Question Description
Directions: The question below is based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Diseases have always plagued the earth’s living organisms. Scientists believe that huge numbers of plant and animal diseases have developed and been eradicated naturally over time. This ongoing emergence and disappearance of diseases is ignored by those who blame the widespread incidence of cancer entirely upon man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances to, for instance, produce bigger and better food sources. For example, some claim that the use of hormones to increase meat production heightens the risk of cancer in people who eat meat. People who hold this view need to accept the fact that even if cancer was not such a prevalent disease, another disease would have arisen naturally to take its place.Q. Which one of the following identifies a flaw in the passage’s reasoning?a)The writer wrongly assumes that the use of hormones in meat production never has an effect upon people who eat meat.b)The writer ignores the fact that scientists are developing cures for some types of cancer.c)The writer does not consider the fact that a number of diseases have not yet been discovered.d)While the writer identifies a group that believes cancer is caused by man’s interference with natural forms of food production, he does not identify or recognize scientists who disagree with this contention.e)The author does not acknowledge that man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances might trigger the emergence of new diseases.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2025 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: The question below is based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Diseases have always plagued the earth’s living organisms. Scientists believe that huge numbers of plant and animal diseases have developed and been eradicated naturally over time. This ongoing emergence and disappearance of diseases is ignored by those who blame the widespread incidence of cancer entirely upon man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances to, for instance, produce bigger and better food sources. For example, some claim that the use of hormones to increase meat production heightens the risk of cancer in people who eat meat. People who hold this view need to accept the fact that even if cancer was not such a prevalent disease, another disease would have arisen naturally to take its place.Q. Which one of the following identifies a flaw in the passage’s reasoning?a)The writer wrongly assumes that the use of hormones in meat production never has an effect upon people who eat meat.b)The writer ignores the fact that scientists are developing cures for some types of cancer.c)The writer does not consider the fact that a number of diseases have not yet been discovered.d)While the writer identifies a group that believes cancer is caused by man’s interference with natural forms of food production, he does not identify or recognize scientists who disagree with this contention.e)The author does not acknowledge that man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances might trigger the emergence of new diseases.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: The question below is based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Diseases have always plagued the earth’s living organisms. Scientists believe that huge numbers of plant and animal diseases have developed and been eradicated naturally over time. This ongoing emergence and disappearance of diseases is ignored by those who blame the widespread incidence of cancer entirely upon man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances to, for instance, produce bigger and better food sources. For example, some claim that the use of hormones to increase meat production heightens the risk of cancer in people who eat meat. People who hold this view need to accept the fact that even if cancer was not such a prevalent disease, another disease would have arisen naturally to take its place.Q. Which one of the following identifies a flaw in the passage’s reasoning?a)The writer wrongly assumes that the use of hormones in meat production never has an effect upon people who eat meat.b)The writer ignores the fact that scientists are developing cures for some types of cancer.c)The writer does not consider the fact that a number of diseases have not yet been discovered.d)While the writer identifies a group that believes cancer is caused by man’s interference with natural forms of food production, he does not identify or recognize scientists who disagree with this contention.e)The author does not acknowledge that man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances might trigger the emergence of new diseases.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: The question below is based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Diseases have always plagued the earth’s living organisms. Scientists believe that huge numbers of plant and animal diseases have developed and been eradicated naturally over time. This ongoing emergence and disappearance of diseases is ignored by those who blame the widespread incidence of cancer entirely upon man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances to, for instance, produce bigger and better food sources. For example, some claim that the use of hormones to increase meat production heightens the risk of cancer in people who eat meat. People who hold this view need to accept the fact that even if cancer was not such a prevalent disease, another disease would have arisen naturally to take its place.Q. Which one of the following identifies a flaw in the passage’s reasoning?a)The writer wrongly assumes that the use of hormones in meat production never has an effect upon people who eat meat.b)The writer ignores the fact that scientists are developing cures for some types of cancer.c)The writer does not consider the fact that a number of diseases have not yet been discovered.d)While the writer identifies a group that believes cancer is caused by man’s interference with natural forms of food production, he does not identify or recognize scientists who disagree with this contention.e)The author does not acknowledge that man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances might trigger the emergence of new diseases.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: The question below is based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Diseases have always plagued the earth’s living organisms. Scientists believe that huge numbers of plant and animal diseases have developed and been eradicated naturally over time. This ongoing emergence and disappearance of diseases is ignored by those who blame the widespread incidence of cancer entirely upon man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances to, for instance, produce bigger and better food sources. For example, some claim that the use of hormones to increase meat production heightens the risk of cancer in people who eat meat. People who hold this view need to accept the fact that even if cancer was not such a prevalent disease, another disease would have arisen naturally to take its place.Q. Which one of the following identifies a flaw in the passage’s reasoning?a)The writer wrongly assumes that the use of hormones in meat production never has an effect upon people who eat meat.b)The writer ignores the fact that scientists are developing cures for some types of cancer.c)The writer does not consider the fact that a number of diseases have not yet been discovered.d)While the writer identifies a group that believes cancer is caused by man’s interference with natural forms of food production, he does not identify or recognize scientists who disagree with this contention.e)The author does not acknowledge that man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances might trigger the emergence of new diseases.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: The question below is based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Diseases have always plagued the earth’s living organisms. Scientists believe that huge numbers of plant and animal diseases have developed and been eradicated naturally over time. This ongoing emergence and disappearance of diseases is ignored by those who blame the widespread incidence of cancer entirely upon man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances to, for instance, produce bigger and better food sources. For example, some claim that the use of hormones to increase meat production heightens the risk of cancer in people who eat meat. People who hold this view need to accept the fact that even if cancer was not such a prevalent disease, another disease would have arisen naturally to take its place.Q. Which one of the following identifies a flaw in the passage’s reasoning?a)The writer wrongly assumes that the use of hormones in meat production never has an effect upon people who eat meat.b)The writer ignores the fact that scientists are developing cures for some types of cancer.c)The writer does not consider the fact that a number of diseases have not yet been discovered.d)While the writer identifies a group that believes cancer is caused by man’s interference with natural forms of food production, he does not identify or recognize scientists who disagree with this contention.e)The author does not acknowledge that man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances might trigger the emergence of new diseases.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: The question below is based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Diseases have always plagued the earth’s living organisms. Scientists believe that huge numbers of plant and animal diseases have developed and been eradicated naturally over time. This ongoing emergence and disappearance of diseases is ignored by those who blame the widespread incidence of cancer entirely upon man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances to, for instance, produce bigger and better food sources. For example, some claim that the use of hormones to increase meat production heightens the risk of cancer in people who eat meat. People who hold this view need to accept the fact that even if cancer was not such a prevalent disease, another disease would have arisen naturally to take its place.Q. Which one of the following identifies a flaw in the passage’s reasoning?a)The writer wrongly assumes that the use of hormones in meat production never has an effect upon people who eat meat.b)The writer ignores the fact that scientists are developing cures for some types of cancer.c)The writer does not consider the fact that a number of diseases have not yet been discovered.d)While the writer identifies a group that believes cancer is caused by man’s interference with natural forms of food production, he does not identify or recognize scientists who disagree with this contention.e)The author does not acknowledge that man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances might trigger the emergence of new diseases.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: The question below is based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Diseases have always plagued the earth’s living organisms. Scientists believe that huge numbers of plant and animal diseases have developed and been eradicated naturally over time. This ongoing emergence and disappearance of diseases is ignored by those who blame the widespread incidence of cancer entirely upon man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances to, for instance, produce bigger and better food sources. For example, some claim that the use of hormones to increase meat production heightens the risk of cancer in people who eat meat. People who hold this view need to accept the fact that even if cancer was not such a prevalent disease, another disease would have arisen naturally to take its place.Q. Which one of the following identifies a flaw in the passage’s reasoning?a)The writer wrongly assumes that the use of hormones in meat production never has an effect upon people who eat meat.b)The writer ignores the fact that scientists are developing cures for some types of cancer.c)The writer does not consider the fact that a number of diseases have not yet been discovered.d)While the writer identifies a group that believes cancer is caused by man’s interference with natural forms of food production, he does not identify or recognize scientists who disagree with this contention.e)The author does not acknowledge that man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances might trigger the emergence of new diseases.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: The question below is based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Diseases have always plagued the earth’s living organisms. Scientists believe that huge numbers of plant and animal diseases have developed and been eradicated naturally over time. This ongoing emergence and disappearance of diseases is ignored by those who blame the widespread incidence of cancer entirely upon man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances to, for instance, produce bigger and better food sources. For example, some claim that the use of hormones to increase meat production heightens the risk of cancer in people who eat meat. People who hold this view need to accept the fact that even if cancer was not such a prevalent disease, another disease would have arisen naturally to take its place.Q. Which one of the following identifies a flaw in the passage’s reasoning?a)The writer wrongly assumes that the use of hormones in meat production never has an effect upon people who eat meat.b)The writer ignores the fact that scientists are developing cures for some types of cancer.c)The writer does not consider the fact that a number of diseases have not yet been discovered.d)While the writer identifies a group that believes cancer is caused by man’s interference with natural forms of food production, he does not identify or recognize scientists who disagree with this contention.e)The author does not acknowledge that man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances might trigger the emergence of new diseases.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.