CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >   The questions below are based on the reasoni... Start Learning for Free
The questions below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage. Diseases have always plagued the earth’s living organisms. Scientists believe that huge numbers of plant and animal diseases have developed and been eradicated naturally over time. This ongoing emergence and disappearance of diseases is ignored by those who blame the widespread incidence of cancer entirely upon man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances to, for instance, produce bigger and better food sources. For example, some claim that the use of hormones to increase meat production heightens the risk of cancer in people who eat meat. People who hold this view need to accept the fact that even if cancer was not such a prevalent disease, another disease would have arisen naturally to take its place. Which one of the following identifies a flaw in the passage’s reasoning?
  • a)
    The writer wrongly assumes that the use of hormones in meat production never has an effect upon people who eat meat.
  • b)
    The writer ignores the fact that scientists are developing cures for some types of cancer.
  • c)
    The writer does not consider the fact that a number of diseases have not yet been discovered.
  • d)
    While the writer identifies a group that believes cancer is caused by man’s interference with natural forms of food production, he does not identify or recognize scientists who disagree with this contention.
  • e)
    The author does not acknowledge that man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances might trigger the emergence of new diseases.
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
The questions below are based on the reasoning contained in brief sta...
Explanation of the Correct Answer (Option E)
The passage discusses the relationship between human intervention in food production and the prevalence of cancer, while asserting that diseases naturally emerge and disappear over time. The flaw in the passage’s reasoning is highlighted in option E, which points out an important oversight.
Key Points Supporting Option E:
- Neglect of Human Impact: The author fails to consider that alterations made by humans to naturally occurring substances (such as hormones in meat production) could lead to the emergence of new diseases. This is a significant oversight because it directly counters the notion that human impact is negligible.
- Assumption of Natural Equilibrium: The argument implies that the natural cycle of disease emergence and eradication remains unaffected by human actions. However, this assumption overlooks the possibility that human interventions could disrupt this balance, potentially triggering new health issues.
- Lack of Evidence: The passage presents a one-sided view, emphasizing that if cancer were to disappear, another disease would simply take its place, without acknowledging that human modifications may introduce unforeseen health risks.
Conclusion
In summary, option E identifies a critical flaw in the passage’s reasoning by emphasizing the potential consequences of human interference in natural processes. This highlights the complexity of disease dynamics and the importance of considering how human actions can influence health outcomes.
Free Test
Community Answer
The questions below are based on the reasoning contained in brief sta...
The author seems to consider the emergence of new diseases as entirely independent of man’s use of technological advances. However, the implementation of scientific advances might impact the ongoing emergence and disappearance of diseases. Therefore, the flaw in the writer’s reasoning stems from his refusal to consider the possible impact of man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances upon the emergence of new diseases. The correct answer is (E). Selection (A) is tempting. However, the author disagrees with those who argue that man’s conduct is entirely responsible for the high incidence of cancer. Thus, he implies that man’s actions might have some role in the prevalence of cancer. There is nothing in the passage to indicate whether or not (B) is true, even though it is common knowledge that scientists are continually conducting cancer research. The test is designed so that outside knowledge is not needed to answer the questions. Rather, the questions should be answered solely on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Inadvertently, the test authors might include a question that can be more readily answered with outside knowledge, but they make every effort to avoid that situation. With respect to (C), whether or not diseases have been discovered or not is irrelevant to the passage, and (D) is similarly irrelevant. * To give the sentence that meaning, reword it as Not every Republican is a conservative.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Top Courses for CAT

The questions below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage. Diseases have always plagued the earth’s living organisms. Scientists believe that huge numbers of plant and animal diseases have developed and been eradicated naturally over time. This ongoing emergence and disappearance of diseases is ignored by those who blame the widespread incidence of cancer entirely upon man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances to, for instance, produce bigger and better food sources. For example, some claim that the use of hormones to increase meat production heightens the risk of cancer in people who eat meat. People who hold this view need to accept the fact that even if cancer was not such a prevalent disease, another disease would have arisen naturally to take its place. Which one of the following identifies a flaw in the passage’s reasoning?a) The writer wrongly assumes that the use of hormones in meat production never has an effect upon people who eat meat.b) The writer ignores the fact that scientists are developing cures for some types of cancer.c) The writer does not consider the fact that a number of diseases have not yet been discovered.d) While the writer identifies a group that believes cancer is caused by man’s interference with natural forms of food production, he does not identify or recognize scientists who disagree with this contention.e) The author does not acknowledge that man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances might trigger the emergence of new diseases.