Question Description
Directions: The question consists one or more principles, followed by some facts. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Principle: When the parties to an agreement agree on the same thing in the same sense, there arises legally binding obligations between them.Facts: Zaverilal's antique shop was a well-known shop of the locality. Taradevi, a socialite of the locality, went to the shop; she was attracted by an earthern jar on display. Zaverilal explained to her that the jar belonged to Hoysala period; and despite its earthern composition, it was very strong and almost unbreakable. Taradevi replied to him that she was so captivated by the jar that it was immaterial to her as to which period it belonged. She bought the jar and came home. She placed the jar in a prominent place in her drawing room. One of her friends, an art critique, who happened to visit her, told her that the jar was not at all an antique, but Taradevi did not bother about it. One day, it accidentally fell down and broke into pieces. Taradevi took up the matter with Zaverilal that his both statements were wrong and therefore, he should pay damages to her.Decide.a)Zaverilal must compensate her since his both the statements concerning jar were wrong.b)Zaverilal need not compensate since Taradevi was not concerned with its antique value at all.c)Zaverilal must compensate because he carelessly made the statements.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: The question consists one or more principles, followed by some facts. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Principle: When the parties to an agreement agree on the same thing in the same sense, there arises legally binding obligations between them.Facts: Zaverilal's antique shop was a well-known shop of the locality. Taradevi, a socialite of the locality, went to the shop; she was attracted by an earthern jar on display. Zaverilal explained to her that the jar belonged to Hoysala period; and despite its earthern composition, it was very strong and almost unbreakable. Taradevi replied to him that she was so captivated by the jar that it was immaterial to her as to which period it belonged. She bought the jar and came home. She placed the jar in a prominent place in her drawing room. One of her friends, an art critique, who happened to visit her, told her that the jar was not at all an antique, but Taradevi did not bother about it. One day, it accidentally fell down and broke into pieces. Taradevi took up the matter with Zaverilal that his both statements were wrong and therefore, he should pay damages to her.Decide.a)Zaverilal must compensate her since his both the statements concerning jar were wrong.b)Zaverilal need not compensate since Taradevi was not concerned with its antique value at all.c)Zaverilal must compensate because he carelessly made the statements.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: The question consists one or more principles, followed by some facts. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Principle: When the parties to an agreement agree on the same thing in the same sense, there arises legally binding obligations between them.Facts: Zaverilal's antique shop was a well-known shop of the locality. Taradevi, a socialite of the locality, went to the shop; she was attracted by an earthern jar on display. Zaverilal explained to her that the jar belonged to Hoysala period; and despite its earthern composition, it was very strong and almost unbreakable. Taradevi replied to him that she was so captivated by the jar that it was immaterial to her as to which period it belonged. She bought the jar and came home. She placed the jar in a prominent place in her drawing room. One of her friends, an art critique, who happened to visit her, told her that the jar was not at all an antique, but Taradevi did not bother about it. One day, it accidentally fell down and broke into pieces. Taradevi took up the matter with Zaverilal that his both statements were wrong and therefore, he should pay damages to her.Decide.a)Zaverilal must compensate her since his both the statements concerning jar were wrong.b)Zaverilal need not compensate since Taradevi was not concerned with its antique value at all.c)Zaverilal must compensate because he carelessly made the statements.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: The question consists one or more principles, followed by some facts. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Principle: When the parties to an agreement agree on the same thing in the same sense, there arises legally binding obligations between them.Facts: Zaverilal's antique shop was a well-known shop of the locality. Taradevi, a socialite of the locality, went to the shop; she was attracted by an earthern jar on display. Zaverilal explained to her that the jar belonged to Hoysala period; and despite its earthern composition, it was very strong and almost unbreakable. Taradevi replied to him that she was so captivated by the jar that it was immaterial to her as to which period it belonged. She bought the jar and came home. She placed the jar in a prominent place in her drawing room. One of her friends, an art critique, who happened to visit her, told her that the jar was not at all an antique, but Taradevi did not bother about it. One day, it accidentally fell down and broke into pieces. Taradevi took up the matter with Zaverilal that his both statements were wrong and therefore, he should pay damages to her.Decide.a)Zaverilal must compensate her since his both the statements concerning jar were wrong.b)Zaverilal need not compensate since Taradevi was not concerned with its antique value at all.c)Zaverilal must compensate because he carelessly made the statements.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: The question consists one or more principles, followed by some facts. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Principle: When the parties to an agreement agree on the same thing in the same sense, there arises legally binding obligations between them.Facts: Zaverilal's antique shop was a well-known shop of the locality. Taradevi, a socialite of the locality, went to the shop; she was attracted by an earthern jar on display. Zaverilal explained to her that the jar belonged to Hoysala period; and despite its earthern composition, it was very strong and almost unbreakable. Taradevi replied to him that she was so captivated by the jar that it was immaterial to her as to which period it belonged. She bought the jar and came home. She placed the jar in a prominent place in her drawing room. One of her friends, an art critique, who happened to visit her, told her that the jar was not at all an antique, but Taradevi did not bother about it. One day, it accidentally fell down and broke into pieces. Taradevi took up the matter with Zaverilal that his both statements were wrong and therefore, he should pay damages to her.Decide.a)Zaverilal must compensate her since his both the statements concerning jar were wrong.b)Zaverilal need not compensate since Taradevi was not concerned with its antique value at all.c)Zaverilal must compensate because he carelessly made the statements.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: The question consists one or more principles, followed by some facts. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Principle: When the parties to an agreement agree on the same thing in the same sense, there arises legally binding obligations between them.Facts: Zaverilal's antique shop was a well-known shop of the locality. Taradevi, a socialite of the locality, went to the shop; she was attracted by an earthern jar on display. Zaverilal explained to her that the jar belonged to Hoysala period; and despite its earthern composition, it was very strong and almost unbreakable. Taradevi replied to him that she was so captivated by the jar that it was immaterial to her as to which period it belonged. She bought the jar and came home. She placed the jar in a prominent place in her drawing room. One of her friends, an art critique, who happened to visit her, told her that the jar was not at all an antique, but Taradevi did not bother about it. One day, it accidentally fell down and broke into pieces. Taradevi took up the matter with Zaverilal that his both statements were wrong and therefore, he should pay damages to her.Decide.a)Zaverilal must compensate her since his both the statements concerning jar were wrong.b)Zaverilal need not compensate since Taradevi was not concerned with its antique value at all.c)Zaverilal must compensate because he carelessly made the statements.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: The question consists one or more principles, followed by some facts. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Principle: When the parties to an agreement agree on the same thing in the same sense, there arises legally binding obligations between them.Facts: Zaverilal's antique shop was a well-known shop of the locality. Taradevi, a socialite of the locality, went to the shop; she was attracted by an earthern jar on display. Zaverilal explained to her that the jar belonged to Hoysala period; and despite its earthern composition, it was very strong and almost unbreakable. Taradevi replied to him that she was so captivated by the jar that it was immaterial to her as to which period it belonged. She bought the jar and came home. She placed the jar in a prominent place in her drawing room. One of her friends, an art critique, who happened to visit her, told her that the jar was not at all an antique, but Taradevi did not bother about it. One day, it accidentally fell down and broke into pieces. Taradevi took up the matter with Zaverilal that his both statements were wrong and therefore, he should pay damages to her.Decide.a)Zaverilal must compensate her since his both the statements concerning jar were wrong.b)Zaverilal need not compensate since Taradevi was not concerned with its antique value at all.c)Zaverilal must compensate because he carelessly made the statements.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: The question consists one or more principles, followed by some facts. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Principle: When the parties to an agreement agree on the same thing in the same sense, there arises legally binding obligations between them.Facts: Zaverilal's antique shop was a well-known shop of the locality. Taradevi, a socialite of the locality, went to the shop; she was attracted by an earthern jar on display. Zaverilal explained to her that the jar belonged to Hoysala period; and despite its earthern composition, it was very strong and almost unbreakable. Taradevi replied to him that she was so captivated by the jar that it was immaterial to her as to which period it belonged. She bought the jar and came home. She placed the jar in a prominent place in her drawing room. One of her friends, an art critique, who happened to visit her, told her that the jar was not at all an antique, but Taradevi did not bother about it. One day, it accidentally fell down and broke into pieces. Taradevi took up the matter with Zaverilal that his both statements were wrong and therefore, he should pay damages to her.Decide.a)Zaverilal must compensate her since his both the statements concerning jar were wrong.b)Zaverilal need not compensate since Taradevi was not concerned with its antique value at all.c)Zaverilal must compensate because he carelessly made the statements.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: The question consists one or more principles, followed by some facts. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Principle: When the parties to an agreement agree on the same thing in the same sense, there arises legally binding obligations between them.Facts: Zaverilal's antique shop was a well-known shop of the locality. Taradevi, a socialite of the locality, went to the shop; she was attracted by an earthern jar on display. Zaverilal explained to her that the jar belonged to Hoysala period; and despite its earthern composition, it was very strong and almost unbreakable. Taradevi replied to him that she was so captivated by the jar that it was immaterial to her as to which period it belonged. She bought the jar and came home. She placed the jar in a prominent place in her drawing room. One of her friends, an art critique, who happened to visit her, told her that the jar was not at all an antique, but Taradevi did not bother about it. One day, it accidentally fell down and broke into pieces. Taradevi took up the matter with Zaverilal that his both statements were wrong and therefore, he should pay damages to her.Decide.a)Zaverilal must compensate her since his both the statements concerning jar were wrong.b)Zaverilal need not compensate since Taradevi was not concerned with its antique value at all.c)Zaverilal must compensate because he carelessly made the statements.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.