All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Directions: Read the Passage carefully and an... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Directions: Read the Passage carefully and answer the question as follow.
America since the days of Captain John Smith has been the land of hope for multitudes in Europe. In many a humble home, perhaps in some English village, or an Ulster farm, or in the Rhine valley, one might find a family assembled for the reading of a letter from son, or brother, or friend, who had made the great venture of going to the New World. “Land is abundant here and cheap,” the letter would state. “Wages are high, food is plentiful, farmers live better than lords. If one will work only five days a week one can live grandly.”
In pamphlets intended to encourage immigration, the opportunities for advancement were set forth in glowing colors. In Virginia alone, it was stated, in 1649, there were “of kine, oxen, bulls, calves, twenty thousand, large and good.” When the traveller Welby came to America he was surprised to “see no misery, no disgusting army of paupers, not even beggars;” while Henry B. Fearson noted that laborers were “more erect in their posture, less careworn in their countenances” than those of Europe.
In Virginia, as in other colonies, it was the cheapness of land and the dearness of labor which gave the newcomer his chance to rise. The rich man might possess many thousands of acres, but they would profit him nothing unless he could find the labor to put them under cultivation. Indentured workers met his needs in part, but they were expensive, hard to acquire, and served for only four years. If he hired freemen, he would have to pay wages which in England would have seemed fantastic.
Thus, the so-called servants who had completed their terms and men who had come over as freemen found it easy to earn enough to buy small plantations of their own. One has only to glance at the Rent Roll to see that the large plantations were vastly outnumbered by the small farms of the yeomen. It proves that Virginia at the beginning of the eighteenth century was not the land of huge estates, worked by servants and slaves, but of a numerous, prosperous middle class.
Q. Which of the following assertions is best supported by the above passage?
  • a)
    Hiring indentured workers in the US colonies was cheaper than hiring migrant workers.
  • b)
    Rich landlords in American colonies had the option of hiring indentured workers.
  • c)
    European laborers had a deformity in their posture.
  • d)
    Indentured workers were not allowed to buy land in American colonies.
  • e)
    The plight of migrant workers in Virginia was different from their plight in other American colonies.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: Read the Passage carefully and answer the question as foll...
Option (B) can clearly be inferred from the information in P3 —Indentured workers met his needs in part—and should be the correct answer.
(A) P3 states the opposite.
(C) The passage states no such thing anywhere. If the American workers walked with a more erect posture, it had more to do with their economic and social conditions and not any physical
superiority.
(D) The first sentence of P4 states the opposite.
(E) The first sentence of P3 states that what was true for Virginia was also true for other American colonies.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Directions: Read the Passage carefully and answer the question as follow.America since the days of Captain John Smith has been the land of hope for multitudes in Europe. In many a humble home, perhaps in some English village, or an Ulster farm, or in the Rhine valley, one might find a family assembled for the reading of a letter from son, or brother, or friend, who had made the great venture of going to the New World. “Land is abundant here and cheap,” the letter would state. “Wages are high, food is plentiful, farmers live better than lords. If one will work only five days a week one can live grandly.”In pamphlets intended to encourage immigration, the opportunities for advancement were set forth in glowing colors. In Virginia alone, it was stated, in 1649, there were “of kine, oxen, bulls, calves, twenty thousand, large and good.” When the traveller Welby came to America he was surprised to “see no misery, no disgusting army of paupers, not even beggars;” while Henry B. Fearson noted that laborers were “more erect in their posture, less careworn in their countenances” than those of Europe.In Virginia, as in other colonies, it was the cheapness of land and the dearness of labor which gave the newcomer his chance to rise. The rich man might possess many thousands of acres, but they would profit him nothing unless he could find the labor to put them under cultivation. Indentured workers met his needs in part, but they were expensive, hard to acquire, and served for only four years. If he hired freemen, he would have to pay wages which in England would have seemed fantastic.Thus, the so-called servants who had completed their terms and men who had come over as freemen found it easy to earn enough to buy small plantations of their own. One has only to glance at the Rent Roll to see that the large plantations were vastly outnumbered by the small farms of the yeomen. It proves that Virginia at the beginning of the eighteenth century was not the land of huge estates, worked by servants and slaves, but of a numerous, prosperous middle class.Q.According to the passage, which of the following is an incorrect statement about Virginia in the eighteenth century?

Directions: Read the Passage carefully and answer the question as follow.America since the days of Captain John Smith has been the land of hope for multitudes in Europe. In many a humble home, perhaps in some English village, or an Ulster farm, or in the Rhine valley, one might find a family assembled for the reading of a letter from son, or brother, or friend, who had made the great venture of going to the New World. “Land is abundant here and cheap,” the letter would state. “Wages are high, food is plentiful, farmers live better than lords. If one will work only five days a week one can live grandly.”In pamphlets intended to encourage immigration, the opportunities for advancement were set forth in glowing colors. In Virginia alone, it was stated, in 1649, there were “of kine, oxen, bulls, calves, twenty thousand, large and good.” When the traveller Welby came to America he was surprised to “see no misery, no disgusting army of paupers, not even beggars;” while Henry B. Fearson noted that laborers were “more erect in their posture, less careworn in their countenances” than those of Europe.In Virginia, as in other colonies, it was the cheapness of land and the dearness of labor which gave the newcomer his chance to rise. The rich man might possess many thousands of acres, but they would profit him nothing unless he could find the labor to put them under cultivation. Indentured workers met his needs in part, but they were expensive, hard to acquire, and served for only four years. If he hired freemen, he would have to pay wages which in England would have seemed fantastic.Thus, the so-called servants who had completed their terms and men who had come over as freemen found it easy to earn enough to buy small plantations of their own. One has only to glance at the Rent Roll to see that the large plantations were vastly outnumbered by the small farms of the yeomen. It proves that Virginia at the beginning of the eighteenth century was not the land of huge estates, worked by servants and slaves, but of a numerous, prosperous middle class.Q.According to the passage, which of the following is a reason that provided migrants the opportunity to rise in American colonies?

Directions: Read the Passage carefully and answer the question as follow.America since the days of Captain John Smith has been the land of hope for multitudes in Europe. In many a humble home, perhaps in some English village, or an Ulster farm, or in the Rhine valley, one might find a family assembled for the reading of a letter from son, or brother, or friend, who had made the great venture of going to the New World. “Land is abundant here and cheap,” the letter would state. “Wages are high, food is plentiful, farmers live better than lords. If one will work only five days a week one can live grandly.” In pamphlets intended to encourage immigration, the opportunities for advancement were set forth in glowing colors. In Virginia alone, it was stated, in 1649, there were “of kine, oxen, bulls, calves, twenty thousand, large and good.” When the traveller Welby came to America he was surprised to “see no misery, no disgusting army of paupers, not even beggars;” while Henry B. Fearson noted that laborers were “more erect in their posture, less careworn in their countenances” than those of Europe. In Virginia, as in other colonies, it was the cheapness of land and the dearness of labor which gave the newcomer his chance to rise. The rich man might possess many thousands of acres, but they would profit him nothing unless he could find the labor to put them under cultivation. Indentured workers met his needs in part, but they were expensive, hard to acquire, and served for only four years. If he hired freemen, he would have to pay wages which in England would have seemed fantastic. Thus, the so-called servants who had completed their terms and men who had come over as freemen found it easy to earn enough to buy small plantations of their own. One has only to glance at the Rent Roll to see that the large plantations were vastly outnumbered by the small farms of the yeomen. It proves that Virginia at the beginning of the eighteenth century was not the land of huge estates, worked by servants and slaves, but of a numerous, prosperous middle class.Q. The author mentions the accounts of Welby and Fearson in the passage in order to

Directions: Read the Passage carefully and answer the question as follow.America since the days of Captain John Smith has been the land of hope for multitudes in Europe. In many a humble home, perhaps in some English village, or an Ulster farm, or in the Rhine valley, one might find a family assembled for the reading of a letter from son, or brother, or friend, who had made the great venture of going to the New World. “Land is abundant here and cheap,” the letter would state. “Wages are high, food is plentiful, farmers live better than lords. If one will work only five days a week one can live grandly.”In pamphlets intended to encourage immigration, the opportunities for advancement were set forth in glowing colors. In Virginia alone, it was stated, in 1649, there were “of kine, oxen, bulls, calves, twenty thousand, large and good.” When the traveller Welby came to America he was surprised to “see no misery, no disgusting army of paupers, not even beggars;” while Henry B. Fearson noted that laborers were “more erect in their posture, less careworn in their countenances” than those of Europe.In Virginia, as in other colonies, it was the cheapness of land and the dearness of labor which gave the newcomer his chance to rise. The rich man might possess many thousands of acres, but they would profit him nothing unless he could find the labor to put them under cultivation. Indentured workers met his needs in part, but they were expensive, hard to acquire, and served for only four years. If he hired freemen, he would have to pay wages which in England would have seemed fantastic.Thus, the so-called servants who had completed their terms and men who had come over as freemen found it easy to earn enough to buy small plantations of their own. One has only to glance at the Rent Roll to see that the large plantations were vastly outnumbered by the small farms of the yeomen. It proves that Virginia at the beginning of the eighteenth century was not the land of huge estates, worked by servants and slaves, but of a numerous, prosperous middle class.Q.Why does the author mention ‘celestial bodies’ in the passage?

PassageRoughly 40 per cent of the African American population of the Southern United States left the South between 1915 and 1960, primarily for the industrial cities of the North. While there was some African American migration to the North during the nineteenth century, most accounts point to 1915 as the start of what historians call the Great Migration. There were at least three catalysts of the Great Migration. First, World War I increased labour demand in the industrial North. Second, the war in Europe cut off immigration, which led many Northern employers to send labour agents to recruit African American labour in the South. Finally, a boll weevil infestation ruined cotton crops and reduced labour demand in much of the South in the 1910s and 1920s.In short, the Great Migration began in 1915 and not earlier, because it was only then that the North-South income gap became large enough to start such a large-scale migration. Less clear, however, is why migration continued and even accelerated, in subsequent decades, at the same time that North-South income differences were narrowing.We propose that once started, migration develops momentum over time as current migration reduces the difficulty and cost of future migration. Economists have typically assumed that people migrate if their expected earnings in the destination exceed those of the origin enough to outweigh the difficulties and one-time costs of migration. Previous research suggests that the difficulties and costs arise from several sources. First, the uncertainty that potential migrants face concerning housing and labour-market conditions in the destination presents a significant hindrance. Second, there is a simple cost in terms of time and money of physically moving from the origin to the destination. Third, new migrants must familiarize themselves with local labour- and housing-market institutions once they arrive; they must find housing and work, and they must often adapt to a new culture or language.Empirical studies show that during the Great Migration, information was passed through letters that were often read by dozens of people and through conversation when migrants made trips back to their home communities. Thus early migrants provided information about labor- and housing-market conditions to friends and relatives who had not yet made the trip. First-time African American migrants often travelled with earlier migrants returning to the North after a visit to the South, which reduced physical costs. Additionally, previous migrants reduced new migrants cost of adapting to a new locale and culture by providing them with temporary housing, food, and even credit. Previous migrants also provided a cultural cushion for later migrants, so that they did not have to struggle as hard with their new surroundings.Q.The authors of the passage would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements?

Top Courses for GMATView all

Top Courses for GMAT

Directions: Read the Passage carefully and answer the question as follow.America since the days of Captain John Smith has been the land of hope for multitudes in Europe. In many a humble home, perhaps in some English village, or an Ulster farm, or in the Rhine valley, one might find a family assembled for the reading of a letter from son, or brother, or friend, who had made the great venture of going to the New World. “Land is abundant here and cheap,” the letter would state. “Wages are high, food is plentiful, farmers live better than lords. If one will work only five days a week one can live grandly.”In pamphlets intended to encourage immigration, the opportunities for advancement were set forth in glowing colors. In Virginia alone, it was stated, in 1649, there were “of kine, oxen, bulls, calves, twenty thousand, large and good.” When the traveller Welby came to America he was surprised to “see no misery, no disgusting army of paupers, not even beggars;” while Henry B. Fearson noted that laborers were “more erect in their posture, less careworn in their countenances” than those of Europe.In Virginia, as in other colonies, it was the cheapness of land and the dearness of labor which gave the newcomer his chance to rise. The rich man might possess many thousands of acres, but they would profit him nothing unless he could find the labor to put them under cultivation. Indentured workers met his needs in part, but they were expensive, hard to acquire, and served for only four years. If he hired freemen, he would have to pay wages which in England would have seemed fantastic.Thus, the so-called servants who had completed their terms and men who had come over as freemen found it easy to earn enough to buy small plantations of their own. One has only to glance at the Rent Roll to see that the large plantations were vastly outnumbered by the small farms of the yeomen. It proves that Virginia at the beginning of the eighteenth century was not the land of huge estates, worked by servants and slaves, but of a numerous, prosperous middle class.Q.Which of the following assertions is best supported by the above passage?a)Hiring indentured workers in the US colonies was cheaper than hiring migrant workers.b)Rich landlords in American colonies had the option of hiring indentured workers.c)European laborers had a deformity in their posture.d)Indentured workers were not allowed to buy land in Americancolonies.e)The plight of migrant workers in Virginia was different from their plight in other American colonies.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: Read the Passage carefully and answer the question as follow.America since the days of Captain John Smith has been the land of hope for multitudes in Europe. In many a humble home, perhaps in some English village, or an Ulster farm, or in the Rhine valley, one might find a family assembled for the reading of a letter from son, or brother, or friend, who had made the great venture of going to the New World. “Land is abundant here and cheap,” the letter would state. “Wages are high, food is plentiful, farmers live better than lords. If one will work only five days a week one can live grandly.”In pamphlets intended to encourage immigration, the opportunities for advancement were set forth in glowing colors. In Virginia alone, it was stated, in 1649, there were “of kine, oxen, bulls, calves, twenty thousand, large and good.” When the traveller Welby came to America he was surprised to “see no misery, no disgusting army of paupers, not even beggars;” while Henry B. Fearson noted that laborers were “more erect in their posture, less careworn in their countenances” than those of Europe.In Virginia, as in other colonies, it was the cheapness of land and the dearness of labor which gave the newcomer his chance to rise. The rich man might possess many thousands of acres, but they would profit him nothing unless he could find the labor to put them under cultivation. Indentured workers met his needs in part, but they were expensive, hard to acquire, and served for only four years. If he hired freemen, he would have to pay wages which in England would have seemed fantastic.Thus, the so-called servants who had completed their terms and men who had come over as freemen found it easy to earn enough to buy small plantations of their own. One has only to glance at the Rent Roll to see that the large plantations were vastly outnumbered by the small farms of the yeomen. It proves that Virginia at the beginning of the eighteenth century was not the land of huge estates, worked by servants and slaves, but of a numerous, prosperous middle class.Q.Which of the following assertions is best supported by the above passage?a)Hiring indentured workers in the US colonies was cheaper than hiring migrant workers.b)Rich landlords in American colonies had the option of hiring indentured workers.c)European laborers had a deformity in their posture.d)Indentured workers were not allowed to buy land in Americancolonies.e)The plight of migrant workers in Virginia was different from their plight in other American colonies.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the Passage carefully and answer the question as follow.America since the days of Captain John Smith has been the land of hope for multitudes in Europe. In many a humble home, perhaps in some English village, or an Ulster farm, or in the Rhine valley, one might find a family assembled for the reading of a letter from son, or brother, or friend, who had made the great venture of going to the New World. “Land is abundant here and cheap,” the letter would state. “Wages are high, food is plentiful, farmers live better than lords. If one will work only five days a week one can live grandly.”In pamphlets intended to encourage immigration, the opportunities for advancement were set forth in glowing colors. In Virginia alone, it was stated, in 1649, there were “of kine, oxen, bulls, calves, twenty thousand, large and good.” When the traveller Welby came to America he was surprised to “see no misery, no disgusting army of paupers, not even beggars;” while Henry B. Fearson noted that laborers were “more erect in their posture, less careworn in their countenances” than those of Europe.In Virginia, as in other colonies, it was the cheapness of land and the dearness of labor which gave the newcomer his chance to rise. The rich man might possess many thousands of acres, but they would profit him nothing unless he could find the labor to put them under cultivation. Indentured workers met his needs in part, but they were expensive, hard to acquire, and served for only four years. If he hired freemen, he would have to pay wages which in England would have seemed fantastic.Thus, the so-called servants who had completed their terms and men who had come over as freemen found it easy to earn enough to buy small plantations of their own. One has only to glance at the Rent Roll to see that the large plantations were vastly outnumbered by the small farms of the yeomen. It proves that Virginia at the beginning of the eighteenth century was not the land of huge estates, worked by servants and slaves, but of a numerous, prosperous middle class.Q.Which of the following assertions is best supported by the above passage?a)Hiring indentured workers in the US colonies was cheaper than hiring migrant workers.b)Rich landlords in American colonies had the option of hiring indentured workers.c)European laborers had a deformity in their posture.d)Indentured workers were not allowed to buy land in Americancolonies.e)The plight of migrant workers in Virginia was different from their plight in other American colonies.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the Passage carefully and answer the question as follow.America since the days of Captain John Smith has been the land of hope for multitudes in Europe. In many a humble home, perhaps in some English village, or an Ulster farm, or in the Rhine valley, one might find a family assembled for the reading of a letter from son, or brother, or friend, who had made the great venture of going to the New World. “Land is abundant here and cheap,” the letter would state. “Wages are high, food is plentiful, farmers live better than lords. If one will work only five days a week one can live grandly.”In pamphlets intended to encourage immigration, the opportunities for advancement were set forth in glowing colors. In Virginia alone, it was stated, in 1649, there were “of kine, oxen, bulls, calves, twenty thousand, large and good.” When the traveller Welby came to America he was surprised to “see no misery, no disgusting army of paupers, not even beggars;” while Henry B. Fearson noted that laborers were “more erect in their posture, less careworn in their countenances” than those of Europe.In Virginia, as in other colonies, it was the cheapness of land and the dearness of labor which gave the newcomer his chance to rise. The rich man might possess many thousands of acres, but they would profit him nothing unless he could find the labor to put them under cultivation. Indentured workers met his needs in part, but they were expensive, hard to acquire, and served for only four years. If he hired freemen, he would have to pay wages which in England would have seemed fantastic.Thus, the so-called servants who had completed their terms and men who had come over as freemen found it easy to earn enough to buy small plantations of their own. One has only to glance at the Rent Roll to see that the large plantations were vastly outnumbered by the small farms of the yeomen. It proves that Virginia at the beginning of the eighteenth century was not the land of huge estates, worked by servants and slaves, but of a numerous, prosperous middle class.Q.Which of the following assertions is best supported by the above passage?a)Hiring indentured workers in the US colonies was cheaper than hiring migrant workers.b)Rich landlords in American colonies had the option of hiring indentured workers.c)European laborers had a deformity in their posture.d)Indentured workers were not allowed to buy land in Americancolonies.e)The plight of migrant workers in Virginia was different from their plight in other American colonies.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: Read the Passage carefully and answer the question as follow.America since the days of Captain John Smith has been the land of hope for multitudes in Europe. In many a humble home, perhaps in some English village, or an Ulster farm, or in the Rhine valley, one might find a family assembled for the reading of a letter from son, or brother, or friend, who had made the great venture of going to the New World. “Land is abundant here and cheap,” the letter would state. “Wages are high, food is plentiful, farmers live better than lords. If one will work only five days a week one can live grandly.”In pamphlets intended to encourage immigration, the opportunities for advancement were set forth in glowing colors. In Virginia alone, it was stated, in 1649, there were “of kine, oxen, bulls, calves, twenty thousand, large and good.” When the traveller Welby came to America he was surprised to “see no misery, no disgusting army of paupers, not even beggars;” while Henry B. Fearson noted that laborers were “more erect in their posture, less careworn in their countenances” than those of Europe.In Virginia, as in other colonies, it was the cheapness of land and the dearness of labor which gave the newcomer his chance to rise. The rich man might possess many thousands of acres, but they would profit him nothing unless he could find the labor to put them under cultivation. Indentured workers met his needs in part, but they were expensive, hard to acquire, and served for only four years. If he hired freemen, he would have to pay wages which in England would have seemed fantastic.Thus, the so-called servants who had completed their terms and men who had come over as freemen found it easy to earn enough to buy small plantations of their own. One has only to glance at the Rent Roll to see that the large plantations were vastly outnumbered by the small farms of the yeomen. It proves that Virginia at the beginning of the eighteenth century was not the land of huge estates, worked by servants and slaves, but of a numerous, prosperous middle class.Q.Which of the following assertions is best supported by the above passage?a)Hiring indentured workers in the US colonies was cheaper than hiring migrant workers.b)Rich landlords in American colonies had the option of hiring indentured workers.c)European laborers had a deformity in their posture.d)Indentured workers were not allowed to buy land in Americancolonies.e)The plight of migrant workers in Virginia was different from their plight in other American colonies.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Read the Passage carefully and answer the question as follow.America since the days of Captain John Smith has been the land of hope for multitudes in Europe. In many a humble home, perhaps in some English village, or an Ulster farm, or in the Rhine valley, one might find a family assembled for the reading of a letter from son, or brother, or friend, who had made the great venture of going to the New World. “Land is abundant here and cheap,” the letter would state. “Wages are high, food is plentiful, farmers live better than lords. If one will work only five days a week one can live grandly.”In pamphlets intended to encourage immigration, the opportunities for advancement were set forth in glowing colors. In Virginia alone, it was stated, in 1649, there were “of kine, oxen, bulls, calves, twenty thousand, large and good.” When the traveller Welby came to America he was surprised to “see no misery, no disgusting army of paupers, not even beggars;” while Henry B. Fearson noted that laborers were “more erect in their posture, less careworn in their countenances” than those of Europe.In Virginia, as in other colonies, it was the cheapness of land and the dearness of labor which gave the newcomer his chance to rise. The rich man might possess many thousands of acres, but they would profit him nothing unless he could find the labor to put them under cultivation. Indentured workers met his needs in part, but they were expensive, hard to acquire, and served for only four years. If he hired freemen, he would have to pay wages which in England would have seemed fantastic.Thus, the so-called servants who had completed their terms and men who had come over as freemen found it easy to earn enough to buy small plantations of their own. One has only to glance at the Rent Roll to see that the large plantations were vastly outnumbered by the small farms of the yeomen. It proves that Virginia at the beginning of the eighteenth century was not the land of huge estates, worked by servants and slaves, but of a numerous, prosperous middle class.Q.Which of the following assertions is best supported by the above passage?a)Hiring indentured workers in the US colonies was cheaper than hiring migrant workers.b)Rich landlords in American colonies had the option of hiring indentured workers.c)European laborers had a deformity in their posture.d)Indentured workers were not allowed to buy land in Americancolonies.e)The plight of migrant workers in Virginia was different from their plight in other American colonies.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Read the Passage carefully and answer the question as follow.America since the days of Captain John Smith has been the land of hope for multitudes in Europe. In many a humble home, perhaps in some English village, or an Ulster farm, or in the Rhine valley, one might find a family assembled for the reading of a letter from son, or brother, or friend, who had made the great venture of going to the New World. “Land is abundant here and cheap,” the letter would state. “Wages are high, food is plentiful, farmers live better than lords. If one will work only five days a week one can live grandly.”In pamphlets intended to encourage immigration, the opportunities for advancement were set forth in glowing colors. In Virginia alone, it was stated, in 1649, there were “of kine, oxen, bulls, calves, twenty thousand, large and good.” When the traveller Welby came to America he was surprised to “see no misery, no disgusting army of paupers, not even beggars;” while Henry B. Fearson noted that laborers were “more erect in their posture, less careworn in their countenances” than those of Europe.In Virginia, as in other colonies, it was the cheapness of land and the dearness of labor which gave the newcomer his chance to rise. The rich man might possess many thousands of acres, but they would profit him nothing unless he could find the labor to put them under cultivation. Indentured workers met his needs in part, but they were expensive, hard to acquire, and served for only four years. If he hired freemen, he would have to pay wages which in England would have seemed fantastic.Thus, the so-called servants who had completed their terms and men who had come over as freemen found it easy to earn enough to buy small plantations of their own. One has only to glance at the Rent Roll to see that the large plantations were vastly outnumbered by the small farms of the yeomen. It proves that Virginia at the beginning of the eighteenth century was not the land of huge estates, worked by servants and slaves, but of a numerous, prosperous middle class.Q.Which of the following assertions is best supported by the above passage?a)Hiring indentured workers in the US colonies was cheaper than hiring migrant workers.b)Rich landlords in American colonies had the option of hiring indentured workers.c)European laborers had a deformity in their posture.d)Indentured workers were not allowed to buy land in Americancolonies.e)The plight of migrant workers in Virginia was different from their plight in other American colonies.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Read the Passage carefully and answer the question as follow.America since the days of Captain John Smith has been the land of hope for multitudes in Europe. In many a humble home, perhaps in some English village, or an Ulster farm, or in the Rhine valley, one might find a family assembled for the reading of a letter from son, or brother, or friend, who had made the great venture of going to the New World. “Land is abundant here and cheap,” the letter would state. “Wages are high, food is plentiful, farmers live better than lords. If one will work only five days a week one can live grandly.”In pamphlets intended to encourage immigration, the opportunities for advancement were set forth in glowing colors. In Virginia alone, it was stated, in 1649, there were “of kine, oxen, bulls, calves, twenty thousand, large and good.” When the traveller Welby came to America he was surprised to “see no misery, no disgusting army of paupers, not even beggars;” while Henry B. Fearson noted that laborers were “more erect in their posture, less careworn in their countenances” than those of Europe.In Virginia, as in other colonies, it was the cheapness of land and the dearness of labor which gave the newcomer his chance to rise. The rich man might possess many thousands of acres, but they would profit him nothing unless he could find the labor to put them under cultivation. Indentured workers met his needs in part, but they were expensive, hard to acquire, and served for only four years. If he hired freemen, he would have to pay wages which in England would have seemed fantastic.Thus, the so-called servants who had completed their terms and men who had come over as freemen found it easy to earn enough to buy small plantations of their own. One has only to glance at the Rent Roll to see that the large plantations were vastly outnumbered by the small farms of the yeomen. It proves that Virginia at the beginning of the eighteenth century was not the land of huge estates, worked by servants and slaves, but of a numerous, prosperous middle class.Q.Which of the following assertions is best supported by the above passage?a)Hiring indentured workers in the US colonies was cheaper than hiring migrant workers.b)Rich landlords in American colonies had the option of hiring indentured workers.c)European laborers had a deformity in their posture.d)Indentured workers were not allowed to buy land in Americancolonies.e)The plight of migrant workers in Virginia was different from their plight in other American colonies.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Read the Passage carefully and answer the question as follow.America since the days of Captain John Smith has been the land of hope for multitudes in Europe. In many a humble home, perhaps in some English village, or an Ulster farm, or in the Rhine valley, one might find a family assembled for the reading of a letter from son, or brother, or friend, who had made the great venture of going to the New World. “Land is abundant here and cheap,” the letter would state. “Wages are high, food is plentiful, farmers live better than lords. If one will work only five days a week one can live grandly.”In pamphlets intended to encourage immigration, the opportunities for advancement were set forth in glowing colors. In Virginia alone, it was stated, in 1649, there were “of kine, oxen, bulls, calves, twenty thousand, large and good.” When the traveller Welby came to America he was surprised to “see no misery, no disgusting army of paupers, not even beggars;” while Henry B. Fearson noted that laborers were “more erect in their posture, less careworn in their countenances” than those of Europe.In Virginia, as in other colonies, it was the cheapness of land and the dearness of labor which gave the newcomer his chance to rise. The rich man might possess many thousands of acres, but they would profit him nothing unless he could find the labor to put them under cultivation. Indentured workers met his needs in part, but they were expensive, hard to acquire, and served for only four years. If he hired freemen, he would have to pay wages which in England would have seemed fantastic.Thus, the so-called servants who had completed their terms and men who had come over as freemen found it easy to earn enough to buy small plantations of their own. One has only to glance at the Rent Roll to see that the large plantations were vastly outnumbered by the small farms of the yeomen. It proves that Virginia at the beginning of the eighteenth century was not the land of huge estates, worked by servants and slaves, but of a numerous, prosperous middle class.Q.Which of the following assertions is best supported by the above passage?a)Hiring indentured workers in the US colonies was cheaper than hiring migrant workers.b)Rich landlords in American colonies had the option of hiring indentured workers.c)European laborers had a deformity in their posture.d)Indentured workers were not allowed to buy land in Americancolonies.e)The plight of migrant workers in Virginia was different from their plight in other American colonies.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Read the Passage carefully and answer the question as follow.America since the days of Captain John Smith has been the land of hope for multitudes in Europe. In many a humble home, perhaps in some English village, or an Ulster farm, or in the Rhine valley, one might find a family assembled for the reading of a letter from son, or brother, or friend, who had made the great venture of going to the New World. “Land is abundant here and cheap,” the letter would state. “Wages are high, food is plentiful, farmers live better than lords. If one will work only five days a week one can live grandly.”In pamphlets intended to encourage immigration, the opportunities for advancement were set forth in glowing colors. In Virginia alone, it was stated, in 1649, there were “of kine, oxen, bulls, calves, twenty thousand, large and good.” When the traveller Welby came to America he was surprised to “see no misery, no disgusting army of paupers, not even beggars;” while Henry B. Fearson noted that laborers were “more erect in their posture, less careworn in their countenances” than those of Europe.In Virginia, as in other colonies, it was the cheapness of land and the dearness of labor which gave the newcomer his chance to rise. The rich man might possess many thousands of acres, but they would profit him nothing unless he could find the labor to put them under cultivation. Indentured workers met his needs in part, but they were expensive, hard to acquire, and served for only four years. If he hired freemen, he would have to pay wages which in England would have seemed fantastic.Thus, the so-called servants who had completed their terms and men who had come over as freemen found it easy to earn enough to buy small plantations of their own. One has only to glance at the Rent Roll to see that the large plantations were vastly outnumbered by the small farms of the yeomen. It proves that Virginia at the beginning of the eighteenth century was not the land of huge estates, worked by servants and slaves, but of a numerous, prosperous middle class.Q.Which of the following assertions is best supported by the above passage?a)Hiring indentured workers in the US colonies was cheaper than hiring migrant workers.b)Rich landlords in American colonies had the option of hiring indentured workers.c)European laborers had a deformity in their posture.d)Indentured workers were not allowed to buy land in Americancolonies.e)The plight of migrant workers in Virginia was different from their plight in other American colonies.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup