below is a statement of legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer.Legal Principles: Negligence is a legal wrong that is suffered by someone at the hands of another who has a duty to take care but fails to take proper care to avoid what a reasonable person would regard as a foreseeable risk. The test of liability requires that the harm must be a reasonably foreseeable result of the defendant's conduct, a relationship of proximity must exist and it must be fair, just and reasonable to impose liability. The claimant must prove that harm would not have occurred 'but for' the negligence of the defendant. Duty of care is a legal obligation which is imposed on an individual requiring adherence to a standard of reasonable care while performing any acts that could foreseeably harm others. Conversations between a doctor and patient are generally confidential but there are few exceptions. Soman was the student of PRQ University. He met Pamela in a youth festival and fell in love with her. However, Pamela was not interested in having any serious relationship with Soman. Due to this, Soman went into emotional crisis and started consulting a psychologist in the PRQ Memorial Hospital. In October 2018, Soman murdered Pamela. Pamela’s parents contended that only a short time prior, Soman had expressed his intention to murder their daughter to his therapist, Dr. Surana, a psychologist employed by the University. They further alleged that Dr. Surana had warned campus police of Soman’s intentions, and that the police had briefly detained him, but then released him. Pamela’s parents filed a case of negligence against the Police Department and the University officials on two grounds: the failure to confine Soman, in spite of his expressed intentions to kill Pamela, and failure to warn Pamela or her parents. Defendants maintained that they owed no duty of care to the victim, and were immune from suit.Q. Which of the following is incorrect?

Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Nothing is an offense merely by reason of its being done with the knowledge that it is likely to cause harm, if it be done without any criminal intention to cause harm, and in good faith for the purpose of preventing or avoiding other harm to person or property.Facts: Hari, a bus driver was driving negligently and took a sharp turn without slowing down. Suddenly, he found a child standing on the road and in order to prevent him, he immediately turned his steering in other direction and collided with a car and thereby killed three individuals. The police charged him with death due to rash and negligent act. Decide whether Hari can avail the defense enunciated in the above principle.

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principles:1. Trespass to the person means a direct or an intentional interference with a person's body or liberty.2. For the prevention of trespass, only reasonable and justified force should be used and that too be used after warning.Facts: Ram entered Prakash's bus, but failed to buy the ticket. At a station, he was asked to get off the bus. On his refusal to get down, force was used to make him get off the bus. Ram sued Prakash for his forcible removal.Decidea)Prakash is liable to use unreasonable force against Ram.b)Prakash is justified in his actions.c)Prakash is liable because every person has a right to travel by bus.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principles:1. Trespass to the person means a direct or an intentional interference with a person's body or liberty.2. For the prevention of trespass, only reasonable and justified force should be used and that too be used after warning.Facts: Ram entered Prakash's bus, but failed to buy the ticket. At a station, he was asked to get off the bus. On his refusal to get down, force was used to make him get off the bus. Ram sued Prakash for his forcible removal.Decidea)Prakash is liable to use unreasonable force against Ram.b)Prakash is justified in his actions.c)Prakash is liable because every person has a right to travel by bus.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principles:1. Trespass to the person means a direct or an intentional interference with a person's body or liberty.2. For the prevention of trespass, only reasonable and justified force should be used and that too be used after warning.Facts: Ram entered Prakash's bus, but failed to buy the ticket. At a station, he was asked to get off the bus. On his refusal to get down, force was used to make him get off the bus. Ram sued Prakash for his forcible removal.Decidea)Prakash is liable to use unreasonable force against Ram.b)Prakash is justified in his actions.c)Prakash is liable because every person has a right to travel by bus.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principles:1. Trespass to the person means a direct or an intentional interference with a person's body or liberty.2. For the prevention of trespass, only reasonable and justified force should be used and that too be used after warning.Facts: Ram entered Prakash's bus, but failed to buy the ticket. At a station, he was asked to get off the bus. On his refusal to get down, force was used to make him get off the bus. Ram sued Prakash for his forcible removal.Decidea)Prakash is liable to use unreasonable force against Ram.b)Prakash is justified in his actions.c)Prakash is liable because every person has a right to travel by bus.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principles:1. Trespass to the person means a direct or an intentional interference with a person's body or liberty.2. For the prevention of trespass, only reasonable and justified force should be used and that too be used after warning.Facts: Ram entered Prakash's bus, but failed to buy the ticket. At a station, he was asked to get off the bus. On his refusal to get down, force was used to make him get off the bus. Ram sued Prakash for his forcible removal.Decidea)Prakash is liable to use unreasonable force against Ram.b)Prakash is justified in his actions.c)Prakash is liable because every person has a right to travel by bus.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principles:1. Trespass to the person means a direct or an intentional interference with a person's body or liberty.2. For the prevention of trespass, only reasonable and justified force should be used and that too be used after warning.Facts: Ram entered Prakash's bus, but failed to buy the ticket. At a station, he was asked to get off the bus. On his refusal to get down, force was used to make him get off the bus. Ram sued Prakash for his forcible removal.Decidea)Prakash is liable to use unreasonable force against Ram.b)Prakash is justified in his actions.c)Prakash is liable because every person has a right to travel by bus.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principles:1. Trespass to the person means a direct or an intentional interference with a person's body or liberty.2. For the prevention of trespass, only reasonable and justified force should be used and that too be used after warning.Facts: Ram entered Prakash's bus, but failed to buy the ticket. At a station, he was asked to get off the bus. On his refusal to get down, force was used to make him get off the bus. Ram sued Prakash for his forcible removal.Decidea)Prakash is liable to use unreasonable force against Ram.b)Prakash is justified in his actions.c)Prakash is liable because every person has a right to travel by bus.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principles:1. Trespass to the person means a direct or an intentional interference with a person's body or liberty.2. For the prevention of trespass, only reasonable and justified force should be used and that too be used after warning.Facts: Ram entered Prakash's bus, but failed to buy the ticket. At a station, he was asked to get off the bus. On his refusal to get down, force was used to make him get off the bus. Ram sued Prakash for his forcible removal.Decidea)Prakash is liable to use unreasonable force against Ram.b)Prakash is justified in his actions.c)Prakash is liable because every person has a right to travel by bus.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principles:1. Trespass to the person means a direct or an intentional interference with a person's body or liberty.2. For the prevention of trespass, only reasonable and justified force should be used and that too be used after warning.Facts: Ram entered Prakash's bus, but failed to buy the ticket. At a station, he was asked to get off the bus. On his refusal to get down, force was used to make him get off the bus. Ram sued Prakash for his forcible removal.Decidea)Prakash is liable to use unreasonable force against Ram.b)Prakash is justified in his actions.c)Prakash is liable because every person has a right to travel by bus.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the most appropriate option.Principles:1. Trespass to the person means a direct or an intentional interference with a person's body or liberty.2. For the prevention of trespass, only reasonable and justified force should be used and that too be used after warning.Facts: Ram entered Prakash's bus, but failed to buy the ticket. At a station, he was asked to get off the bus. On his refusal to get down, force was used to make him get off the bus. Ram sued Prakash for his forcible removal.Decidea)Prakash is liable to use unreasonable force against Ram.b)Prakash is justified in his actions.c)Prakash is liable because every person has a right to travel by bus.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup