Introduction:
The Mahalwari system was introduced by the British in India as a form of land revenue system. It was first introduced in the North-Western Provinces in 1822 and was later extended to other parts of the country.

The Village System:
The village system was a modified version of the Mahalwari system and was introduced in the Punjab region of India. Under this system, the land was assessed and taxed village-wise. Each village was treated as a unit and the revenue was collected from the entire village.

Features of the Village System:
1. Assessment of land: The land was assessed based on its productivity and the revenue was fixed accordingly.

2. Collection of revenue: The revenue was collected from the entire village and not from individual landholders.

3. Responsibility of revenue collection: The responsibility of revenue collection was given to the village headman or the lambardar.

4. Distribution of revenue: The revenue collected from the village was distributed among the landholders based on the area of land they owned.

5. Periodic assessment: The land was periodically assessed to ensure that the revenue collected was in line with the productivity of the land.

Advantages of the Village System:
1. Simplified system: The village system simplified the land revenue system and made it easier for the villagers to understand.

2. Better revenue collection: The revenue collection under the village system was more efficient as the responsibility was given to the village headman who had a better understanding of the local conditions.

3. Incentive for productivity: The productivity of the land was taken into account while assessing the revenue, which provided an incentive for the landholders to improve their land.

Conclusion:
The village system was a modified version of the Mahalwari system and was introduced in the Punjab region of India. It simplified the land revenue system and made it more efficient. The revenue collection was based on the productivity of the land and was collected from the entire village. The revenue collected was distributed among the landholders based on the area of land they owned.