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The questions below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage. Diseases have always plagued the earth’s living organisms. Scientists believe that huge numbers of plant and animal diseases have developed and been eradicated naturally over time. This ongoing emergence and disappearance of diseases is ignored by those who blame the widespread incidence of cancer entirely upon man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances to, for instance, produce bigger and better food sources. For example, some claim that the use of hormones to increase meat production heightens the risk of cancer in people who eat meat. People who hold this view need to accept the fact that even if cancer was not such a prevalent disease, another disease would have arisen naturally to take its place. Which one of the following identifies a flaw in the passage’s reasoning?a) The writer wrongly assumes that the use of hormones in meat production never has an effect upon people who eat meat.b) The writer ignores the fact that scientists are developing cures for some types of cancer.c) The writer does not consider the fact that a number of diseases have not yet been discovered.d) While the writer identifies a group that believes cancer is caused by man’s interference with natural forms of food production, he does not identify or recognize scientists who disagree with this contention.e) The author does not acknowledge that man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances might trigger the emergence of new diseases.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2025 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about The questions below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage. Diseases have always plagued the earth’s living organisms. Scientists believe that huge numbers of plant and animal diseases have developed and been eradicated naturally over time. This ongoing emergence and disappearance of diseases is ignored by those who blame the widespread incidence of cancer entirely upon man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances to, for instance, produce bigger and better food sources. For example, some claim that the use of hormones to increase meat production heightens the risk of cancer in people who eat meat. People who hold this view need to accept the fact that even if cancer was not such a prevalent disease, another disease would have arisen naturally to take its place. Which one of the following identifies a flaw in the passage’s reasoning?a) The writer wrongly assumes that the use of hormones in meat production never has an effect upon people who eat meat.b) The writer ignores the fact that scientists are developing cures for some types of cancer.c) The writer does not consider the fact that a number of diseases have not yet been discovered.d) While the writer identifies a group that believes cancer is caused by man’s interference with natural forms of food production, he does not identify or recognize scientists who disagree with this contention.e) The author does not acknowledge that man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances might trigger the emergence of new diseases.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The questions below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage. Diseases have always plagued the earth’s living organisms. Scientists believe that huge numbers of plant and animal diseases have developed and been eradicated naturally over time. This ongoing emergence and disappearance of diseases is ignored by those who blame the widespread incidence of cancer entirely upon man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances to, for instance, produce bigger and better food sources. For example, some claim that the use of hormones to increase meat production heightens the risk of cancer in people who eat meat. People who hold this view need to accept the fact that even if cancer was not such a prevalent disease, another disease would have arisen naturally to take its place. Which one of the following identifies a flaw in the passage’s reasoning?a) The writer wrongly assumes that the use of hormones in meat production never has an effect upon people who eat meat.b) The writer ignores the fact that scientists are developing cures for some types of cancer.c) The writer does not consider the fact that a number of diseases have not yet been discovered.d) While the writer identifies a group that believes cancer is caused by man’s interference with natural forms of food production, he does not identify or recognize scientists who disagree with this contention.e) The author does not acknowledge that man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances might trigger the emergence of new diseases.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The questions below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage. Diseases have always plagued the earth’s living organisms. Scientists believe that huge numbers of plant and animal diseases have developed and been eradicated naturally over time. This ongoing emergence and disappearance of diseases is ignored by those who blame the widespread incidence of cancer entirely upon man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances to, for instance, produce bigger and better food sources. For example, some claim that the use of hormones to increase meat production heightens the risk of cancer in people who eat meat. People who hold this view need to accept the fact that even if cancer was not such a prevalent disease, another disease would have arisen naturally to take its place. Which one of the following identifies a flaw in the passage’s reasoning?a) The writer wrongly assumes that the use of hormones in meat production never has an effect upon people who eat meat.b) The writer ignores the fact that scientists are developing cures for some types of cancer.c) The writer does not consider the fact that a number of diseases have not yet been discovered.d) While the writer identifies a group that believes cancer is caused by man’s interference with natural forms of food production, he does not identify or recognize scientists who disagree with this contention.e) The author does not acknowledge that man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances might trigger the emergence of new diseases.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The questions below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage. Diseases have always plagued the earth’s living organisms. Scientists believe that huge numbers of plant and animal diseases have developed and been eradicated naturally over time. This ongoing emergence and disappearance of diseases is ignored by those who blame the widespread incidence of cancer entirely upon man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances to, for instance, produce bigger and better food sources. For example, some claim that the use of hormones to increase meat production heightens the risk of cancer in people who eat meat. People who hold this view need to accept the fact that even if cancer was not such a prevalent disease, another disease would have arisen naturally to take its place. Which one of the following identifies a flaw in the passage’s reasoning?a) The writer wrongly assumes that the use of hormones in meat production never has an effect upon people who eat meat.b) The writer ignores the fact that scientists are developing cures for some types of cancer.c) The writer does not consider the fact that a number of diseases have not yet been discovered.d) While the writer identifies a group that believes cancer is caused by man’s interference with natural forms of food production, he does not identify or recognize scientists who disagree with this contention.e) The author does not acknowledge that man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances might trigger the emergence of new diseases.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The questions below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage. Diseases have always plagued the earth’s living organisms. Scientists believe that huge numbers of plant and animal diseases have developed and been eradicated naturally over time. This ongoing emergence and disappearance of diseases is ignored by those who blame the widespread incidence of cancer entirely upon man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances to, for instance, produce bigger and better food sources. For example, some claim that the use of hormones to increase meat production heightens the risk of cancer in people who eat meat. People who hold this view need to accept the fact that even if cancer was not such a prevalent disease, another disease would have arisen naturally to take its place. Which one of the following identifies a flaw in the passage’s reasoning?a) The writer wrongly assumes that the use of hormones in meat production never has an effect upon people who eat meat.b) The writer ignores the fact that scientists are developing cures for some types of cancer.c) The writer does not consider the fact that a number of diseases have not yet been discovered.d) While the writer identifies a group that believes cancer is caused by man’s interference with natural forms of food production, he does not identify or recognize scientists who disagree with this contention.e) The author does not acknowledge that man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances might trigger the emergence of new diseases.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The questions below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage. Diseases have always plagued the earth’s living organisms. Scientists believe that huge numbers of plant and animal diseases have developed and been eradicated naturally over time. This ongoing emergence and disappearance of diseases is ignored by those who blame the widespread incidence of cancer entirely upon man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances to, for instance, produce bigger and better food sources. For example, some claim that the use of hormones to increase meat production heightens the risk of cancer in people who eat meat. People who hold this view need to accept the fact that even if cancer was not such a prevalent disease, another disease would have arisen naturally to take its place. Which one of the following identifies a flaw in the passage’s reasoning?a) The writer wrongly assumes that the use of hormones in meat production never has an effect upon people who eat meat.b) The writer ignores the fact that scientists are developing cures for some types of cancer.c) The writer does not consider the fact that a number of diseases have not yet been discovered.d) While the writer identifies a group that believes cancer is caused by man’s interference with natural forms of food production, he does not identify or recognize scientists who disagree with this contention.e) The author does not acknowledge that man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances might trigger the emergence of new diseases.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The questions below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage. Diseases have always plagued the earth’s living organisms. Scientists believe that huge numbers of plant and animal diseases have developed and been eradicated naturally over time. This ongoing emergence and disappearance of diseases is ignored by those who blame the widespread incidence of cancer entirely upon man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances to, for instance, produce bigger and better food sources. For example, some claim that the use of hormones to increase meat production heightens the risk of cancer in people who eat meat. People who hold this view need to accept the fact that even if cancer was not such a prevalent disease, another disease would have arisen naturally to take its place. Which one of the following identifies a flaw in the passage’s reasoning?a) The writer wrongly assumes that the use of hormones in meat production never has an effect upon people who eat meat.b) The writer ignores the fact that scientists are developing cures for some types of cancer.c) The writer does not consider the fact that a number of diseases have not yet been discovered.d) While the writer identifies a group that believes cancer is caused by man’s interference with natural forms of food production, he does not identify or recognize scientists who disagree with this contention.e) The author does not acknowledge that man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances might trigger the emergence of new diseases.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The questions below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage. Diseases have always plagued the earth’s living organisms. Scientists believe that huge numbers of plant and animal diseases have developed and been eradicated naturally over time. This ongoing emergence and disappearance of diseases is ignored by those who blame the widespread incidence of cancer entirely upon man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances to, for instance, produce bigger and better food sources. For example, some claim that the use of hormones to increase meat production heightens the risk of cancer in people who eat meat. People who hold this view need to accept the fact that even if cancer was not such a prevalent disease, another disease would have arisen naturally to take its place. Which one of the following identifies a flaw in the passage’s reasoning?a) The writer wrongly assumes that the use of hormones in meat production never has an effect upon people who eat meat.b) The writer ignores the fact that scientists are developing cures for some types of cancer.c) The writer does not consider the fact that a number of diseases have not yet been discovered.d) While the writer identifies a group that believes cancer is caused by man’s interference with natural forms of food production, he does not identify or recognize scientists who disagree with this contention.e) The author does not acknowledge that man’s alteration of naturally occurring substances might trigger the emergence of new diseases.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev