All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Given that Agatha Christie wrote 66 novels an... Start Learning for Free
Given that Agatha Christie wrote 66 novels and 14 short story collections, all of which are still in print in multiple formats and dozens of languages, sceptics would be well advised to admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other novelist ever has.
  • a)
    admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other novelist ever has
  • b)
    be defeated on the issue of whether she sold more books than every other novelist ever did
  • c)
    admit defeat on the issue of whether she sold more books than any other novelist ever has
  • d)
    admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other novelist
  • e)
    be defeated on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than every other novelist ever has
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your GMAT doubts with EduRev
Verified Answer
Given that Agatha Christie wrote 66 novels and 14 short story collecti...
Identifying What Is Tested
Look for differences across the answer options to identify what is being tested in the sentence.
  • Different options use different constructions for “defeat”.
  • Some of the options use “any other novelist” and some use the construction “every other novelist”.
  • Some of the options use “whether” and some use the construction “whether or not”.
Understanding the Sentence
  • Agatha Christie has written many books that are still being published, so it makes no sense to argue that she has not sold more books than others have.
  • Some of the options are ending with the construction “any other novelist ever has” and others end with “every other novelist”. What is the intent of this part of the sentence? We are trying to determine whether Agatha Christie has sold more books than others have. The intention of the sentence is to compare the verb “sold” and so, the correct construction of the sentence has to have the verb on both sides of the comparison. Ideally, we need to say that “Agatha Christie sold more books than others have sold", but in general, when the verb takes a supportive “have” or “be” verb, it is enough if the supportive verb (in this case “has”) is repeated.
  • When presenting two possibilities, which is what we are doing in this sentence (either Christie sold more books or she did not), the correct usage is “whether”. The “or not” or negative possibility of the event not happening is already implied when you say “whether”. Use “whether or not” only when you mean “no matter what”.
Process of Elimination
  • Options (B) and (D) can be eliminated for the incorrect comparison. There is no verb to complete the comparison.
  • Option (B) can also be eliminated for the usage “be defeated”. The sentence, if you look at the part that is not underlined as well, states “sceptics would be well advised to be defeated”. This construction does not make sense. How can we tell a group of people to be defeated? We can tell them to accept that they have been defeated though. So option (E) can be eliminated as well.
  • The difference between option (A) and option (C) is the usage “whether or not” and “whether”. Eliminate option (A) because in this sentence “whether or not” is incorrect.
Choice C is the correct answer.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Given that Agatha Christie wrote 66 novels and 14 short story collecti...
Identifying What Is Tested
Look for differences across the answer options to identify what is being tested in the sentence.
  • Different options use different constructions for “defeat”.
  • Some of the options use “any other novelist” and some use the construction “every other novelist”.
  • Some of the options use “whether” and some use the construction “whether or not”.
Understanding the Sentence
  • Agatha Christie has written many books that are still being published, so it makes no sense to argue that she has not sold more books than others have.
  • Some of the options are ending with the construction “any other novelist ever has” and others end with “every other novelist”. What is the intent of this part of the sentence? We are trying to determine whether Agatha Christie has sold more books than others have. The intention of the sentence is to compare the verb “sold” and so, the correct construction of the sentence has to have the verb on both sides of the comparison. Ideally, we need to say that “Agatha Christie sold more books than others have sold", but in general, when the verb takes a supportive “have” or “be” verb, it is enough if the supportive verb (in this case “has”) is repeated.
  • When presenting two possibilities, which is what we are doing in this sentence (either Christie sold more books or she did not), the correct usage is “whether”. The “or not” or negative possibility of the event not happening is already implied when you say “whether”. Use “whether or not” only when you mean “no matter what”.
Process of Elimination
  • Options (B) and (D) can be eliminated for the incorrect comparison. There is no verb to complete the comparison.
  • Option (B) can also be eliminated for the usage “be defeated”. The sentence, if you look at the part that is not underlined as well, states “sceptics would be well advised to be defeated”. This construction does not make sense. How can we tell a group of people to be defeated? We can tell them to accept that they have been defeated though. So option (E) can be eliminated as well.
  • The difference between option (A) and option (C) is the usage “whether or not” and “whether”. Eliminate option (A) because in this sentence “whether or not” is incorrect.
Choice C is the correct answer.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Recent studies on Native American languages point towards an alarming problem in the United States today. Language loss, a global phenomenon, is accelerating among indigenous groups in the United States. A large majority of Native American vernaculars are spoken only by elders and the remainder are fast approaching that status, as growing numbers of children speak only English.To many, the precedence of one common language seems like an achievement of globalisation and hence they argue that it would be wiser to spend resources on improving the English speaking skills of Native Americans rather than resuscitating fading tongues. However, no language is just a collection of words and, therefore, languages are not so simply substitutable for each other. Each language is a unique tool for analyzing and synthesizing the world and to lose such a tool is to forget a way of constructing reality, blotting out a perspective evolved over many generations. Native American languages express ideas on which Native American cultures are anchored; a native language does not justreflecta culture - in a functional sense itisthe culture. These languages are based on entirely different histories, scientific and natural-world understandings, spiritual beliefs, and political and legal ideas. They capture concepts that do not exist in English. In essence, they are based on different realities.Realising the magnitude of this language-loss, most indigenous tribes today are making some type of effort toward a language-comeback. These efforts include everything from instituting apprenticeship programs, which pair a fluent elder with a student, to using, what may seem like an unusual tool because of the inherent reservations in Native American communities to being photographed or recorded in any form, technology such as YouTube videos of native speakers or Google Hangout video chats for live, long-distance conversations. The idea is to engage the younger members of the tribe who, in their effort to fit in to the more popular culture, are quickly losing ties with their unique heritage.Which of the following statements would the author most likely agree with?

Recent studies on Native American languages point towards an alarming problem in the United States today. Language loss, a global phenomenon, is accelerating among indigenous groups in the United States. A large majority of Native American vernaculars are spoken only by elders and the remainder are fast approaching that status, as growing numbers of children speak only English.To many, the precedence of one common language seems like an achievement of globalisation and hence they argue that it would be wiser to spend resources on improving the English speaking skills of Native Americans rather than resuscitating fading tongues. However, no language is just a collection of words and, therefore, languages are not so simply substitutable for each other. Each language is a unique tool for analyzing and synthesizing the world and to lose such a tool is to forget a way of constructing reality, blotting out a perspective evolved over many generations. Native American languages express ideas on which Native American cultures are anchored; a native language does not justreflecta culture - in a functional sense itisthe culture. These languages are based on entirely different histories, scientific and natural-world understandings, spiritual beliefs, and political and legal ideas. They capture concepts that do not exist in English. In essence, they are based on different realities.Realising the magnitude of this language-loss, most indigenous tribes today are making some type of effort toward a language-comeback. These efforts include everything from instituting apprenticeship programs, which pair a fluent elder with a student, to using, what may seem like an unusual tool because of the inherent reservations in Native American communities to being photographed or recorded in any form, technology such as YouTube videos of native speakers or Google Hangout video chats for live, long-distance conversations. The idea is to engage the younger members of the tribe who, in their effort to fit in to the more popular culture, are quickly losing ties with their unique heritage.The author is primarily concerned with

The story of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight has its foundation in Arthurian legend as formulated and passed down by the pagan oral tradition. In its written form, however, the tale bears the marks of Christian influence—it contains numerous scriptural and doctrinal references to Christianity. Since the author of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight is unknown, it is difficult to determine with any certainty the extent to which he was responsible for the incorporation of Christianity into the legend. For all we know, the story may have been “Christianized” in its oral form long before the poet set it into writing. The poet himself supports this possibility by writing in the opening lines that he will tell “anew” the tale “as I heard it in hall.” If this is the case (and even if it is not), it is distinctly possible that the heroes of the Arthurian tradition represent in the written form a pagan interpretation of Christian ideals, rather than an externally imposed Christianization of pagan codes of behavior.While it could certainly be argued that the poet portrays Sir Gawain as a good Christian hero in an attempt to infuse the story with Christian values, the critical tone of the narrative seems to suggest a different conclusion—that by critically editorializing the paganized form of Christianity embodied by Sir Gawain, the poet is trying to correct what he sees to be the flaws of that form. From the perspective of this conclusion it is clear that the poet only “Christianizes” the traditional legend to the extent that he criticizes the pagan interpretation of Christianity that is inherent in the behavior of its heroes.Those who would argue that the poet intends to portray Sir Gawain as the perfect Christian hero would point to the descriptions of his chivalric qualities. The poet does indeed describe Gawain’s Christian virtues generously; he even makes a special aside early in the second fit to describe the significance of the pentangle embossed on Gawain’s shield, and to explain “why the pentangle is proper to that peerless prince.” The author then delves into a lengthy enumeration of Gawain’s Christian virtues. What is more, the fact that he uses the pentangle—a pagan symbol—to do it would seem to suggest that the author does indeed intend to add a Christian interpretation to the pagan legend he is retelling. Taken in its larger context, however, this passage takes on a different significance. In further examination of the poet’s descriptions of Sir Gawain, it becomes apparent that the knight’s seemingly perfect Christian behavior is superficial. A contrast can be observed between his “Christian” words and actions and his decidedly un-Christian motives. One theory is that, by emphasizing this contrast, the poet30 intends to denounce the pagan “misunderstanding” of the Christian message.Q.Which of the following can be inferred from the author’s interpretation of the Christian aspects of the poem presented in the third paragraph?

Though the truism about Inuits having a hundred words for snow is an exaggeration, languages really are full of charming quirks that reveal the character of a culture. Dialects of Scottish Gaelic, for instance, traditionally spoken in the Highlands and, later on, in fishing villages, have a great many very specific words for seaweed, as well as names for each of the components of a rabbit snare and a word for an egg that emerges from a hen sans shell. Unfortunately for those who find these details fascinating, languages are going extinct at an incredible clip, - one dies every 14 days - and linguists are rushing around with tape recorders and word lists, trying to record at least a fragment of each before they go. The only way the old tongues will stick around is if populations themselves decide that there is something of value in them, whether for reasons of patriotism, cultural heritage, or just to lure in some language-curious tourists. But even when the general public opinion is for preservation of their linguistic diversity, linguists are finding it increasingly difficult to achieve such a task.Mathematicians can help linguists out in this mission. To provide a test environment for programs that encourage the learning of endangered local languages, Anne Kandler and her colleagues decided to make a mathematical model of the speakers of Scottish Gaelic. This was an apposite choice because the local population was already becoming increasingly conscious about the cultural value of their language and statistics of the Gaelic speakers was readily available. The model the mathematicians built not only uses statistics such as the number of people speaking the languages, the number of polyglots and rate of change in these numbers but also figures which represent the economic value of the language and the perceived cultural value amongst people. These numbers were substituted in the differential equations of the model to find out the number of new Gaelic speakers required annually to stop the dwindling of the Gaelic population. The estimate of the number determined by Kandlers research helped the national Gaelic Development Agency to formulate an effective plan towards the preserving the language. Many languages such as Quechua, Chinook and Istrian Vlashki can be saved using such mathematical models. Results from mathematical equations can be useful in strategically planning preservation strategies. Similarly mathematical analysis of languages which have survived against many odds can also provide useful insights which can be applied towards saving other endangered languages.The Authors conclusion that languages such as Quechua, Chinook, and Istrian Vlashki can be saved using such mathematical models (beginning of last para.) is most weakened if which of the following is found to be true?

Top Courses for GMATView all

Top Courses for GMAT

Given that Agatha Christie wrote 66 novels and 14 short story collections, all of which are still in print in multiple formats and dozens of languages, sceptics would be well advised to admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other novelist ever has.a)admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other novelist ever hasb)be defeated on the issue of whether she sold more books than every other novelist ever didc)admit defeat on the issue of whether she sold more books than any other novelist ever hasd)admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other noveliste)be defeated on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than every other novelist ever hasCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Given that Agatha Christie wrote 66 novels and 14 short story collections, all of which are still in print in multiple formats and dozens of languages, sceptics would be well advised to admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other novelist ever has.a)admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other novelist ever hasb)be defeated on the issue of whether she sold more books than every other novelist ever didc)admit defeat on the issue of whether she sold more books than any other novelist ever hasd)admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other noveliste)be defeated on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than every other novelist ever hasCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Given that Agatha Christie wrote 66 novels and 14 short story collections, all of which are still in print in multiple formats and dozens of languages, sceptics would be well advised to admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other novelist ever has.a)admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other novelist ever hasb)be defeated on the issue of whether she sold more books than every other novelist ever didc)admit defeat on the issue of whether she sold more books than any other novelist ever hasd)admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other noveliste)be defeated on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than every other novelist ever hasCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Given that Agatha Christie wrote 66 novels and 14 short story collections, all of which are still in print in multiple formats and dozens of languages, sceptics would be well advised to admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other novelist ever has.a)admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other novelist ever hasb)be defeated on the issue of whether she sold more books than every other novelist ever didc)admit defeat on the issue of whether she sold more books than any other novelist ever hasd)admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other noveliste)be defeated on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than every other novelist ever hasCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Given that Agatha Christie wrote 66 novels and 14 short story collections, all of which are still in print in multiple formats and dozens of languages, sceptics would be well advised to admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other novelist ever has.a)admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other novelist ever hasb)be defeated on the issue of whether she sold more books than every other novelist ever didc)admit defeat on the issue of whether she sold more books than any other novelist ever hasd)admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other noveliste)be defeated on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than every other novelist ever hasCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Given that Agatha Christie wrote 66 novels and 14 short story collections, all of which are still in print in multiple formats and dozens of languages, sceptics would be well advised to admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other novelist ever has.a)admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other novelist ever hasb)be defeated on the issue of whether she sold more books than every other novelist ever didc)admit defeat on the issue of whether she sold more books than any other novelist ever hasd)admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other noveliste)be defeated on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than every other novelist ever hasCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Given that Agatha Christie wrote 66 novels and 14 short story collections, all of which are still in print in multiple formats and dozens of languages, sceptics would be well advised to admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other novelist ever has.a)admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other novelist ever hasb)be defeated on the issue of whether she sold more books than every other novelist ever didc)admit defeat on the issue of whether she sold more books than any other novelist ever hasd)admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other noveliste)be defeated on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than every other novelist ever hasCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Given that Agatha Christie wrote 66 novels and 14 short story collections, all of which are still in print in multiple formats and dozens of languages, sceptics would be well advised to admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other novelist ever has.a)admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other novelist ever hasb)be defeated on the issue of whether she sold more books than every other novelist ever didc)admit defeat on the issue of whether she sold more books than any other novelist ever hasd)admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other noveliste)be defeated on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than every other novelist ever hasCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Given that Agatha Christie wrote 66 novels and 14 short story collections, all of which are still in print in multiple formats and dozens of languages, sceptics would be well advised to admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other novelist ever has.a)admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other novelist ever hasb)be defeated on the issue of whether she sold more books than every other novelist ever didc)admit defeat on the issue of whether she sold more books than any other novelist ever hasd)admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other noveliste)be defeated on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than every other novelist ever hasCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Given that Agatha Christie wrote 66 novels and 14 short story collections, all of which are still in print in multiple formats and dozens of languages, sceptics would be well advised to admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other novelist ever has.a)admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other novelist ever hasb)be defeated on the issue of whether she sold more books than every other novelist ever didc)admit defeat on the issue of whether she sold more books than any other novelist ever hasd)admit defeat on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than any other noveliste)be defeated on the issue of whether or not she sold more books than every other novelist ever hasCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup