All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   The Supreme Court being the highest court of... Start Learning for Free
The Supreme Court being the highest court of appeal, is the most superior judiciary but the various High Courts exercise a jurisdiction even wider than that of the Supreme Court under:
  • a)
    Article 32 of Constitution
  • b)
    Article 141 of Constitution
  • c)
    Article 164 of Constitution
  • d)
    Articles 226 & 227 of Constitution
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your CLAT doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
The Supreme Court being the highest court of appeal, is the most supe...
The High court exercises power of superintendence over subordinate courts and tribunals. Supreme Court has no such powers. The High Courts have much larger jurisdiction than Supreme Court in respect of the writs but the Supreme Court remains the court of appeal for the judgments and other orders of High Courts. The Supreme Court being the highest court of appeal, is the most superior judiciary but the various High Courts exercise a jurisdiction even wider than that of the Supreme Court under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
The Supreme Court being the highest court of appeal, is the most supe...
Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution:
The High Courts in India have been granted extensive powers under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, which allow them to exercise jurisdiction over a wide range of matters. These articles empower the High Courts to issue writs, orders, and directions to any person, authority, or government within their territorial jurisdiction.

Article 226:
Under Article 226, the High Courts can issue various writs such as habeas corpus, mandamus, certiorari, prohibition, and quo warranto. These writs are meant to protect the fundamental rights of individuals and ensure that the government and its agencies act in accordance with the law.

Article 227:
Article 227, on the other hand, gives the High Courts the power of superintendence over all courts and tribunals within their jurisdiction. This means that the High Courts can supervise the functioning of lower courts and tribunals to ensure that they are following proper legal procedures and delivering justice effectively.

Wide Jurisdiction:
The jurisdiction of the High Courts under Articles 226 and 227 is wider than that of the Supreme Court in certain respects. While the Supreme Court primarily deals with constitutional matters and appeals from lower courts, the High Courts can intervene in a broader range of issues, including administrative decisions, fundamental rights violations, and judicial review of lower court judgments.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, the powers granted to the High Courts under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution make them crucial institutions in the Indian judicial system. Their wide jurisdiction allows them to safeguard the rights of citizens, oversee the functioning of lower courts, and ensure justice is delivered efficiently.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

The Writ Jurisdiction of Supreme Court can be invoked under Article 32 of the Constitution for the violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Part - III of the Constitution. Any provision in any Constitution for Fundamental Rights is meaningless unless there are adequate safeguards to ensure enforcement of such provisions. Since the reality of such rights is tested only through the judiciary, the safeguards assume even more importance. In addition, enforcement also depends upon the degree of independence of the Judiciary and the availability of relevant instruments with the executive authority. Indian Constitution, like most of Western Constitutions, lays down certain provisions to ensure the enforcement of Fundamental Rights. However, Article 32 is referred to as the “Constitutional Remedy” for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. This provision itself has been included in the Fundamental Rights and hence it cannot be denied to any person. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar described Article 32 as the most important one, without which the Constitution would be reduced to nullity. It is also referred to as the heart and soul of the Constitution. By including Article 32 in the Fundamental Rights, the Supreme Court has been made the protector and guarantor of these Rights. An application made under Article 32 of the Constitution before the Supreme Court, cannot be refused on technical grounds. In addition to the prescribed five types of writs, the Supreme Court may pass any other appropriate order. Moreover, only the questions pertaining to the Fundamental Rights can be determined in proceedings against Article 32. Under Article 32, the Supreme Court may issue a Writ against any person or government within the territory of India. Where the infringement of a Fundamental Right has been established, the Supreme Court cannot refuse relief on the ground that the aggrieved person may have remedy before some other court or under the ordinary law.The relief can also not be denied on the ground that the disputed facts have to be investigated or some evidence has to be collected. Even if an aggrieved person has not asked for a particular Writ, the Supreme Court, after considering the facts and circumstances, may grant the appropriate Writ and may even modify it to suit the exigencies of the case. Normally, only the aggrieved person is allowed to move the Court. But it has been held by the Supreme Court that in social or public interest matters, any one may move the Court. A Public Interest Litigation can be filed before the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution or before the High Court of a State under Article 226 of the Constitution under their respective Writ Jurisdictions.What is the correct meaning of the word ‘infringement’?

The Writ Jurisdiction of Supreme Court can be invoked under Article 32 of the Constitution for the violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Part – III of the Constitution. Any provision in any Constitution for Fundamental Rights is meaningless unless there are adequate safeguards to ensure enforcement of such provisions. Since the reality of such rights is tested only through the judiciary, the safeguards assume even more importance. In addition, enforcement also depends upon the degree of independence of the Judiciary and the availability of relevant instruments with the executive authority. Indian Constitution, like most of Western Constitutions, lays down certain provisions to ensure the enforcement of Fundamental Rights.However, Article 32 is referred to as the “Constitutional Remedy” for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. This provision itself has been included in the Fundamental Rights and hence it cannot be denied to any person. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar described Article 32 as the most important one, without which the Constitution would be reduced to nullity. It is also referred to as the heart and soul of the Constitution. By including Article 32 in the Fundamental Rights, the Supreme Court has been made the protector and guarantor of these Rights. An application made under Article 32 of the Constitution before the Supreme Court, cannot be refused on technical grounds. In addition to the prescribed five types of writs, the Supreme Court may pass any other appropriate order. Moreover, only the questions pertaining to the Fundamental Rights can be determined in proceedings against Article 32. Under Article 32, the Supreme Court may issue a Writ against any person or government within the territory of India. Where the infringement of a Fundamental Right has been established, the Supreme Court cannot refuse relief on the ground that the aggrieved person may have remedy before some other court or under the ordinary law.The relief can also not be denied on the ground that the disputed facts have to be investigated or some evidence has to be collected. Even if an aggrieved person has not asked for a particular Writ, the Supreme Court, after considering the facts and circumstances, may grant the appropriate Writ and may even modify it to suit the exigencies of the case. Normally, only the aggrieved person is allowed to move the Court. But it has been held by the Supreme Court that in social or public interest matters, any one may move the Court. A Public Interest Litigation can be filed before the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution or before the High Court of a State under Article 226 of the Constitution under their respective Writ Jurisdictions.Q. What is the tone of the author?

The Writ Jurisdiction of Supreme Court can be invoked under Article 32 of the Constitution for the violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Part - III of the Constitution. Any provision in any Constitution for Fundamental Rights is meaningless unless there are adequate safeguards to ensure enforcement of such provisions. Since the reality of such rights is tested only through the judiciary, the safeguards assume even more importance. In addition, enforcement also depends upon the degree of independence of the Judiciary and the availability of relevant instruments with the executive authority. Indian Constitution, like most of Western Constitutions, lays down certain provisions to ensure the enforcement of Fundamental Rights. However, Article 32 is referred to as the “Constitutional Remedy” for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. This provision itself has been included in the Fundamental Rights and hence it cannot be denied to any person. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar described Article 32 as the most important one, without which the Constitution would be reduced to nullity. It is also referred to as the heart and soul of the Constitution. By including Article 32 in the Fundamental Rights, the Supreme Court has been made the protector and guarantor of these Rights. An application made under Article 32 of the Constitution before the Supreme Court, cannot be refused on technical grounds. In addition to the prescribed five types of writs, the Supreme Court may pass any other appropriate order. Moreover, only the questions pertaining to the Fundamental Rights can be determined in proceedings against Article 32. Under Article 32, the Supreme Court may issue a Writ against any person or government within the territory of India. Where the infringement of a Fundamental Right has been established, the Supreme Court cannot refuse relief on the ground that the aggrieved person may have remedy before some other court or under the ordinary law.The relief can also not be denied on the ground that the disputed facts have to be investigated or some evidence has to be collected. Even if an aggrieved person has not asked for a particular Writ, the Supreme Court, after considering the facts and circumstances, may grant the appropriate Writ and may even modify it to suit the exigencies of the case. Normally, only the aggrieved person is allowed to move the Court. But it has been held by the Supreme Court that in social or public interest matters, any one may move the Court. A Public Interest Litigation can be filed before the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution or before the High Court of a State under Article 226 of the Constitution under their respective Writ Jurisdictions.All of the following can be inferred from the passage except

The Writ Jurisdiction of Supreme Court can be invoked under Article 32 of the Constitution for the violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Part – III of the Constitution. Any provision in any Constitution for Fundamental Rights is meaningless unless there are adequate safeguards to ensure enforcement of such provisions. Since the reality of such rights is tested only through the judiciary, the safeguards assume even more importance. In addition, enforcement also depends upon the degree of independence of the Judiciary and the availability of relevant instruments with the executive authority. Indian Constitution, like most of Western Constitutions, lays down certain provisions to ensure the enforcement of Fundamental Rights.However, Article 32 is referred to as the “Constitutional Remedy” for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. This provision itself has been included in the Fundamental Rights and hence it cannot be denied to any person. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar described Article 32 as the most important one, without which the Constitution would be reduced to nullity. It is also referred to as the heart and soul of the Constitution. By including Article 32 in the Fundamental Rights, the Supreme Court has been made the protector and guarantor of these Rights. An application made under Article 32 of the Constitution before the Supreme Court, cannot be refused on technical grounds. In addition to the prescribed five types of writs, the Supreme Court may pass any other appropriate order. Moreover, only the questions pertaining to the Fundamental Rights can be determined in proceedings against Article 32. Under Article 32, the Supreme Court may issue a Writ against any person or government within the territory of India. Where the infringement of a Fundamental Right has been established, the Supreme Court cannot refuse relief on the ground that the aggrieved person may have remedy before some other court or under the ordinary law.The relief can also not be denied on the ground that the disputed facts have to be investigated or some evidence has to be collected. Even if an aggrieved person has not asked for a particular Writ, the Supreme Court, after considering the facts and circumstances, may grant the appropriate Writ and may even modify it to suit the exigencies of the case. Normally, only the aggrieved person is allowed to move the Court. But it has been held by the Supreme Court that in social or public interest matters, any one may move the Court. A Public Interest Litigation can be filed before the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution or before the High Court of a State under Article 226 of the Constitution under their respective Writ Jurisdictions.Q. All of the following can be inferred from the passage except

The Writ Jurisdiction of Supreme Court can be invoked under Article 32 of the Constitution for the violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Part - III of the Constitution. Any provision in any Constitution for Fundamental Rights is meaningless unless there are adequate safeguards to ensure enforcement of such provisions. Since the reality of such rights is tested only through the judiciary, the safeguards assume even more importance. In addition, enforcement also depends upon the degree of independence of the Judiciary and the availability of relevant instruments with the executive authority. Indian Constitution, like most of Western Constitutions, lays down certain provisions to ensure the enforcement of Fundamental Rights. However, Article 32 is referred to as the “Constitutional Remedy” for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. This provision itself has been included in the Fundamental Rights and hence it cannot be denied to any person. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar described Article 32 as the most important one, without which the Constitution would be reduced to nullity. It is also referred to as the heart and soul of the Constitution. By including Article 32 in the Fundamental Rights, the Supreme Court has been made the protector and guarantor of these Rights. An application made under Article 32 of the Constitution before the Supreme Court, cannot be refused on technical grounds. In addition to the prescribed five types of writs, the Supreme Court may pass any other appropriate order. Moreover, only the questions pertaining to the Fundamental Rights can be determined in proceedings against Article 32. Under Article 32, the Supreme Court may issue a Writ against any person or government within the territory of India. Where the infringement of a Fundamental Right has been established, the Supreme Court cannot refuse relief on the ground that the aggrieved person may have remedy before some other court or under the ordinary law.The relief can also not be denied on the ground that the disputed facts have to be investigated or some evidence has to be collected. Even if an aggrieved person has not asked for a particular Writ, the Supreme Court, after considering the facts and circumstances, may grant the appropriate Writ and may even modify it to suit the exigencies of the case. Normally, only the aggrieved person is allowed to move the Court. But it has been held by the Supreme Court that in social or public interest matters, any one may move the Court. A Public Interest Litigation can be filed before the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution or before the High Court of a State under Article 226 of the Constitution under their respective Writ Jurisdictions.What is the tone of the author?

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

The Supreme Court being the highest court of appeal, is the most superior judiciary but the various High Courts exercise a jurisdiction even wider than that of the Supreme Court under:a)Article 32 of Constitutionb)Article 141 of Constitutionc)Article 164 of Constitutiond)Articles 226 & 227 of ConstitutionCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The Supreme Court being the highest court of appeal, is the most superior judiciary but the various High Courts exercise a jurisdiction even wider than that of the Supreme Court under:a)Article 32 of Constitutionb)Article 141 of Constitutionc)Article 164 of Constitutiond)Articles 226 & 227 of ConstitutionCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about The Supreme Court being the highest court of appeal, is the most superior judiciary but the various High Courts exercise a jurisdiction even wider than that of the Supreme Court under:a)Article 32 of Constitutionb)Article 141 of Constitutionc)Article 164 of Constitutiond)Articles 226 & 227 of ConstitutionCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The Supreme Court being the highest court of appeal, is the most superior judiciary but the various High Courts exercise a jurisdiction even wider than that of the Supreme Court under:a)Article 32 of Constitutionb)Article 141 of Constitutionc)Article 164 of Constitutiond)Articles 226 & 227 of ConstitutionCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The Supreme Court being the highest court of appeal, is the most superior judiciary but the various High Courts exercise a jurisdiction even wider than that of the Supreme Court under:a)Article 32 of Constitutionb)Article 141 of Constitutionc)Article 164 of Constitutiond)Articles 226 & 227 of ConstitutionCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The Supreme Court being the highest court of appeal, is the most superior judiciary but the various High Courts exercise a jurisdiction even wider than that of the Supreme Court under:a)Article 32 of Constitutionb)Article 141 of Constitutionc)Article 164 of Constitutiond)Articles 226 & 227 of ConstitutionCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The Supreme Court being the highest court of appeal, is the most superior judiciary but the various High Courts exercise a jurisdiction even wider than that of the Supreme Court under:a)Article 32 of Constitutionb)Article 141 of Constitutionc)Article 164 of Constitutiond)Articles 226 & 227 of ConstitutionCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The Supreme Court being the highest court of appeal, is the most superior judiciary but the various High Courts exercise a jurisdiction even wider than that of the Supreme Court under:a)Article 32 of Constitutionb)Article 141 of Constitutionc)Article 164 of Constitutiond)Articles 226 & 227 of ConstitutionCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The Supreme Court being the highest court of appeal, is the most superior judiciary but the various High Courts exercise a jurisdiction even wider than that of the Supreme Court under:a)Article 32 of Constitutionb)Article 141 of Constitutionc)Article 164 of Constitutiond)Articles 226 & 227 of ConstitutionCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The Supreme Court being the highest court of appeal, is the most superior judiciary but the various High Courts exercise a jurisdiction even wider than that of the Supreme Court under:a)Article 32 of Constitutionb)Article 141 of Constitutionc)Article 164 of Constitutiond)Articles 226 & 227 of ConstitutionCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup