All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >   Directions: The question below are based on ... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Directions: The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.
Scientists have studied the effects of electromagnetic fields associated with high voltage power lines upon people whose homes are located within 300 yards of the lines. They have compared the growth rate of children who live near the lines with the growth rate of children who live elsewhere. Because they found no significant differences in the growth rates in the two study areas, they have concluded that electromagnetic fields are harmless.
Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously jeopardize the scientists’ conclusion?
  • a)
    The scientists did not consider other possible impacts upon growth rates.
  • b)
    In studying people who lived near high voltage power lines, the scientists did not consider what type of housing those people lived in.
  • c)
    The growth rates of children have changed considerably since the 1920s.
  • d)
    People who live near electromagnetic fields suffer health problems that are not reflected in the growth rates of their children.
  • e)
    As children get older, their activities tend to occur away from home more often.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: The question below are based on the reasoning contained i...
(A) No. The study is concerned only with the effects of electromagnetic fields. Determining what other factors might impact children’s growth rates would be irrelevant to determining the effects of electromagnetic fields.
(B) No. Since the growth rate for both groups of children was the same, it does not appear that the type of housing was important in determining the effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields.
(C) No. The growth rate of children in the 1920s is insignificant to the purpose of this study—to determine whether proximity to electromagnetic fields has any harmful effects.
(D) Yes. The scientists assume that the only negative effect from living near electromagnetic fields would be a lower growth rate in children. Perhaps adults and children who live near the lines suffer from other ailments. These would not be reflected in a study of children’s growth rates and thus, this statement, if true, would seriously jeopardize the scientists’ conclusion.
(E) No. Children’s growth rates were the same, so how much time children who lived near the power lines spent at home would appear to be irrelevant.
Attention CAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

The questions below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage. Scientists have studied the effects of electromagnetic fields associated with high voltage power lines upon people whose homes are located within 300 yards of the lines. They have compared the growth rate of children who live near the lines with the growth rate of children who live elsewhere. Because they found no significant differences in the growth rates in the two study areas, they have concluded that electromagnetic fields are harmless.Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously jeopardize the scientists’ conclusion?

The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.One theory of school governance can be pictured as an upside-down triangle. Students, teachers and the faculty/parent committee make up the body of the triangle, but the triangle has no point, that is, it has no school principal. Schools are run by the faculty/parent committee, which makes all significant decisions concerning academic standards, curriculum, discipline, extra-curricular activities, etc. As a result, under this theory, innovative teaching methods and progressive academic programs cannot be implemented.Q. The argument depends upon which one of the following assumptions

The questions below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage. In the last decade, the use of bicycle helmets has increased tremendously, particularly among young children. Although bicycle helmets appear to be as sturdy and safe as football helmets, they are exempt from the safety standards the government has imposed upon the manufacture of football helmets. As a result, a child involved in a bicycle accident is more likely to suffer a serious head injury than is a child injured in a football game. The argument depends upon which one of the following assumptions

The questions below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage. An oligarchy is a government run by a small, conservative faction. Often, oligarchies consist of families such as the Royal family in Saudi Arabia. Like the Royal family in Saudi Arabia, no one person in an oligarchy has the power to make a particular investment. Therefore, risky investments are never made by oligarchies. The conclusion of the argument is valid if which one of the following is assumed?

Top Courses for CATView all

Top Courses for CAT

Directions: The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Scientists have studied the effects of electromagnetic fields associated with high voltage power lines upon people whose homes are located within 300 yards of the lines. They have compared the growth rate of children who live near the lines with the growth rate of children who live elsewhere. Because they found no significant differences in the growth rates in the two study areas, they have concluded that electromagnetic fields are harmless.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously jeopardize the scientists’ conclusion?a)The scientists did not consider other possible impacts upon growth rates.b)In studying people who lived near high voltage power lines, the scientists did not consider what type of housing those people lived in.c)The growth rates of children have changed considerably since the 1920s.d)People who live near electromagnetic fields suffer health problems that are not reflected in the growth rates of their children.e)As children get older, their activities tend to occur away from home more often.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Scientists have studied the effects of electromagnetic fields associated with high voltage power lines upon people whose homes are located within 300 yards of the lines. They have compared the growth rate of children who live near the lines with the growth rate of children who live elsewhere. Because they found no significant differences in the growth rates in the two study areas, they have concluded that electromagnetic fields are harmless.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously jeopardize the scientists’ conclusion?a)The scientists did not consider other possible impacts upon growth rates.b)In studying people who lived near high voltage power lines, the scientists did not consider what type of housing those people lived in.c)The growth rates of children have changed considerably since the 1920s.d)People who live near electromagnetic fields suffer health problems that are not reflected in the growth rates of their children.e)As children get older, their activities tend to occur away from home more often.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Scientists have studied the effects of electromagnetic fields associated with high voltage power lines upon people whose homes are located within 300 yards of the lines. They have compared the growth rate of children who live near the lines with the growth rate of children who live elsewhere. Because they found no significant differences in the growth rates in the two study areas, they have concluded that electromagnetic fields are harmless.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously jeopardize the scientists’ conclusion?a)The scientists did not consider other possible impacts upon growth rates.b)In studying people who lived near high voltage power lines, the scientists did not consider what type of housing those people lived in.c)The growth rates of children have changed considerably since the 1920s.d)People who live near electromagnetic fields suffer health problems that are not reflected in the growth rates of their children.e)As children get older, their activities tend to occur away from home more often.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Scientists have studied the effects of electromagnetic fields associated with high voltage power lines upon people whose homes are located within 300 yards of the lines. They have compared the growth rate of children who live near the lines with the growth rate of children who live elsewhere. Because they found no significant differences in the growth rates in the two study areas, they have concluded that electromagnetic fields are harmless.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously jeopardize the scientists’ conclusion?a)The scientists did not consider other possible impacts upon growth rates.b)In studying people who lived near high voltage power lines, the scientists did not consider what type of housing those people lived in.c)The growth rates of children have changed considerably since the 1920s.d)People who live near electromagnetic fields suffer health problems that are not reflected in the growth rates of their children.e)As children get older, their activities tend to occur away from home more often.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Scientists have studied the effects of electromagnetic fields associated with high voltage power lines upon people whose homes are located within 300 yards of the lines. They have compared the growth rate of children who live near the lines with the growth rate of children who live elsewhere. Because they found no significant differences in the growth rates in the two study areas, they have concluded that electromagnetic fields are harmless.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously jeopardize the scientists’ conclusion?a)The scientists did not consider other possible impacts upon growth rates.b)In studying people who lived near high voltage power lines, the scientists did not consider what type of housing those people lived in.c)The growth rates of children have changed considerably since the 1920s.d)People who live near electromagnetic fields suffer health problems that are not reflected in the growth rates of their children.e)As children get older, their activities tend to occur away from home more often.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Scientists have studied the effects of electromagnetic fields associated with high voltage power lines upon people whose homes are located within 300 yards of the lines. They have compared the growth rate of children who live near the lines with the growth rate of children who live elsewhere. Because they found no significant differences in the growth rates in the two study areas, they have concluded that electromagnetic fields are harmless.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously jeopardize the scientists’ conclusion?a)The scientists did not consider other possible impacts upon growth rates.b)In studying people who lived near high voltage power lines, the scientists did not consider what type of housing those people lived in.c)The growth rates of children have changed considerably since the 1920s.d)People who live near electromagnetic fields suffer health problems that are not reflected in the growth rates of their children.e)As children get older, their activities tend to occur away from home more often.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Scientists have studied the effects of electromagnetic fields associated with high voltage power lines upon people whose homes are located within 300 yards of the lines. They have compared the growth rate of children who live near the lines with the growth rate of children who live elsewhere. Because they found no significant differences in the growth rates in the two study areas, they have concluded that electromagnetic fields are harmless.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously jeopardize the scientists’ conclusion?a)The scientists did not consider other possible impacts upon growth rates.b)In studying people who lived near high voltage power lines, the scientists did not consider what type of housing those people lived in.c)The growth rates of children have changed considerably since the 1920s.d)People who live near electromagnetic fields suffer health problems that are not reflected in the growth rates of their children.e)As children get older, their activities tend to occur away from home more often.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Scientists have studied the effects of electromagnetic fields associated with high voltage power lines upon people whose homes are located within 300 yards of the lines. They have compared the growth rate of children who live near the lines with the growth rate of children who live elsewhere. Because they found no significant differences in the growth rates in the two study areas, they have concluded that electromagnetic fields are harmless.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously jeopardize the scientists’ conclusion?a)The scientists did not consider other possible impacts upon growth rates.b)In studying people who lived near high voltage power lines, the scientists did not consider what type of housing those people lived in.c)The growth rates of children have changed considerably since the 1920s.d)People who live near electromagnetic fields suffer health problems that are not reflected in the growth rates of their children.e)As children get older, their activities tend to occur away from home more often.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Scientists have studied the effects of electromagnetic fields associated with high voltage power lines upon people whose homes are located within 300 yards of the lines. They have compared the growth rate of children who live near the lines with the growth rate of children who live elsewhere. Because they found no significant differences in the growth rates in the two study areas, they have concluded that electromagnetic fields are harmless.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously jeopardize the scientists’ conclusion?a)The scientists did not consider other possible impacts upon growth rates.b)In studying people who lived near high voltage power lines, the scientists did not consider what type of housing those people lived in.c)The growth rates of children have changed considerably since the 1920s.d)People who live near electromagnetic fields suffer health problems that are not reflected in the growth rates of their children.e)As children get older, their activities tend to occur away from home more often.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Scientists have studied the effects of electromagnetic fields associated with high voltage power lines upon people whose homes are located within 300 yards of the lines. They have compared the growth rate of children who live near the lines with the growth rate of children who live elsewhere. Because they found no significant differences in the growth rates in the two study areas, they have concluded that electromagnetic fields are harmless.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously jeopardize the scientists’ conclusion?a)The scientists did not consider other possible impacts upon growth rates.b)In studying people who lived near high voltage power lines, the scientists did not consider what type of housing those people lived in.c)The growth rates of children have changed considerably since the 1920s.d)People who live near electromagnetic fields suffer health problems that are not reflected in the growth rates of their children.e)As children get older, their activities tend to occur away from home more often.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup