CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >   Directions: The question below are based on ... Start Learning for Free
Directions: The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.
Scientists have studied the effects of electromagnetic fields associated with high voltage power lines upon people whose homes are located within 300 yards of the lines. They have compared the growth rate of children who live near the lines with the growth rate of children who live elsewhere. Because they found no significant differences in the growth rates in the two study areas, they have concluded that electromagnetic fields are harmless.
Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously jeopardize the scientists’ conclusion?
  • a)
    The scientists did not consider other possible impacts upon growth rates.
  • b)
    In studying people who lived near high voltage power lines, the scientists did not consider what type of housing those people lived in.
  • c)
    The growth rates of children have changed considerably since the 1920s.
  • d)
    People who live near electromagnetic fields suffer health problems that are not reflected in the growth rates of their children.
  • e)
    As children get older, their activities tend to occur away from home more often.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: The question below are based on the reasoning contained i...
(A) No. The study is concerned only with the effects of electromagnetic fields. Determining what other factors might impact children’s growth rates would be irrelevant to determining the effects of electromagnetic fields.
(B) No. Since the growth rate for both groups of children was the same, it does not appear that the type of housing was important in determining the effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields.
(C) No. The growth rate of children in the 1920s is insignificant to the purpose of this study—to determine whether proximity to electromagnetic fields has any harmful effects.
(D) Yes. The scientists assume that the only negative effect from living near electromagnetic fields would be a lower growth rate in children. Perhaps adults and children who live near the lines suffer from other ailments. These would not be reflected in a study of children’s growth rates and thus, this statement, if true, would seriously jeopardize the scientists’ conclusion.
(E) No. Children’s growth rates were the same, so how much time children who lived near the power lines spent at home would appear to be irrelevant.
Attention CAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CAT.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Directions: The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Scientists have studied the effects of electromagnetic fields associated with high voltage power lines upon people whose homes are located within 300 yards of the lines. They have compared the growth rate of children who live near the lines with the growth rate of children who live elsewhere. Because they found no significant differences in the growth rates in the two study areas, they have concluded that electromagnetic fields are harmless.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously jeopardize the scientists’ conclusion?a)The scientists did not consider other possible impacts upon growth rates.b)In studying people who lived near high voltage power lines, the scientists did not consider what type of housing those people lived in.c)The growth rates of children have changed considerably since the 1920s.d)People who live near electromagnetic fields suffer health problems that are not reflected in the growth rates of their children.e)As children get older, their activities tend to occur away from home more often.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Scientists have studied the effects of electromagnetic fields associated with high voltage power lines upon people whose homes are located within 300 yards of the lines. They have compared the growth rate of children who live near the lines with the growth rate of children who live elsewhere. Because they found no significant differences in the growth rates in the two study areas, they have concluded that electromagnetic fields are harmless.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously jeopardize the scientists’ conclusion?a)The scientists did not consider other possible impacts upon growth rates.b)In studying people who lived near high voltage power lines, the scientists did not consider what type of housing those people lived in.c)The growth rates of children have changed considerably since the 1920s.d)People who live near electromagnetic fields suffer health problems that are not reflected in the growth rates of their children.e)As children get older, their activities tend to occur away from home more often.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Scientists have studied the effects of electromagnetic fields associated with high voltage power lines upon people whose homes are located within 300 yards of the lines. They have compared the growth rate of children who live near the lines with the growth rate of children who live elsewhere. Because they found no significant differences in the growth rates in the two study areas, they have concluded that electromagnetic fields are harmless.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously jeopardize the scientists’ conclusion?a)The scientists did not consider other possible impacts upon growth rates.b)In studying people who lived near high voltage power lines, the scientists did not consider what type of housing those people lived in.c)The growth rates of children have changed considerably since the 1920s.d)People who live near electromagnetic fields suffer health problems that are not reflected in the growth rates of their children.e)As children get older, their activities tend to occur away from home more often.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Scientists have studied the effects of electromagnetic fields associated with high voltage power lines upon people whose homes are located within 300 yards of the lines. They have compared the growth rate of children who live near the lines with the growth rate of children who live elsewhere. Because they found no significant differences in the growth rates in the two study areas, they have concluded that electromagnetic fields are harmless.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously jeopardize the scientists’ conclusion?a)The scientists did not consider other possible impacts upon growth rates.b)In studying people who lived near high voltage power lines, the scientists did not consider what type of housing those people lived in.c)The growth rates of children have changed considerably since the 1920s.d)People who live near electromagnetic fields suffer health problems that are not reflected in the growth rates of their children.e)As children get older, their activities tend to occur away from home more often.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Scientists have studied the effects of electromagnetic fields associated with high voltage power lines upon people whose homes are located within 300 yards of the lines. They have compared the growth rate of children who live near the lines with the growth rate of children who live elsewhere. Because they found no significant differences in the growth rates in the two study areas, they have concluded that electromagnetic fields are harmless.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously jeopardize the scientists’ conclusion?a)The scientists did not consider other possible impacts upon growth rates.b)In studying people who lived near high voltage power lines, the scientists did not consider what type of housing those people lived in.c)The growth rates of children have changed considerably since the 1920s.d)People who live near electromagnetic fields suffer health problems that are not reflected in the growth rates of their children.e)As children get older, their activities tend to occur away from home more often.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Scientists have studied the effects of electromagnetic fields associated with high voltage power lines upon people whose homes are located within 300 yards of the lines. They have compared the growth rate of children who live near the lines with the growth rate of children who live elsewhere. Because they found no significant differences in the growth rates in the two study areas, they have concluded that electromagnetic fields are harmless.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously jeopardize the scientists’ conclusion?a)The scientists did not consider other possible impacts upon growth rates.b)In studying people who lived near high voltage power lines, the scientists did not consider what type of housing those people lived in.c)The growth rates of children have changed considerably since the 1920s.d)People who live near electromagnetic fields suffer health problems that are not reflected in the growth rates of their children.e)As children get older, their activities tend to occur away from home more often.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Scientists have studied the effects of electromagnetic fields associated with high voltage power lines upon people whose homes are located within 300 yards of the lines. They have compared the growth rate of children who live near the lines with the growth rate of children who live elsewhere. Because they found no significant differences in the growth rates in the two study areas, they have concluded that electromagnetic fields are harmless.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously jeopardize the scientists’ conclusion?a)The scientists did not consider other possible impacts upon growth rates.b)In studying people who lived near high voltage power lines, the scientists did not consider what type of housing those people lived in.c)The growth rates of children have changed considerably since the 1920s.d)People who live near electromagnetic fields suffer health problems that are not reflected in the growth rates of their children.e)As children get older, their activities tend to occur away from home more often.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Scientists have studied the effects of electromagnetic fields associated with high voltage power lines upon people whose homes are located within 300 yards of the lines. They have compared the growth rate of children who live near the lines with the growth rate of children who live elsewhere. Because they found no significant differences in the growth rates in the two study areas, they have concluded that electromagnetic fields are harmless.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously jeopardize the scientists’ conclusion?a)The scientists did not consider other possible impacts upon growth rates.b)In studying people who lived near high voltage power lines, the scientists did not consider what type of housing those people lived in.c)The growth rates of children have changed considerably since the 1920s.d)People who live near electromagnetic fields suffer health problems that are not reflected in the growth rates of their children.e)As children get older, their activities tend to occur away from home more often.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Scientists have studied the effects of electromagnetic fields associated with high voltage power lines upon people whose homes are located within 300 yards of the lines. They have compared the growth rate of children who live near the lines with the growth rate of children who live elsewhere. Because they found no significant differences in the growth rates in the two study areas, they have concluded that electromagnetic fields are harmless.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously jeopardize the scientists’ conclusion?a)The scientists did not consider other possible impacts upon growth rates.b)In studying people who lived near high voltage power lines, the scientists did not consider what type of housing those people lived in.c)The growth rates of children have changed considerably since the 1920s.d)People who live near electromagnetic fields suffer health problems that are not reflected in the growth rates of their children.e)As children get older, their activities tend to occur away from home more often.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Scientists have studied the effects of electromagnetic fields associated with high voltage power lines upon people whose homes are located within 300 yards of the lines. They have compared the growth rate of children who live near the lines with the growth rate of children who live elsewhere. Because they found no significant differences in the growth rates in the two study areas, they have concluded that electromagnetic fields are harmless.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously jeopardize the scientists’ conclusion?a)The scientists did not consider other possible impacts upon growth rates.b)In studying people who lived near high voltage power lines, the scientists did not consider what type of housing those people lived in.c)The growth rates of children have changed considerably since the 1920s.d)People who live near electromagnetic fields suffer health problems that are not reflected in the growth rates of their children.e)As children get older, their activities tend to occur away from home more often.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev